Per Enflo

At Stockholm University, Hans Rådström suggested that Enflo consider Hilbert's fifth problem in the spirit of functional analysis.[4] In two years, 1969–1970, Enflo published five papers on Hilbert's fifth problem; these papers are collected in Enflo (1970), along with a short summary. Some of the results of these papers are described in Enflo (1976) and in the last chapter of Benyamini and Lindenstrauss.

Enflo's techniques have found application in computer science. Algorithm theorists derive approximation algorithms that embed finite metric spaces into low-dimensional Euclidean spaces with low "distortion" (in Gromov's terminology for the Lipschitz category; c.f. Banach–Mazur distance). Low-dimensional problems have lower computational complexity, of course. More importantly, if the problems embed well in either the Euclidean plane or the three-dimensional Euclidean space, then geometric algorithms become exceptionally fast.

However, such embedding techniques have limitations, as shown by Enflo's (1969) theorem:[5]

For every ${\displaystyle m\geq 2}$, the Hamming cube ${\displaystyle C_{m}}$ cannot be embedded with "distortion ${\displaystyle D}$" (or less) into ${\displaystyle 2^{m}}$-dimensional Euclidean space if ${\displaystyle D<{\sqrt {m}}}$. Consequently, the optimal embedding is the natural embedding, which realizes ${\displaystyle \{0,1\}^{m}}$ as a subspace of ${\displaystyle m}$-dimensional Euclidean space.[6]

This theorem, "found by Enflo [1969], is probably the first result showing an unbounded distortion for embeddings into Euclidean spaces. Enflo considered the problem of uniform embeddability among Banach spaces, and the distortion was an auxiliary device in his proof."[7]

A uniformly convex space is a Banach space so that, for every ${\displaystyle \epsilon >0}$ there is some ${\displaystyle \delta >0}$ so that for any two vectors with ${\displaystyle \|x\|\leq 1}$ and ${\displaystyle \|y\|\leq 1,}$

${\displaystyle \|x+y\|>2-\delta }$

implies that

${\displaystyle \|x-y\|<\epsilon .}$

Intuitively, the center of a line segment inside the unit ball must lie deep inside the unit ball unless the segment is short.

In 1972 Enflo proved that "every super-reflexive Banach space admits an equivalent uniformly convex norm".[8][9]

With one paper, which was published in 1973, Per Enflo solved three problems that had stumped functional analysts for decades: The basis problem of Stefan Banach, the "Goose problem" of Stanislaw Mazur, and the approximation problem of Alexander Grothendieck. Grothendieck had shown that his approximation problem was the central problem in the theory of Banach spaces and continuous linear operators.

The basis problem was posed by Stefan Banach in his book, Theory of Linear Operators. Banach asked whether every separable Banach space has a Schauder basis.

A Schauder basis or countable basis is similar to the usual (Hamel) basis of a vector space; the difference is that for Hamel bases we use linear combinations that are finite sums, while for Schauder bases they may be infinite sums. This makes Schauder bases more suitable for the analysis of infinite-dimensional topological vector spaces including Banach spaces.

Schauder bases were described by Juliusz Schauder in 1927.[10][11] Let V denote a Banach space over the field F. A Schauder basis is a sequence (b_n) of elements of V such that for every element v ∈ V there exists a unique sequence (α_n) of elements in F so that

${\displaystyle v=\sum _{n\in \mathbb {N} }\alpha _{n}b_{n}\,}$

where the convergence is understood with respect to the norm topology. Schauder bases can also be defined analogously in a general topological vector space.

In 1937, Polish mathematician Stanislaw Mazur promised a "live goose" as the prize for solving problem 153 in the Scottish Book. In 1972, Mazur presented the goose to Per Enflo.

In 1972 Stanislaw Mazur awarded Enflo the promised live goose for solving a problem in the Scottish book.

Banach and other Polish mathematicians would work on mathematical problems at the Scottish Café. When a problem was especially interesting and when its solution seemed difficult, the problem would be written down in the book of problems, which soon became known as the Scottish Book. For problems that seemed especially important or difficult or both, the problem's proposer would often pledge to award a prize for its solution.

On 6 November 1936, Stanislaw Mazur posed a problem on representing continuous functions. Formally writing down problem 153 in the Scottish Book, Mazur promised as the reward a "live goose", an especially rich price during the Great Depression and on the eve of World War II.

Fairly soon afterwards, it was realized that Mazur's problem was closely related to Banach's problem on the existence of Schauder bases in separable Banach spaces. Most of the other problems in the Scottish Book were solved regularly. However, there was little progress on Mazur's problem and a few other problems, which became famous open problems to mathematicians around the world.[12]

Grothendieck's work on the theory of Banach spaces and continuous linear operators introduced the approximation property. A Banach space is said to have the approximation property, if every compact operator is a limit of finite-rank operators. The converse is always true.[13]

In a long monograph, Grothendieck proved that if every Banach space had the approximation property, then every Banach space would have a Schauder basis. Grothendieck thus focused the attention of functional analysts on deciding whether every Banach space have the approximation property.[13]

In 1972, Per Enflo constructed a separable Banach space that lacks the approximation property and a Schauder basis.[14] In 1972, Mazur awarded a live goose to Enflo in a ceremony at the Stefan Banach Center in Warsaw; the "goose reward" ceremony was broadcast throughout Poland.[15]

In functional analysis, one of the most prominent problems was the invariant subspace problem, which required the evaluation of the truth of the following proposition:

Given a complex Banach space H of dimension > 1 and a bounded linear operator T : H → H, then H has a non-trivial closed T-invariant subspace, i.e. there exists a closed linear subspace W of H which is different from {0} and H such that T(W) ⊆ W.

For Banach spaces, the first example of an operator without an invariant subspace was constructed by Enflo. (For Hilbert spaces, the invariant subspace problem remains open.)

Enflo proposed a solution to the invariant subspace problem in 1975, publishing an outline in 1976. Enflo submitted the full article in 1981 and the article's complexity and length delayed its publication to 1987[16] Enflo's long "manuscript had a world-wide circulation among mathematicians"[17] and some of its ideas were described in publications besides Enflo (1976).[18][19] Enflo's works inspired a similar construction of an operator without an invariant subspace for example by Beauzamy, who acknowledged Enflo's ideas.[16]

In the 1990s, Enflo developed a "constructive" approach to the invariant subspace problem on Hilbert spaces.[20]

An essential idea in Enflo's construction was "concentration of polynomials at low degrees": For all positive integers ${\displaystyle m}$ and ${\displaystyle n}$, there exists ${\displaystyle C(m,n)>0}$ such that for all homogeneous polynomials ${\displaystyle P}$ and ${\displaystyle Q}$ of degrees ${\displaystyle m}$ and ${\displaystyle n}$ (in ${\displaystyle k}$ variables), then

${\displaystyle |PQ|\geq C(m,n)|P|\,|Q|,}$

where ${\displaystyle |P|}$ denotes the sum of the absolute values of the coefficients of ${\displaystyle P}$. Enflo proved that ${\displaystyle C(m,n)}$ does not depend on the number of variables ${\displaystyle k}$. Enflo's original proof was simplified by Montgomery.[21]

This result was generalized to other norms on the vector space of homogeneous polynomials. Of these norms, the most used has been the Bombieri norm.

The Bombieri norm is defined in terms of the following scalar product: For all ${\displaystyle \alpha ,\beta \in \mathbb {N} ^{N}}$ we have

${\displaystyle \langle X^{\alpha }|X^{\beta }\rangle =0}$ if ${\displaystyle \alpha \neq \beta }$

For every ${\displaystyle \alpha \in \mathbb {N} ^{N}}$ we define ${\displaystyle ||X^{\alpha }||^{2}={\frac {|\alpha |!}{\alpha$ !}},}

where we use the following notation: if ${\displaystyle \alpha =(\alpha _{1},\dots ,\alpha _{N})\in \mathbb {N} ^{N}}$, we write ${\displaystyle |\alpha |=\Sigma _{i=1}^{N}\alpha _{i}}$ and ${\displaystyle \alpha$ !=\Pi _{i=1}^{N}(\alpha _{i}!)} and ${\displaystyle X^{\alpha }=\Pi _{i=1}^{N}X_{i}^{\alpha _{i}}.}$

The most remarkable property of this norm is the Bombieri inequality:

Let ${\displaystyle P,Q}$ be two homogeneous polynomials respectively of degree ${\displaystyle d^{\circ }(P)}$ and ${\displaystyle d^{\circ }(Q)}$ with ${\displaystyle N}$ variables, then, the following inequality holds:

${\displaystyle {\frac {d^{\circ }(P)!d^{\circ }(Q)!}{(d^{\circ }(P)+d^{\circ }(Q))!}}||P||^{2}\,||Q||^{2}\leq ||P\cdot Q||^{2}\leq ||P||^{2}\,||Q||^{2}.}$

In the above statement, the Bombieri inequality is the left-hand side inequality; the right-hand side inequality means that the Bombieri norm is a norm of the algebra of polynomials under multiplication.

The Bombieri inequality implies that the product of two polynomials cannot be arbitrarily small, and this lower-bound is fundamental in applications like polynomial factorization (or in Enflo's construction of an operator without an invariant subspace).

Enflo's idea of "concentration of polynomials at low degrees" has led to important publications in number theory[22] algebraic and Diophantine geometry,[23] and polynomial factorization.[24]

Enflo has also published in population genetics and paleoanthropology.[25]

Today, all humans belong to one population of Homo sapiens sapiens, which is individed by species barrier. However, according to the "Out of Africa" model this is not the first species of hominids: the first species of genus Homo, Homo habilis, evolved in East Africa at least 2 Ma, and members of this species populated different parts of Africa in a relatively short time. Homo erectus evolved more than 1.8 Ma, and by 1.5 Ma had spread throughout the Old World.

Anthropologists have been divided as to whether current human population evolved as one interconnected population (as postulated by the Multiregional Evolution hypothesis), or evolved only in East Africa, speciated, and then migrating out of Africa and replaced human populations in Eurasia (called the "Out of Africa" Model or the "Complete Replacement" Model).

Neanderthals and modern humans coexisted in Europe for several thousand years, but the duration of this period is uncertain.[26] Modern humans may have first migrated to Europe 40–43,000 years ago.[27] Neanderthals may have lived as recently as 24,000 years ago in refugia on the south coast of the Iberian peninsula such as Gorham's Cave.[28][29] Inter-stratification of Neanderthal and modern human remains has been suggested,[30] but is disputed.[31]

With Hawks and Wolpoff, Enflo published an explanation of fossil evidence on the DNA of Neanderthal and modern humans. This article tries to resolve a debate in the evolution of modern humans between theories suggesting either multiregional and single African origins. In particular, the extinction of Neanderthals could have happened due to waves of modern humans entered Europe – in technical terms, due to "the continuous influx of modern human DNA into the Neandertal gene pool."[32][33][34]

Enflo has also written about the population dynamics of zebra mussels in Lake Erie.[35]

A concert pianist, Per Enflo debuted at the Stockholm Concert Hall in 1963.[36]

• "Recipients of 2005 Distinguished Scholar Award at Kent State University Announced", eInside, 2005-4-11. Retrieved on February 4, 2007.

• Enflo, Per. (1970) Investigations on Hilbert's fifth problem for non locally compact groups (Stockholm University). Enflo's thesis contains reprints of exactly five papers:
  • Enflo, Per (1969a). "Topological groups in which multiplication on one side is differentiable or linear". Math. Scand. 24: 195–197. doi:10.7146/math.scand.a-10930.
  • Per Enflo (1969). "On the nonexistence of uniform homeomorphisms between L_p spaces". Ark. Mat. 8 (2): 103–5. Bibcode:1970ArM.....8..103E. doi:10.1007/BF02589549.
  • Enflo, Per (1969b). "On a problem of Smirnov". Ark. Mat. 8 (2): 107–109. Bibcode:1970ArM.....8..107E. doi:10.1007/bf02589550.
  • Enflo, Per (1970a). "Uniform structures and square roots in topological groups I". Israel Journal of Mathematics. 8 (3): 230–252. doi:10.1007/BF02771560. S2CID 189773170.
  • Enflo, Per (1970b). "Uniform structures and square roots in topological groups II". Israel Journal of Mathematics. 8 (3): 253–272. doi:10.1007/BF02771561. S2CID 121193430.
    • Enflo, Per. 1976. Uniform homeomorphisms between Banach spaces. Séminaire Maurey-Schwartz (1975—1976), Espaces, ${\displaystyle L^{p}}$, applications radonifiantes et géométrie des espaces de Banach, Exp. No. 18, 7 pp. Centre Math., École Polytech., Palaiseau. MR0477709 (57 #17222) [Highlights of papers on Hilbert's fifth problem and on independent results of Martin Ribe, another student of Hans Rådström]
• Enflo, Per (1972). "Banach spaces which can be given an equivalent uniformly convex norm". Israel Journal of Mathematics. 13 (3–4): 281–288. doi:10.1007/BF02762802. MR 0336297. S2CID 120895135.
• Enflo, Per (1973). "A counterexample to the approximation problem in Banach spaces". Acta Mathematica. 130: 309–317. doi:10.1007/BF02392270. MR 0402468.
• Enflo, Per (1976). "On the invariant subspace problem in Banach spaces" (PDF). Séminaire Maurey--Schwartz (1975--1976) Espaces L^p, applications radonifiantes et géométrie des espaces de Banach, Exp. Nos. 14–15. Centre Math., École Polytech., Palaiseau. pp. 1–7. MR 0473871.
• Enflo, Per (1987). "On the invariant subspace problem for Banach spaces". Acta Mathematica. 158 (3): 213–313. doi:10.1007/BF02392260. ISSN 0001-5962. MR 0892591.
• Beauzamy, Bernard; Bombieri, Enrico; Enflo, Per; Montgomery, Hugh L. (1990). "Products of polynomials in many variables". Journal of Number Theory. 36 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1016/0022-314X(90)90075-3. hdl:2027.42/28840. MR 1072467.
• Beauzamy, Bernard; Enflo, Per; Wang, Paul (October 1994). "Quantitative Estimates for Polynomials in One or Several Variables: From Analysis and Number Theory to Symbolic and Massively Parallel Computation". Mathematics Magazine. 67 (4): 243–257. JSTOR 2690843. (accessible to readers with undergraduate mathematics)
• P. Enflo, John D. Hawks, M. Wolpoff. "A simple reason why Neanderthal ancestry can be consistent with current DNA information". American Journal Physical Anthropology, 2001
• Enflo, Per; Lomonosov, Victor (2001). "Some aspects of the invariant subspace problem". Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces. Vol. I. Amsterdam: North-Holland. pp. 533–559.
• Bartle, R. G. (1977). "Review of Per Enflo's "A counterexample to the approximation problem in Banach spaces" Acta Mathematica 130 (1973), 309–317". Mathematical Reviews. 130: 309–317. doi:10.1007/BF02392270. MR 0402468.
• Beauzamy, Bernard (1985) [1982]. Introduction to Banach Spaces and their Geometry (Second revised ed.). North-Holland. ISBN 0-444-86416-4. MR 0889253.
• Beauzamy, Bernard (1988). Introduction to Operator Theory and Invariant Subspaces. North Holland. ISBN 0-444-70521-X. MR 0967989.
• Enrico Bombieri and Walter Gubler (2006). Heights in Diophantine Geometry. Cambridge U. P. ISBN 0-521-84615-3.
• Roger B. Eggleton (1984). "Review of Mauldin's The Scottish Book: Mathematics from the Scottish Café". Mathematical Reviews. MR 0666400.
• Grothendieck, A.: Produits tensoriels topologiques et espaces nucleaires. Memo. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (1955).
• Halmos, Paul R. (1978). "Schauder bases". American Mathematical Monthly. 85 (4): 256–257. doi:10.2307/2321165. JSTOR 2321165. MR 0488901.
• Paul R. Halmos, "Has progress in mathematics slowed down?" Amer. Math. Monthly 97 (1990), no. 7, 561–588. MR1066321
• William B. Johnson "Complementably universal separable Banach spaces" in Robert G. Bartle (ed.), 1980 Studies in functional analysis, Mathematical Association of America.
• Kałuża, Roman (1996). Ann Kostant and Wojbor Woyczyński (ed.). Through a Reporter's Eyes: The Life of Stefan Banach. Birkhäuser. ISBN 0-8176-3772-9. MR 1392949.
• Knuth, Donald E (1997). "4.6.2 Factorization of Polynomials". Seminumerical Algorithms. The Art of Computer Programming. Vol. 2 (Third ed.). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. pp. 439–461, 678–691. ISBN 0-201-89684-2.
• Kwapień, S. "On Enflo's example of a Banach space without the approximation property". Séminaire Goulaouic-Schwartz 1972—1973: Équations aux dérivées partielles et analyse fonctionnelle, Exp. No. 8, 9 pp. Centre de Math., École Polytech., Paris, 1973. MR407569
• Lindenstrauss, Joram and Benyamini, Yoav. Geometric nonlinear functional analysis Colloquium publications, 48. American Mathematical Society.
• Lindenstrauss, J.; Tzafriri, L.: Classical Banach Spaces I, Sequence spaces, 1977. Springer-Verlag.
• Matoušek, Jiří (2002). Lectures on Discrete Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-95373-1..
• R. Daniel Mauldin, ed. (1981). The Scottish Book: Mathematics from the Scottish Café (Including selected papers presented at the Scottish Book Conference held at North Texas State University, Denton, Tex., May 1979). Boston, Mass.: Birkhäuser. pp. xiii+268 pp. (2 plates). ISBN 3-7643-3045-7. MR 0666400.
• Nedevski, P.; Trojanski, S. (1973). "P. Enflo solved in the negative Banach's problem on the existence of a basis for every separable Banach space". Fiz.-Mat. Spis. Bulgar. Akad. Nauk. 16 (49): 134–138. MR 0458132.
• Pietsch, Albrecht (2007). History of Banach spaces and linear operators]. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston, Inc. pp. xxiv+855 pp. ISBN 978-0-8176-4367-6. MR 2300779.
• Pisier, Gilles (1975). "Martingales with values in uniformly convex spaces". Israel Journal of Mathematics. 20 (3–4): 326–350. doi:10.1007/BF02760337. MR 0394135. S2CID 120947324.
• Heydar Radjavi & Peter Rosenthal (March 1982). "The invariant subspace problem". The Mathematical Intelligencer. 4 (1): 33–37. doi:10.1007/BF03022994. S2CID 122811130.
• Karen Saxe, Beginning Functional Analysis, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, 2002 Springer-Verlag, New York. (Pages 122–123 sketch a biography of Per Enflo.)
• Schmidt, Wolfgang M. (1980 [1996 with minor corrections]) Diophantine approximation. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 785. Springer.
• Singer, Ivan. Bases in Banach spaces. II. Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România, Bucharest; Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1981. viii+880 pp. ISBN 3-540-10394-5. MR610799
• Yadav, B. S. (2005). "The present state and heritages of the invariant subspace problem". Milan Journal of Mathematics. 73: 289–316. doi:10.1007/s00032-005-0048-7. ISSN 1424-9286. MR 2175046. S2CID 121068326.

• Per Enflo at the Mathematics Genealogy Project
• Google Scholar. "Per Enflo". Retrieved 2010-05-15. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
• Mathematical Reviews. "Per Enflo". Retrieved 2010-05-14.