Paul Grimm (prehistorian)

Grimm, son of a paymaster, was born in Torgau, graduated from high school at Aschersleben in 1925, and then attended the University of Halle, where he studied prehistory, history, classical archaeology, German studies, geography and geology until 1929. He first participated in an excavation in 1927 under Hans Hahne. From 1929 he was a research assistant at the State Bureau for Prehistory. In 1929 he was awarded a doctorate for his dissertation on Die vor- und frühgeschichtliche Besiedlung des Unterharzes und seines Vorlandes auf Grund der Bodenfunde (The Prehistoric and Protohistoric Settlement of Lower Harz and its Hinterland on the basis of Archaeological Finds). His examiners were Hahne and Georg Karo.

Grimm was a member of the German Youth Movement and from 1926 also a member of the völkisch youth league Adler und Falke (Eagle and Falcon).[2] Well before the Nazi seizure of power he was a member of the Mannus-Society for "Aryan prehistory" and the prehistoric division of the Militant League for German Culture.[3] On 1 February 1933, Grimm joined the Nazi Party and was registered as party member 1,447,316. He was a Blockleiter from 1933 to 1934.[2] In 1935, Grimm was curator and acting director of the State Bureau for Volk Studies in Halle.[2] From 1935 he was an editor of the journal Mitteldeutsche Volkheit – Hefte für Vorgeschichte, Rassenkunde und Volkskunde (Central German Volk Studies – Volumes on Prehistory, Racial Studies and Volk Studies), along with the leader of the Volk Studies department, Heinz-Julius Niehoff.[4] After he achieved his habilitation with his work on the Salzmünde Culture he was employed as reader and director of the State Bureau of Volk Studies in Halle from 1939 to 1945.

On 22 October 1940, Paul Grimm was called up for military service. From January 1942 until November 1942, Grimm was an employee of the "Sonderstabs Vor- und Frühgeschichte" (Task force for Prehistory and Protohistory) at the Reichsleiter Rosenberg Taskforce.[5] The Rosenberg Taskforce was a subdivision of the Nazi party tasked with confiscating artistic and cultural treasures throughout German-occupied Europe and using them to advance Nazi ideology. Grimm was also leader of the State Agency for Prehistory and Protohistory in Kyiv. In this role, he was first tasked with taking control of the various prehistoric artefacts in the Ukraine, especially those which could be used to argue for the role of Germanic peoples in Ukrainian prehistory, and with putting on an exhibition in Kyiv for the Wehrmacht based on Nazi historical ideas.[5] He organised the transfer of the collection of the Kyiv Institute of Archaeology from the destroyed Lavra to a new museum.[5] In the following years, Ukrainian and German sources praised his great personal service, as manifested in his sound scholarly work and his personal conduct towards Ukrainian museum staff.[6][7]

In November 1942, Grimm was drafted into the army for a second time. After he was discharged in December 1944 due to sickness, Grimm was employed by the Institute for Eastern Studies in Schloss Höchstädt, Dillingen.[8] There, with several colleagues, Grimm managed the most important depot of prehistoric and protohistoric artefacts and Volkish objects plundered from the occupied Soviet territories.[9][10][11] Immediately before the arrival of the American army in June 1945, Grimm was promoted to be Leader of the "Bergungsstätte Höchstädt" (Höchstädt Collection Point).[12] Grimm surrendered the collections to the Americans[13] and left Höchstädt for Halle in June 1945, without questioning.

Ernst Klee,[3] Gunter Schöbel,[14] and Thomas Widera[15] accuse Grimm of being at the very least an accomplice in the theft of artefacts from the occupied territories. Grimm had not demonstrably participated in the conveyance of Ukrainian artefacts to Höchstädt from Kyiv, so this accusation is controversial.[6][7] Joachim Herrmann argues that Grimm did not support the appropriation and even subverted it.[16] Given Grimm's activities in Kyiv and Höchstädt, however, it is impossible to deny his knowledge.[15]

In December 1945, Grimm was dismissed from the public service for his membership in the Nazi party.[2][17] On 26 February 1946, Paul Grimm was arrested by the NKVD and interned in the Torgau special camp. In December 1946 he was taken from there to Buchenwald, from which he was released on 3 February 1950. He was never sentenced by the Soviets and was later invited to archaeological conferences in Russia and Ukraine on several occasions. In 1951 he became a member of the East Berlin Academy of Sciences and worked in the Commission for Prehistory and Protohistory. After holding several teaching positions, he became professor of the Humboldt University of Berlin in 1955 and from 1957 he was the assistant to the director of the Institute for Prehistory and Protohistory at the Academy of Sciences. In 1955 he was also made a member of the German Archaeological Institute.

From 1956 until 1972, he was editor in chief of the journal Ausgrabungen und Funde, Nachrichtenblatt für Vor- und Frühgeschichte (Excavations and Finds, Current Events in Prehistory and Protohistory). He was a member of the editorial board of Natur und Heimat (Nature and Homeland) from 1953 to 1962 and the Zeitschrift für Archäologie (Journal of Archaeology) from its first volume in 1967 until 1973.[18] Paul Grimm participated extensively in popular scholarship through articles, pamphlets, and tours of excavations as well as through his membership in the Cultural Association of the GDR, for which he delivered numerous lectures on many subjects, particularly the excavations at Tilleda.[19]

Especially in his pioneering excavations of the abandoned Medieval village of Hohenrode and Tilleda Palace, the first entirely excavated Kaiserpfalz (Imperial palace), Grimm was responsible for great advances in German archaeology. These excavations and his theoretical discussions made Grimm a pioneer of Medieval archaeology. He stressed that archaeological and literary sources had essentially equal authority, but nevertheless saw a close connection between the archaeological and historical data.