Pepper v. United States

Pepper v. United States, 562 U.S. 476 (2011), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States concerning whether a United States District Court properly handled the sentencing of a former methamphetamine dealer. He was originally sentenced to 24 months in prison, far shorter than what federal guidelines generally specify for crimes of that nature. Prosecutors appealed the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which remanded the case back to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, which affirmed the original sentence after testimony relating the defendant's rehabilitation. The case was appealed to the Eighth Circuit again, and was again remanded. A different District Court judge gave him a 65-month sentence. The defendant then brought the case back to the Eighth Circuit, which confirmed the later ruling, and to then to the Supreme Court. Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the court, which ruled in favor of the defendant.[1]

Pepper v. United States
Argued December 6, 2010
Decided March 2, 2011
Full case nameJason Pepper v. United States
Citations562 U.S. 476 (more)
131 S. Ct. 1229; 179 L. Ed. 2d 196; 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1902
ArgumentOral argument
Case history
PriorDefendant sentenced, unreported (N.D. Iowa); remanded for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, 412 F.3d 995 (Pepper I; 8th Cir., 2005); new sentence vacated and remanded, 486 F.3d 408 (Pepper II; 8th Cir., 2007); vacated and remanded in light of Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 1089 (2008); Pepper II remand confirmed, 518 F.3d 949 (Pepper III, 8th. Cir., 2008); third resentencing affirmed, 570 F.3d 958 (Pepper IV, 8th. Cir., 2009); certiorari granted, 561 U.S. 1024
Holding
Original District Court decisions relating to sentencing the defendant were compatible with federal sentencing guidelines, as judges may consider a defendant's rehabilitation during the resentencing process. Eighth Circuit partially reversed, partially affirmed, and remanded in part.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajoritySotomayor, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg; Breyer, Alito (Part III)
ConcurrenceBreyer (in part)
Concur/dissentAlito
DissentThomas
Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
18 U.S.C. § 3553

See also

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.