Pinaceae

The Pinaceae (/pɪˈneɪsiːˌiː, -siˌaɪ/), or pine family, are conifer trees or shrubs, including many of the well-known conifers of commercial importance such as cedars, firs, hemlocks, piñons, larches, pines and spruces. The family is included in the order Pinales, formerly known as Coniferales. Pinaceae are supported as monophyletic by their protein-type sieve cell plastids, pattern of proembryogeny, and lack of bioflavonoids. They are the largest extant conifer family in species diversity, with between 220 and 250 species (depending on taxonomic opinion) in 11 genera,[1] and the second-largest (after Cupressaceae) in geographical range, found in most of the Northern Hemisphere, with the majority of the species in temperate climates, but ranging from subarctic to tropical. The family often forms the dominant component of boreal, coastal, and montane forests. One species, Pinus merkusii, grows just south of the equator in Southeast Asia.[2] Major centres of diversity are found in the mountains of southwest China, Mexico, central Japan, and California.

Pinaceae
Temporal range:
Larix (golden), Abies (central foreground) and Pinus (right foreground)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Gymnosperms
Division: Pinophyta
Class: Pinopsida
Order: Pinales
Family: Pinaceae
Lindley 1836
Genera
Synonyms
  • Abietaceae von Berchtold & Presl 1820
  • Cedraceae Vest 1818
  • Compsostrobaceae Delevoryas & Hope 1973
  • †Kranneraceae Corda 1866
  • Piceaceae Goroschankin 1904

Description
Cultivated pine forest in Vagamon, southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India

Members of the family Pinaceae are trees (rarely shrubs) growing from 2 to 100 metres (7 to 300 feet) tall, mostly evergreen (except the deciduous Larix and Pseudolarix), resinous, monoecious, with subopposite or whorled branches, and spirally arranged, linear (needle-like) leaves.[1] The embryos of Pinaceae have three to 24 cotyledons.

The female cones are large and usually woody, 2–60 centimetres (1–24 inches) long, with numerous spirally arranged scales, and two winged seeds on each scale. The male cones are small, 0.5–6 cm (1⁄4–2+1⁄4 in) long, and fall soon after pollination; pollen dispersal is by wind. Seed dispersal is mostly by wind, but some species have large seeds with reduced wings, and are dispersed by birds. Analysis of Pinaceae cones reveals how selective pressure has shaped the evolution of variable cone size and function throughout the family. Variation in cone size in the family has likely resulted from the variation of seed dispersal mechanisms available in their environments over time. All Pinaceae with seeds weighing less than 90 milligrams are seemingly adapted for wind dispersal. Pines having seeds larger than 100 mg are more likely to have benefited from adaptations that promote animal dispersal, particularly by birds.[3] Pinaceae that persist in areas where tree squirrels are abundant do not seem to have evolved adaptations for bird dispersal.

Boreal conifers have many adaptions for winter. The narrow conical shape of northern conifers, and their downward-drooping limbs help them shed snow, and many of them seasonally alter their biochemistry to make them more resistant to freezing, called "hardening".

Classification
An immature second-year cone of European black pine (Pinus nigra) with the light brown umbo visible on the green cone scales
An immature cone of Norway spruce (Picea abies) with no umbo

Classification of the subfamilies and genera of Pinaceae has been subject to debate in the past. Pinaceae ecology, morphology, and history have all been used as the basis for methods of analyses of the family. An 1891 publication divided the family into two subfamilies, using the number and position of resin canals in the primary vascular region of the young taproot as the primary consideration. In a 1910 publication, the family was divided into two tribes based on the occurrence and type of long–short shoot dimorphism.

A more recent classification divided the subfamilies and genera based on the consideration of features of ovulate cone anatomy among extant and fossil members of the family. Below is an example of how the morphology has been used to classify Pinaceae. The 11 genera are grouped into four subfamilies, based on the microscopical anatomy and the morphology of the cones, pollen, wood, seeds, and leaves:[4]

  • Subfamily Pinoideae (Pinus): cones are biennial, rarely triennial, with each year's scale-growth distinct, forming an umbo on each scale, the cone scale base is broad, concealing the seeds fully from abaxial (below the phloem vessels) view, the seed is without resin vesicles, the seed wing holds the seed in a pair of claws, leaves have primary stomatal bands adaxial (above the xylem) or equally on both surfaces.
  • Subfamily Piceoideae (Picea): cones are annual, without a distinct umbo, the cone scale base is broad, concealing the seeds fully from abaxial view, seed is without resin vesicles, blackish, the seed wing holds the seed loosely in a cup, leaves have primary stomatal bands adaxial (above the xylem) or equally on both surfaces.
  • Subfamily Laricoideae (Larix, Pseudotsuga, and Cathaya): cones are annual, without a distinct umbo, the cone scale base is broad, concealing the seeds fully from abaxial view, the seed is without resin vesicles, whitish, the seed wing holds the seed tightly in a cup, leaves have primary stomatal bands abaxial only.
  • Subfamily Abietoideae (Abies, Cedrus, Pseudolarix, Keteleeria, Nothotsuga, and Tsuga): cones are annual, without a distinct umbo, the cone scale base is narrow, with the seeds partly visible in abaxial view, the seed has resin vesicles, the seed wing holds the seed tightly in a cup, leaves have primary stomatal bands abaxial only.

Phylogeny

A revised 2018 phylogeny places Cathaya as sister to the pines rather than in the Laricoidae subfamily with Larix and Pseudotsuga.

Ran et al. 2018[5] & Leslie et al. 2018[6][7] Stull et al. 2021[8][9]
Abietoideae
Cedreae

Cedrus (cedars 4 sp.)

Pseudolariceae

Pseudolarix (golden larch 1 sp.)

Nothotsuga (1 sp.)

Tsuga (hemlock 9 sp.)

Abieteae

Keteleeria (3 sp.)

Abies (firs c.50 sp.)

Pinoideae
Lariceae

Pseudotsuga (Douglas-firs 5 sp.)

Larix (larches 14 sp.)

Pineae

Picea (spruces c 35 sp.)

Cathaya (1 sp.)

Pinus (pines c.115 sp.)
Abietoideae
Cedreae

Cedrus

Pseudolariceae

Pseudolarix

Nothotsuga

Tsuga

Abieteae

Keteleeria

Abies

Pinoideae
Lariceae

Pseudotsuga

Larix

Pineae

Cathaya

Picea

Pinus

Multiple molecular studies indicate that in contrast to previous classifications placing it outside the conifers, Gnetophyta may in fact be the sister group to the Pinaceae, with both lineages having diverged during the early-mid Carboniferous. This is known as the "gnepine" hypothesis.[10][11]

Evolutionary history

Pinaceae is estimated to have diverged from other conifer groups during the late Carboniferous ~313 million years ago.[12] Various possible stem-group relatives have been reported from as early as the Late Permian (Lopingian) The extinct conifer cone genus Schizolepidopsis likely represent stem-group members of the Pinaceae, the first good records of which are in the Middle-Late Triassic, with abundant records during the Jurassic across Eurasia.[13][14] The oldest crown group (descendant of the last common ancestor of all living species) member of Pinaceae is the cone Eathiestrobus, known from the Upper Jurassic (lower Kimmeridgian, 157.3-154.7 million years ago) of Scotland,[15] which likely belongs to the pinoid grouping of the family.[16][14] Pinaceae rapidly radiated during the Early Cretaceous.[12] Members of the modern genera Pinus (pines), Picea (spruce) and Cedrus (cedar) first appear during the Early Cretaceous.[17][18][19] The extinct Cretaceous genera Pseudoaraucaria and Obirastrobus appear to be members of Abietoideae, while Pityostrobus appears to be non-monophyletic, containing many disparately related members of Pinaceae.[16]

Defense mechanisms

External stresses on plants have the ability to change the structure and composition of forest ecosystems. Common external stress that Pinaceae experience are herbivore and pathogen attack which often leads to tree death.[20] In order to combat these stresses, trees need to adapt or evolve defenses against these stresses. Pinaceae have evolved a myriad of mechanical and chemical defenses, or a combination of the two, in order to protect themselves against antagonists.[21] Pinaceae have the ability to up-regulate a combination of constitutive mechanical and chemical strategies to further their defenses.[22]

Pinaceae defenses are prevalent in the bark of the trees. This part of the tree contributes a complex defensive boundary against external antagonists.[23] Constitutive and induced defenses are both found in the bark.[23][24][25]

Constitutive defenses

Constitutive defenses are typically the first line of defenses used against antagonists and can include sclerified cells, lignified periderm cells, and secondary compounds such as phenolics and resins.[26][23][24] Constitutive defenses are always expressed and offer immediate protection from invaders but could also be defeated by antagonists that have evolved adaptations to these defense mechanisms.[26][23] One of the common secondary compounds used by Pinaceae are phenolics or polyphenols. These secondary compounds are preserved in vacuoles of polyphenolic parenchyma cells (PP) in the secondary phloem.[27][25]

Induced defenses

Induced defense responses need to be activated by certain cues, such as herbivore damage or other biotic signals.[26]

A common induced defense mechanism used by Pinaceae is resins.[28] Resins are also one of the primary defenses used against attack.[21] Resins are short term defenses that are composed of a complex combination of volatile mono- (C10) and sesquiterpenes (C15) and nonvolatile diterpene resin acids (C20).[21][28] They are produced and stored in specialized secretory areas known as resin ducts, resin blisters, or resin cavities.[28] Resins have the ability to wash away, trap, fend off antagonists, and are also involved in wound sealing.[27] They are an effective defense mechanism because they have toxic and inhibitory effects on invaders, such as insects or pathogens.[29] Resins could have developed as an evolutionary defense against bark beetle attacks.[28] One well researched resin present in Pinaceae is oleoresin. Oleoresin had been found to be a valuable part of the conifer defense mechanism against biotic attacks.[29] They are found in secretory tissues in tree stems, roots, and leaves.[29] Oleoresin is also needed in order to classify conifers.[29]

Active research: methyl jasmonate

The topic of defense mechanisms within family Pinaceae is a very active area of study with numerous studies being conducted. Many of these studies use methyl jasmonate (MJ) as an antagonist.[24][25][30] Methyl jasmonate is known to be able to induce defense responses in the stems of multiple Pinaceae species.[24][30] It has been found that MJ stimulated the activation of PP cells and formation of xylem traumatic resin ducts (TD). These are structures that are involved in the release of phenolics and resins, both forms of defense mechanism.[24][25]

  • Close up of bishop pine cones
    Close up of bishop pine cones
  • Knobcone pine cone
    Knobcone pine cone

References
  1. Aljos Farjon (1998). World Checklist and Bibliography of Conifers. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. ISBN 978-1-900347-54-9.
  2. Earle, Christopher J., ed. (2018). "Pinus merkusii". The Gymnosperm Database. Retrieved March 17, 2015.
  3. Craig W. Benkman (1995). "Wind dispersal capacity of pine seeds and the evolution of different seed dispersal modes in pines" (PDF). Oikos. 73 (2): 221–224. doi:10.2307/3545911. JSTOR 3545911.
  4. Robert A. Price, Jeanine Olsen-Stojkovich & Jerold M. Lowenstein (1987). "Relationships among the genera of Pinaceae: an immunological comparison". Systematic Botany. 12 (1): 91–97. doi:10.2307/2419217. JSTOR 2419217.
  5. Ran, Jin-Hua; Shen, Ting-Ting; Wu, Hui; Gong, Xun; Wang, Xiao-Quan (2018-12-01). "Phylogeny and evolutionary history of Pinaceae updated by transcriptomic analysis". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 129: 106–116. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2018.08.011. ISSN 1055-7903. PMID 30153503. S2CID 52110440.
  6. Leslie, Andrew B.; Beaulieu, Jeremy; Holman, Garth; Campbell, Christopher S.; Mei, Wenbin; Raubeson, Linda R.; Mathews, Sarah; et al. (2018). "An overview of extant conifer evolution from the perspective of the fossil record". American Journal of Botany. 105 (9): 1531-1544. doi:10.1002/ajb2.1143.
  7. Leslie, Andrew B.; et al. (2018). "ajb21143-sup-0004-AppendixS4" (PDF). doi:10.1002/ajb2.1143. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  8. Stull, Gregory W.; Qu, Xiao-Jian; Parins-Fukuchi, Caroline; Yang, Ying-Ying; Yang, Jun-Bo; Yang, Zhi-Yun; Hu, Yi; Ma, Hong; Soltis, Pamela S.; Soltis, Douglas E.; Li, De-Zhu; Smith, Stephen A.; Yi, Ting-Shuang; et al. (2021). "Gene duplications and phylogenomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic evolution in gymnosperms". Nature Plants. 7 (8): 1015–1025. bioRxiv 10.1101/2021.03.13.435279. doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00964-4. PMID 34282286. S2CID 232282918.
  9. Stull, Gregory W.; et al. (2021). "main.dated.supermatrix.tree.T9.tre". Figshare. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14547354.v1. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. Stull, Gregory W.; Qu, Xiao-Jian; Parins-Fukuchi, Caroline; Yang, Ying-Ying; Yang, Jun-Bo; Yang, Zhi-Yun; Hu, Yi; Ma, Hong; Soltis, Pamela S.; Soltis, Douglas E.; Li, De-Zhu (July 19, 2021). "Gene duplications and phylogenomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic evolution in gymnosperms". Nature Plants. 7 (8): 1015–1025. doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00964-4. ISSN 2055-0278. PMID 34282286. S2CID 236141481.
  11. Ran, Jin-Hua; Shen, Ting-Ting; Wang, Ming-Ming; Wang, Xiao-Quan (2018). "Phylogenomics resolves the deep phylogeny of seed plants and indicates partial convergent or homoplastic evolution between Gnetales and angiosperms". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 285 (1881): 20181012. doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.1012. PMC 6030518. PMID 29925623.
  12. Leslie, Andrew B.; Beaulieu, Jeremy; Holman, Garth; Campbell, Christopher S.; Mei, Wenbin; Raubeson, Linda R.; Mathews, Sarah (2018). "An overview of extant conifer evolution from the perspective of the fossil record". American Journal of Botany. 105 (9): 1531–1544. doi:10.1002/ajb2.1143. ISSN 1537-2197. PMID 30157290. S2CID 52120430.
  13. Domogatskaya, Ksenia V.; Herman, Alexei B. (May 2019). "New species of the genus Schizolepidopsis (conifers) from the Albian of the Russian high Arctic and geological history of the genus". Cretaceous Research. 97: 73–93. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2019.01.012. S2CID 134849082.
  14. Matsunaga, Kelly K. S.; Herendeen, Patrick S.; Herrera, Fabiany; Ichinnorov, Niiden; Crane, Peter R.; Shi, Gongle (2021-05-10). "Ovulate Cones of Schizolepidopsis ediae sp. nov. Provide Insights into the Evolution of Pinaceae". International Journal of Plant Sciences. 182 (6): 490–507. doi:10.1086/714281. ISSN 1058-5893.
  15. Rothwell, Gar W.; Mapes, Gene; Stockey, Ruth A.; Hilton, Jason (April 2012). "The seed cone Eathiestrobus gen. nov.: Fossil evidence for a Jurassic origin of Pinaceae". American Journal of Botany. 99 (4): 708–720. doi:10.3732/ajb.1100595. PMID 22491001.
  16. Smith, Selena Y.; Stockey, Ruth A.; Rothwell, Gar W.; Little, Stefan A. (2017-01-02). "A new species of Pityostrobus (Pinaceae) from the Cretaceous of California: moving towards understanding the Cretaceous radiation of Pinaceae". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 15 (1): 69–81. doi:10.1080/14772019.2016.1143885. ISSN 1477-2019. S2CID 88292891.
  17. Blokhina, N. I.; Afonin, M. (2007). "Fossil wood Cedrus penzhinaensis sp. nov. (Pinaceae) from the Lower Cretaceous of north-western Kamchatka (Russia)". Acta Paleobotanica. 47: 379–389. S2CID 54653621.
  18. Ashley A. Klymiuk & Ruth A. Stockey (2012). "A Lower Cretaceous (Valanginian) seed cone provides the earliest fossil record for Picea (Pinaceae)". American Journal of Botany. 99 (6): 1069–1082. doi:10.3732/ajb.1100568. PMID 22623610.
  19. Patricia E. Ryberg; Gar W. Rothwell; Ruth A. Stockey; Jason Hilton; Gene Mapes; James B. Riding (2012). "Reconsidering Relationships among Stem and Crown Group Pinaceae: Oldest Record of the Genus Pinus from the Early Cretaceous of Yorkshire, United Kingdom". International Journal of Plant Sciences. 173 (8): 917–932. doi:10.1086/667228. S2CID 85402168.
  20. Cherubini, Paolo; Fontana, Giovanni; Rigling, Daniel; Dobbertin, Matthias; Brang, Peter; Innes, John L. (2002). "Tree-Life History Prior to Death: Two Fungal Root Pathogens Affect Tree-Ring Growth Differently". Journal of Ecology. 90 (5): 839–850. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00715.x. JSTOR 3072253.
  21. Zulak, K. G.; Bohlmann, J. (2010). "Terpenoid biosynthesis and specialized vascular cells of conifer defense. - Semantic Scholar". Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 52 (1): 86–97. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00910.x. PMID 20074143. S2CID 26043965.
  22. Franceschi, Vincent R.; Krokene, Paal; Christiansen, Erik; Krekling, Trygve (2005-08-01). "Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests". New Phytologist. 167 (2): 353–376. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.x. ISSN 1469-8137. PMID 15998390.
  23. Franceschi, V. R., P. Krokene, T. Krekling, and E. Christiansen. 2000. Phloem parenchyma cells are involved in local and distance defense response to fungal inoculation or bark-beetle attack in Norway spruce (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 87:314-326.
  24. Hudgins, J. W.; Christiansen, E.; Franceschi, V. R. (2004-03-01). "Induction of anatomically based defense responses in stems of diverse conifers by methyl jasmonate: a phylogenetic perspective". Tree Physiology. 24 (3): 251–264. doi:10.1093/treephys/24.3.251. ISSN 0829-318X. PMID 14704135.
  25. Krokene, P.; Nagy, N. E.; Solheim, H. (2008-01-01). "Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: anatomically based defense responses and increased resistance against fungal infection". Tree Physiology. 28 (1): 29–35. doi:10.1093/treephys/28.1.29. ISSN 0829-318X. PMID 17938111.
  26. Sampedro, L. (2014-09-01). "Physiological trade-offs in the complexity of pine tree defensive chemistry". Tree Physiology. 34 (9): 915–918. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpu082. ISSN 0829-318X. PMID 25261122.
  27. Nagy, N. E.; Krokene, P.; Solheim, H. (2006-02-01). "Anatomical-based defense responses of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stems to two fungal pathogens". Tree Physiology. 26 (2): 159–167. doi:10.1093/treephys/26.2.159. ISSN 0829-318X. PMID 16356912.
  28. Nagy, Nina E.; Franceschi, Vincent R.; Solheim, Halvor; Krekling, Trygve; Christiansen, Erik (2000-03-01). "Wound-induced traumatic resin duct development in stems of Norway spruce (Pinaceae): anatomy and cytochemical traits". American Journal of Botany. 87 (3): 302–313. doi:10.2307/2656626. ISSN 1537-2197. JSTOR 2656626. PMID 10718991.
  29. Lewinsohn, Efraim; Gijzen, Mark; Croteau, Rodney (1991-05-01). "Defense Mechanisms of Conifers: Differences in Constitutive and Wound-Induced Monoterpene Biosynthesis Among Species". Plant Physiology. 96 (1): 44–49. doi:10.1104/pp.96.1.44. ISSN 0032-0889. PMC 1080711. PMID 16668184.
  30. Fäldt, Jenny; Martin, Diane; Miller, Barbara; Rawat, Suman; Bohlmann, Jörg (2003-01-01). "Traumatic resin defense in Norway spruce (Picea abies): Methyl jasmonate-induced terpene synthase gene expression, and cDNA cloning and functional characterization of (+)-3-carene synthase". Plant Molecular Biology. 51 (1): 119–133. doi:10.1023/A:1020714403780. ISSN 0167-4412. PMID 12602896. S2CID 21153303.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Pinaceae.
Wikispecies has information related to Pinaceae.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.