Professional identification

Professional Identification is a type of social identification and is the sense of oneness individuals have with a profession (e.g. law, medicine) and the degree to which individuals define themselves as profession members.[1][2][3][4] Professional identity consists of the individual's alignment of roles, responsibilities, values, and ethical standards to be consistent with practices accepted by their specific profession.[5]

Sources of professional identification

Researchers have found that a desire for quality (rather than profits) is associated with professional identification.[6] Organizations tend to be concerned with efficiency and profitability, whereas professions care mainly about providing the highest-quality service (as defined by the professions), almost regardless of cost or revenue considerations (Freidson, 2001). Administrators are usually seen as promoting profitability at the expense of profession-defined quality (Freidson, 2001).[7] In one notable study, practicing physicians viewed administrators with medical degrees (e.g., the M.D.) as “outsiders” to the medical profession because of what the physicians believed to be the administrators’ undue emphasis on organizational goals (Hoff, 1999: 336). Practicing physicians viewed administrators with MDs more negatively than those without MDs because the former were thought to have “betrayed” the medical profession by assuming administrative roles (Hoff, 1999: 344).[8]

Formation of professional identity

Professional identity formation is a complex process through which the sense of oneness with a profession is developed, with some of the difficulty arising out of balancing personal identity with professional identity.[5] Professional identity begins to form while individuals gain their educational training for their profession.[9][10] Drawing on community of practice theory, transitions between communities can lead to the individual experiencing tension or conflict in how the distinct communities' values and expectations differ, causing the individual to restructure the boundaries between their professional, personal, and private spheres of identity.[10]

Recent research

For over 50 years, researchers have studied whether professional employees' social identities influence their work behaviors.[11] David R. Hekman and colleagues found that professional identification may conflict with organizational identification.[12] Organizational identification may lead employees to believe that administrators are “like them” and “on their side", whereas professional identification leads employees to believe that administrators are “not like them” and “not on their side”.[13]

See also

References
  1. Ashforth B. E., & Mael F. A. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
  2. Cheney G. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
  3. Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M., & Harquail C. V. (1994). Organizational Images and Member Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
  4. Pratt, M.G., (1998). To be or not to be: Central Questions in organizational identification. In Whetten D.A., & Godfrey P.C. (Eds.): Identity in Organizations: Building theory through conversation (pp.171- 207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  5. Goltz, Heather Honoré; Smith, Matthew Lee (2014-11-01). "Forming and Developing Your Professional Identity Easy as PI". Health Promotion Practice. 15 (6): 785–789. doi:10.1177/1524839914541279. ISSN 1524-8399. PMID 25015568. S2CID 206740294.
  6. Bamber, E.W. & Iyer, V.M. 2002. Big 5 auditors' professional and organizational identification: consistency or conflict? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory
  7. Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  8. Hoff, T. J. 1999. The social organization of physician-managers in a changing HMO. Work and Occupations, 26: 324 –351.
  9. Tomer, Gunjan; Mishra, Sushanta Kumar (2015-06-01). "Professional identity construction among software engineering students: A study in India". Information Technology & People. 29 (1). doi:10.1108/ITP-10-2013-0181. ISSN 0959-3845.
  10. Nyström, Sofia (2009). "The Dynamics of Professional Identity Formation: Graduates' Transitions from Higher Education to Working Life". Vocations and Learning. 2 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1007/s12186-008-9014-1. ISSN 1874-785X. S2CID 143402240.
  11. Gouldner, A. W. 1957. "Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles I." Administrative Science Quarterly, 2: 281–306.
  12. Hekman, D.R., Steensma, H.K., Bigley, G.A., Hereford, J.F., (2009) “Effects of Organizational and Professional Identification on the Relationship Between Administrators’ Social Influence and Professional Employees' Adoption of New Work Behavior.” Journal of Applied Psychology.
  13. Hekman, D.R., Bigley, G.A., Steensma, H.K., Hereford, J.F., (2009) “Combined Effects of Organizational and Professional Identification on the Reciprocity Dynamic for Professional Employees.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 52, No. 3.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.