Proton spin crisis

The proton spin crisis (or proton spin puzzle) is a theoretical crisis precipitated by a 1987 experiment by the European Muon Collaboration (EMC),[1] which tried to determine the distribution of spin within the proton.[2]

Unsolved problem in physics:

How do the quarks and gluons carry the spin of protons?

(more unsolved problems in physics)

Physicists expected that the quarks carry all a proton's spin. However, not only was the total proton spin carried by quarks far smaller than 100%, these results were consistent with almost zero (4~24%[3]) proton spin being carried by quarks. This surprising and puzzling result was termed the "proton spin crisis".[4] The problem is considered one of the important unsolved problems in physics.[5]

Background

A key question is how the nucleons' spins are distributed amongst their constituent parts ("partons": quarks and gluons). Components of proton's spin are expectation values of individual sources of angular momentum. These values depend on the renormalization scale, because their operators are not separately conserved.[6] Physicists originally expected that valence quarks would carry all of the nucleon spin.

A proton is built from three valence quarks (two up quarks and one down quark), virtual gluons, and virtual (or sea) quarks and antiquarks (virtual particles do not influence the proton's quantum numbers). The ruling hypothesis was that since the proton is stable, then it exists in the lowest possible energy level. Therefore, it was expected that the quark's wave function is the spherically symmetric s-wave with no spatial contribution to angular momentum. The proton is, like each of its quarks, a spin  1 /2 particle (a fermion). Therefore, it was hypothesized that two of the quarks would have their spins parallel to the proton's and the spin of the third quark would be opposite.

The experiment

In this EMC experiment, a quark of a polarized proton target was hit by a polarized muon beam, and the quark's instantaneous spin was measured. In a polarized proton target, all the protons' spin take the same direction, and therefore it was expected that the spin of two out of the three quarks cancels out and the spin of the third quark is polarized in the direction of the proton's spin. Thus, the sum of the quarks' spin was expected to be equal to the proton's spin.

Instead, the experiment found that the number of quarks with spin in the proton's spin direction was almost the same as the number of quarks whose spin was in the opposite direction. This is the proton spin crisis. Similar results have been obtained in later experiments.[7]

Subsequent work

A paper published in 2008 showed that more than half of the spin of the proton comes from the spin of its quarks, and that the missing spin is produced by the quarks' orbital angular momentum.[8] This work used relativistic effects together with other quantum chromodynamic properties and explained how they boil down to an overall spatial angular momentum that is consistent with the experimental data. A 2013 paper showed how to calculate the gluon helicity contribution using lattice QCD.[9]

According to physicist Xiangdong Ji in 2017, Lattice QCD shows "the theoretical expectation on the fraction of the nucleon spin carried in quark spin is about 30%. Thus there is no substantial discrepancy between the fundamental theory and data."[10]

Monte Carlo calculations have shown that 50% of the proton spin comes from gluon polarization.[11] Results from the RHIC, published in 2016, indicate that gluons may carry even more of protons' spin than quarks do.[12] However, in 2018 lattice QCD calculations indicated that it is the quark orbital angular momentum that is the dominant contribution to the nucleon spin.[13]

In a 2022 AAPPS Bulletin, Keh-Fei Liu calculated that quark spin contributes about 40% of the angular momentum, quark orbital angular momentum contributes about 15%, and gluon orbital angular momentum contributes about 40%. Given various error bars on both theoretical calculations and on experiments, this too is consistent with the observed experimental quark spin contribution of around 30%.[14]

References
  1. Ashman, J.; Badelek, B.; Baum, G.; Beaufays, J.; Bee, C.P.; Benchouk, C.; et al. (European Muon Collaboration (EMC)) (1988). "A measurement of the spin asymmetry and determination of the structure function g1 in deep inelastic muon-proton scattering". Physics Letters B. 206 (2): 364–370. Bibcode:1988PhLB..206..364A. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91523-7. ISSN 0370-2693. CERN EP 87-230.
  2. Ashman, J.; et al. (European Muon Collaboration (EMC)) (1988). "A measurement of the spin asymmetry and determination of the structure function g1 in deep inelastic muon-proton scattering" (PDF). Physics Letters B. 206 (2): 364. Bibcode:1988PhLB..206..364A. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91523-7.
  3. "Are scientists finally on the brink of understanding where proton spin comes from?". phys.org. June 2015.
  4. Londergan, J. T. (2009). "Nucleon resonances and quark structure". International Journal of Modern Physics E. 18 (5–6): 1135–1165. arXiv:0907.3431. Bibcode:2009IJMPE..18.1135L. doi:10.1142/S0218301309013415. S2CID 118475917.
  5. Hansson, Johan (July 2010) [8 March 2010]. "The "proton spin crisis" – a quantum query" (PDF). Progress in Physics. 3: 51–52. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-05-04.
  6. Ji, Xiangdong; Yuan, Feng; Zhao, Yong (2020-09-02). "Proton spin after 30 years: What we know and what we don't?". arXiv:2009.01291 [hep-ph].
  7. Jaffe, R. (1995). "Where does the proton really get its spin?" (PDF). Physics Today. Vol. 48, no. 9. pp. 24–30. Bibcode:1995PhT....48i..24J. doi:10.1063/1.881473. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-16. Retrieved 2013-02-11.
  8. Thomas, A. (2008). "Interplay of spin and orbital angular momentum in the proton". Physical Review Letters. 101 (10): 102003. arXiv:0803.2775. Bibcode:2008PhRvL.101j2003T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.102003. PMID 18851208. S2CID 18761490.
  9. Ji, Xiangdong; Zhang, Jian-Hui; Zhao, Yong (2013-09-10). "Physics of the gluon-helicity contribution to proton spin". Physical Review Letters. 111 (11): 112002. arXiv:1304.6708. Bibcode:2013PhRvL.111k2002J. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.112002. PMID 24074075. S2CID 38560063.
  10. Ji, Xiangdong (2017). "Proton tomography through deeply virtual Compton scattering". National Science Review. 4 (2): 213–223.
  11. Bass, Steven D. (2017-03-06). "Spinning gluons in the proton". Viewpoint. Physics. 10: 23. doi:10.1103/Physics.10.23.
  12. Walsh, Karen Mcnulty (2016-02-16). "Physicists zoom in on gluons' contribution to proton spin". Phys.org.
  13. Deur, A.; Brodsky, S.J.; de Teramond, G.F. (2019). "The Spin Structure of the Nucleon". Reports on Progress in Physics. 82 (76201): 076201. arXiv:1807.05250. Bibcode:2019RPPh...82g6201D. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab0b8f. S2CID 18954455.
  14. Liu, Keh-Fei (December 2022). "Status on lattice calculations of the proton spin decomposition". AAPPS Bulletin. 32 (1): 8. arXiv:2112.08416. doi:10.1007/s43673-022-00037-4.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.