Quantum 1/f noise

Quantum 1/f noise is an intrinsic and fundamental part of quantum mechanics. Fighter pilots, photographers, and scientists all appreciate the higher quality of images and signals resulting from the consideration of quantum 1/f noise. Engineers have battled unwanted 1/f noise since 1925, giving it poetic names (such as flicker noise, funkelrauschen, bruit de scintillation, etc.) due to its mysterious nature. The Quantum 1/f noise theory was developed about 50 years later, describing the nature of 1/f noise, allowing it the be explained and calculated via straightforward engineering formulas. It allows for the low-noise optimization of materials, devices and systems of most high-technology applications of modern industry and science. The theory includes the conventional and coherent quantum 1/f effects (Q1/fE). Both effects are combined in a general engineering formula, and present in Q1/f noise, which is itself most of fundamental 1/f noise. The latter is defined as the result of the simultaneous presence of nonlinearity and a certain type of homogeneity in a system, and can be quantum or classical.

The conventional Q1/fE represents 1/f fluctuations caused by bremsstrahlung, decoherence and interference in the scattering of charged particles off one another, in tunneling or in any other process in solid state physics and in general.

Other noise data sets

It has also recently been claimed that 1/f noise has been seen in higher ordered self constructing functions, as well as complex systems, both biological, chemical, and physical.

The theory

The basic derivation of quantum 1/f was made by Peter Handel, a theoretical physicist at the University of Missouri–St. Louis, and published in Physical Review A, in August 1980.

Several hundred papers have been published by many authors on Handel's quantum theory on 1/f noise, which is a new aspect of quantum mechanics. They verified, applied, and further developed the quantum 1/f noise formulas.[1] Aldert van der Ziel, the nestor of the electronic noise field, verified and applied it in many devices and systems, together with dozens of his PhD students. It is described in the last of his 12 books: "Noise in electronic devices and circuits" published by Wiley in 1986. He also updated and generalized many verifications, practical applications, etc., in his authoritative 1988 review "Unified Description of 1/f Noise" in Proceedings of IEEE.[2]

Denials of the theory

In 1986 and 1987, two independent groups of theorists of the field, Group-1: Theo Nieuwenhuizen, Daan Frenkel and Nico G. van Kampen; Group-2: Laszlo B. Kish and Peter Heszler; concluded that Handel's theory explaining the quantum 1/f effect was incorrect for both physical and mathematical reasons.[3][4] Shortly thereafter an independent set of arguments showing that the "quantum 1/f noise" explanation of electronic 1/f noise was certainly incorrect was included in a standard review article on 1/f noise by Michael Weissman.[5] Nieuwenhuizen, et al., state in the conclusion of their paper, "As the theoretical basis for Handel's quantum theory of 1/f noise appears to be lacking, we must conclude that the agreement with experiments is fortuituous"[3] and, in this way, they are indicating that some of the published experimental results are suspicious. Though there have been attempts to answer some of the objections to Handel's theory, quantum 1/f noise is considered to be a non-existent effect by the majority of scientists that are familiar with its theory. The difficulty is that here a judgment based on fundamental science requires the knowledge of quantum electrodynamics however most of noise scientists are solid state physicists or engineers. Science citation index shows over 20 thousand papers annually with "noise" and/or "fluctuation"(s) keywords. The opinion of the above-mentioned relevant experts in the field of noise is that, until the publication rate on the non-existent quantum 1/f noise effect stays around 1 paper/year, it is more economical to refer to the old denials[3][4] than to write up new refusals.

See also

References
  1. Handel, P.H. (March 2008). "Quantum 1/f Bibliography". www.umsl.edu.
  2. Van Der Ziel, A. (1988). "Unified presentation of 1/f noise in electron devices: Fundamental 1/f noise sources". Proceedings of the IEEE. 76 (3): 233–258. doi:10.1109/5.4401.
  3. Nieuwenhuizen, Th. M.; Frenkel, D.; van Kampen, N. G. (1987-03-01). "Objections to Handel's quantum theory of1/fnoise". Physical Review A. American Physical Society (APS). 35 (6): 2750–2753. doi:10.1103/physreva.35.2750. ISSN 0556-2791. PMID 9898471.
  4. Kiss, L B; Heszler, P (1986-09-30). "An exact proof of the invalidity of 'Handel's quantum 1/f noise model', based on quantum electrodynamics". Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics. IOP Publishing. 19 (27): L631–L633. doi:10.1088/0022-3719/19/27/005. ISSN 0022-3719.
  5. Weissman, M. B. (1988). "1/ƒ Noise and other slow non-exponential kinetics in condensed matter". Reviews of Modern Physics. 60 (2): 537–571. Bibcode:1988RvMP...60..537W. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.60.537.

Further reading

For more on Quantum 1/f noise, see:

For the coherent quantum 1/f effect, see:

  • Handel, Peter H. (1996-03-01). "Coherent and conventional quantum 1/f effect". Physica Status Solidi B. Wiley. 194 (1): 393–409. doi:10.1002/pssb.2221940133. ISSN 0370-1972.
  • P. H. Handel: "Derivation of the Quantum 1/f Effect in Devices", IEEE Trans. on Electr. Devices (1994), submitted for publication.
  • Handel, P.H.; Tournier, A.; Henning, B. (2005). "Quantum 1/f effect in resonant biochemical piezoelectric and MEMS sensors". IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 52 (9): 1461–1467. doi:10.1109/tuffc.2005.1516017. ISSN 0885-3010. PMID 16285443. S2CID 42681846.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.