Queen mandibular pheromone

Queen mandibular pheromone, or QMP, is a honey bee pheromone produced by the queen and fed to her attendants who share it with the rest of the colony to give the colony the sense of belonging to the queen. Newly emerged queens produce very little QMP. By the sixth day they are producing enough to attract drones for mating. A laying queen makes twice that amount. Lack of QMP seems to attract robber bees. A study of foraging worker bees has suggested that foraging bees are not attracted to QMP.[1]

Chemical composition

Chemically, QMP is very diverse, with at least 17 major components and other minor ones. Five of these compounds are: 9-oxo-2-decenoic acid (9ODA), cis- and trans-9-hydroxydec-2-enoic acid (9HDA), methyl p-hydroxybenzoate (HOB) and 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylethanol (HVA).

Drones

QMP functions as a sex pheromone for drones, attracting males to an unmated queen. 9ODA specifically is known to attract drones over long distances, and its combination with 9HDA and 10HDA at close range increases drone attraction to the queen.[2]

Drone detection of 9ODA begins in the antennae, triggering a pathway that leads to behavioral responses. This begins with diffusion of 9ODA through the antennae's pores, into the lymph of the olfactory sensillum. The hydrophilic domain of carrier protein ASP1 binds to an apolar region of 9ODA, forming a complex that is transported to olfactory receptors located in the olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs).[2] Olfactory receptor AmOR11 specifically is involved in responding to the pheromone/carrier complex. Although expressed in all castes, expression of AmOR11 is significantly higher in drones, further suggesting its role in 9ODA detection. The binding of the pheromone/carrier to AmOR11 sends a signal to the brain's primary olfactory centres. The specific neural pathway by which 9ODA causes behavioral changes is not yet developed in bees, however research shows olfactory signals from floral odors are integrated to the level of mushroom bodies. Research has not been conducted for the 9ODA pathway.[2]

Workers

Components of QMP also function as a retinue pheromone, causing retinue behavioral and physiological changes in the female worker bees. Changes in QMP's chemical composition following a queen's mating attracts young worker bees to her, fulfilling her feeding and grooming requirements. QMP is transferred through contact from the queen to young workers, and in turn to the rest of the hive's workers. In doing so, the queen elicits behavioral changes in remaining workers, preventing the rearing of new queens, and preventing ovary development.[2]

Behavioral changes in the workers as a result of QMP exposure is thought to be mediated through changes in juvenile hormone (JH) level. 9ODA specifically leads to changes in the endocrine organs, via the brain's mushroom bodies. QMP moderates the decrease in JH synthesis in young bees, preventing foraging behaviour.[2]

Queen retinue pheromone

Slessor (2005) differentiates QMP from queen retinue pheromone, on the basis of three fatty-acid constituents which are not derived from the mandibular gland.[3]

Beekeeping

Sometimes beekeepers re-queen their hives for various reasons. Some beekeepers place these now-unneeded queens in alcohol. The alcohol preserves the deceased queen and her pheromones. This "queen juice" can then be used as a lure in swarm traps. The dead queen is either placed in a swarm trap or a q-tip or cottonball dipped in the alcohol into a swarm trap. The alcohol evaporates, leaving the queen pheromone which may enhance the chances of a swarm moving into a trap.

References

Vergoz V, McQuillan HJ, Geddes LH, Pullar K, Nicholson BJ, Paulin MG, Mercer AR (December 2009). "Peripheral modulation of worker bee responses to queen mandibular pheromone". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (49): 20930–20935. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10620930V. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907563106. PMC 2791564. PMID 19934051.
Jarriault A, Mercer A (2012). "Queen mandibular pheromone: questions that remain to be solved". Apidologie. 43 (3): 292–307. doi:10.1007/s13592-011-0117-6. S2CID 256200825.
Slessor KN, Winston ML, Le Conte Y (November 2005). "Pheromone communication in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 31 (11): 2731–2745. doi:10.1007/s10886-005-7623-9. PMID 16273438. S2CID 10597514.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] Vergoz V, McQuillan HJ, Geddes LH, Pullar K, Nicholson BJ, Paulin MG, Mercer AR (December 2009). "Peripheral modulation of worker bee responses to queen mandibular pheromone". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (49): 20930–20935. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10620930V. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907563106. PMC 2791564. PMID 19934051.

[edot-2] Jarriault A, Mercer A (2012). "Queen mandibular pheromone: questions that remain to be solved". Apidologie. 43 (3): 292–307. doi:10.1007/s13592-011-0117-6. S2CID 256200825.

[jdot-3] Slessor KN, Winston ML, Le Conte Y (November 2005). "Pheromone communication in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 31 (11): 2731–2745. doi:10.1007/s10886-005-7623-9. PMID 16273438. S2CID 10597514.