Root mean square

In mathematics and its applications, the root mean square of a set of numbers $x_{i}$ (abbreviated as RMS, RMS or rms and denoted in formulas as either $x_{\mathrm {RMS} }$ or $\mathrm {RMS} _{x}$ ) is defined as the square root of the mean square (the arithmetic mean of the squares) of the set.[1] The RMS is also known as the quadratic mean (denoted $M_{2}$ )[2][3] and is a particular case of the generalized mean. The RMS of a continuously varying function (denoted $f_{\mathrm {RMS} }$ ) can be defined in terms of an integral of the squares of the instantaneous values during a cycle.

For alternating electric current, RMS is equal to the value of the constant direct current that would produce the same power dissipation in a resistive load.[1] In estimation theory, the root-mean-square deviation of an estimator is a measure of the imperfection of the fit of the estimator to the data.

Definition

The RMS value of a set of values (or a continuous-time waveform) is the square root of the arithmetic mean of the squares of the values, or the square of the function that defines the continuous waveform. In physics, the RMS current value can also be defined as the "value of the direct current that dissipates the same power in a resistor."

In the case of a set of n values $\{x_{1},x_{2},\dots ,x_{n}\}$ , the RMS is

x_{\text{RMS}}={\sqrt {{\frac {1}{n}}\left({x_{1}}^{2}+{x_{2}}^{2}+\cdots +{x_{n}}^{2}\right)}}.

The corresponding formula for a continuous function (or waveform) f(t) defined over the interval $T_{1}\leq t\leq T_{2}$ is

f_{\text{RMS}}={\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2}-T_{1}}}{\int _{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}{[f(t)]}^{2}\,{\rm {d}}t}}},

and the RMS for a function over all time is

f_{\text{RMS}}=\lim _{T\rightarrow \infty }{\sqrt {{1 \over {2T}}{\int _{-T}^{T}{[f(t)]}^{2}\,{\rm {d}}t}}}.

The RMS over all time of a periodic function is equal to the RMS of one period of the function. The RMS value of a continuous function or signal can be approximated by taking the RMS of a sample consisting of equally spaced observations. Additionally, the RMS value of various waveforms can also be determined without calculus, as shown by Cartwright.[4]

In the case of the RMS statistic of a random process, the expected value is used instead of the mean.

In common waveforms

Sine, square, triangle, and sawtooth waveforms. In each, the centerline is at 0, the positive peak is at

y=A_{1}

and the negative peak is at

y=-A_{1}

A rectangular pulse wave of duty cycle D, the ratio between the pulse duration (

\tau

) and the period (T); illustrated here with a = 1.

Graph of a sine wave's voltage vs. time (in degrees), showing RMS, peak (PK), and peak-to-peak (PP) voltages.

If the waveform is a pure sine wave, the relationships between amplitudes (peak-to-peak, peak) and RMS are fixed and known, as they are for any continuous periodic wave. However, this is not true for an arbitrary waveform, which may not be periodic or continuous. For a zero-mean sine wave, the relationship between RMS and peak-to-peak amplitude is:

Peak-to-peak

=2{\sqrt {2}}\times {\text{RMS}}\approx 2.8\times {\text{RMS}}.

For other waveforms, the relationships are not the same as they are for sine waves. For example, for either a triangular or sawtooth wave

Peak-to-peak

=2{\sqrt {3}}\times {\text{RMS}}\approx 3.5\times {\text{RMS}}.

Waveform	Variables and operators	RMS
DC	$y=A_{0}\,$	$A_{0}\,$
Sine wave	$y=A_{1}\sin(2\pi ft)\,$	${\frac {A_{1}}{\sqrt {2}}}$
Square wave	$y={\begin{cases}A_{1}&\operatorname {frac} (ft)<0.5\\-A_{1}&\operatorname {frac} (ft)>0.5\end{cases}}$	$A_{1}\,$
DC-shifted square wave	$y=A_{0}+{\begin{cases}A_{1}&\operatorname {frac} (ft)<0.5\\-A_{1}&\operatorname {frac} (ft)>0.5\end{cases}}$	${\sqrt {A_{0}^{2}+A_{1}^{2}}}\,$
Modified sine wave	$y={\begin{cases}0&\operatorname {frac} (ft)<0.25\\A_{1}&0.25<\operatorname {frac} (ft)<0.5\\0&0.5<\operatorname {frac} (ft)<0.75\\-A_{1}&\operatorname {frac} (ft)>0.75\end{cases}}$	${\frac {A_{1}}{\sqrt {2}}}$
Triangle wave	$y=\left\|2A_{1}\operatorname {frac} (ft)-A_{1}\right\|$	$A_{1} \over {\sqrt {3}}$
Sawtooth wave	$y=2A_{1}\operatorname {frac} (ft)-A_{1}\,$	$A_{1} \over {\sqrt {3}}$
Pulse wave	$y={\begin{cases}A_{1}&\operatorname {frac} (ft)<D\\0&\operatorname {frac} (ft)>D\end{cases}}$	$A_{1}{\sqrt {D}}$
Phase-to-phase sine wave	$y=A_{1}\sin(t)-A_{1}\sin \left(t-{\frac {2\pi }{3}}\right)\,$	$A_{1}{\sqrt {\frac {3}{2}}}$
where: y is displacement, t is time, f is frequency, A_i is amplitude (peak value), D is the duty cycle or the proportion of the time period (1/f) spent high, frac(r) is the fractional part of r.

In waveform combinations

Waveforms made by summing known simple waveforms have an RMS value that is the root of the sum of squares of the component RMS values, if the component waveforms are orthogonal (that is, if the average of the product of one simple waveform with another is zero for all pairs other than a waveform times itself).[5]

{\text{RMS}}_{\text{Total}}={\sqrt {{\text{RMS}}_{1}^{2}+{\text{RMS}}_{2}^{2}+\cdots +{\text{RMS}}_{n}^{2}}}

Alternatively, for waveforms that are perfectly positively correlated, or "in phase" with each other, their RMS values sum directly.

Uses

Voltage

A special case of RMS of waveform combinations is:[6]

{\text{RMS}}_{\text{AC+DC}}={\sqrt {{\text{V}}_{\text{DC}}^{2}+{\text{RMS}}_{\text{AC}}^{2}}}

where ${\text{V}}_{\text{DC}}$ refers to the direct current (or average) component of the signal, and ${\text{RMS}}_{\text{AC}}$ is the alternating current component of the signal.

Average electrical power

Electrical engineers often need to know the power, P, dissipated by an electrical resistance, R. It is easy to do the calculation when there is a constant current, I, through the resistance. For a load of R ohms, power is given by:

P=I^{2}R.

However, if the current is a time-varying function, I(t), this formula must be extended to reflect the fact that the current (and thus the instantaneous power) is varying over time. If the function is periodic (such as household AC power), it is still meaningful to discuss the average power dissipated over time, which is calculated by taking the average power dissipation:

{\begin{aligned}P_{av}&=\left(I(t)^{2}R\right)_{av}&&{\text{where }}\left(\cdots \right)_{av}{\text{ denotes the temporal mean of a function}}\\[3pt]&=\left(I(t)^{2}\right)_{av}R&&{\text{(as }}R{\text{ does not vary over time, it can be factored out)}}\\[3pt]&=I_{\text{RMS}}^{2}R&&{\text{by definition of root-mean-square}}\end{aligned}}

So, the RMS value, I_RMS, of the function I(t) is the constant current that yields the same power dissipation as the time-averaged power dissipation of the current I(t).

Average power can also be found using the same method that in the case of a time-varying voltage, V(t), with RMS value V_RMS,

P_{\text{Avg}}={V_{\text{RMS}}^{2} \over R}.

This equation can be used for any periodic waveform, such as a sinusoidal or sawtooth waveform, allowing us to calculate the mean power delivered into a specified load.

By taking the square root of both these equations and multiplying them together, the power is found to be:

P_{\text{Avg}}=V_{\text{RMS}}I_{\text{RMS}}.

Both derivations depend on voltage and current being proportional (that is, the load, R, is purely resistive). Reactive loads (that is, loads capable of not just dissipating energy but also storing it) are discussed under the topic of AC power.

In the common case of alternating current when I(t) is a sinusoidal current, as is approximately true for mains power, the RMS value is easy to calculate from the continuous case equation above. If I_p is defined to be the peak current, then:

I_{\text{RMS}}={\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2}-T_{1}}}\int _{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}\left[I_{\text{p}}\sin(\omega t)\right]^{2}dt}},

where t is time and ω is the angular frequency (ω = 2 $π$ /T, where T is the period of the wave).

Since I_p is a positive constant:

I_{\text{RMS}}=I_{\text{p}}{\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2}-T_{1}}}{\int _{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}{\sin ^{2}(\omega t)}\,dt}}}.

Using a trigonometric identity to eliminate squaring of trig function:

{\begin{aligned}I_{\text{RMS}}&=I_{\text{p}}{\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2}-T_{1}}}{\int _{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}{1-\cos(2\omega t) \over 2}\,dt}}}\\[3pt]&=I_{\text{p}}{\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2}-T_{1}}}\left[{t \over 2}-{\sin(2\omega t) \over 4\omega }\right]_{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}}}\end{aligned}}

but since the interval is a whole number of complete cycles (per definition of RMS), the sine terms will cancel out, leaving:

I_{\text{RMS}}=I_{\text{p}}{\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2}-T_{1}}}\left[{t \over 2}\right]_{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}}}=I_{\text{p}}{\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2}-T_{1}}}{{T_{2}-T_{1}} \over 2}}}={I_{\text{p}} \over {\sqrt {2}}}.

A similar analysis leads to the analogous equation for sinusoidal voltage:

V_{\text{RMS}}={V_{\text{p}} \over {\sqrt {2}}},

where I_P represents the peak current and V_P represents the peak voltage.

Because of their usefulness in carrying out power calculations, listed voltages for power outlets (for example, 120 V in the US, or 230 V in Europe) are almost always quoted in RMS values, and not peak values. Peak values can be calculated from RMS values from the above formula, which implies V_P = V_RMS × √2, assuming the source is a pure sine wave. Thus the peak value of the mains voltage in the USA is about 120 × √2, or about 170 volts. The peak-to-peak voltage, being double this, is about 340 volts. A similar calculation indicates that the peak mains voltage in Europe is about 325 volts, and the peak-to-peak mains voltage, about 650 volts.

RMS quantities such as electric current are usually calculated over one cycle. However, for some purposes the RMS current over a longer period is required when calculating transmission power losses. The same principle applies, and (for example) a current of 10 amps used for 12 hours each 24-hour day represents an average current of 5 amps, but an RMS current of 7.07 amps, in the long term.

The term RMS power is sometimes erroneously used in the audio industry as a synonym for mean power or average power (it is proportional to the square of the RMS voltage or RMS current in a resistive load). For a discussion of audio power measurements and their shortcomings, see Audio power.

Speed

In the physics of gas molecules, the root-mean-square speed is defined as the square root of the average squared-speed. The RMS speed of an ideal gas is calculated using the following equation:

v_{\text{RMS}}={\sqrt {3RT \over M}}

where R represents the gas constant, 8.314 J/(mol·K), T is the temperature of the gas in kelvins, and M is the molar mass of the gas in kilograms per mole. In physics, speed is defined as the scalar magnitude of velocity. For a stationary gas, the average speed of its molecules can be in the order of thousands of km/h, even though the average velocity of its molecules is zero.

Error

When two data sets — one set from theoretical prediction and the other from actual measurement of some physical variable, for instance — are compared, the RMS of the pairwise differences of the two data sets can serve as a measure of how far on average the error is from 0. The mean of the absolute values of the pairwise differences could be a useful measure of the variability of the differences. However, the RMS of the differences is usually the preferred measure, probably due to mathematical convention and compatibility with other formulae.

In frequency domain

The RMS can be computed in the frequency domain, using Parseval's theorem. For a sampled signal $x[n]=x(t=nT)$ , where $T$ is the sampling period,

\sum _{n=1}^{N}{x^{2}[n]}={\frac {1}{N}}\sum _{m=1}^{N}\left|X[m]\right|^{2},

where $X[m]=\operatorname {FFT} \{x[n]\}$ and N is the sample size, that is, the number of observations in the sample and FFT coefficients.

In this case, the RMS computed in the time domain is the same as in the frequency domain:

{\text{RMS}}\{x[n]\}={\sqrt {{\frac {1}{N}}\sum _{n}{x^{2}[n]}}}={\sqrt {{\frac {1}{N^{2}}}\sum _{m}{{\bigl |}X[m]{\bigr |}}^{2}}}={\sqrt {\sum _{m}{\left|{\frac {X[m]}{N}}\right|^{2}}}}.

Relationship to other statistics

Geometric proof without words that max (a,b) > root mean square (RMS) or quadratic mean (QM) > arithmetic mean (AM) > geometric mean (GM) > harmonic mean (HM) > min (a,b) of two distinct positive numbers a and b [note 1]

If ${\bar {x}}$ is the arithmetic mean and $\sigma _{x}$ is the standard deviation of a population or a waveform, then:[7]

x_{\text{rms}}^{2}={\overline {x}}^{2}+\sigma _{x}^{2}={\overline {x^{2}}}.

From this it is clear that the RMS value is always greater than or equal to the average, in that the RMS includes the "error" / square deviation as well.

Physical scientists often use the term root mean square as a synonym for standard deviation when it can be assumed the input signal has zero mean, that is, referring to the square root of the mean squared deviation of a signal from a given baseline or fit.[8][9] This is useful for electrical engineers in calculating the "AC only" RMS of a signal. Standard deviation being the RMS of a signal's variation about the mean, rather than about 0, the DC component is removed (that is, RMS(signal) = stdev(signal) if the mean signal is 0).

Notes

If AC = a and BC = b. OC = AM of a and b, and radius r = QO = OG.
Using Pythagoras' theorem, QC² = QO² + OC² ∴ QC = √QO² + OC² = QM.
Using Pythagoras' theorem, OC² = OG² + GC² ∴ GC = √OC² − OG² = GM.
Using similar triangles, HC/GC = GC/OC ∴ HC = GC²/OC = HM.

References

"Root-mean-square value". A Dictionary of Physics (6 ed.). Oxford University Press. 2009. ISBN 9780199233991.
Thompson, Sylvanus P. (1965). Calculus Made Easy. Macmillan International Higher Education. p. 185. ISBN 9781349004874. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
Jones, Alan R. (2018). Probability, Statistics and Other Frightening Stuff. Routledge. p. 48. ISBN 9781351661386. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
Cartwright, Kenneth V (Fall 2007). "Determining the Effective or RMS Voltage of Various Waveforms without Calculus" (PDF). Technology Interface. 8 (1): 20 pages.
Nastase, Adrian S. "How to Derive the RMS Value of Pulse and Square Waveforms". MasteringElectronicsDesign.com. Retrieved 21 January 2015.
"Make Better AC RMS Measurements with your Digital Multimeter" (PDF). Keysight. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 January 2019. Retrieved 15 January 2019.
Chris C. Bissell; David A. Chapman (1992). Digital signal transmission (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-521-42557-5.
Weisstein, Eric W. "Root-Mean-Square". MathWorld.
"ROOT, TH1:GetRMS". Archived from the original on 2017-06-30. Retrieved 2013-07-18.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[7] If AC = a and BC = b. OC = AM of a and b, and radius r = QO = OG.
Using Pythagoras' theorem, QC² = QO² + OC² ∴ QC = √QO² + OC² = QM.
Using Pythagoras' theorem, OC² = OG² + GC² ∴ GC = √OC² − OG² = GM.
Using similar triangles, HC/GC = GC/OC ∴ HC = GC²/OC = HM.

[dicphys-1] "Root-mean-square value". A Dictionary of Physics (6 ed.). Oxford University Press. 2009. ISBN 9780199233991.

[2] Thompson, Sylvanus P. (1965). Calculus Made Easy. Macmillan International Higher Education. p. 185. ISBN 9781349004874. Retrieved 5 July 2020.

[3] Jones, Alan R. (2018). Probability, Statistics and Other Frightening Stuff. Routledge. p. 48. ISBN 9781351661386. Retrieved 5 July 2020.

[4] Cartwright, Kenneth V (Fall 2007). "Determining the Effective or RMS Voltage of Various Waveforms without Calculus" (PDF). Technology Interface. 8 (1): 20 pages.

[5] Nastase, Adrian S. "How to Derive the RMS Value of Pulse and Square Waveforms". MasteringElectronicsDesign.com. Retrieved 21 January 2015.

[6] "Make Better AC RMS Measurements with your Digital Multimeter" (PDF). Keysight. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 January 2019. Retrieved 15 January 2019.

[8] Chris C. Bissell; David A. Chapman (1992). Digital signal transmission (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-521-42557-5.

[9] Weisstein, Eric W. "Root-Mean-Square". MathWorld.

[10] "ROOT, TH1:GetRMS". Archived from the original on 2017-06-30. Retrieved 2013-07-18.

Machine learning evaluation metrics
Regression	MSE MAE sMAPE MAPE MASE MSPE RMS RMSE/RMSD R² MDA MAD
Classification	F-score P4 Accuracy Precision Recall Kappa MCC AUC ROC Sensitivity and specificity Logarithmic Loss
Clustering	Silhouette Calinski-Harabasz Davies-Bouldin Dunn index Hopkins statistic Jaccard index Rand index Similarity measure SMC SimHash
Ranking	MRR DCG NDCG AP
Computer Vision	PSNR SSIM IoU
NLP	Perplexity BLEU
Deep Learning Related Metrics	Inception score FID
Recommender system	Coverage Intra-list Similarity
Similarity	Cosine similarity Euclidean distance Pearson correlation coefficient
Confusion matrix