SCImago Journal Rank

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator is a measure of the prestige of scholarly journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the prestige of the journals where the citations come from.

"SCImago" redirects here. Not to be confused with SCImago Institutions Rankings.
Portal SCImago Journal & Country Rank screenshot
Part of a series on
Citation metrics

Rationale

Citations are an indicator of popularity of scientific works and can be perceived as endorsement; prestige can be understood as a combination of the number of endorsements and the prestige of the works publishing them. Adopting this view, the SJR indicator assigns different values to citations depending on the perceived prestige of the journals where they come from.

However, studies of methodological quality and reliability have found that "reliability of published research works in several fields may be decreasing with increasing journal rank",[1] contrary to widespread expectations.[2]

The calculation of the SJR indicator is similar to the Eigenfactor score, with the former being based on the Scopus database and the latter on the Web of Science database,[3] and there are other differences.[4]

Computation

A journal's SJR indicator is a numeric value representing the average number of weighted citations received during a selected year per document published in that journal during the previous three years, as indexed by Scopus. Higher SJR indicator values are meant to indicate greater journal prestige. SJR is developed by the Scimago Lab,[5] originated from a research group at the University of Granada.

The SJR indicator is a variant of the eigenvector centrality measure used in network theory. Such measures establish the importance of a node in a network based on the principle that connections to high-scoring nodes contribute more to the score of the node. The SJR indicator has been developed to be used in extremely large and heterogeneous journal citation networks. It is a size-independent indicator and its values order journals by their "average prestige per article" and can be used for journal comparisons in science evaluation processes. The SJR indicator is a free journal metric inspired by, and using an algorithm similar to, PageRank.

The SJR indicator computation is carried out using an iterative algorithm that distributes prestige values among the journals until a steady-state solution is reached. The SJR algorithm begins by setting an identical amount of prestige to each journal, then using an iterative procedure, this prestige is redistributed in a process where journals transfer their achieved prestige to each other through citations. The process ends up when the difference between journal prestige values in consecutive iterations do not reach a minimum threshold value any more. The process is developed in two phases, (a) the computation of Prestige SJR (PSJR) for each journal: a size-dependent measure that reflects the whole journal prestige, and (b) the normalization of this measure to achieve a size-independent measure of prestige, the SJR indicator.[6]

In addition to the network-based SJR indicator, the SJR also provides a more direct alternative to the impact factor (IF), in the form of average citations per document in a 2-year period, abbreviated as Cites per Doc. (2y).[7][8]

See also

References
  1. Brembs, Björn (2018). "Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 12: 37. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037. PMC 5826185. PMID 29515380.
  2. Triggle, Chris R; MacDonald, Ross; Triggle, David J.; Grierson, Donald (2022-04-03). "Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges". Accountability in Research. 29 (3): 133–164. doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1909481. One might expect, therefore, that a high JIF factor indicates a higher standard of interest, accuracy and reliability of papers published therein. This is sometimes true but unfortunately is certainly not always the case (Brembs 2018, 2019). Thus, Björn Brembs (2019) concluded: "There is a growing body of evidence against our subjective notion of more prestigious journals publishing 'better' science. In fact, the most prestigious journals may be publishing the least reliable science."
  3. "SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) as an alternative to Thomson Reuters's Impact Factor and EigenFactor". 21 Aug 2008. Archived from the original on 2013-04-26. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  4. "Network-based Citation Metrics: Eigenfactor vs. SJR". 28 Jul 2015. Archived from the original on 2020-04-26. Retrieved 26 Apr 2020.
  5. "Scimago Lab". Scimago Lab Website. Retrieved 22 July 2021.
  6. SCImago Journal & Country Rank. "DESCRIPTION OF SCIMAGO JOURNAL RANK INDICATOR" (PDF). SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  7. Declan Butler (2 January 2008). "Free journal-ranking tool enters citation market". Nature. 451 (6): 6. Bibcode:2008Natur.451....6B. doi:10.1038/451006a. PMID 18172465.
  8. Matthew E. Falagas; et al. (2008). "Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor". The FASEB Journal. 22 (8): 2623–2628. doi:10.1096/fj.08-107938. PMID 18408168.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.