Sensory-specific satiety

Sensory specific satiety is a sensory hedonic phenomenon that refers to the declining satisfaction generated by the consumption of a certain type of food, and the consequent renewal in appetite resulting from the exposure to a new flavour or food.[1] The phenomenon was first described in 1956[2] by the French physiologist Jacques Le Magnen. The term "sensory specific satiety" was coined in 1981[3] by Barbara J. Rolls and Edmund T. Rolls. The concept illustrates the role of physical stimuli in generating appetite and, more specifically, explains the significance of taste, or food flavour in relation to hunger.[4] Besides conditioned satiety and alimentary alliesthesia, it is one of the three major phenomena of satiation. An Ingestive Classics paper on the topic has been written in conversation with Barbara J. Rolls (see https://www.ssib.org/web/classic24.php)

Diners at a buffet eat a larger quantity of food than those eating a single dish

Sensory specific satiety is most commonly illustrated in the laboratory setting by offering participants a first course ad libitum then after a short interval offering a second course or access to a standard buffet. After the eating a first course consisting of one food consumers are less likely to select that food again if offered the same food in a second course, or to select this food again from an array presented in a buffet. The more variety offered, the more people will eat. Thus, a larger amount of food will be eaten at a buffet because the variety of foods and flavors presented renews the desire to eat (appetite) in the individual. A study conducted by Rolls and van Duijvenvoorde in 1984 verified this process by simulating a buffet-style meal. They fed participants four courses of the same food or four courses of different foods which included sausages, bread and butter, chocolate dessert, and bananas. The results revealed a 44% increase in overall food consumption when exposed to the meals with a variety of foods.[1]

Postingestive feedback factors such as energy density and nutrient composition could affect the palatability of a food which in turn would inhibit or facilitate sensory specific satiety. Studies done by Birch & Deysher (1986) and B.J. Rolls et al., summarized in a paper by Raynor and Epstein, show that postingesitive feedback does not influence sensory specific satiety. Since postingestive feedback seems to have little effect on the expression of sensory specific satiety, it is probable that sensory specific satiety is more driven by external factors, such as the sensory properties of the food, than internal factors.[1]

Obesity in relation to sensory specific satiety

Studies have shown that eating a limited variety of foods can result in monotony effects, which some have termed "long-term sensory-specific satiety".[5] By continuing to eat similar meals, a dieter can reduce their overall food intake and use sensory specific satiety as a tool for weight loss. In contrast, eating a large variety of foods is thought to be a driver of overconsumption with potential links to obesity because of the stimulation of appetite from diverse foods.[6] Foods which are high in energy density do not produce a greater level of sensory specific satiety than foods which are low in energy density.[7]

Age in relation to sensory specific satiety

Sensory specific satiety varies depending on age, with older adults experiencing decreased sensory specific satiety and adolescents experiencing enhanced effects.[8] In a study focusing on age in sensory specific satiety, it was hypothesized that the degree of sensory specific satiety is affected by age due to the slow sensory loss experienced by people as they age.[8] It was predicted that due to sensory impairment with ageing, older people might tend towards consuming a monotonous diet since foods are experienced as less pleasantness resulting from blunted sensory acuity. However, it was shown that the decline in sensory specific satiety observed in ageing was not linked to sensory loss; instead, there is an unclear cognitive process that relates to decline in sensory specific satiety that may reflect an overall desire in appetite with ageing compared to adolescents.[8]

References
  1. Raynor H, Epstein L. Dietary Variety, Energy Regulation, and Obesity. Psychological Bulletin 2001; 127: 325-341. full text
  2. Le Magnen J. Hyperphagie provoquée chez le Rat blanc par altération du mécanisme de satiété périphérique. Comptes Rendus des Séances de la Société de Biologie (Paris) 1956; 150(1): 32–35.
  3. Rolls BJ, Rolls ET, Rowe EA, Sweeney K. Sensory specific satiety in man. Physiol Behav. 1981;27(1):137-42.
  4. Gray P. 2007. Psychology. Fifth Edition. Worth Publishers. table of contents Archived 2011-03-03 at the Wayback Machine
    • Raynor HA, Niemeier HM, Wing RR. Effect of limiting snack food variety on long-term sensory-specific satiety and monotony during obesity treatment. Eating Behaviors 2006; 7(1):1-14. abstract
  6. "Society for the Study of Ingestive Behavior". www.ssib.org. Retrieved 2022-02-18.
  7. Rolls BJ, Van Duijvenvoorde PM, Rowe EA. Variety in the diet enhances intake in a meal and contributes to the development of obesity in the rat. Physiology & Behavior 1983; 31(1):21-7. abstract
  8. Rolls BJ, McDermott TM. Effect of age on sensory-specific satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 54(6): 988-996. abstract
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.