Sexual suggestiveness

Sexual suggestiveness is visual, verbal, written or behavioral material or action with sexual undertones implying sexual intent in order to provoke sexual arousal.[1][2][3][4]

Refectory painting on the theme of Temptation by Lucas Cranach the Elder c.1520 (detail), Lutherhaus, Wittenberg... this decorates the end wall of one of the main university refectories...whilst the painting is already sexually charged, the aspect which requires a second glance is the woman's pillow, which is in a form suggesting a vagina

There are variations in the perception and display of sexual suggestiveness, including but not limited to gender, culture and generation. Different cultures and different generations have varying views on what is considered to be sexually suggestive. For example, in British culture, it is normal for a woman to wear shorts and bare her legs on a hot, sunny day, but a woman with naked flesh on show would be considered promiscuous in certain cultures around the world. For the majority of the 20th century in western culture, it was considered vulgar for women to have their sexual ornaments (breasts) fully on show; in more modern times, this may not be a deviation from the norm. In evolutionary terms, sexual suggestiveness is a mode from which sexual mates are gained. Therefore, the ability to use sexual suggestiveness effectively is a trait that is part of sexual selection.

Displays of sexual suggestiveness include things such as; women in swimsuit adverts, sexually-themed music or music with a strong beat meant for dancing, sexting, erotic lingerie or "wolf whistling".[5][6][7][8][9] Sexual suggestiveness may also involve nudity, or the exposure of the nipples, genitals, buttocks or other taboo areas of the body.[10][11] Even a brand name or phrase can be considered to be sexually suggestive if it has strong sexual connotations or undertones.[12]

In some cases, displays of sexual suggestiveness may be misinterpreted which may lead to dangerous or harmful situations.

Evolutionary perspective

From an evolutionary point of view, sexual suggestiveness evolved in order to aid in securing a sexual partner or mate. Once the individual has decided on a mate to pursue, sexual suggestiveness helps in attracting the mate - this is a skill which has been sexually selected (sexual selection) for during evolution. Sexually suggestive behaviors include things such as "showing more skin" and flirting. Both of these examples are behaviors which the individual would intentionally display. There is also research to suggest that sexually suggestive behaviors may not always be deliberate.[13] Unbeknownst to the individual, factors such as the menstrual cycle, voice pitch and rate of money spending can all have an effect on sexual success and sexually suggestive behavior. For example, when women were in the work place and ovulating they were more likely to engage in sexually suggestive behaviors e.g. showing more skin; further, women who work as lap dancers earn more money when they are in the ovulating stage. This may be because the female unwittingly behaves in a more sexual way and therefore puts out more sexually suggestive cues.[14] There is not, however, any evidence to show that these women are aware that their actions or earnings are intrinsically linked to their menstrual cycle.

21st century

The rise of the media, advertising and film industries as well as the growth of the fashion industry are all contributing factors to increase sexually suggestive content in an every-day setting. There are far more displays of sexually suggestive behavior in modern-day life than there ever has been before and not just within advertising. The idea that sex sells is evident in many aspects of daily modern life particularly within social media and film where female sexual ornaments are a focal point. For example, many films include additional sex scenes and sexually suggestive female characters regardless of the film's narrative.[15][16]

The progression of the Internet and social media means that sexual content is far more available and accessible in the 21st century than ever before. This has a knock on effect on people's sexualization and sexual behavior. Children's sexuality develops at an earlier age if they have been exposed to more sexual content when young. For example, young adolescents engage in more sexual behaviors if they have been exposed to more sexual content in the media or on television.[17][18] On average, females become pubescent earlier in their development if they have been exposed to sexual content or sexual behavior.[19][20] Most psychologists agree that this physical display of sexuality is due to evolutionary reasons and that girls develop their sexuality (e.g. behaving sexually suggestively) at an earlier age in order to sexually compete with other women and successfully reproduce.[21][22]

Misinterpretation

The increase in sexual content in modern society often results in a more nonchalant approach to sexually suggestive behavior. People, predominantly women, often act in a way that they themselves do not consider to be sexually suggestive but which can be misinterpreted by others.[23][24] For example, wearing clothes or skirts/shorts that show skin is not something that most Western women would consider to be overtly provocative but it is still regarded as sexually suggestive by others. Misconstruing people's behaviour can have disastrous consequences, contributing to harassment and rape culture.[25][26]

Evolutionary psychology explains that this misinterpretation is the result of sexual selection. Men have adapted through sexual selection to have the maximum number of offspring possible, and therefore exhibit certain behaviors that facilitate maximum reproduction. Men perceive sexually suggestive behavior and other sexual cues, including biological ornaments, as signs of reproductive ability and willingness.[27] The hypothesis of rape as an adaption states that the rape of reproductive-age females was favoured by direct selection in order to increase the chance of reproductive success.[28][29] Sexually suggestive behavior and biological ornamentation are signs of sexual maturity and thus females who display more of these behaviors, or who have more obvious ornamentation, are more likely to be at a higher risk of harassment, or even rape.[30] This evolutionary explanation also extends to women. At their most fertile stage in their menstrual cycle, during estrus, women are far less likely to engage in rape-risky behaviors such as walking alone late at night, than women who are in the least fertile stage of their menstrual cycle, the luteal phase or women using hormonal contraception.[31] This is because women who are in the luteal phase or women using a hormonal contraceptive are much less likely to become pregnant after sexual intercourse than estrus women are.[32]

These evolutionary explanations serve only to increase the psychological understanding of sexual behaviors. Sexual suggestiveness, rape, and all other sexual behaviors, are evidenced to be products of past evolution. In the case of rape, however, just because some evidence indicates that it may be natural does not make it acceptable.[33][34][35]

Flirting
Main article: Flirting

Flirting can be sexually suggestive, which can intentionally elicit a sexual response from another person.[36] Research has identified different motivations for engaging in flirting behaviors. There is flirting with a sexual motivation, which is done with a view to engaging in Human sexual activity and there is also flirting with a fun motivation, in which the interaction itself is the pleasurable part.[36] An instrumental motivation of flirting behavior is flirting performed in order to accomplish an instrumental goal, such as getting someone to buy you a drink. However, flirting can sometimes lead to unintentional responses. If the motivation behind sexually suggestive behavior is misinterpreted or miscommunicated, then a sexual response could be elicited where it is not wanted. If escalated, this can lead to sexual harassment in the workplace or sexual coercion in a relationship.[37] In line with evolutionary explanations of sexually suggestive behavior, research has shown that women are more likely to consider the use of flirting as being for relational purposes, and males are more likely to interpret female flirting as having a sexual motivation.[36][37]

Gender differences

There are some reported gender differences between how sexual suggestiveness is perceived. Males and females have different thresholds for the perception of sexual suggestiveness or intent. Males are, in general, more sexually occupied than females. To support this assumption research shows that males perceive people as more interested in a sexual encounter than females do.[38] It has also been suggested that males find it difficult to differentiate between liking, love and sexual intent, and in this case sexual suggestiveness. Unfortunately, this difficulty in separation between the two from the male's point of view may lead to rape or other sexual assault. During the evolution of human sexuality, the fact that females are the choosy gender meant that males who were able to quickly detect a female's willingness were the males who passed along their genes effectively. In light of this, males, therefore, tend to read sexual acceptance signals in friendly actions even when this may not be the females intention.[39] Females are however better at reading platonic signals from the opposite sex and at differentiating between liking, loving and sexual suggestiveness.[40]

There are also gender differences between how sexual suggestiveness is displayed via flirting. Recent research has shown that females are more likely than males to flirt with the intention of developing a new relationship,[41] or with the intention of intensifying an existing relationship.[42] It has also been found that females use flirting as a way of assessing the interest of a potential mate; as the end result is sexual activity, it can be inferred that this is a sexually suggestive act.[43] On the other hand, a variety of different researchers have found that males are significantly more sexually motivated in their displays of sexual suggestiveness (such as flirting) than females.[44] The research done by Clark and Hatfield (1989)[45] supports these assumptions by clearly suggesting that female courtship is motivated by relationship development and that male courtship is motivated by sexual desire. It is these gender differences that can explain the potential miscommunication of social actions.

Cultural differences

Since the 1990s there has been a dramatic increase in the understanding of human sexuality from an evolutionary perspective.[46] Evolutionary theory proposes that humans all behave in the same way, in order to maximise survival and reproductive success.[14] However, as with much of human behavior, there are substantial differences in the sexual suggestiveness of people from different cultures. What may be a culturally appropriate display of 'sexiness' in one culture may be considered inappropriate in another, and vice versa.[14] For example, in many Westernized cultures women displaying their bare legs in public is considered to be a relatively unassuming display of suggestiveness, while in many African societies, for example, the same behavior would be considered immodest. It can be argued that religion is a significant factor in the cultural differences of sexual suggestiveness, especially with regards to what displays of suggestiveness are considered appropriate.[47] In particular, some Christian and Muslim communities are more strict on what levels of suggestiveness are appropriate for unmarried young women.

In the media

General

A considerable amount of research has concluded that sexually suggestive content is pervasive in the media. The most common type of sexually suggestive content in adolescent programming is in the form of a sexual innuendo. Sexual innuendoes give a suggestive alternative meaning to an otherwise neutral phrase. For example, the use of the phrase "bend over backwards" when describing a colleague, in the sitcom How I Met Your Mother, is used by the main character Barney to imply something in both a figurative sense (i.e. that she is willing to work hard) and a suggestive sense (alluding to her flexibility in sexual positions). Content analyses of sexual behavior in the media found that sexual content on television has risen from 45% in 1975 to 81% now.[48] 83% of all programs on television contain sexual content.[49][50] 80% of programs contain sexually suggestive references, and 49% of shows contain sexual behavior which include flirting.[48] Sexual innuendoes occur as much as twice per program in popular American sitcoms, whilst flirting occurred at least once per programme.[49] The use of sexual innuendoes in the media is also done through newspapers, magazines and music, and accounts for roughly 12% of the entire sexual content shown in the media overall.[49] Analysis of sexually suggestive behavior in sports media showed that there was considerable gender differences in how sports stars are portrayed visually.[51] For example, women are photographed nude more frequently than men, and were photographed in a hetero-sexy manner which was done to attract the male gaze, such as with sports equipment covering their genitalia due to its suggestive nature.[51] Overall, women are portrayed in a manner that alludes to their status as a sex symbol.

Sexual content in the form of innuendo, suggestive imagery and double entendre is used as a tool in advertising.[52] Suggestive advertising is used to draw in attention,[53] by monopolizing attentional resources, and as a means of distinguishing their products from similar products which are usually advertised in the same medium (such as in the same magazine).[53] Furthermore, advertisers use sexually suggestive material to imply an association between their product and benefits which are in some way related to sex (such as mate attraction).[54] There was a significant increase in the amount of advertisements from 1983 to 2003 which used sexually suggestive images of models,[53] suggesting that advertisers are finding it beneficial. While the physical properties of the model are the most sexually suggestive, a number of non-verbal communicative features have also been identified as being provocative, such as the models pose (plumped lips, cocked head to show the neck) as well as verbal communicative features such as suggestive comments.[54]

Effects

A number of studies have looked at the effects of sexual content in the media on preadolescent and adolescent sexual development. It has been put forth that watching a high level of television, in which there is a lot of sexually suggestive behavior, can lead to the initiation of sexual intercourse at a younger age than those who watch the least amount of sexually suggestive programming.[50] In addition to this, adolescents who had been exposed to a high level of sexual content, would engage in a level of sexual activity expected by those up to three years older who watched less sexual content.[50] It has been suggested that according to social learning theory, television is a method by which children can acquire behaviors, through observational learning,[55] and that this is a potential method through which children are becoming increasingly sexualized.[56] Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and pregnancy in the U.S are more common among adolescents who begin sexual activity earlier, demonstrating that earlier sexualization, for which sexually suggestive content in the media has been implicated, has far reaching effects.[50]

Sexually suggestive content can also affect adolescents' views and attitudes towards sex, and their sexual socialization as whole. Research conducted with the cultivation theory in mind, has found that there is an association between people with a high regular exposure to sexually oriented genres (such as soap operas and hip-hop music) and more liberal attitudes towards sexual behavior like the acceptance of pre-marital sex, as well as non-relational sex and sexual harassment.[57] Furthermore, as sexual competence is portrayed as a positive attribute on television, particularly for males, regular exposure to sexual content can cause adolescents to form unrealistic expectations, and view their own sexual experiences (or lack thereof) as negative.[58] Moreover, the vast majority of this sexual content alludes to the positive nature of sex only, suggesting that sexually suggestive behavior in the media is serving to perpetuate a view that there are little negative consequences of engaging in sexual activity. Research has shown that the effects of sexually suggestive references in the media are also moderated by the developmental stage of the viewer. For example, 12 year olds have more difficulty correctly interpreting innuendos than 14 year olds.[59] Furthermore, pre-pubescent adolescents often view sexual references on television with disgust and embarrassment, whereas pubescent adolescents viewed it with interest.[60]

See also

References

Notes

  1. "Sexually suggestive content: YouTube knows it when it sees it". VentureBeat. 2008-12-03. Retrieved 2013-09-07.
  2. "Sexy - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary". Merriam-webster.com. 2012-08-31. Retrieved 2013-09-07.
  3. "'Safe Church' sexual misconduct" (PDF). Episcopalmarlboro.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 April 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  4. Wright, Anne (February 2009). Grandma's Sex Handbook - Anne Wright - Google Books. ISBN 9780578020754. Retrieved 2013-09-07.
  5. National Research Council (2002). What Is Pornography?. Nap.edu. doi:10.17226/10261. ISBN 978-0-309-08274-7. Retrieved 2013-09-07.
  6. "Sexually suggestive M&S bus advert banned | News | The Christian Institute". Christian.org.uk. 2011-12-07. Retrieved 2013-09-07.
  7. "What is Sexting". Archived from the original on 2012-01-26. Retrieved 2014-02-14.
  8. Frangos, J; Ritter, W; Friedman, D (2013-03-25). "Brain Potentials to Sexually Suggestive Whistles Show Meaning Modulates the Mismatch Negativity". NeuroReport. 16 (12): 1313–1317. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000175619.23807.b7. PMC 1361366. PMID 16056131.
  9. Frith, Simon (2004). Popular Music: The rock era - Google Books. ISBN 9780415332682. Retrieved 2013-09-07.
  10. "One in Five Teens Sends Sexually Explicit Images". Marketingcharts.com. 2009-01-06. Retrieved 2013-09-07.
  11. Duncan, Stephen F.; Wallace Goddard, H. (2010-08-27). Family Life Education: Principles and Practices for Effective Outreach - Stephen F. Duncan, H. Wallace Goddard - Google Books. ISBN 9781412979085. Retrieved 2013-09-07.
  12. "Stiffy's vodka ruled irresponsible over sexually suggestive name". Harpers.co.uk. 2011-11-08. Archived from the original on 2012-05-28. Retrieved 2013-09-07.
  13. Haselton M. G., Mortezaie M., Pillsworth E. G., Bleske-Rechek A., Frederick D. A. (2007). "Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress". Hormones and Behavior. 51 (1): 40–45. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.007. PMID 17045994. S2CID 9268718.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. Gallup Jr G. G., Frederick D. A. (2010). "The science of sex appeal: An evolutionary perspective". Review of General Psychology. 14 (3): 240. doi:10.1037/a0020451. S2CID 55031962.
  15. Benshoff, H. M., & Griffin, S. (2011). America on film: Representing race, class, gender, and sexuality at the movies. John Wiley & Sons.
  16. Barlow D. H. (1986). "Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 54 (2): 140–148. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.54.2.140. PMID 3700800.
  17. Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and Sexting: How and why minor teens are sending sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude images via text messaging.hdl:11212/2060
  18. Strasburger, V. C. (1995). Adolescents and the media: medical and psychological impact. Sage Publications, Inc.
  19. Ward L. M., Rivadeneyra R. (1999). "Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents' sexual attitudes and expectations: The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement". Journal of Sex Research. 36 (3): 237–249. doi:10.1080/00224499909551994.
  20. Brown J. D. (2002). "Mass media influences on sexuality". Journal of Sex Research. 39 (1): 42–45. doi:10.1080/00224490209552118. PMID 12476255. S2CID 6342646.
  21. Malamuth N. M. (1996). "Sexually explicit media, gender differences, and evolutionary theory". Journal of Communication. 46 (3): 8–31. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01486.x.
  22. Harris, R. J., & Scott, C. L. (Eds.) (2002). Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  23. Stockdale M. S. (1993). "The Role of Sexual Misperceptions of Women′ s Friendliness in an Emerging Theory of Sexual Harassment". Journal of Vocational Behavior. 42 (1): 84–101. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1993.1006.
  24. Synovitz L. B., Byrne T. J. (1998). "Antecedents of sexual victimization: Factors discriminating victims from non-victims". Journal of American College Health. 46 (4): 151–158. doi:10.1080/07448489809595602. PMID 9519576.
  25. Thornhill R., Thornhill N. W. (1983). "Human rape: An evolutionary analysis". Ethology and Sociobiology. 4 (3): 137–173. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(83)90027-4.
  26. Koukounas E., Letch N. M. (2001). "Psychological correlates of perception of sexual intent in women". The Journal of Social Psychology. 141 (4): 443–456. doi:10.1080/00224540109600564. PMID 11577845. S2CID 28096379.
  27. Clutton-Brock T (2007). "Sexual selection in males and females". Science. 318 (5858): 1882–1885. Bibcode:2007Sci...318.1882C. doi:10.1126/science.1133311. PMID 18096798. S2CID 6883765.
  28. Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2001). A Natural History of Rape. MIT press.
  29. Palmer C. T. (1991). "Human rape: Adaptation or by‐product?". Journal of Sex Research. 28 (3): 365–386. doi:10.1080/00224499109551614.
  30. McKibbin W. F., Shackelford T. K., Goetz A. T., Starratt V. G. (2008). "Why do men rape? An evolutionary psychological perspective". Review of General Psychology. 12 (1): 86. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.86. S2CID 804014.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. Chavanne T. J., Gallup G. G. (1998). "Variation in risk taking behavior among female college students as a function of the menstrual cycle". Evolution and Human Behavior. 19 (1): 27–32. doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(98)00016-6.
  32. Gangestad S. W., Thornhill R. (2008). "Human oestrus". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 275 (1638): 991–1000. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1425. PMC 2394562. PMID 18252670.
  33. Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). A Natural History of Rape. MIT Press.
  34. Thornhill R (1998). "Biology of Human Rape, The". Jurimetrics. 39: 137.
  35. Thornhill R., Palmer C. T. (2002). "Rape and evolution: a reply to our critics". Psychology, Evolution & Gender. 4 (3): 283–296. doi:10.1080/14616661.2002.10383129.
  36. Henningsen D. D. (2004). "Flirting with Meaning: An Examination of Miscommunication in Flirting Interactions". Sex Roles. 50 (7): 481–489. doi:10.1023/b:sers.0000023068.49352.4b. S2CID 143077407.
  37. Richman J. A.; et al. (1999). "Sexual Harassment and Generalized Workplace Abuse Among University Employees: Prevalence and Mental Health Correlates". American Journal of Public Health. 89 (3): 358–363. doi:10.2105/ajph.89.3.358. PMC 1508597. PMID 10076485.
  38. Shotland, R. L., & Craig, J. M. (1988). Can men and women differentiate between friendly and sexually interested behavior?. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66-73.
  39. Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). Why men rape. The Sciences, 40(1), 30-36. Chicago
  40. Abbey A (1982). "Sex Differences in Attributions for Friendly Behavior: Do Males Misperceive Females' Friendliness?". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 42 (5): 830–38. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.5.830.
  41. Messman S. J., Canary D. J., Hause R. S. (2000). "Motives to remain platonic, equity and the use of maintenance strategies in opposite sex friendships". Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 17: 67–94. doi:10.1177/0265407500171004. S2CID 145745343.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  42. Downey J. L., Damhave K. W. (1991). "The effect of place, type of comment and effort expended on the perception of flirtation". Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 6: 35–43.
  43. Moore M. M., Butler D. I. (1989). "Predictive aspects of non-verbal courtship behavior in women". Semiotica. 76 (3–4): 205–215. doi:10.1515/semi.1989.76.3-4.205. S2CID 144916891.
  44. Henningsen D. D. (2004). "Flirting with meaning: An examination of miscommunication in flirting interactions". Sex Roles. 50 (7–8): 481–489. doi:10.1023/b:sers.0000023068.49352.4b. S2CID 143077407.
  45. Clark R. D., Hatfield E. (1989). "Gender differences in awareness of courtship initiation tactics". Sex Roles. 32 (11–12): 717–734. doi:10.1007/BF01560186. S2CID 143945877.
  46. Buss, D. (2015). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Psychology Press.
  47. Melman, B. (2016). Women’s Orients: English Women and the Middle East, 1718–1918: Sexuality, Religion and Work. Springer.
  48. Kunkel, D., Cope, K., Farinola, W., Biely, E., Rollin, E., & Donnerstein, E. (1999). Sex on TE.' A biennial report to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 2001. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
  49. Pardun C.J., L'Engle K.L., Brown J.D. (2005). "Linking exposure to outcomes: Early adolescents' consumption of sexual content in six media". Mass Communication & Society. 8 (2): 75–91. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0802_1. S2CID 33425569.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  50. Collins R.L., Elliott M. N., Berry S. H.; et al. (2004). "Watching sex on television predicts adolescent initiation of sexual Behavior". Pediatrics. 114 (3): e280-9. doi:10.1542/peds.2003-1065-l. PMID 15342887.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  51. Clavio G., Eagleman A. N. (2011). "Gender and Sexually Suggestive Images in Sports Blogs". Journal of Sport Management. 7 (4): 295–304. doi:10.1123/jsm.25.4.295.
  52. Courtney, A., Whipple, T. (1983). Sex Stereotyping in Advertising (Lexington, MA: Heath)
  53. Reichert T., Carpenter C. (2004). "An update on sex in magazine advertising: 1983 to 2003". Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 81 (4): 823–837. doi:10.1177/107769900408100407. S2CID 145777787.
  54. Reichert T. Ramirez (2000). "Defining Sexually Oriented Appeals in Advertising: a Grounded Theory Investigation". Association for Consumer Research. 27: 267–273.
  55. Bandura A., Ross D., Ross S.A. (1963). "Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models". The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 66: 3–11. doi:10.1037/h0048687. PMID 13966304.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  56. Kim J. L., Sorsoli C. L., Collins K., Zylbergold B. A., Schooler D., Tolman D. L. (2007). "From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television". Journal of Sex Research. 44 (2): 145–157. doi:10.1080/00224490701263660. PMID 17599272. S2CID 45859683.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  57. Ward L. M. (2002). "Does television exposure affect emerging adults' attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation". Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 31: 1–15. doi:10.1023/a:1014068031532. hdl:2027.42/45292. S2CID 59490946.
  58. Ward L. M. (2003). "Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research". Developmental Review. 23 (3): 347–388. doi:10.1016/s0273-2297(03)00013-3.
  59. Silverman-Watkins L. T., Sprafkin J. N. (1983). "Adolescents' comprehension of televised sexual innuendos". Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 4 (4): 359–369. doi:10.1016/0193-3973(83)90013-8.
  60. Brown, J. D., White, A. B., Nikipoulou, L. (1993). Disinterest, intrigue and resistance: Early adolescent girls’ use of sexual media content. In B. Greenberg, J. D. Brown, & N. Buerkel-Rothfuss (Eds.)., Media, sex, and the adolescent (pp 177-195). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.