Shikshin Temple

The Shorchuk or Shikshin Temple (Uyghur: Хорчу, romanized: Xorqu; simplified Chinese: 七个星佛寺; traditional Chinese: 七個星佛寺; pinyin: Qīgèxīng Fósì; lit. 'Seven-Stars Buddhist Temple') is a ruined compound of Buddhist sites located about 25–30 km southwest of the town of Karasahr, Yanqi Hui Autonomous County, Xinjiang, China. The site was a major religious center along the northern route of the Silk Road in the second half of the first millennium CE. Another name for the site is Ming-oi (明屋, "The Thousand Houses") in Turkic.[1]

Qigexing Buddhist Temple Ruins
View of the ruins
Shikshin Temple is located in Xinjiang
Shikshin Temple
Location of the site in Xinjiang, China
Shikshin Temple is located in China
Shikshin Temple
Shikshin Temple (China)
LocationXinjiang, China
Coordinates41.936°N 86.341°E / 41.936; 86.341
Site notes
ConditionIn ruins

Names
Mural depicting a woman with funerary urn.

The site's Chinese name "Qigexing" has also been spelled as "Shikchin", "Shikshin", "Šikšin", "Xikeqin", or "Xigexing". The archaeologist Albert Grünwedel who worked at the site during the third German Turfan expedition (1905-1907) referred to the site as "Šorčuq"[2](derived from the Uyghur name Xorqu), this name is also sometimes spelled as Shorchuk,[3][4] "Chorchuk",[5] or "Shorchuq"[6] and may refer to salt deposits in the surrounding steppes.[2][3] The site is also referred to as "Ming oi" or "Mingoi" (明屋), a term that literally means "Thousand Dwellings" in the Uyghur language[3] and is also used for other temple sites in the region such as the Kizil Caves.

History
Map of the ruins of the Shorchuk/Qigexing site by Albert Grünwedel (1912), X: little temple, boxed X: large temple, o: stupas

In prehistory Qigexing was part of the city state of Ārśi or Agni (now known as Karasahr/Qarasheher). Ārśi is believed to have been the homeland of an extinct Indo-European language known as "Tocharian A", or Agnean, and was significant in the introduction of Buddhism to China. As late as the 6th century CE, Buddhist works and official documents were being written in Tocharian A. Ārśi was mentioned in Chinese sources, as early as the Han Dynasty, as the Kingdom of Yanqi (Chinese: 焉耆; pinyin: Yanqi or Yen-ch'i – a derivative of Ārśi/Agni).

Qigexing was conquered by the Han Dynasty in 94 CE, during its reconquest of the Tarim Basin. The Buddhist monk Faxian visited the area of Yanqi around 400 CE and mentions the presence of about 4,000 monks who were practicing Hinayana Buddhism.[7]

The monk Xuanzang, who lived in the 7th century CE, reports the existence of 10 Buddhist monasteries with 2,000 monks who belonged to the Sarvastivada school of Buddhism in the area around Yanqi.[7] In 644 CE, the Tang Dynasty invaded and annexed Yanqi during their wars against the Western Turks, a conflict that would last until the Turks were defeated in 657 CE. Tang control of the kingdom was re-established in 648 CE when a Tang general defeated a usurper who had deposed the puppet ruler that the Tang installed four years before.[8] In 719 CE, the Tang established one of the Four Garrisons of Anxi in Yanqi, the other garrisons were in Kucha, Kashgar, and Hotan. Aurel Stein hypothesized that the Buddhist temples of Qigexing were burned during an iconoclasm after Islam became the state religion of the Kara-Khanid Khanate.[3]

Archeological finds in Qigexing include the ruins of larger temple compounds (with more than 100 buildings in total[7]) as well as twelve cave temples.[2][7] The remains of some wall paintings and in particular sculptures have been discovered at the site. Sculptures have been found as individual figures as well as in friezes. The style of the artworks mixes indo-Iranian elements with Chinese styles.[7] The depiction of human heads at the site has a characteristic style with faces that are bulged out like balloons.[7] The Qigexing site is also an important source for manuscripts written in the East Tocharian language, also known as Tocharian A or Agnean, after Agni, an ancient name for Yanqi. Of the 1150 leaves and fragments in East Tocharian that were included in a 2007 survey, 383 came from a single scriptorum in Qigexing.[4]

The site was investigated by Albert Grünwedel during the third German Turfan expedition (1905-1907),[2][9] by Aurel Stein in December 1907,[3] as well as by Sergey Oldenburg during the Russian Turkistan Expedition (1909-1910).[10]

  • Statue from Shikshin Temple, Nakshatra Cave, 5th-6th century CE
    Statue from Shikshin Temple, Nakshatra Cave, 5th-6th century CE
  • Statue from Shikshin Temple, Nakshatra Cave, 5th-6th century CE
    Statue from Shikshin Temple, Nakshatra Cave, 5th-6th century CE
  • A King in sculpture from Qigexing (possibly 8th century CE).
    A King in sculpture from Qigexing (possibly 8th century CE).
  • Turk soldier in armour, Shorchuk, 8th century CE.
    Turk soldier in armour, Shorchuk, 8th century CE.[11]
  • Sorcuq horseman, possibly 8th century CE
    Sorcuq horseman, possibly 8th century CE
  • Soldier cast, made from molds from Shorchuk, Volkerkunde Museum, Berlin
    Soldier cast, made from molds from Shorchuk, Volkerkunde Museum, Berlin
  • Soldier mold,Shorchuk, Volkerkunde Museum, Berlin
    Soldier mold,Shorchuk, Volkerkunde Museum, Berlin
  • Shorchuk warrior statuette of a Central Asian soldier, late 5th-7th century.
    Shorchuk warrior statuette of a Central Asian soldier, late 5th-7th century.[12][13]
  • Shorchuk soldier statuette, Tang Dynasty, 6th-7th century.
    Shorchuk soldier statuette, Tang Dynasty, 6th-7th century.
  • Wall painting of the Distribution of Relics, detail of the warriors Cave 11 (Grunwedel Cave 9), cave temple site, Shorchuk Ming-oi, Karashahr, Hermitage Museum.
    Wall painting of the Distribution of Relics, detail of the warriors Cave 11 (Grunwedel Cave 9), cave temple site, Shorchuk Ming-oi, Karashahr, Hermitage Museum.[14]

References
  1. "British Museum". www.britishmuseum.org.
  2. Albert Grünwedel: Altbuddhistische Kultstätten in Chinesisch-Turkistan, Bericht über archäologische Arbeiten von 1906 bis 1907 bei Kucha, Qarašahr und in der Oase Turfan, Berlin, 1912
  3. Aurel Stein: Serindia - Detailed Report of Explorations in Central Asia and Westernmost China, Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1921
  4. Hansen, Valerie (2012-07-17). The Silk Road: A New History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-993921-3.
  5. Stein, M. Aurel (1912). Ruins Of Desert Cathay: personal narrative of explorations in Central Asia and westernmost China. Vol. 2. p. 365.
  6. Baij Nath Puri: Buddhism In Central Asia, Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 1987
  7. Marianne Yaldız: Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte Chinesisch-Zentralasiens (Xinjiang), Leiden, 1987
  8. Wechsler, Howard J.; Twitchett, Dennis C. (1979). Denis C. Twitchett; John K. Fairbank (eds.). The Cambridge History of China, Volume 3: Sui and T'ang China, 589–906, Part I. Cambridge University Press. pp. 225–227. ISBN 978-0-521-21446-9.
  9. Zaturpanskij, Choros (i.e. A. v. Le Coq): Reisewege und Ergebnisse der deutschen Turfanexpeditionen, Orientalisches Archiv 3, 1912, pp. 116–127
  10. S. F. Oldenburg: Russian Turkistan Expedition, 1909-1910, vol. 1, 1914
  11. G, Reza Karamian; Farrokh, Kaveh; Syvänne, Ilkka; Kubik, Adam; Czerwieniec-Ivasyk, Marta; Maksymiuk, Katarzyna. Crowns, hats, turbans and helmets The headgear in Iranian history volume I: Pre-Islamic Period Edited by Katarzyna Maksymiuk & Gholamreza Karamian Siedlce-Tehran 2017. p. 252.
  12. "British Museum". The British Museum.
  13. Rhie, Marylin M. (2002). Early Buddhist art of China and Central Asia. Leiden: Brill. p. 556, Fig. 5.47n. ISBN 978-90-04-11499-9. Fig. 5.47n Warrior, from the cella (Stein xi) of F4, main temple site, Shorchuk Ming-oi, Karashahr, painted stucco, H. 42.8 em, British Museum, London (after Whitfield (1982-1985), III, color pl. 98). Page 556: The military uniformed figures in the adjacent panel are most relatable to sculptures and paintings from Shorchuk Mingo-oi (Figs. 5.47n; 5.78b) ranging from the late 5th to the 7th century. The warrior head from Shorchuk Ming-oi in Fig. 5.49c with its chubby face and subdued yet soft f ea tu res seems to relate with the heads of the warriors in this Tumshuk painting. This style does not appear to relate to the T'ang period 7th-9th century or later, where the military uniform and helmets, etc. are differently portrayed.
  14. Rhie, Marylin M. (2002). Early Buddhist art of China and Central Asia. Leiden: Brill. p. Fig. 5.78b. ISBN 978-90-04-11499-9.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.