Hollow Moon

The Hollow Moon and the closely related Spaceship Moon are pseudoscientific hypotheses that propose that Earth's Moon is either wholly hollow or otherwise contains a substantial interior space. No scientific evidence exists to support the idea; seismic observations and other data collected since spacecraft began to orbit or land on the Moon indicate that it has a thin crust, extensive mantle and small, dense core, although overall it is much less dense than Earth.

The first publication to mention a hollow Moon was H. G. Wells' 1901 novel The First Men in the Moon. The concept of a (partially) hollow Moon has been employed in science fiction multiple times. In 1970, two Soviet authors published a short piece in the popular press speculating that the Moon might be "the Creation of Alien Intelligence". Since the late 1970s, the hypothesis has been endorsed by conspiracy theorists like Jim Marrs and David Icke.

Introduction

The Hollow Moon hypothesis is the suggestion that the Moon is hollow, usually as a product of an alien civilization.[1][2] It is often called the Spaceship Moon hypothesis[1][2] and often corresponds with beliefs in UFOs or ancient astronauts.[2]

The suggestion of a hollow moon first appeared in science fiction, when H. G. Wells wrote about a hollow Moon in his 1901 book The First Men in the Moon.[1][3] The concept of hollow planets was not new; The first discussion of a Hollow Earth was by scientist Edmond Halley in 1692.[4][5] Wells borrowed from earlier fictional works that described a hollow Earth, such as the 1741 novel Niels Klim's Underground Travels by Ludvig Holberg.[6] Both Hollow Moon and Hollow Earth are now considered to be fringe theories or conspiracy theories.[1] The concept of the Moon as a spaceship is often mentioned as one of David Icke's beliefs.[7][8]

Claims and rebuttals

Density

The fact that the Moon is less dense than the Earth is advanced by conspiracy theorists as support for claims of a hollow Moon.[9] The Moon's mean density is 3.3 g/cm3, whereas the Earth's is 5.5 g/cm3.[10] Mainstream science argues this difference is due to the fact that the Earth's upper mantle and crust are less dense than its heavy, iron core.[10] [3][11]

The Moon rang like a bell

Between 1969 and 1977, seismometers installed on the Moon by the Apollo missions recorded moonquakes. The Moon was described as "ringing like a bell" during some of those quakes, specifically the shallow ones.[12] This phrase was brought to popular attention in March 1970[1] in an article in Popular Science.[13]

On November 20, 1969, Apollo 12 deliberately crashed the Ascent Stage of its Lunar Module onto the Moon's surface; NASA reported that the Moon rang 'like a bell' for almost an hour, leading to arguments that it must be hollow like a bell.[1] Lunar seismology experiments since then have shown that the lunar body has shallow moonquakes that act differently from quakes on Earth, due to differences in texture, type and density of the planetary strata, but there is no evidence of any large empty space inside the body.[12]

Vasin-Shcherbakov "spaceship" conjecture
Speculative cutaway model of a Spaceship Moon

In 1970, Michael Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, of the Soviet Academy of Sciences, advanced a hypothesis that the Moon is a spaceship created by unknown beings.[2] The article was entitled "Is the Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?" and was published in Sputnik, the Soviet equivalent of Reader's Digest.[1][14] The Vasin-Shcerbakov hypothesis was reported in the West that same year.[15]

The authors reference earlier speculation by astrophysicist Iosif Shklovsky, who suggested that the Martian moon Phobos was an artificial satellite and hollow; this has since been shown not to be the case.[16] Skeptical author Jason Colavito points out that all of their evidence is circumstantial, and that, in the 1960s, the atheistic Soviet Union promoted the ancient astronaut concept in an attempt to undermine the West's faith in religion.[2]

"Perfect" solar eclipses

In 1965, author Isaac Asimov observed: "What makes a total eclipse so remarkable is the sheer astronomical accident that the Moon fits so snugly over the Sun. The Moon is just large enough to cover the Sun completely (at times) so that a temporary night falls and the stars spring out. [...] The Sun's greater distance makes up for its greater size and the result is that the Moon and the Sun appear to be equal in size. [...] There is no astronomical reason why Moon and Sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidence, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion."[17]

Since the 1970s, conspiracy theorists have cited Asimov's observations on solar eclipses as evidence of the Moon's artificiality.[18][19] Mainstream astronomers reject this interpretation. They note that the angular diameters of Sun and Moon vary by several percent over time and do not actually "perfectly" match during eclipses.[20] Nor is Earth the only planet with such a satellite: Saturn's moon Prometheus has roughly the same angular diameter as the Sun when viewed from Saturn.[20]

Some scholars have claimed that "the conditions required for perfect solar eclipses are the same conditions generally acknowledged to be necessary for intelligent life to emerge"; If so, the Moon's size and orbit might be best explained by the weak anthropic principle.[20][21][22]

Scientific perspective

Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that the Moon is a solid body which formed from an impact between Earth and a planetoid.

Origin of the Moon
Main article: Giant-impact hypothesis

Historically, it was theorized that the Moon originated when a rapidly-spinning Earth expelled a piece of its mass.[23] This was proposed by George Darwin (son of the famous biologist Charles Darwin) in 1879[24] and retained some popularity until Apollo.[23] The Austrian geologist Otto Ampferer in 1925 also suggested the emerging of the Moon as cause for continental drift.[25] A second hypothesis argued the Earth and the Moon formed together as a double system from the primordial accretion disk of the Solar System.[26][27] Finally, a third hypothesis suggested that the Moon may have been a planetoid captured by Earth's gravity.[23][28][29]

The modern explanation for the origin of the Moon is usually the giant-impact hypothesis, which argues a Mars-sized body struck the Earth, making a debris ring that eventually collected into a single natural satellite, the Moon.[30][31] The giant-impact hypothesis is currently the favored scientific hypothesis for the formation of the Moon.[32]

Internal structure
Schematic cross-section of the internal structure of the Moon

Multiple lines of evidence disprove that the Moon is hollow.[1][33] One involves moment of inertia parameters; the other involves seismic observations.[1][33] The moment of inertia parameters indicate that the core of the Moon is both dense and small, with the rest of the Moon consisting of material with nearly-constant density. Seismic observations have been made, constraining the thickness of the Moon's crust, mantle and core, demonstrating it could not be hollow.[34]

Mainstream scientific opinion on the internal structure of the Moon overwhelmingly supports a solid internal structure with a thin crust, an extensive mantle and a small denser core.[35][36]

Moment of inertia factor
Body Moment
of inertia
factor
Hollow Sphere0.67
Uniform Sphere0.4
Denser at Core< 0.4
Moon0.39
Earth0.33
All Mass at Core0.0

The moment of inertia factor is a number, ranging from 0 to .67, that represents the distribution of mass in a spherical body. A moment of inertia factor of 0 represents a body with all its mass concentrated at its central core, while a factor of .67 represents a perfectly hollow sphere.[37] A moment of inertia factor of 0.4 corresponds to a sphere of uniform density, while factors less than 0.4 represent bodies with cores that are more dense than their surfaces. [38] The Earth, with its dense inner core, has a moment of inertia factor of 0.3307 [38]

In 1965, astronomer Wallace John Eckert attempted to calculate the lunar moment of inertia factor using a novel analysis of the Moon's perigee and node.[39] His calculations suggested the Moon might be hollow, a result Eckert rejected as absurd.[40] Subsequent analysis revealed Eckert had failed to account for nonuniformity of Earth's rotation in the orbital theory of the Moon.[41] By 1968, other methods had allowed the Moon's moment of inertia factor to be accurately calculated at its accepted value.[42]

From 1969 to 1973, five retroreflectors were installed on the Moon during the Apollo program (11, 14, and 15) and Lunokhod 1 and 2 missions.[43] These reflectors made it possible to measure the distance between the surfaces of the Earth and the Moon using extremely precise laser ranging. True (physical) libration of the Moon measured via Lunar laser ranging constrains the moment of inertia factor to 0.394 ± 0.002.[44] This is very close to the value for a solid object with radially constant density, which would be 0.4.[44]

Seismic activity
Main article: Lunar seismology

From 1969 through 1972, Apollo astronauts installed several seismographic measuring systems on the Moon and their data made available to scientists (such as those from the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package). The Apollo 11 instrument functioned through August of the landing year. The instruments placed by the Apollo 12, 14, 15, and 16 missions were functional until they were switched off in 1977.[45][46]

The existence of moonquakes was an unexpected discovery from seismometers. Analysis of lunar seismic data has helped constrain the thickness of the crust (~45 km)[36][47] and mantle, as well as the core radius (~330 km).[35]

Doppler Gravity Experiment
A visualization of the lunar gravity field based on Lunar Prospector data.

In 1998, the United States launched the Lunar Prospector, which hosted the Doppler Gravity Experiment (DGE) -- the first polar, low-altitude mapping of the lunar gravity field. The Prospector DGE obtained data constituted the "first truly operational gravity map of the Moon".[48] The purpose of the Lunar Prospector DGE was to learn about the surface and internal mass distribution of the Moon.[48] This was accomplished by measuring the Doppler shift in the S-band tracking signal as it reaches Earth, which can be converted to spacecraft accelerations.[48] The accelerations can be processed to provide estimates of the lunar gravity field. Estimates of the surface and internal mass distribution give information on the crust, lithosphere, and internal structure of the Moon.[48]

Fiction

Conspiracy theory
  • Don Wilson, Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon (1975) and Secrets of Our Spaceship Moon (1979), inspired by Vasin-Shcherbakov, Wilson popularized the Spaceship Moon hypothesis.[55]
  • George H. Leonard, Somebody Else Is On The Moon (1976) Argues the Moon is inhabited by an Alien race, but NASA has covered up this fact.[56]
  • Fred Steckling, We Discovered Alien Bases on the Moon (1981) [57][58]
  • Jim Marrs Alien Agenda (1997) Long-time JFK conspiracy theorist Marrs embraced the Spaceship Moon conspiracy theory[59]
  • Christopher Knight & Alan Butler, Who Built the Moon? (2005). They suggest humans from the future traveled into the past to build the Moon in order to safeguard human evolution.[60]
  • David Icke, Human Race Get off Your Knees – The Lion Sleeps No More (2010). Icke suggests that the Moon is in fact a space station from which Reptilians manipulate human thought.[61]

References
  1. "Is the Moon Hollow?". Armagh Planetarium. 22 May 2015. Archived from the original on 11 April 2019. Retrieved 26 August 2016.
  2. ""Spaceship Moon" and Soviet Scientific Politics". JasonColavito.com. 23 September 2012.
  3. "Hollow Moon". Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute. 2 February 2009.
  4. "An Account of the cause of the Change of the Variation of the Magnetic Needle; with an Hypothesis of the Structure of the Internal Pardnerrts of the Earth". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. III (195). pp. 470–78, esp. p. 475. 1683–1694. doi:10.1098/rstl.1686.0107.
  5. N. Kollerstrom (1992). "The Hollow World of Edmond Halley". Journal for the History of Astronomy. 23 (3): 185–92. Bibcode:1992JHA....23..185K. doi:10.1177/002182869202300304. S2CID 126158643.
  6. Jerome Hamilton Buckley, ed. (1975). The Worlds of Victorian Fiction. Harvard University Press. p. 412, n. 27. ISBN 978-0-674-96205-7.
  7. "Taking tea with David Icke, the world's best-known conspiracy theorist". The Sydney Morning Herald. 16 July 2016.
  8. "Mocked prophet: what is David Icke's appeal?". New Humanist. 10 December 2014.
  9. "The Strange Origin of the Hollow Moon Conspiracy Theory". 18 October 2022.
  10. Cain, Fraser (3 November 2008). "Density of the Moon". Universe Today. Retrieved 21 November 2016.
  11. "Why Do We Have a Two-Faced Moon?". Bad Astronomer. 1 July 2014.
  12. "Moonquakes". NASA. 15 March 2006.
  13. Wernher von Braun (March 1970). "How APOLLO 13 Will Probe The Moon's Interior". Popular Science.
  14. Dominic Phelan, ed. (2013). Cold War Space Sleuths. Springer-Praxis. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-4614-3052-0.
  15. "14 Sep 1970, 4 – The Expositor at Newspapers.com". Newspapers.com.
  16. Öpik, Ernst Julius (March 1963). "News and Comments: Phobos, Nature of Acceleration". Irish Astronomical Journal. 6: 40. Bibcode:1963IrAJ....6R..40.
  17. Isaac Asimov, Of Time And Space 4. The Heavenly Zoo
  18. Wilson, Don (March 2, 1979). Secrets of Our Spaceship Moon. Dell. ISBN 978-0-440-16550-7 – via Google Books.
  19. Marrs, Jim (March 22, 2000). Alien Agenda: Investigating the Extraterrestrial Presence Among Us. Harper Collins. ISBN 978-0-06-095536-6 – via Google Books.
  20. "23 Jun 1999, 16 – The Daily Telegraph at Newspapers.com". Newspapers.com.
  21. Gonzalez, G. (1999). "Wonderful eclipses". Astronomy & Geophysics. 40 (3): 3.18–3.20. doi:10.1093/astrog/40.3.3.18.
  22. Gonzalez, Guillermo; Richards, Jay W. (March 1, 2004). The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-59698-707-4 – via Google Books.
  23. "Lunar Origin. JNot a valid reference must be a Scientifi publication". Archived from the original on 2018-03-23. Retrieved 2018-03-23.
  24. Wise, D. U. (1966). "Origin of the Moon by Fission". In Marsden, B. G.; Cameron, A. G. W. (eds.). The Earth-Moon System. Boston, MA: Springer. pp. 213–223. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8401-4_14. ISBN 978-1-4684-8403-8.
  25. Ampferer, O. (July 1925). "Über Kontinentverschiebungen". Naturwissenschaften (in German). 13 (31): 669–675. Bibcode:1925NW.....13..669A. doi:10.1007/BF01558835. S2CID 40767867. Fulltext page 672.
  26. The Formation of the Moon burro.cwru.edu
  27. "BBC Earth | Home". Bbcearth.com.
  28. "14 Jan 1968, Page 124 – The Philadelphia Inquirer at Newspapers.com". Newspapers.com.
  29. Cummings, Warren D. (25 September 2019). Evolving Theories on the Origin of the Moon. Springer. ISBN 9783030291198.
  30. "NASA – NASA Lunar Scientists Develop New Theory on Earth and Moon Formation". Nasa.gov.
  31. Staff (September 7, 2014). "Revisiting the Moon". The New York Times. Retrieved September 8, 2014.
  32. Canup, R.; Asphaug, E. (2001). "Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation" (PDF). Nature. 412 (6848): 708–712. Bibcode:2001Natur.412..708C. doi:10.1038/35089010. PMID 11507633. S2CID 4413525. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-07-30. Retrieved 2011-12-10.
  33. "About the Ask an Astronomer Team". Ask an Astronomer. Cornell University. 14 November 2011. Archived from the original on 4 February 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  34. "Can we prove that the Moon isn't hollow?". Ask an Astronomer. Cornell University. October 2007. Archived from the original on 2008-04-22.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  35. "NASA Research Team Reveals Moon Has Earth-Like Core". NASA. 6 January 2011.
  36. Mark Wieczorek and 15 coauthors (2006). "The constitution and structure of the lunar interior" (PDF). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry. 60 (1): 221–364. Bibcode:2006RvMG...60..221W. doi:10.2138/rmg.2006.60.3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-12-21.
  37. Miriam Riner (December 2008). Compositional Variations in the Inner Solar System (Ph.D.). Arizona State University. p. 3.
  38. Williams, James G. (1994). "Contributions to the Earth's obliquity rate, precession, and nutation". The Astronomical Journal. 108: 711. Bibcode:1994AJ....108..711W. doi:10.1086/117108. ISSN 0004-6256. S2CID 122370108.
  39. Eckert, W. J. (1965). "1965AJ.....70..787E Page 788". The Astronomical Journal. 70: 787. Bibcode:1965AJ.....70..787E. doi:10.1086/109818.
  40. "18 Apr 1965, Page 1 – Colorado Springs Gazette-Telegraph at Newspapers.com". Newspapers.com.
  41. Meshcheryakov, G. A.; Zazulyak, P. M.; Kirichuk, V. V. (1976). "1976SvA....20..351M Page 351". Soviet Astronomy. 20: 351. Bibcode:1976SvA....20..351M.
  42. Solomon, Sean C.; Toksöz, M. Nafi (December 1, 1968). "On the density distribution in the moon". Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. 1 (7): 475–484. Bibcode:1968PEPI....1..475S. doi:10.1016/0031-9201(68)90016-2 – via ScienceDirect.
  43. Chapront, J.; Chapront-Touzé, M.; Francou, G. (1999). "Determination of the lunar orbital and rotational parameters and of the ecliptic reference system orientation from LLR measurements and IERS data". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 343: 624–633. Bibcode:1999A&A...343..624C.
  44. AS Konopliv; AB Binder; LL Hood; AB Kucinskas; WL Sjogren; JG Williams (1998). "Improved Gravity Field of the Moon from Lunar Prospector". Science. 281 (5382): 1476–80. Bibcode:1998Sci...281.1476K. doi:10.1126/science.281.5382.1476. PMID 9727968.
  45. Nunn, C.; et al. (July 3, 2020). "Lunar Seismology: A Data and Instrumentation Review". Space Science Reviews. 216 (5): 89. Bibcode:2020SSRv..216...89N. doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00709-3.
  46. Goins, N. R.; et al. (June 10, 1981). "Lunar seismology – The internal structure of the moon". Journal of Geophysical Research. 86: 5061. Bibcode:1981JGR....86.5061G. doi:10.1029/JB086iB06p05061. hdl:2060/19790009611.
  47. A. Khan; K. Mosegaard (2002). "An inquiry into the lunar interior: A nonlinear inversion of the Apollo lunar seismic data" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research. 107 (E6): 5036. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5036K. doi:10.1029/2001JE001658. ISSN 0148-0227.
  48. "Doppler Gravity Experiment Results". NASA. Archived from the original on July 12, 2008. Retrieved July 14, 2008.
  49. H.G. Wells (1901). The First Men in The Moon. George Newnes Ltd. pp. 285–88.
  50. Edgar Rice Burroughs (1926). "2". The Moon Maid. A. C. McClurg.
  51. Maria Nikolajeva (2000). From Mythic to Linear: Time in Children's Literature. The Scarecrow Press, Inc. p. 74. ISBN 978-0-8108-4952-5.
  52. Donald E. Palumbo (2016). An Asimov Companion. McFarland & Company. p. 123. ISBN 978-0-7864-9823-9.
  53. "David Weber takes readers on a tour Off Armageddon Reef and discusses writing, religion and responsibility". Sci Fi Weekly. 7 May 2007. Archived from the original on 29 January 2008.
  54. "CAPTURING A COLOSSAL CLOSE ENCOUNTER OF THE LUNAR KIND IN MOONFALL". VFX Voice Magazine. 2022-01-10. Retrieved 2022-02-21.
  55. "2 Nov 1975, Page 62 – Detroit Free Press". Newspapers.com. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  56. Discussed in Milton Cooper's 1991 conspiracy work Behold a Pale Horse
  57. Steckling, Fred (1981). We Discovered Alien Bases on the Moon. F. Steckling. ISBN 978-0-942176-00-1.
  58. Discussed in Milton Cooper's 1991 conspiracy work Behold a Pale Horse
  59. Marrs, Jim (1997). Alien Agenda: Investigating the Extraterrestrial Presence Among Us. HarperCollinsPublishers. ISBN 978-0-06-018642-5.
  60. "Peer review: Who Built the Moon?". The Guardian. 1 September 2005.
  61. David G. Robertson (2016). UFOs, Conspiracy Theories and the New Age: Millennial Conspiracism. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 148. ISBN 978-1-4742-5322-2.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.