Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.

Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 26, 2002. The Court held that for complaints in employment discrimination cases, a plaintiff is not required to allege specific facts that establish a prima facie case as required by the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework.[1][2]

Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 15, 2002
Decided February 26, 2002
Full case nameAkos Swierkiewicz, Petitioner v. Sorema N. A.
Docket no.00-1853
Citations534 U.S. 506 (more)
122 S. Ct. 992; 152 L. Ed. 2d 1; 2002 U.S. LEXIS 1374
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinion
MajorityJustice Thomas, joined by unanimous

Background

Plaintiff brought suit against his former employer, alleging wrongful termination due to his national origin and age, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967.[2][3][4] The District Court dismissed the complaint, finding that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case because he failed to allege facts that would support an inference of discrimination. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed, holding that plaintiff did not meet his burden set forth in the McDonnell Douglas framework.[2][3][4]

Decision

In a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Thomas, the Court reversed, holding that “an employment discrimination complaint need not include such facts and instead must contain only ‘a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.’ Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 8(a)(2).”[5][2] The Court also stated that the required prima facie case in the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework is a “flexible evidentiary standard” instead of a “rigid pleading requirement.”.[6][2][3][7]

See also

References
  1. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002)
  2. "Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002)". Justia Law. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  3. "Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A." Oyez,www.oyez.org/cases/2001/00-1853. Accessed 9 Sep. 2023.
  4. "SWIERKIEWICZ v. SOREMA N. A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002)". FindLaw. Retrieved September 11, 2023.
  5. Swierkiewicz, 534 U.S. at 508.
  6. Swierkiewicz, 534 U.S. at 512.
  7. "Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A. 00-1853". American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved September 11, 2023.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.