Transcranial pulsed ultrasound

Transcranial pulsed ultrasound (TPU) uses low intensity, low frequency ultrasound (LILFU) to stimulate the brain. In 2002, Dr. Alexander Bystritsky first proposed the idea that this methodology contained therapeutic benefits.[1] Beginning in 2008, Dr. William Tyler and his research team from Arizona State University began an investigation and development of this alternative neuromodulation without the harmful effects and risks of invasive surgery. They discovered that this low-power ultrasound is able to stimulate high neuron activity which allows for the manipulation of the brain waves through an external source. Unlike deep brain stimulation or Vagus nerve stimulation, which use implants and electrical impulses, TPU is a noninvasive and focused procedure that does not require the implantation of electrodes that could damage the nervous tissue. Its use is applicable in the various fields including but not limited to medical and military science. Although this technology holds great potential to introducing new and beneficial alternatives to conventional brain manipulation, it is a relatively young science and has certain obstructions to its full development such as a lack of complete understanding and control of every safety measure.[2]

Research and applications

Most of the research as of 2010 revolved around projects to utilize TPU as a method of treating neural disorders and improving cognitive function. However, in 2012 Dr. Tyler also began research on ultrasound's potential to stopping seizures.[3] Dr. Tyler and his team still continue to improve their knowledge of brain stimulation therapy and hope to provide a strong foundation in the implementation of such methods.[4]

Medical field

Scientists continue to test a variety of mammals such as humans, monkeys[5] and mice on positively affecting the treatment of epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, chronic pain, coma, dystonia, psychoses and depression by applying safe, low-intensity, TPU. Because the potential for this technology covers a wide variety of benefits, continued research into its safety and efficacy is expected to accelerate its integration into standard medical practice.[2]

Military

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is undergoing research to develop a helmet that could control the mental stress of soldiers through the use of TPU. It could have the potential to moderate a soldier's stress and anxiety levels.[6] Sound waves would target specific areas of the brain to stimulate activity in regions only a few cubic millimeters in size. This would allow them to target very specific areas of the brain with great accuracy and without inflicting damage to its surroundings. A prototype of this device is currently being worked upon to better the ability and potential of soldiers.[7]

Testing

Conventional ultrasound used for anatomical analysis typically uses a wave frequency of about 20 MHz to penetrate the bodily tissue and produce images. In comparison, the low frequency of TPU has a sub-thermal exposure of about 5.7 MHz. By significantly reducing the wave frequency, excitable tissue can be manipulated without overexposure or detectable damage. Scientists have discovered that focusing on targeted brain regions in animals has been proven to alter their behavior, their cells' electrical properties (electrophysiology), and their synaptic plasticity, which is essentially the neuron's ability to function.[1]

For instance, when focused on the motor cortex of mice, TPU has been shown to induce paw movements without changing the structure or function of that area of the brain. This proves that this method is capable of controlling brain activity at a high cognitive level. It is clear that shorter waves are able to activate neuron activity while longer waves inhibit it. However, the mechanism responsible for this reaction is yet to be discovered. A recent leading hypothesis is the mechanical manipulation of stretch-sensitive membranes actually stimulates certain voltage-gated ion channels, such as sodium or calcium, thus modulating neuronal activity.[1]

Limitations

Clinical trials have been used to determine any outstanding harmful effects. Although no subjects have displayed long-term neurological abnormalities as a result of these tests, this is a relatively new procedure and has not been studied enough to predict long term side effects. Even though it is a safer alternative to surgery because it is non-invasive, ultrasound always holds the potential to unintentionally disarrange the neurons in a harmful way and cause minor hemorrhages after long-term exposure.[8]

Therapeutic benefits

Opposing high-frequency ultrasound, LILFU holds the following benefits: lower absorption in tissue, greater physical penetration depth in tissue, stronger particle deflections, significantly better acoustic penetration and power in bone, greater influence in kinetic effects, immediate/short-term effect results, longer/persistent effects after procedure and a higher degree of patient safety.[9]

References
  1. Hameroff, Stewart (2013). "Transcranial ultrasound (TUS) effects on mental states: A pilot study" (PDF). Brain Stimulation. Elsevier. 6 (3): 409–15. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2012.05.002. PMID 22664271. S2CID 206354818. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 March 2013. Retrieved 25 October 2013.
  2. "Ultrasound Shown To Exert Remote Control Of Brain Circuits". ScienceDaily. Brain Circuits. Retrieved 23 October 2013.
  3. Tyler, William. "Our Research in the News". Tyler Laboratory. Retrieved 10 November 2013.
  4. Tyler, William. "Research Program Summary". The Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute. Archived from the original on 3 November 2013. Retrieved 23 October 2013.
  5. Deffieux, T., Younan, Y., Wattiez, N., Tanter, M., Pouget, P., & Aubry, J. F. (2013). Low-intensity focused ultrasound modulates monkey visuomotor behavior. Current Biology, 23(23), 2430-2433
  6. Dillow, Clay (10 September 2010). "DARPA Wants to Install Transcranial Ultrasonic Mind Control Devices in Soldiers' Helmets". Popular Science. Bonnier Corporation. Retrieved 21 February 2016.
  7. Tyler, Dr. William J. "Remote Control of Brain Activity Using Ultrasound". Armed with Science. U.S. Defense Department. Retrieved 21 February 2016.
  8. Daffertshofer, M. (2005). "Transcranial low-frequency ultrasound-mediated thrombolysis in brain ischemia: increased risk of hemorrhage with combined ultrasound and tissue plasminogen activator: results of a phase II clinical trial". Stroke. 36 (7): 1441–6. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000170707.86793.1a. PMID 15947262.
  9. "Why low-frequency Ultrasound?". UltraPuls. Retrieved 13 November 2013.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.