Transnational psychology

Transnational psychology is a branch of psychology that applies postcolonial, context-sensitive cultural psychology, and transnational feminist lenses to the field of psychology to study, understand, and address the impact of colonization, imperialism, and globalization, and to counter the Western bias in the field of psychology.[1][2][3] Transnational psychologists partner with members of local communities to examine the unique psychological characteristics of groups without regard to nation-state boundaries.

Transnational Psychology

As articulated by Kurtis, Adams, Grabe, Else-Quest, Collins, Machizawa and Rice, transnational psychology aims to counter the Western bias in the field of psychology.[4] Kurtis and Adams proposed applying the principles of transnational feminism and using a context-sensitive cultural psychology lens to reconsider, de-naturalize, and de-universalize psychological science.[1] They identified people in the non-Western, "Majority World" (areas where the majority of the world's population lives) as valuable resources for revising traditional psychological science.[1] Transnational psychology is essentially synonymous with transnational feminist psychology.[4] Both transnational feminism and transnational psychology are concerned with how globalization and capitalism affect people across nations, races, genders, classes, and sexualities. The transnational academic paradigm draws from postcolonial feminist theories, which emphasize how colonialist legacies have shaped and continue to shape the social, economic, and political oppression of people across the globe. It rejects the idea that people from different regions have the same subjectivities and recognizes that global capitalism has created similar relations of exploitation and inequality. A 2015 Summit organized by Machizawa, Collins, and Rice further developed transnational psychology[5] by inspiring presentations and publications that applied transnational feminist principles to psychological topics.[3][6][7]

International psychology, global psychology, and cross-cultural psychology share the common goal of making psychology more universal and less ethnocentric in character, whereas transnational psychology is concerned with uncovering the particularities of the psychology of groups without regard to nation-state boundaries and is opposed to universalization.

Transnational intersectionality

Grabe and Else-Quest proposed the concept of "transnational intersectionality" that expands current conceptions of intersectionality, adding global forces to the analysis of how oppressive institutions are interconnected.[2] In addition, Bhatia believes that a transnational cultural psychology is needed examine the psychology of diasporas, who are impacted by globalization and consequently have many "homes," languages, and selves.[8] This movement asks to critique the ideologies of traditional white, classist, western models of psychology practices from an intersectional approach and how these connect with labor, theoretical applications, and analytical practice on a geopolitical scale.

WEIRD bias

Scholars have noted that most of the articles in American Psychological Association journals are about largely white, US populations, despite U.S. citizens only constituting about 5% of the world's population. Arnett (2008) pointed out that psychologists have no grounds for assuming psychological processes are universal and generalizing research findings to the rest of the global population.[9] Henrich, Heine, and Norenzayan (2010) noted that although only 1/8 of people worldwide live in regions that fall into the WEIRD (western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic) societal classification, 60–90% of psychology studies are performed on participants from these areas.[10][3] They gave examples of results that differ significantly between people from WEIRD and tribal cultures, including the Müller-Lyer illusion. Arnett (2008), Altmaier and Hall (2008), and Morgan-Consoli et al. (2018) all view the Western bias in research and theory as a serious problem considering psychologists are increasingly applying psychological principles developed in WEIRD regions in their research, clinical work, and consultation with populations around the world.[9][11][12] In 2018, Rad, Martingano & Ginges stated that nearly a decade after Henrich et al.'s paper, over 80% of the samples used in studies published in the journal, Psychological Science, were from the WEIRD population. Their analysis also showed that several studies did not fully disclose the origin of their samples, and the authors offer a set of recommendations to editors and reviewers to reduce the WEIRD bias.[13]

See also

References
  1. Kurtiş, Tuğçe; Adams, Glenn (21 August 2015). "Decolonizing Liberation: Toward a Transnational Feminist Psychology". Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 3 (1): 388–413. doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.326. ISSN 2195-3325.
  2. Grabe, Shelly; Else-Quest, Nicole M. (June 2012). "The Role of Transnational Feminism in Psychology: Complementary Visions". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 36 (2): 158–161. doi:10.1177/0361684312442164. ISSN 0361-6843. S2CID 53585351.
  3. Transnational psychology of women : expanding international and intersectional approaches. Collins, Lynn H.,, Machizawa, Sayaka,, Rice, Joy K. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. ISBN 1-4338-3124-4. OCLC 1090706835.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  4. "Introduction to transnational psychology". Transnational psychology of women : expanding international and intersectional approaches (PDF). Collins, Lynn H.,, Machizawa, Sayaka,, Rice, Joy K. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. ISBN 1-4338-3124-4. OCLC 1090706835.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  5. "Psychology of Women International Psychology of Women Summit". Sexuality, Women, & Gender Project. 23 September 2015. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
  6. Psychological Practice with Women : Guidelines, Diversity, Empowerment. Enns, Carolyn Zerbe., Rice, Joy K., Nutt, Roberta Lynn, 1944– (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. 2015. ISBN 978-1-4338-1813-4. OCLC 889759649.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  7. Integrating multiculturalism and intersectionality into the psychology curriculum : strategies for instructors. Mena, Jasmine A.,, Quina, Kathryn. Washington, DC. ISBN 978-1-4338-3008-2. OCLC 1060181008.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  8. Bhatia, Sunil (February 2010). "Review: Theorizing Indigenous Psychology: UICHOL KIM, KUO-SHU YANG, & KWANG-KUO HWANG (EDS.), Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: People in Context. New York: Springer, 2006. 518 pp. ISBN 978-0-387-28661-7 (hbk)". Theory & Psychology. 20 (1): 137–140. doi:10.1177/0959354309345640. ISSN 0959-3543. S2CID 144900847.
  9. Arnett, Jeffrey J. (2008). "The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American". American Psychologist. 63 (7): 602–614. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602. ISSN 1935-990X. PMID 18855491.
  10. Henrich, Joseph; Heine, Steven J.; Norenzayan, Ara (June 2010). "The weirdest people in the world?". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 33 (2–3): 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0013-26A1-6. ISSN 0140-525X. PMID 20550733. S2CID 219338876.
  11. Global promise: quality assurance and accountability in professional psychology. Hall, Judy E., Altmaier, Elizabeth M. New York: Oxford University Press. 2008. ISBN 978-0-19-530608-8. OCLC 174134048.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  12. Morgan-Consoli, Melissa L.; Inman, Arpana G.; Bullock, Merry; Nolan, Susan A. (July 2018). "Framework for competencies for U.S. psychologists engaging internationally". International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation. 7 (3): 174–188. doi:10.1037/ipp0000090. ISSN 2157-3891. S2CID 159028411.
  13. Rad, Mostafa Salari; Martingano, Alison Jane; Ginges, Jeremy (6 November 2018). "Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens : Making psychological science more representative of the human population". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (45): 11401–11405. Bibcode:2018PNAS..11511401R. doi:10.1073/pnas.1721165115. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 6233089. PMID 30397114.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.