Turnip Winter

The Turnip Winter (German: Steckrübenwinter) of 1916 to 1917 was a period of profound civilian hardship in Germany during World War I.

A ration stamp of the city of Erfurt, 1917 for 1 kilogram (2.2 lb) of turnips per week

Introduction

For the duration of World War I, Germany was constantly under threat of starvation due to the success of the Allied blockade of Germany. Whatever meagre rations remained were sent to the troops fighting the war, so the civilian population faced the brunt of the famine. The winter of 1916–1917, later known as the "Turnip Winter", marked one of the harshest years in wartime Germany. Poor autumn weather led to an equally poor potato harvest and much of the produce that was shipped to German cities rotted. Germany's massive military recruitment played a direct role in this, as all areas of the economy suffered from lack of manpower, including agriculture.[1] The loss of the potato crop forced the German population to subsist on Swedish turnip or rutabaga as an alternative.

Traditionally used as animal feed, the root vegetable was virtually the only food available throughout the winter of 1917. Malnourishment and illness claimed thousands of lives, mainly those of civilians, and wounded soldiers who had returned to the home front. A distinct example of the conditions at home in Germany was the spike in female mortality, which when compared to pre-war rates, increased by 11.5% in 1916 and 30% in 1917.[2] This rate increased due to malnutrition and disease that was commonplace amongst the German populace. The famine and hardship of the Turnip Winter severely affected the morale within Germany, revealing to the Germans just how hard-pressed the country had become under the duress of the war.

Background

At war with France, Britain, and Russia beginning in the summer of 1914, Germany faced the strain of a two-front war. To evade this compromising situation the Germans developed a strategy known as the Schlieffen Plan. The Plan proposed that if German troops could invade France through Belgium and defeat the French, quickly removing one front, they would then be able to focus solely on Russia.[3] German faith in the Schlieffen Plan proved overly optimistic and French forces commanded by General Joseph Joffre “checked the German attack at the Marne River in September,” in what would be known as the First Battle of the Marne.[4] After facing defeat at the Battle of the Marne, the actual strain of a two-front war became progressively more real for Germany. The Germans had assumed that the Schlieffen Plan would prove successful and that the war would not be a prolonged affair.[5] In the months after the Battle of the Marne, German troops faced a succession of battles against combined British and French armies, known as the “Race to the Sea,” where the opposing forces attempted to “turn the other’s flank" in a contest to reach the North Sea.

From October to late November, the armies clashed in a nearly month-long battle at Ypres in Flanders, near the North Sea, which incurred a devastating loss of life for both sides.[6] After Ypres, only months after the beginning of the Great War, the German army had already lost 241,000 men.[7] As the end of 1914 approached, fighting in Western Europe, ultimately known as the “Western Front,” settled to a draining affair as the German, French and British lines entrenched themselves.[8] In response to the early land campaigns, the British responded with naval measures. In order to wear down German forces, the Royal Navy, towards the end of 1914, blockaded “the northern approaches to the North Sea in an effort to cut off supplies to the soldiers and civilians of the Central Powers.”[9] Locked into sustained fighting on the Western Front, which had already reduced supplies, the Germans now faced both the Russian threat in the east and the British blockade that “cut Germany off from sources of essential commodities.”[10]

The British blockade highlighted major flaws in German wartime society. Although the German economy was an international juggernaut that “managed to produce most of the industrial requirements of the war,” the nation “failed to secure a sufficiency of food.”[11] With continued fighting on two fronts and supplies restricted by the British blockade, German food shortages at home and for troops became increasingly troublesome issues. During the winter of 1916–17, such problems reached new levels in a period known as the "Turnip Winter'".

The Turnip Winter
Rutabaga or Swedish turnip – usually used in Germany to feed pigs

The Turnip Winter occurred during the winter of 1916–1917 in Germany. Continually poor weather conditions led to a diminished harvest, most notably in cereal production.[12]: 233  Additionally, an Allied blockade first instituted in 1914 contributed to reduced food supplies from the Central Powers by 33 percent.[13] Food shortages were also attributed to a seizure of horses for the army, the conscription of a large part of the agricultural workforce, and a shortage of farming fertilizers caused by the diversion of nitrogen to explosives production.[14]

In response, the German government initiated a food rationing campaign. The campaign began with the establishment of the War Food Office on May 22, 1916. The office was responsible for “the perception of the Chancellor to create and uphold the military and nation's food supply.”[15] In the summer of 1917, the food allocated only offered 1,560 calories (6,500 kJ) daily diet and dropped to 1,000 calories per day in winter.[12]: 237  However, the Imperial Health Office (renamed "Reich Health Office" in 1918) required 3,000 calories (12,600 kJ) for a healthy adult male, three times what was available in winter. The Health Office also set maximum prices to ensure the nutrition of Germany's poor. Current historians attest that national figures regarding the event are misleading, stating farmers and soldiers ate better than common folk. The government also worked to combat cereal shortages by making bread baked with potato. At the rise of a potato famine in 1916, a German culinary staple, the government substituted the item with turnips hoping to make up the difference. In turn, German soldiers, "increasingly relied, for sheer survival, on one of the least appealing vegetables known to man, the humble turnip."[16] During this time, the black market became a prominent means of obtaining otherwise scarce foodstuffs. Historian Avner Offer suggests that approximately “one-fifth to one-third of food could only be obtained through illegal channels.”[17]

Social unrest

Driven by starvation, children would break into barns and loot orchards in search of food. Such disregard for authority effectively doubled the youth crime rate in Germany.[18] Historian G.J. Meyer noted that, according to a report from a prominent Berlin physician, “eighty thousand children had died of starvation in 1916.”[16] Worker strikes were also common during this time as food shortages often directly led to labor unrest. The most notable strike took place in Düsseldorf in the summer of 1917 where workers complained of uneven food distribution.[19]

Military issues

In 1916, a naval revolt arose from protests against inedible rations. Sailors claimed that they received rations, shorted by two ounces, for three consecutive weeks while officers ate and drank luxuriously.[20] The conservative German government believed a Socialist conspiracy was behind the mutiny. In 1926, German officials put Socialist Deputy Wilhelm Dittmann on trial for the uprising. Through letters from sailors to their respective homes, Dittmann illustrated that food was inedible and “did not have any political significance.”[20] The letters cleared the Socialist party from accusations that they had sought to extend the Bolshevik Revolution into Germany.[20]

Aftermath

The solution to replace potatoes with turnips greatly affected the diets and nutrition of the German people during and after the war. By the start of the war, Germany consumed potatoes more than any other food, and the shortage greatly changed the gastronomic tastes of the Germans.[21] In addition to affecting the Germans’ tastes, replacing the potatoes did not allow the German people to get the necessary vitamins and minerals they were accustomed to acquiring.[21] The turnips did not affect just the potatoes, but the bread as well. Bread called Kriegsbrot ("War bread")[note 1] contained flour from potatoes. When replaced by substitutes, the bread became significantly harder to digest, making it difficult for the body to adapt to this change. The Kriegsbrot demonstrates how the Turnip Winter reached the front lines as well, as soldiers were greatly affected by the lack of food.[21] The continued search for substitutes during the blockade truly affected the ability for the German people to obtain food in cities. One woman recounts the experience by saying:

We are all growing thinner every day, and the rounded contours of the German nation have become a legend of the past. We are all gaunt and bony now, and have dark shadows round our eyes, and our thoughts are chiefly taken up with wondering what our next meal will be, and dreaming of the good things that once existed.[21]

However, not only were there physical symptoms, as she describes, but also social consequences, such as the pillaging of food stores after the war.[21]

Notes
  1. Cozean, Jesse (2011). My Grandfather's War: A Young Man's Lessons from the Greatest Generation. Globe Pequot. p. 112. ISBN 9780762776092. The recipe, as quoted from the records of the German Food Providing Ministry published in Berlin in 1941, was "50% bruised rye grain, 20% sliced sugar beets, 20% 'tree flour' (sawdust), 10% minced leaves and straw."

References
  1. Grebler, Leo; Winkler, Wilhelm (November 1941). The Cost of the World War to Germany and to Austria-Hungary. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. p. 29.
  2. Keegan, John (2012). The First World War. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. 495. ISBN 9780307831705.
  3. Robbins, Keith (22 August 2002). The First World War. Oxford University Press. p. 30. ISBN 9780192803184. It had appeared, for a time, that the British and French were going to be defeated in northern France and Belgium, with a similar fate awaiting the Germans on their Eastern front and the Serbs on their Northern front, but in all cases the defenders had averted disaster.
  4. Gordon Wright. "France in Modern Times." (New York: W. W. Norton, 1981), 302.
  5. Michael S. Neiberg. Fighting The Great War. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005), 32.
  6. Robbins 2002, p. 34. "At the other end of the line, further German attempts to outflank Verdun failed, but they did capture Saint-Mihiel and a section of the west bank of the Meuse before they were stopped. In the north, a sustained German attack in early October led to the surrender of Antwerp on 10 October. Not even the presence of Winston Churchill and a few thousand British marines could prevent the inevitable. Churchill, King Albert and the Belgian army extricated themselves in time. The Belgians joined the British in Flanders and, together with a small French contribution, they formed a not invariably solid line confronting the Germans. The Germans appeared confident that they could reach the Channel ports, through the British also appeared confident that they could attack. The Allies did give ground in the series of battles which took place between mid-October and mid-November known collectively as the first battle of Ypres, but the Germans did not achieve their objectives."
  7. Keegan 2012, p. 136.
  8. Robbins 2002, p. 34a.
  9. William Kelleher Storey. "First World War: A Concise Global History." (Rowman & Littlefield, 2010), 71.
  10. Meyer, G. J. (2006). A World Undone. Random House Publishing Group. p. 275. ISBN 9780440335870.
  11. Offer, Avner (1989). The First World War: An Agrarian Interpretation. Clarendon Press. p. 23. ISBN 9780198219460.
  12. Starling, Ernest H. (1920). "The Food Supply of Germany During the War". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 83 (2): 225–254. doi:10.2307/2341079. JSTOR 2341079.
  13. Webb, Ken (2017) [2012]. "World War I: From Sarajevo to Versailles". Ken Webb (3rd Edition): 79.
  14. Holborn, Hajo (1982). A History of Modern Germany, Volume 3: 1840-1945. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 459–460. ISBN 978-0691008868.
  15. Tucker, Spencer; Roberts, Priscilla Mary (2005). World War I: A Student Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 1242. ISBN 9781851098798. When the Imperial Grain Corporations (Reichsgetreidestelle) was established in July 1915, [Dr. Georg] Michaelis became chairman of its board. In 1916 he proposed establishment of an independent War Food Office (Kriegsernährungsamt) to organize the entire German food supply on the home front. Due to bureaucratic rivalries, he did not head the new office.
  16. Meyer 2006, p. 415.
  17. Offer 1989, p. 54.
  18. Offer 1989, p. 59.
  19. Offer 1989, p. 69.
  20. Eyre, Lincoln (23 January 1926). "Says Food Caused German Mutinies". The New York Times.
  21. Vincent, Charles Paul (1985). The Politics of Hunger: The Allied Blockade of Germany, 1915-1919. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press. p. 127. ISBN 9780821408209.

Sources

Further reading
  • Neiberg, Michael S. Fighting The Great War. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005.
  • Storey, William Kelleher. First World War: A Concise Global History. Rowman & Littlefield, 2010, 71.
  • Wright, Gordon. France in Modern Times. New York: W. W. Norton, 1981.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.