Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., 595 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a lack of either factual or legal knowledge can excuse an inaccuracy in a copyright registration.[1]
Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. | |
---|---|
Argued November 8, 2021 Decided February 24, 2022 | |
Full case name | Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. |
Docket no. | 20-915 |
Citations | 595 U.S. ___ (more) |
Holding | |
Lack of either factual or legal knowledge can excuse an inaccuracy in a copyright registration. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Breyer, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett |
Dissent | Thomas, joined by Alito; Gorsuch (all but Part II) |
External links
- Text of Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., 595 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Cornell Justia
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.