Urban evolution

Urban evolution refers to the heritable genetic changes of populations in response to urban development and anthropogenic activities in urban areas. Urban evolution can be caused by mutation, genetic drift, gene flow, or evolution by natural selection.[1] Biologists have observed evolutionary change in numerous species compared to their rural counterparts on a relatively short timescale.[1][2]

Strong selection pressures due to urbanization play a big role in this process. The changed environmental conditions lead to selection and adaptive changes in city-dwelling plants and animals.[3][2] Also, there is a significant change in species composition between rural and urban ecosystems.[4]

Shared aspects of cities worldwide also give ample opportunity for scientists to study the specific evolutionary responses in these rapidly changed landscapes independently. How certain organisms (are able to) adapt to urban environments while others cannot, gives a live perspective on rapid evolution.[3][2]

Urbanization

With urban growth, the urban-rural gradient has seen a large shift in distribution of humans, moving from low density to very high in the last millennia. This has brought a large change to environments as well as societies.[5]

Urbanization transforms natural habitats to completely altered living spaces that sustain large human populations. Increasing congregation of humans accompanies the expansion of infrastructure, industry and housing. Natural vegetation and soil are mostly replaced or covered by dense grey materials. Urbanized areas continue to expand both in size and number globally; in 2018, the United Nations estimated that 68% of people globally will live in ever-larger urban areas by 2050.[6]

Urban evolution selective agents

Urbanization intensifies diverse stressors spatiotemporally such that they can act in concert to cause rapid evolutionary consequences such as extinction, maladaptation, or adaptation.[7] Three factors have come to the forefront as the main evolutionary influencers in urban areas: the urban microclimate, pollution, and urban habitat fragmentation.[8] These influence the processes that drive evolution, such as natural and sexual selection, mutation, gene flow and genetic drift.

Urban microclimate

A microclimate is defined as any area where the climate differs from the surrounding area. Modifications of the landscape and other abiotic factors contribute to a changed climate in urban areas. The use of impervious dark surfaces which retain and reflect heat, and human generated heat energy lead to an urban heat island in the center of cities, where the temperature is increased significantly. A large urban microclimate does not only affect temperature, but also rainfall, snowfall, air pressure and wind, the concentration of polluted air, and how long that air remains in the city.[9][10][11]

These climatological transformations increase selection pressure.[12] Certain species have shown to be adapting to the urban microclimate.[3][2]

Urban pollution

Many species have evolved over macroevolutionary timescales by adapting in response to the presence of toxins in the environment of the planet. Human activities, including urbanization, have greatly increased selection pressures due to pollution of the environment, climate change, ocean acidification, and other stressors. Species in urban settings must deal with higher concentrations of contaminants than naturally would occur.[13][14]

There are two main forms of pollution which lead to selective pressures: energy or chemical substances. Energy pollution can come in the form of artificial lighting, sounds, thermal changes, radioactive contamination and electromagnetic waves. Chemical pollution leads to the contamination of the atmosphere, the soil, water and food. All these polluting factors can alter species’ behavior and/or physiology, which in turn can lead to evolutionary changes.[15]

Urban habitat fragmentation

The fragmentation of previously intact natural habitats into smaller pockets which can still sustain organisms leads to selection and adaptation of species. These new urban patches, often called urban green spaces, come in all shapes and sizes ranging from parks, gardens, plants on balconies, to the breaks in pavement and ledges on buildings. The diversity in habitats leads to adaptation of local organisms to their own niche.[16] And contrary to popular belief, there is higher biodiversity in urban areas than previously believed. This is due to the numerous microhabitats. These remnants of wild vegetation or artificially created habitats with often exotic plants and animals all support different kinds of species, which leads to pockets of diversity inside cities.[17]

With habitat fragmentation also comes genetic fragmentation; genetic drift and inbreeding within small isolated populations results in low genetic variation in the gene pool. Low genetic variation is generally seen as bad for chances of survival. This is why probably some species aren’t able to sustain themselves in the fragmented environments of urban areas.[18]

Urban evolution examples

The differing urban environment imposes different selection pressures than the natural setting.[7] These stressors elicit phenotypic changes in populations of organisms which may be due to phenotypic plasticity—the ability of individual organisms to express different phenotypes from the same genotype as a result of exposure to different environmental conditions--or actual genetic changes.

In considering the examples of urban evolution, observed phenotypic divergences or differences in responses to urbanization have to be genetically based and adaptive (increase fitness in that particular environment) to be tagged as evolution and adaptation, respectively. Hence, it will be appropriate to consider neutral/non-adaptive and adaptive urban evolution, with the later needing to be sufficiently proven.[7]

Although there is widespread agreement that adaptation is occurring in urban populations, as of 2021 there are almost no proven examples – almost all are cases of selection, reasoned speculation connecting to adaptive benefit, but no evidence of actual adaptive phenotype.[7] At this time only six examples are demonstrated:

Some interesting cases of possible adaptation which remain insufficiently proven are:

  • Bobcats (Lynx rufus) in Los Angeles, CA, USA were selected for immune genetics loci by an epidemic of mange there, however Serieys et al. 2014 does not provide proof of resistant phenotype.[7]
  • Water dragon lizards (Intellagama lesueurii) in Brisbane, Australia do show divergence.[7] Littleford-Colquhoun et al. 2017 find divergence of both morphology and genetics, but remind readers that they have not demonstrated that this is adaptive.[7]

Claimed examples of urban adaptation include:

  • The common blackbird (Turdus merula) may be the first example of actual speciation by urban evolution, due to the urban heat island and food abundance the urban blackbird has become non-migratory in urban areas. The birds also sing higher and at different times, and they breed earlier than their rural counterparts which leads to sexual selection and a separated gene pool. Natural behavioral differences have also formed between urban and rural birds.[20][21]
  • Urban Anole lizards (Anolis) have evolved longer limbs and more lamellae compared with anolis lizards from forest habitats. This because the lizards can navigate the artificial building materials used in cities better.[3][22]
  • The urban Hawksbeard plant (Crepis) has evolved a higher percentage of heavier nondispersing seeds compared to rural hawksbeard plants, because habitat fragmentation leads to a lower chance of dispersing seeds to settle.[23]
  • White clover (Trifolium repens) has repeatedly adapted to urban environments on a global scale due to genetic changes in a heritable antiherbivore defense trait (hydryogen cyanide) in response to urban-rural changes in drought stress, vegetation and winter temperatures.[24][25]
  • The London Underground mosquito (Culex pipiens f. molestus) has undergone reproductive isolation in populations at higher latitudes, including the London Underground railway populations, where attempted hybridizations between molestus and the surface-living Culex pipiens pipiens are not viable in contrast to populations of pipiens and molestus in cities at lower latitudes where hybrids are found naturally.[26]

In one case selection is widely expected to occur and yet is not found:

References
  1. Johnson, M. T. J., and J. Munshi-South. 2017. Evolution of life in urban environments. Science 358:aam8327.
  2. Diamond, Sarah E.; Martin, Ryan A. (3 November 2021). "Evolution in Cities". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 52 (1): 519–540. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-012021-021402. ISSN 1543-592X. S2CID 239646134.
  3. Bender, Eric (21 March 2022). "Urban evolution: How species adapt to survive in cities". Knowable Magazine. Annual Reviews. doi:10.1146/knowable-031822-1. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  4. McKinney, Michael L. (2002). "Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation: The impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems". BioScience. 52 (10): 883–890. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 265271.
  5. Henderson, J. Vernon (February 2010). "Cities and Development". Journal of Regional Science. 50 (1): 515–540. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00636.x. PMC 4255706. PMID 25484452.
  6. Kondratyeva, Anna; Knapp, Sonja; Durka, Walter; Kühn, Ingolf; Vallet, Jeanne; Machon, Nathalie; Martin, Gabrielle; Motard, Eric; Grandcolas, Philippe; Pavoine, Sandrine (2020). "Urbanization Effects on Biodiversity Revealed by a Two-Scale Analysis of Species Functional Uniqueness vs. Redundancy". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 8. doi:10.3389/fevo.2020.00073. ISSN 2296-701X.
  7. Lambert, Max R.; Brans, Kristien I.; Des Roches, Simone; Donihue, Colin M.; Diamond, Sarah E. (2021). "Adaptive Evolution in Cities: Progress and Misconceptions". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Cell Press. 36 (3): 239–257. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2020.11.002. ISSN 0169-5347. PMID 33342595. S2CID 229342193.
  8. Schilthuizen, Menno (2018). Darwin comes to town : how the urban jungle drives evolution (First U.S. ed.). New York, N.Y.: Picador. ISBN 978-1250127822.
  9. Matsumoto, Jun; Fujibe, Fumiaki; Takahashi, Hideo (September 2017). "Urban climate in the Tokyo metropolitan area in Japan". Journal of Environmental Sciences. 59: 54–62. doi:10.1016/j.jes.2017.04.012. PMID 28888239.
  10. Emmanuel, Rohinton (27 April 2021). "Urban microclimate in temperate climates: a summary for practitioners". Buildings and Cities. 2 (1): 402–410. doi:10.5334/bc.109. ISSN 2632-6655. S2CID 235571693.
  11. "The climate of London. By T. J. Chandler. London (Hutchinson), 1965. Pp. 292 : 86 Figures; 98 Tables; 5 Appendix Tables. £3. 10s. 0d". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 92 (392): 320–321. 1966. Bibcode:1966QJRMS..92..320.. doi:10.1002/qj.49709239230. ISSN 1477-870X.
  12. Gienapp, Phillip; Reed, Thomas E.; Visser, Marcel E. (22 October 2014). "Why climate change will invariably alter selection pressures on phenology". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 281 (1793): 20141611. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1611. PMC 4173688. PMID 25165771.
  13. Brady, Steven P.; Monosson, Emily; Matson, Cole W.; Bickham, John W. (10 November 2017). "Evolutionary toxicology: Toward a unified understanding of life's response to toxic chemicals". Evolutionary Applications. 10 (8): 745–751. doi:10.1111/eva.12519. ISSN 1752-4571. PMC 5680415. PMID 29151867.
  14. Whitehead, Andrew; Clark, Bryan W.; Reid, Noah M.; Hahn, Mark E.; Nacci, Diane (26 April 2017). "When evolution is the solution to pollution: Key principles, and lessons from rapid repeated adaptation of killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) populations". Evolutionary Applications. 10 (8): 762–783. doi:10.1111/eva.12470. ISSN 1752-4571. PMC 5680427. PMID 29151869.
  15. Whitehead, Andrew (2014), Landry, Christian R.; Aubin-Horth, Nadia (eds.), "Evolutionary Genomics of Environmental Pollution", Ecological Genomics, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, vol. 781, pp. 321–337, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7347-9_16, ISBN 978-94-007-7346-2, PMID 24277307
  16. Dubois, Jonathan; Cheptou, Pierre-Olivier (2017-01-19). "Effects of fragmentation on plant adaptation to urban environments". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 372 (1712): 20160038. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0038. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 5182434. PMID 27920383.
  17. Faeth, Stanley H.; Bang, Christofer; Saari, Susanna (March 2011). "Urban biodiversity: patterns and mechanisms: Urban biodiversity" (PDF). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1223 (1): 69–81. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05925.x. PMID 21449966. S2CID 37119631.
  18. Munshi-South, Jason; Kharchenko, Katerina (2010-09-06). "Rapid, pervasive genetic differentiation of urban white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) populations in New York City: Genetics of Urban White-Footed Mice". Molecular Ecology. 19 (19): 4242–4254. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04816.x. PMID 20819163. S2CID 4012202.
  19. Cook, L M; Saccheri, I J (March 2013). "The peppered moth and industrial melanism: evolution of a natural selection case study". Heredity. 110 (3): 207–212. doi:10.1038/hdy.2012.92. ISSN 0018-067X. PMC 3668657. PMID 23211788.
  20. Mueller, J. C.; Partecke, J.; Hatchwell, B. J.; Gaston, K. J.; Evans, K. L. (July 2013). "Candidate gene polymorphisms for behavioural adaptations during urbanization in blackbirds". Molecular Ecology. 22 (13): 3629–3637. doi:10.1111/mec.12288. PMID 23495914. S2CID 5212597.
  21. Evans, Karl L.; Gaston, Kevin J.; Sharp, Stuart P.; McGowan, Andrew; Hatchwell, Ben J. (February 2009). "The effect of urbanisation on avian morphology and latitudinal gradients in body size". Oikos. 118 (2): 251–259. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17092.x. ISSN 0030-1299.
  22. Winchell, Kristin M.; Reynolds, R. Graham; Prado-Irwin, Sofia R.; Puente-Rolón, Alberto R.; Revell, Liam J. (May 2016). "Phenotypic shifts in urban areas in the tropical lizard Anolis cristatellus: Phenotypic Divergence in Urban Anoles". Evolution. 70 (5): 1009–1022. doi:10.1111/evo.12925. PMID 27074746. S2CID 16781268.
  23. Cheptou, P.-O.; Carrue, O.; Rouifed, S.; Cantarel, A. (2008-03-11). "Rapid evolution of seed dispersal in an urban environment in the weed Crepis sancta". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (10): 3796–3799. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.3796C. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708446105. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 2268839. PMID 18316722.
  24. Santangelo, James S.; et al. (18 March 2022). "Global urban environmental change drives adaptation in white clover" (PDF). Science. 375 (6586): 1275–1281. Bibcode:2022Sci...375.1275S. doi:10.1126/science.abk0989. hdl:10026.1/19203. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 35298255. S2CID 247520798.
  25. Thompson, K. A., M. Renaudin, and M. T. J. Johnson. 2016. Urbanization drives the evolution of parallel clines in plant populations. Page 20162180 in Proc. R. Soc. B.
  26. Byrne, Katharine; Nichols, Richard A (January 1999). "Culex pipiens in London Underground tunnels: differentiation between surface and subterranean populations". Heredity. 82 (1): 7–15. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6884120. ISSN 0018-067X. PMID 10200079.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.