Volume-Control Model

The Volume-Control Model[1] is an analytical framework to describe the conditions that allow the transition of information into power. It requires controlling and regulating the connections between a large volume of information and people. This could be achieved by maintaining a balance between popular and personal information.

While popular information is relevant to a large audience, personal information is relevant to specific people. Ultimately, this is often practiced by network customization, which is tailoring information to specific groups based on common traits.

Basic principles
Volume-Control Model to describe the transition of information to power
Volume-Control Model

The volume-control model is a part of the broader idea of the power-knowledge nexus. Lash[2] referred to the volume of information as an additive power, which is not only related to the amount of information people are exposed to, but also the amount of links they get from others.

Volume is therefore associated with both the amount of information and the amount of people who produce and receive it.

In this model control refers to the ability to effectively connect between the volume of information and the volume of people. One mechanism of control, popularization, is about focusing on the most popular information and offering it to a large number of people.

Popularization is a common strategy of global corporations such as Google (with its PageRank that prioritizes websites with many incoming links) and Netflix (with its algorithm to show the most viewed series and films), which enable them to exert greater control over their users.[3][4]

Another mechanism of control is information personalization. This is often achieved by tailoring information to the specific needs of each unique user, or groups of users, based on their demographic profile and tastes,[5] their search history and website visits,[6] and the information they produce, including web activity and mouse movement.[7]

Applications

According to Scott Galloway,[8] the Big Four tech companies (Google, Meta, Amazon and Apple) have translated information to economic power by securing their exclusive access to a great volume of information and people. Their strategy was offering both popular and customized information to a growing number of users.

This model is being used to explain the bias of Google Images search, in which the vast majority of results to the query "beauty" present mainly white young females.[1] While the unique search query "beauty" enables personalization of images, all of them are ultimately homogeneous and similar to each other.

Taken from beauty industry company websites and fashion magazines, they represent the mainstream perception of beauty as a product. The trade-off between popularization and personalization techniques in the practice of large corporations such Netflix or Meta (with its Instagram platform) can similarly explain the seemingly different but largely homogeneous content they produce.

Another study[9] that applied the Volume-Control Model examined user engagement on Twitter. It measured the personalization strategies using singular pronouns such as "I", "you", "he" and "she", compared to popularization strategies using plural pronouns such as "we" and "they". It was found that retweets are more likely to use popularization strategies as users address larger audiences with the plural pronoun "we". Replies, on the other hand, are more likely to use personalization strategies as users address individuals using singular pronouns.

References
  1. Segev, Elad (2019-09-05). "Volume and control: the transition from information to power". Journal of Multicultural Discourses. 14 (3): 240–257. doi:10.1080/17447143.2019.1662028. ISSN 1744-7143. S2CID 203088993.
  2. Lash, Scott. (2002). Critique of information. London: SAGE. ISBN 9781847876522. OCLC 654641948.
  3. Borghol, Youmna; Ardon, Sebastien; Carlsson, Niklas; Eager, Derek; Mahanti, Anirban (2012). "The untold story of the clones: Content-agnostic factors that impact YouTube video popularity". Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. pp. 1186–1194. arXiv:1311.6526. doi:10.1145/2339530.2339717. ISBN 9781450314626. S2CID 5666648.
  4. Kruitbosch, Gijs; Nack, Frank (31 October 2008). "Broadcast yourself on YouTube: really?". Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Human-centered Computing: 7–10. doi:10.1145/1462027.1462029. S2CID 16264402.
  5. Gilmore, James; Joseph, Pine (1997). "The four faces of mass customization". Harvard Business Review. 75 (1): 91–101. PMID 10174455.
  6. Segev, Elad (2010). Google and the digital divide: the bias of online knowledge. Oxford, U.K.: Chandos Pub. ISBN 9781843345657.
  7. Baeza-Yates, Ricardo (23 May 2018). "Bias on the web". Communications of the ACM. 61 (6): 54–61. doi:10.1145/3209581. S2CID 44111303.
  8. Galloway, Scott (2017). The Four: The Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google. Random House Large Print. ISBN 978-0525501220.
  9. Segev, Elad (April 2023). "Sharing Feelings and User Engagement on Twitter: It's All About Me and You". Social Media + Society. 9 (2). doi:10.1177/20563051231183430.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.