Editorial Board at The Wall Street Journal

The Editorial Board at The Wall Street Journal is the editorial board of the New York newspaper The Wall Street Journal. The board is known for its strong conservative positions which at times brings it into conflict with the Journal's news side.[1]

Overview
Paul Gigot

The Wall Street Journal editorial board members oversee the Journal's editorial page, dictating the tone and direction of the newspaper's opinion section.

Every Saturday and Sunday, three editorial page writers and host Paul Gigot, editor of the Editorial Page, appear on Fox News Channel's Journal Editorial Report to discuss current issues with a variety of guests. As editors of the editorial page, Vermont C. Royster (served 1958–1971) and Robert L. Bartley (served 1972–2000) were especially influential in providing a conservative interpretation of the news on a daily basis.[2]

History

The Journal describes the history of its editorials:

We speak for free markets and free people, the principles, if you will, marked in the watershed year of 1776 by Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence and Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations". So over the past century and into the next, the Journal stands for free trade and sound money; against confiscatory taxation and the ukases of kings and other collectivists; and for individual autonomy against dictators, bullies and even the tempers of momentary majorities. If these principles sound unexceptionable in theory, applying them to current issues is often unfashionable and controversial.[3]

— WSJ Editorial Board

Its historical position was much the same. As former editor William H. Grimes wrote in 1951:

On our editorial page we make no pretense of walking down the middle of the road. Our comments and interpretations are made from a definite point of view. We believe in the individual, in his wisdom and his decency. We oppose all infringements on individual rights, whether they stem from attempts at private monopoly, labor union monopoly or from an overgrowing government. People will say we are conservative or even reactionary. We are not much interested in labels but if we were to choose one, we would say we are radical. Just as radical as the Christian doctrine.[4]

Each Thanksgiving the editorial page prints two articles that have appeared there since 1961. The first is titled The Desolate Wilderness, and describes what the Pilgrims saw when they arrived at the Plymouth Colony. The second is titled And the Fair Land, and describes the bounty of America. It was written by a former editor, Vermont C. Royster, whose Christmas article In Hoc Anno Domini has appeared every December 25 since 1949.[5][6]

Contrasts have been noted between the Journal's news reporting and its editorial pages.[7] "While Journal reporters keep busy informing readers," wrote one reporter in 1982, "Journal editorial writers put forth views that often contradict the paper's best reporting and news analysis."[8] Two summaries published in 1995 by the progressive blog Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, and in 1996 by the Columbia Journalism Review[9] criticized the Journal's editorial page for inaccuracy during the 1980s and 1990s. One reference work in 2011 described the editorial pages as "rigidly neoconservative" while noting that the news coverage "has enjoyed a sterling reputation among readers of all political stripes".[10]

When Rupert Murdoch bought the Journal from the Bancrofts he promised Paul Steiger that “What is on the Opinion pages will never be allowed to flow into the news pages,” and “The two must be kept distinct and while I sometimes find myself nodding in agreement with the comment and commentators, even I occasionally find the views a little too far to the right.”[11]

In 2016 the environmental business group Partnership for Responsible Growth took out ads in the opinion section of the Journal which criticized the Board's position on climate change.[12]

The candidacy and later Presidency of Donald Trump split the Editorial Board and further separated the Board from the Journal's news department. As a result of the conflict a number of staff including Bret Stephens, Bari Weiss, Robert Messenger, and Sohrab Ahmari left the WSJ. After first backing Ted Cruz the board dramatically shifted its support to Trump; according to editors who left the board this shift was due to Rupert Murdoch realizing that Trump could win the election.[13]

In July 2020, more than 280 Journal journalists and Dow Jones staff members wrote a letter to new publisher Almar Latour to criticize the opinion pages' "lack of fact-checking and transparency, and its apparent disregard for evidence", adding that "opinion articles often make assertions that are contradicted by WSJ reporting."[14][15] Among the pieces criticized in the letter was a Mike Pence written one entitled "There Isn't a Coronavirus 'Second Wave.'"[16] The editorial board responded that its opinion pages "won't wilt under cancel-culture pressure" and that the objective of the editorial content is to be independent of the Journal's news content and offer alternative views to "the uniform progressive views that dominate nearly all of today's media."[17] The board's response did not address issues regarding fact-checking that had been raised in the letter.[18]

Positions and views

Economic views

During the Reagan administration, the editorial page was particularly influential as the leading voice for supply-side economics. Under the editorship of Robert L. Bartley, it expounded at length on economic concepts such as the Laffer curve, and how a decrease in certain marginal tax rates and the capital gains tax could allegedly increase overall tax revenue by generating more economic activity.[19]

In the economic argument of exchange rate regimes (one of the most divisive issues among economists), the Journal has a tendency to support fixed exchange rates over floating exchange rates.[20]

Political stance
Donald Trump

The Journal's editorial pages and columns, run separately from the news pages, have a conservative bent and are highly influential in establishment conservative circles.[21] Despite this, the Journal refrains from endorsing candidates and has not endorsed a candidate since 1928.[22] Some of the Journal's former reporters claim that the paper has adopted a more conservative tone since Rupert Murdoch's purchase.[23]

The editorial board has long argued for a pro-human-rights immigration policy. In a July 3, 1984, editorial the board wrote: "If Washington still wants to 'do something' about immigration, we propose a five-word constitutional amendment: There shall be open borders." This stand on immigration reform places the Journal in contrast to most conservative activists, politicians, and media publications, such as National Review and The Washington Times, who favor heightened restrictions on immigration.[24]

In the 2000s, the Journal was a major booster of the Iraq war.

The Journal's editorial page has been seen as critical of many aspects of Barack Obama's presidency. In particular, it has been a prominent critic of the Affordable Care Act legislation passed in 2010, and has featured many opinion columns attacking various aspects of the bill.[25] The Journal's editorial page has also criticized the Obama administration's energy policies and foreign policy.[26][27][28]

On October 25, 2017, the editorial board called for Special Counsel Robert Mueller to resign from the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections and accused Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign of colluding with Russia.[29] In December 2017, the editorial board repeated its calls for Mueller's resignation.[30][31] The Board criticized Mueller's handling of Peter Strzok and questioned Mueller's credibility. A piece published by the Board from a contributor claimed that the investigation would "imperil the rule of law".[31] The editorials by the editorial board caused fractures within The Wall Street Journal, as reporters said that the editorials undermined the paper's credibility.[30][31][32]

In October 2021, the editorial board let former president Donald Trump publish a letter in the editorial pages of the paper. The news sources described the contents of the letter as false and debunked claims about the 2020 presidential election.[33][34][35] The decision to publish the letter was poorly received by many on the Journal's news side.[16] In response to criticism of the Journal's decision to publish the letter, the editorial board said the criticism was "cancel-culture pressure".[36]

In 2022, an editorial called a story told by President Joe Biden about a 10-year-old Ohio girl who was forced to cross state lines to obtain an abortion following a rape "fanciful" and an "unlikely story". The piece also accused the girl's obstetrician-gynecologist of having a "long history of abortion activism in the media". Following confirmation that the story was true, a note was added to the editorial.[37]

Science

The Journal is regarded as a forum for climate change deniers, publishing articles by individuals that reject the consensus position on climate change in its op-ed section.[38] The Journal editorial pages were described as a "forum for climate change denial" in 2011 due to columns that attacked climate scientists and accused them of engaging in fraud.[39] A 2011 study found that the Journal was alone among major American print news media in how, mainly in its editorial pages, it adopted a false balance that overplayed the uncertainty in climate science or denied anthropogenic climate change altogether.[40] That year, the Associated Press described the Journal's editorial pages as "a place friendly to climate change skeptics".[41] In 2013, the editorial board and other opinion writers vocally criticized President Obama's plan to address climate change, mostly without mentioning climate science.[42] A 2015 study found The Wall Street Journal was the newspaper that was least likely to present negative effects of global warming among several newspapers. It was also the most likely to present negative economic framing when discussing climate change mitigation policies, tending to take the stance that the cost of such policies generally outweighs their benefit.[40]

Climate Feedback, a fact-checking website on media coverage of climate science, determined that multiple opinion articles range between "low" and "very low" in terms of scientific credibility.[43][44] The Partnership for Responsible Growth stated in 2016 that 14% of the guest editorials on climate change presented the results of "mainstream climate science", while the majority did not. The Partnership also determined that none of the 201 editorials concerning climate change that were published in The Wall Street Journal since 1997 conceded that the burning of fossil fuels is the main cause of climate change.[45]

In the 1980s and 1990s, the Journal published numerous columns opposing and misrepresenting the scientific consensus on the harms of second-hand smoke.[46][47][48] A 1994 opinion article said that “the anti-smoking brigade relies on proving that secondhand smoke is a dangerous threat to the health of others. ‘Science’ is invoked in ways likely to give science a bad name. . . . [t]he health effects of secondhand smoke are a stretch.”[46]

The board opposed and misrepresented the consensus on acid rain and ozone depletion, but later recognized that efforts to curb acid rain through cap-and-trade had been successful, a decade after the Clean Air Act Amendments.[49]

The editorial board has targeted policy efforts to curb pesticides and asbestos.[50][51][52][53][54]

Board Members

Current

Former

Awards

The Journal won its first two Pulitzer Prizes for editorial writing in 1947 and 1953.

In 1980 Robert L. Bartley was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing.[70]

In 1983 Manuela Hoelterhoff was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for criticism for her "wide-ranging criticism on the arts and other subjects."[68]

In 1984 Vermont Royster was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for commentary.[71]

In 2000 Paul Gigot's column "Potomac Watch" won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary.[72]

In 2001 Dorothy Rabinowitz was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for commentary for "articles on American society and culture."[56]

In 2005 Joe Morgenstern was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for criticism for "reviews that elucidated the strengths and weaknesses of film with rare insight, authority and wit."[67]

In 2006 Robert Pollock won the Gerald Loeb Award for commentary.[69]

In 2011 Joseph Rago was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing.[66]

In 2013 Bret Stephens was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for commentary for "incisive columns on American foreign policy and domestic politics, often enlivened by a contrarian twist."[73]

In 2017 Peggy Noonan was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for commentary "For rising to the moment with beautifully rendered columns that connected readers to the shared virtues of Americans during one of the nation’s most divisive political campaigns."[58]

See also

References
  1. Lee, Edmund (July 24, 2020). "At Wall Street Journal, News Staff and Opinion Side Clash". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 30, 2022. Retrieved November 30, 2022.
  2. Richard Vetter, "Wall Street Journal", in Bruce Frohnen, ed. American Conservatism (2006), pp. 898–99.
  3. "Editorial Board". Dow Jones & Company. Archived from the original on January 9, 2022. Retrieved April 21, 2021.
  4. Grimes, William H. (January 2, 1951). "A Newspaper's Philosophy". The Wall Street Journal. New York, NY. seen in "A Newspaper's Philosophy". Dow Jones & Company. 2007. Archived from the original on July 16, 2007. Retrieved August 26, 2011.
  5. Tofel, Richard J. (2009-02-03). Restless Genius: Barney Kilgore, The Wall Street Journal, and the Invention of Modern Journalism. St. Martin's Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-4299-6711-2.
  6. "Opinion | In Hoc Anno Domini". Wall Street Journal. 2021-12-23. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on 2022-08-03. Retrieved 2022-08-03.
  7. Smith, Ben (October 25, 2020). "Trump Had One Last Story to Sell. The Wall Street Journal Wouldn't Buy It". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020. Retrieved October 31, 2020.
  8. MacDougall, A. Kent (November 1, 1982). "Books: Taking Stock of Dow Jones". Columbia Journalism Review. pp. 59–63.
  9. Naureckas, Jim; Rendall, Steve (September–October 1995). "20 Reasons Not to Trust the Journal Editorial Page". Extra!. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. Archived from the original on November 7, 2008.Lieberman, Trudy (July–August 1996). "Bartley's Believe It Or Not!". Columbia Journalism Review. Archived from the original on January 29, 2008.
  10. Scribner, Todd; Chapman, Roger (2010). "The Wall Street Journal". In Chapman, Roger (ed.). Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia of Issues, Viewpoints, and Voices. M.E. Sharpe. p. 587. ISBN 978-0-7656-2250-1.
  11. Piore, Adam. "Breaking Right". cjr.org. Columbia Journalism Review. Archived from the original on 22 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  12. Corneliussen, Steven T. (2016). "Wall Street Journal opinion editors are attacked for deep climate bias". Physics Today. doi:10.1063/PT.5.8177. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  13. Tanenhaus, Sam (20 December 2017). "On the Front Lines of the GOP's Civil War". esquire.com. Esquire. Archived from the original on 17 July 2020. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  14. Trachtenberg, Jeffrey A. (July 22, 2020). "WSJ Journalists Ask Publisher for Clearer Distinction Between News and Opinion Content". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on December 17, 2021. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  15. McLaughlin, Aidan (July 22, 2020). "WSJ Reporters Call Out Misinformation and 'Disregard For Evidence' From Paper's Opinion Section in Scathing Letter". Mediaite. Archived from the original on July 21, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  16. Garcia, Catherine. "Wall Street Journal reporters say it's 'very disappointing' opinion page published Trump's 'misinformation'". theweek.com. The Week. Archived from the original on 5 August 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
  17. Editorial Board (July 23, 2020). "A Note to Readers These pages won't wilt under cancel-culture pressure". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on December 17, 2021. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  18. Moreno, J. Edward (July 24, 2020). "WSJ editorial board calls employee concerns about opinion page 'cancel culture'". TheHill. Archived from the original on August 4, 2022. Retrieved August 4, 2022.
  19. "Bartley, Longtime Journal Editor And Thinker on Right, Dies at 66". The Wall Street Journal. December 11, 2003. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  20. McCallum, Bennett T. (2002). Wall Street Journal Position on Exchange Rates (Report). Bradley Policy Research Center. hdl:1802/510.
  21. "Unpacking WSJ's 'watershed' Trump editorial". Columbia Journalism Review. Archived from the original on June 21, 2017. Retrieved January 1, 2019.
  22. "A Brief History of Newspaper Endorsements". www.mentalfloss.com. October 23, 2008. Archived from the original on December 4, 2019. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
  23. Carr, David (14 December 2009). ""The Media Equation: Under Murdoch, Tilting Rightward at The Journal"". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 February 2017. Retrieved February 23, 2017.
  24. Rutenberg, Jim (June 3, 2007). "The editorial page commonly publishes pieces by U.S. and world leaders in academia, business, government and politics". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 13, 2011. Retrieved June 5, 2011.
  25. Wagner, Michael W.; Collins, Timothy P. (2014-11-02). "Does Ownership Matter?". Journalism Practice. 8 (6): 758–771. doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.882063. ISSN 1751-2786. S2CID 154147566. Archived from the original on 2021-12-16. Retrieved 2023-01-14.
  26. "Big Solar's Subsidy Bubble". The Wall Street Journal. August 30, 2015. Archived from the original on April 2, 2017.
  27. "Obama's Tide of War". The Wall Street Journal. October 19, 2016. Archived from the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved April 24, 2017.
  28. "Obama's Iran Missile War". The Wall Street Journal. October 13, 2016. Archived from the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved April 24, 2017.
  29. "Democrats, Russians and the FBI". Wall Street Journal. October 25, 2017. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved August 4, 2022.
  30. "Wall Street Journal editorial board calls on special counsel Robert Mueller to resign again". Business Insider. Archived from the original on July 24, 2018. Retrieved July 24, 2018.
  31. Frej, Willa (December 5, 2017). "Wall Street Journal Editorial Board Goes To Bat Against FBI And Robert Mueller For Trump". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on July 26, 2018. Retrieved July 24, 2018.
  32. Pompeo, Joe. ""A Different Level of Crazy": Inside The Wall Street Journal's Civil War". The Hive. Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved July 24, 2018.
  33. Oliver Darcy (October 28, 2021). "Rupert Murdoch is letting his media empire spread January 6 and election conspiracy theories". CNN. Archived from the original on November 1, 2021. Retrieved August 4, 2022.
  34. "Wall Street Journal criticized for Trump letter pushing election lie". the Guardian. October 28, 2021. Archived from the original on July 26, 2022. Retrieved August 4, 2022.
  35. Saul, Derek. "Wall Street Journal Hit For Publishing Letter From Trump With Litany Of Election Fraud Claims". Forbes. Archived from the original on 2021-11-29. Retrieved 2022-08-04.
  36. "Wall Street Journal publishes letter from Trump claiming 'rigged' election". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on 2021-10-27. Retrieved 2021-10-28.
  37. SCHONFELD, ZACH (13 July 2022). "WSJ editorial board adds editor's note over abortion story it called 'fanciful'". thehill.com. The Hill. Archived from the original on 4 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  38. Multiple sources:
  39. Dryzek, John S; Norgaard, Richard B; Schlosberg, David, eds. (2011-08-18). The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford University Press. p. 125. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-173527-1. Archived from the original on 2022-06-27. Retrieved 2022-08-04.
  40. Feldman, Lauren; Hart, P. Sol; Milosevic, Tijana (May 2017). "Polarizing news? Representations of threat and efficacy in leading US newspapers' coverage of climate change". Public Understanding of Science. 26 (4): 481–497. doi:10.1177/0963662515595348. hdl:10852/59799. ISSN 0963-6625. PMID 26229010. S2CID 32171406. Archived from the original on 2022-04-12. Retrieved 2022-08-04.
  41. Borenstein, Seth (October 30, 2011). "Skeptic's own study finds climate change real, but says scientists should be more critical". Associated Press. Archived from the original on August 6, 2022. Retrieved August 3, 2022.
  42. Corneliussen, Steven T. (2013-07-08). "Wall Street Journal opinion writers target President Obama's climate plan". Physics Today. doi:10.1063/PT.4.2500. Archived from the original on 2022-08-03. Retrieved 2022-08-04.
  43. "The Wall Street Journal articles analyzed". Climate Feedback. Archived from the original on April 4, 2019. Retrieved December 28, 2018.
  44. "Wall Street Journal article repeats multiple incorrect and misleading claims made in Steven Koonin's new book 'Unsettled'". Climate Feedback. 2021-05-03. Archived from the original on 2021-05-07. Retrieved 2021-05-06.
  45. "Wall Street Journal accepts environmentalist ad but charges extra". The Washington Post. June 14, 2016. Archived from the original on June 15, 2016. Retrieved June 17, 2016.
  46. Bayer, Ronald; Colgrove, James (2002). "Science, Politics, and Ideology in the Campaign Against Environmental Tobacco Smoke". American Journal of Public Health. 92 (6): 949–954. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.6.949. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 1447493. PMID 12036788.
  47. Lerbinger, Otto (2006-08-15). Corporate Public Affairs: Interacting With Interest Groups, Media, and Government. Routledge. p. 161. ISBN 978-1-135-59999-7.
  48. Rosenstock, Linda; Lee, Lore Jackson (January 2002). "Attacks on Science: The Risks to Evidence-Based Policy". American Journal of Public Health. 92 (1): 14–18. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.1.14. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 1447376. PMID 11772749.
  49. "The Wall Street Journal: Dismissing Environmental Threats Since 1976". Media Matters for America. August 1, 2012. Archived from the original on January 2, 2019. Retrieved January 1, 2019.
  50. Oreskes, Naomi; Conway, Erik M. (2010). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Bloomsbury. pp. 94, 126, 135, 146, 208–213. ISBN 9781608192939.
  51. Fleischer, Doris Z. (August 1993). "Silent Spring: Personal Synthesis of Two Cultures". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 13 (4): 200–202. doi:10.1177/027046769301300403. ISSN 0270-4676. S2CID 144455619.
  52. Fagin, Dan; Lavelle, Marianne (1999). Toxic Deception (2nd ed.). Monroe, Me.: Common Courage Press. pp. vii–viii. ISBN 1-56751-163-5. OCLC 40776758.
  53. Page, Benjamin I. (1995-07-01). "Speedy deliberation: Rejecting "1960s programs" as causes of the Los Angeles riots". Political Communication. 12 (3): 245–261. doi:10.1080/10584609.1995.9963072. ISSN 1058-4609. Archived from the original on 2023-01-14. Retrieved 2022-08-04.
  54. McCulloch, Jock; Tweedale, Geoffrey (July 24, 2008). Defending the Indefensible: The Global Asbestos Industry and Its Fight for Survival. Oxford University Press. p. 183. ISBN 978-0-19-953485-2.
  55. "Daniel Henninger". wsj.com. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 4 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  56. "Dorothy Rabinowitz of The Wall Street Journal". pulitzer.org. Pulitzer. Archived from the original on 18 December 2004. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  57. "Jason L. Riley". wsj.com. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 4 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  58. "Peggy Noonan of The Wall Street Journal". pulitzer.org. Pulitzer. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  59. "Kimberley A. Strassel". wsj.com. Wall Street Journal.
  60. "William McGurn". wsj.com. Wall Street Journal.
  61. "Mary Anastasia O'Grady". wsj.com. Wall Street Journal.
  62. "Allysia Finley". wsj.com. Wall Street Journal.
  63. "Joseph C. Sternberg". wsj.com. Wall Street Journal.
  64. "Kyle Peterson". wsj.com. Wall Street Journal.
  65. "Kate Bachelder Odell". wsj.com. Wall Street Journal.
  66. "Joseph Rago of The Wall Street Journal". pulitzer.org. Pulitzer. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  67. "Joe Morgenstern of The Wall Street Journal". pulitzer.org. pulitzer.org. Archived from the original on 23 August 2019. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  68. "Manuela Hoelterhoff of The Wall Street Journal". pulitzer.org. Pulitzer. Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  69. Dickman, Howard. "Who We Are". wsj.com. WSJ. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  70. "Robert L. Bartley of The Wall Street Journal". pulitzer.org/. Pulitzer. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  71. "Vermont Royster of The Wall Street Journal". pulitzer.org. Pulitzer. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  72. "Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal editorial page editor, joins Pulitzer Prize Board". pulitzer.org. Pulitzer. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  73. "Bret Stephens of The Wall Street Journal". pulitzer.org. Pulitzer. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.