Weak topology

Both the weak topology and the weak* topology are special cases of a more general construction for pairings, which we now describe. The benefit of this more general construction is that any definition or result proved for it applies to both the weak topology and the weak* topology, thereby making redundant the need for many definitions, theorem statements, and proofs. This is also the reason why the weak* topology is also frequently referred to as the "weak topology"; because it is just an instance of the weak topology in the setting of this more general construction.

Suppose (X, Y, b) is a pairing of vector spaces over a topological field ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$ (i.e. X and Y are vector spaces over ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$ and b : X × Y → ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$ is a bilinear map).

Notation. For all x ∈ X, let b(x, •) : Y → ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$ denote the linear functional on Y defined by y ↦ b(x, y). Similarly, for all y ∈ Y, let b(•, y) : X → ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$ be defined by x ↦ b(x, y).

Definition. The weak topology on X induced by Y (and b) is the weakest topology on X, denoted by 𝜎(X, Y, b) or simply 𝜎(X, Y), making all maps b(•, y) : X → ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$ continuous, as y ranges over Y.[1]

The weak topology on Y is now automatically defined as described in the article Dual system. However, for clarity, we now repeat it.

Definition. The weak topology on Y induced by X (and b) is the weakest topology on Y, denoted by 𝜎(Y, X, b) or simply 𝜎(Y, X), making all maps b(x, •) : Y → ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$ continuous, as x ranges over X.[1]

If the field ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$ has an absolute value |⋅|, then the weak topology 𝜎(X, Y, b) on X is induced by the family of seminorms, p_y : X → ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$, defined by

p_y(x) := |b(x, y)|

for all y ∈ Y and x ∈ X. This shows that weak topologies are locally convex.

Assumption. We will henceforth assume that ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$ is either the real numbers ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$ or the complex numbers ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }$.

We now consider the special case where Y is a vector subspace of the algebraic dual space of X (i.e. a vector space of linear functionals on X).

There is a pairing, denoted by ${\displaystyle (X,Y,\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle )}$ or ${\displaystyle (X,Y)}$, called the canonical pairing whose bilinear map ${\displaystyle \langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle }$ is the canonical evaluation map, defined by ${\displaystyle \langle x,x'\rangle =x'(x)}$ for all ${\displaystyle x\in X}$ and ${\displaystyle x'\in Y}$. Note in particular that ${\displaystyle \langle \cdot ,x'\rangle }$ is just another way of denoting ${\displaystyle x'}$ i.e. ${\displaystyle \langle \cdot ,x'\rangle =x'(\cdot )}$.

Assumption. If Y is a vector subspace of the algebraic dual space of X then we will assume that they are associated with the canonical pairing ⟨X, Y⟩.

In this case, the weak topology on X (resp. the weak topology on Y), denoted by 𝜎(X,Y) (resp. by 𝜎(Y,X)) is the weak topology on X (resp. on Y) with respect to the canonical pairing ⟨X, Y⟩.

The topology σ(X,Y) is the initial topology of X with respect to Y.

If Y is a vector space of linear functionals on X, then the continuous dual of X with respect to the topology σ(X,Y) is precisely equal to Y.[1](Rudin 1991, Theorem 3.10)

Let X be a topological vector space (TVS) over ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$, that is, X is a ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$ vector space equipped with a topology so that vector addition and scalar multiplication are continuous. We call the topology that X starts with the original, starting, or given topology (the reader is cautioned against using the terms "initial topology" and "strong topology" to refer to the original topology since these already have well-known meanings, so using them may cause confusion). We may define a possibly different topology on X using the topological or continuous dual space ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$, which consists of all linear functionals from X into the base field ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$ that are continuous with respect to the given topology.

Recall that ${\displaystyle \langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle }$ is the canonical evaluation map defined by ${\displaystyle \langle x,x'\rangle =x'(x)}$ for all ${\displaystyle x\in X}$ and ${\displaystyle x'\in X^{*}}$, where in particular, ${\displaystyle \langle \cdot ,x'\rangle =x'(\cdot )=x'}$.

Definition. The weak topology on X is the weak topology on X with respect to the canonical pairing ${\displaystyle \langle X,X^{*}\rangle }$. That is, it is the weakest topology on X making all maps ${\displaystyle x'=\langle \cdot ,x'\rangle :X\to \mathbb {K} }$ continuous, as ${\displaystyle x'}$ ranges over ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$.[1]

Definition: The weak topology on ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$ is the weak topology on ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$ with respect to the canonical pairing ${\displaystyle \langle X,X^{*}\rangle }$. That is, it is the weakest topology on ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$ making all maps ${\displaystyle \langle x,\cdot \rangle :X^{*}\to \mathbb {K} }$ continuous, as x ranges over X.[1] This topology is also called the weak* topology.

We give alternative definitions below.

Alternatively, the weak topology on a TVS X is the initial topology with respect to the family ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$. In other words, it is the coarsest topology on X such that each element of ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$ remains a continuous function.

A subbase for the weak topology is the collection of sets of the form ${\displaystyle \phi ^{-1}(U)}$ where ${\displaystyle \phi \in X^{*}}$ and U is an open subset of the base field ${\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }$. In other words, a subset of X is open in the weak topology if and only if it can be written as a union of (possibly infinitely many) sets, each of which is an intersection of finitely many sets of the form ${\displaystyle \phi ^{-1}(U)}$.

From this point of view, the weak topology is the coarsest polar topology.

The weak topology is characterized by the following condition: a net ${\displaystyle (x_{\lambda })}$ in X converges in the weak topology to the element x of X if and only if ${\displaystyle \phi (x_{\lambda })}$ converges to ${\displaystyle \phi (x)}$ in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$ or ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }$ for all ${\displaystyle \phi \in X^{*}}$.

In particular, if ${\displaystyle x_{n}}$ is a sequence in X, then ${\displaystyle x_{n}}$ converges weakly to x if

${\displaystyle \varphi (x_{n})\to \varphi (x)}$

as n → ∞ for all ${\displaystyle \varphi \in X^{*}}$. In this case, it is customary to write

${\displaystyle x_{n}{\overset {\mathrm {w} }{\longrightarrow }}x}$

or, sometimes,

${\displaystyle x_{n}\rightharpoonup x.}$

If X is equipped with the weak topology, then addition and scalar multiplication remain continuous operations, and X is a locally convex topological vector space.

If X is a normed space, then the dual space ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$ is itself a normed vector space by using the norm

${\displaystyle \|\phi \|=\sup _{\|x\|\leq 1}|\phi (x)|.}$

This norm gives rise to a topology, called the strong topology, on ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$. This is the topology of uniform convergence. The uniform and strong topologies are generally different for other spaces of linear maps; see below.

If X is a separable (i.e. has a countable dense subset) locally convex space and H is a norm-bounded subset of its continuous dual space, then H endowed with the weak* (subspace) topology is a metrizable topological space.[1] However, for infinite-dimensional spaces, the metric cannot be translation-invariant.[2] If X is a separable metrizable locally convex space then the weak* topology on the continuous dual space of X is separable.[1]

Properties on normed spaces

By definition, the weak* topology is weaker than the weak topology on ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$. An important fact about the weak* topology is the Banach–Alaoglu theorem: if X is normed, then the closed unit ball in ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$ is weak*-compact (more generally, the polar in ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$ of a neighborhood of 0 in X is weak*-compact). Moreover, the closed unit ball in a normed space X is compact in the weak topology if and only if X is reflexive.

In more generality, let F be locally compact valued field (e.g., the reals, the complex numbers, or any of the p-adic number systems). Let X be a normed topological vector space over F, compatible with the absolute value in F. Then in ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$, the topological dual space X of continuous F-valued linear functionals on X, all norm-closed balls are compact in the weak-* topology.

If X is a normed space, a version of the Heine-Borel theorem holds. In particular, a subset of the continuous dual is weak* compact if and only if it is weak* closed and norm-bounded.[1] This implies, in particular, that when X is an infinite-dimensional normed space then the closed unit ball at the origin in the dual space of X does not contain any weak* neighborhood of 0 (since any such neighborhood is norm-unbounded).[1] Thus, even though norm-closed balls are compact, X* is not weak* locally compact.

If X is a normed space, then X is separable if and only if the weak-* topology on the closed unit ball of ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$ is metrizable,[1] in which case the weak* topology is metrizable on norm-bounded subsets of ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$. If a normed space X has a dual space that is separable (with respect to the dual-norm topology) then X is necessarily separable.[1] If X is a Banach space, the weak-* topology is not metrizable on all of ${\displaystyle X^{*}}$ unless X is finite-dimensional.[3]

Consider, for example, the difference between strong and weak convergence of functions in the Hilbert space L²(${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$). Strong convergence of a sequence ${\displaystyle \psi _{k}\in L^{2}(\mathbb {R} ^{n})}$ to an element ψ means that

${\displaystyle \int _{\mathbb {R} ^{n}}|\psi _{k}-\psi |^{2}\,{\rm {d}}\mu \,\to 0}$

as k → ∞. Here the notion of convergence corresponds to the norm on L².

In contrast weak convergence only demands that

${\displaystyle \int _{\mathbb {R} ^{n}}{\bar {\psi }}_{k}f\,\mathrm {d} \mu \to \int _{\mathbb {R} ^{n}}{\bar {\psi }}f\,\mathrm {d} \mu }$

for all functions f ∈ L² (or, more typically, all f in a dense subset of L² such as a space of test functions, if the sequence {ψ_k} is bounded). For given test functions, the relevant notion of convergence only corresponds to the topology used in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }$.

For example, in the Hilbert space L²(0,π), the sequence of functions

${\displaystyle \psi _{k}(x)={\sqrt {2/\pi }}\sin(kx)}$

form an orthonormal basis. In particular, the (strong) limit of ${\displaystyle \psi _{k}}$ as k → ∞ does not exist. On the other hand, by the Riemann–Lebesgue lemma, the weak limit exists and is zero.

One normally obtains spaces of distributions by forming the strong dual of a space of test functions (such as the compactly supported smooth functions on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$). In an alternative construction of such spaces, one can take the weak dual of a space of test functions inside a Hilbert space such as L². Thus one is led to consider the idea of a rigged Hilbert space.

Suppose that X is a vector space and X^# is the algebraic dual space of X (i.e. the vector space of all linear functionals on X). If X is endowed with the weak topology induced by X^# then the continuous dual space of X is X^#, every bounded subset of X is contained in a finite-dimensional vector subspace of X, every vector subspace of X is closed and has a topological complement.[4]