Ripple (payment protocol)

Ripple is a real-time gross settlement system, currency exchange and remittance network that is open to financial institutions worldwide and was created by Ripple Labs Inc., a US-based technology company. Released in 2012, Ripple is built upon a distributed open source protocol, and supports tokens representing fiat currency, cryptocurrency, commodities, or other units of value such as frequent flier miles or mobile minutes.[2] Ripple purports to enable "secure, instantly and nearly free global financial transactions of any size with no chargebacks". The ledger employs the native cryptocurrency known as XRP.

Ripple
Original author(s)Arthur Britto, David Schwartz, Ryan Fugger
Developer(s)Ripple Labs Inc.
Initial release2012
Stable release
1.0.0[1] / 15 May 2018[1]
Repository
Written inC++
Operating systemServer: Linux (RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu), Windows, macOS (development only)
TypeReal-time gross settlement, currency exchange, remittance
LicenseISC license
Websiteripple.com

In December 2020, Ripple Labs and two of its executives were sued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for selling XRP tokens, which the SEC classified as unregistered securities.[3] In July 2023, the court ruled that "XRP, as a digital token, is not in and of itself a 'contract, transaction, or scheme' that embodies the Howey requirements of an investment contract."[4]

History

Ripple was conceived by Jed McCaleb and built by Arthur Britto and David Schwartz who then approached Ryan Fugger who had debuted in 2005 as a financial service to provide secure payment options to members of an online community via a global network.[5][6] Fugger had developed a system called OpenCoin which would transform into Ripple.[7][8] The company also created its own form of digital currency referred to as XRP to allow financial institutions to transfer money with negligible fees and wait-time.[9] In 2013, the company reported interest from banks for using its payment system.[10]

By 2018, over 100 banks had signed up, but most of them were only using Ripple's XCurrent messaging technology, while avoiding the XRP cryptocurrency due to its volatility problems.[11] Representatives of the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT), whose market dominance is being challenged by Ripple, have argued that the scalability issues of Ripple and other blockchain solutions remain unsolved, confining them to bilateral and intra-bank applications.[11] A Ripple executive acknowledged in 2018 that "We started out with your classic blockchain, which we love. But the feedback from the banks is you can’t put the whole world on a blockchain."[12]

Ripple relies on a common shared ledger, which is a distributed database storing information about all Ripple accounts. Chris Larsen told the Stanford Graduate School of Business that the network was managed by a network of independent servers which compare their transaction records, and that servers could in theory belong to anyone, including banks or market makers.[7] Ripple validates accounts and balances instantly for payment transmission and delivers payment notification within a few seconds.[13] Payments are irreversible, and there are no chargebacks.[14]

Ripple Labs continued as the primary contributors of code to the consensus verification system behind Ripple.[15] In 2014, the protocol gained access to the US banking system amid concerns over security and a lack of regulation.[16]

Litigation

A class action was filed against Ripple in May 2018 "alleging that it led a scheme to raise hundreds of millions of dollars through unregistered sales of its XRP tokens". According to the complaint, "the company created billions of coins 'out of thin air' and then profited by selling them to the public in 'what is essentially a never-ending initial coin offering'".[17]

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated legal proceedings against Ripple Labs, CEO Brad Garlinghouse, and co-founder Chris Larsen on December 21, 2020, for allegedly selling unregistered securities. In the lawsuit, the SEC claimed that XRP was a security instead of a commodity, because it was generated and distributed by Ripple Labs in a centralized fashion and was not being adopted by financial institutions for its advertised use cases.[3] The SEC stated that Ripple executives sold 14.6 billion units of XRP for more than $1.38 billion to fund the company's operations and enrich themselves.[18]

In response, Garlinghouse criticized the SEC and indicated that Ripple Labs would defend itself in court.[19] Coinbase delisted XRP on December 28;[20] an investor filed a class action on December 30 alleging that Coinbase sold XRP tokens with the understanding that they were unregistered securities.[21]

On April 13, 2021, SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce published the Token Safe Harbor Proposal 2.0, which is ″intended to provide Initial Development Teams with a three-year time period within which they can facilitate participation in, and the continued development of, a functional or decentralized network, exempt from the registration provisions of the federal securities laws so long as certain conditions are met.″[22]

Judge Analisa Torres issued a decision on motions for summary judgement on 13 July 2023, and stated the XRP token itself is not a security, although the manner in which it is sold could constitute the sale of a security. "XRP, as a digital token, is not in and of itself a 'contract, transaction, or scheme' that embodies the Howey requirements of an investment contract."[4] The ruling further found that the institutional sales of XRP tokens constituted the unregistered offer and sale of investment contracts. However programmatic sales and other XRP token sales by Ripple Labs did not constitute the offer and sale of investment contracts, she ruled. The case could subsequently go to a full trial, or be appealed.[23][4]

Reception

For its creation and development of the Ripple protocol (RTXP) and the Ripple payment/exchange network Ripple Labs was named as one of 2014's 50 Smartest Companies in the February 2014 edition of MIT Technology Review.[24] A scientific study made by two researchers from Stanford and Stockholm universities that studied the money production from an energy consumption point of view and a macroeconomic level stated that running a server on Ripple was comparable to the energy needs of running an email server.[25]

See also

References
  1. "Official source code". Github. Retrieved May 14, 2014.
  2. "Ripple Labs Banks $3.5M for Open-Source Payments System and Virtual Currency". The Wall Street Journal Pro. Dow Jones & Company. November 12, 2013. Retrieved January 28, 2014.
  3. Popper, Nathaniel (December 22, 2020). "Cryptocurrency Company Ripple Is Sued by S.E.C." The New York Times. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  4. District court summary judgement, pdf, 13 July 2023.
  5. Peck, Morgan (January 14, 2013). "Ripple Could Help or Harm Bitcoin". IEEE Spectrum. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Retrieved January 27, 2014.
  6. Liu, Alec. "Ripple Could Make Bitcoin Great (or Destroy It)". Motherboard. Archived from the original on February 7, 2014. Retrieved January 27, 2014.
  7. Andrews, Edmund L. (September 24, 2013). "Chris Larsen: Money Without Borders". Stanford Graduate School of Business. Retrieved April 10, 2015.
  8. Bala, Dr. Venkatesh (October 8, 2014). "Lessons in Innovation Leadership: Chris Larsen". Nielsen. The Cambridge Group. Archived from the original on December 24, 2017. Retrieved June 10, 2015.
  9. Lashinsky, Adam (August 22, 2014). "Isn't one Internet enough?". Fortune Magazine. Retrieved April 10, 2015.
  10. Popper, Nathaniel (November 11, 2013). "The rush to coin virtual money with real value". The New York Times. Retrieved January 26, 2014.
  11. Arnold, Martin (June 6, 2018). "Ripple and Swift slug it out over cross-border payments". Financial Times. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved October 28, 2019.
  12. "Banks unlikely to process payments with distributed ledgers for now, says Ripple". Reuters. June 13, 2018. Retrieved October 30, 2019.
  13. Simonite, Tom (April 11, 2013). "Big-name investors back effort to build a better Bitcoin". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on March 8, 2014. Retrieved January 26, 2014.
  14. Schwartz, Ariel. "Bitcoin 2.0: Can Ripple Make Digital Currency Mainstream?". Fast Company. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  15. Cooper, Jane (March 11, 2014). "Ripple Labs CEO looks to revolutionise online payments". The Banker. Retrieved April 10, 2015.
  16. Scully, Matt (September 24, 2014). "Alternative Money Mover Ripple Labs Enters U.S. Banking System". American Banker. Retrieved June 16, 2015.
  17. Katz, Lily (May 4, 2018). "Ripple Hit With Class-Action Suit Over 'Never Ending ICO'". Bloomberg. Retrieved January 27, 2019.
  18. Crossman, Penny (December 29, 2020). "How will SEC complaint affect banks' relationships with Ripple?". American Banker. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
  19. Roberts, Jeff John (December 21, 2020). "Ripple says it's about to be sued by the SEC, in what the company calls a parting shot at the crypto industry". Fortune. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  20. Campbell, Ian Carlos (December 28, 2020). "Coinbase halts trading of XRP following SEC suit against Ripple". The Verge. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  21. Yasiejko, Christopher; Kharif, Olga (December 30, 2020). "Coinbase Sued Over Crypto XRP Commissions After SEC Pursues Ripple". Bloomberg News. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  22. Peirce, Hester. "Token Safe Harbor Proposal 2.0". Public Statement. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
  23. "Federal court rules Ripple's XRP token can be treated as a security… sometimes". TechCrunch. July 13, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
  24. Bergstein, Brian. "50 Smartest Companies". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on March 8, 2014. Retrieved March 12, 2014.
  25. Leopold, Sid John; Englesson, Niclas (November 27, 2017). "How Eco friendly is our money and is there an alternative?" (PDF). Retrieved August 27, 2018.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.