Zeta Reticuli

At a declination of −62°, the system is not visible from Britain's latitude of +53°, so it never received a Flamsteed designation in John Flamsteed's 1712 Historia Coelestis Britannica. The Bayer designation for this star system, Zeta (ζ) Reticuli, originated in a 1756 star map by the French astronomer Abbé Nicolas-Louis de Lacaille.[13] Subsequently, the two stars received separate designations in the Cape Photographic Durchmusterung, which was processed between 1859 and 1903, then in the Henry Draper Catalogue, published between 1918 and 1924.[14]

The double star ζ Reticuli is located in the western part of the small Reticulum constellation, about 25′ from the constellation's border with Horologium. In dark southern skies, the two stars can be viewed separately with the naked eye, or with a pair of binoculars.[15] ζ¹ Reticuli has an apparent magnitude of 5.52,[2] placing it on the border between 5th- and 6th-magnitude stars. ζ² Reticuli is slightly brighter at magnitude 5.22.[2]

The two stars are located at similar distances from the Sun and share the same motion through space,[16] confirming that they are gravitationally bound and form a wide binary star system. They have an angular separation of 309.2 arcseconds (5.2 arcminutes);[17] far enough apart to appear as a close pair of separate stars to the naked eye under suitable viewing conditions. The distance between the two stars is at least 3,750 AU (0.06 light-year, or almost a hundred times the average distance between Pluto and the Sun), so their orbital period is 170,000 years or more.[18]

Both stars share similar physical characteristics to the Sun,[16] so they are considered solar analogs. Their stellar classification is nearly identical to that of the Sun. ζ¹ has 96% of the Sun's mass and 84% of the Sun's radius. ζ² is slightly larger and more luminous than ζ¹, with 99% of the Sun's mass and 88% of the Sun's radius.[8][19] The two stars are somewhat deficient in metals, having only 60% of the proportion of elements other than hydrogen and helium as compared to the Sun.[4][20] For reasons that remain uncertain, ζ¹ has an anomalously low abundance of beryllium.[11] Two possible explanations are: during the star's formation it underwent multiple intense bursts of mass accretion from a rapidly rotating protostellar cloud, or else the star underwent rotational mixing brought on by a period of rapid rotation during the star's youth.[21]

Both stars were considered unusual because they were thought to have had a lower luminosity than is normal for main-sequence stars of their age and surface temperature. That is, they lie below the main-sequence curve on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram for newly formed stars. However, this was challenged, after using the much more accurate parallaxes from the Hipparcos catalogue (ESA, 1997), it was calculated that the stars actually have higher luminosities and so are shifted upwards, putting them in the main sequence.[4] Most stars will evolve above this curve as they age.[17]

ζ¹ has an intermediate level of magnetic activity in its chromosphere[22] with an erratic variability. A long-term activity cycle of ~4.2 years has been tentatively identified.[23] ζ² is more sedate, showing a much lower level of activity[24] with a ~7.9-year cycle, which may indicate it is in a Maunder Minimum state.[23] Although the kinematics of this system suggest that they belong to a population of older stars, the properties of their stellar chromospheres suggests that they are only about 2 billion years old.[25]

This star system belongs to the Zeta Herculis Moving Group of stars that share a common motion through space, suggesting that they have a common origin. In the galactic coordinate system, the [U, V, W] components of the space velocity for this system are equal to [−70.2, −47.4, +16.4] km/s for ζ¹ and [−69.7, −46.4, +16.8] km/s for ζ².[4] They are currently following an orbit through the Milky Way galaxy that has an eccentricity of 0.24. This orbit will carry the system as close as 17.4 kly (5.335 kpc) and as far as 28.6 kly (8.769 kpc) from the Galactic Center. The inclination of this orbit will carry the stars as much as 1.3 kly (0.4 kpc) from the plane of the galactic disk.[5] This likely puts them outside the thick disk population of stars.[17]

Zeta Reticuli has no known extrasolar planets. In 2002, ζ¹ was examined at an infrared wavelength of 25 μm, but no indication of an excess of infrared radiation was found.[26]

In 2007, the Spitzer Space Telescope was used to find an apparent infrared excess at a wavelength of 70 μm around ζ². This radiation was attributed to emission by a debris disk with a mean temperature of 150 K (−123 °C), theorized to be orbiting the host star at a distance of 4.3 AU.[27] In 2010, the Herschel Space Observatory, a telescope with a comparatively superior spatial resolution and, unlike Spitzer, able to resolve radiation excesses beyond the wavelength of 70 μm, determined the infrared excess as coming from a two-lobed structure that looked like a debris disk seen edge-on. This debris disk interpreted as an analogy to the Kuiper belt with a semi-major axis of 100 AU and a temperature of 30–40 K.[28]

However, observations with ALMA from October and November 2017 revealed that the structure observed by Herschel shows no common proper motion with Zeta Reticuli. In these observations, no significant flux has been detected around ζ², showing that the alleged debris disk is not real, but rather a case of background confusion. The observations demonstrate the need to follow up Herschel observations of debris disks.[29]

• Bob Lazar, Barney and Betty Hill, and Project Serpo fall into the subject of UFO conspiracy theories and alien abduction reports related to Zeta Reticuli
• Zeta Reticuli in fiction

• "Zeta Reticuli". SolStation. Retrieved 2008-08-31.
• "Zeta(1) Reticuli". The Internet Stellar Database. Retrieved 2008-08-31.
• "Zeta(2) Reticuli". The Internet Stellar Database. Retrieved 2008-08-31.
• "Zeta(3) Reticuli". Hatirla Beni Belgesel. Archived from the original on 2011-07-23. Retrieved 2008-08-31.