Emergency tourniquet

Emergency tourniquets are cuff-like devices designed to stop severe traumatic bleeding before or during transport to a care facility. They are wrapped around the limb, proximal to the site of trauma, and tightened until all blood vessels underneath are occluded. The design and construction of emergency tourniquets allows quick application by first aid responders or the injured persons themselves.[1] Correct use of tourniquet devices has been shown to save lives under austere conditions with comparatively low risk of injury. In field trials, prompt application of emergency tourniquets before the patient goes into shock are associated with higher survival rates than any other scenario where tourniquets were used later or not at all.[2][3]

This article is about modern emergency tourniquets. For history, principles and other uses, see Tourniquet and Surgical tourniquet.
Improvised tourniquet on an accidentally severed finger

Tourniquet design
Emergency Tourniquet Devices
Windlass tourniquet
Pneumatic tourniquet

Existing guidelines call for the use of improvised "rope-and-stick" tourniquets as a last resort to stop severe bleeding. However, purpose-made tourniquet devices that are well designed can provide greatly increased safety and efficacy.[2][4] Variability in performance has been shown to exist between various designs and application methods.[5][6]

Mechanical advantage

Mechanisms that confer sufficient mechanical advantage are essential for applying adequate pressure to stop bleeding, particularly on the lower extremities. Pressures that occlude venous but not arterial flow can exacerbate hemorrhage and cause damage to healthy tissue.[1]

Mechanical characteristics of emergency tourniquet devices
TourniquetStrap width (cm) [1]Mechanism [1]Note [1]
SAM XT Tourniquet3.7Windlass and BuckleBuckle sets with correct force; windlass finishes pressure
Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT)3.8WindlassStick and strap inside outer sleeve
Emergency & Military Tourniquet (EMT)9.1PneumaticHand pump and inflatable bladder
K2 Tactical Tourniquet (K2)3.8ClampModified wood clamp
Smart Tactical Application Tourniquet (S.T.A.T.)2.5RatchetStrap with ratcheting mechanism
Last Resort Tourniquet (LRT)5.1RatchetStrap with ratcheting mechanism
London Bridge Tourniquet (LBT)2.4RatchetStrap with ratcheting mechanism
Mechanical Advantage Tourniquet (MAT)3.8Block and tacklePulleys on outer frame
One-Handed Tourniquet (OHT)2.8ElasticParallel bungee cords and clamp
Self-Applied Tourniquet System (SATS)3.8CamCantilever system
Special Operations Forces Tactical Tourniquet (SOFTT)3.7WindlassStick and strap

Results from laboratory and field testing suggest that windlass and pneumatic mechanisms are effective where other systems fail due to excessive pain, slipping, inadequate force, or mechanical failure.[1][2]

Pressure gradients

Pressure underneath a tourniquet cuff is not evenly distributed, with the highest pressures localized around the cuff centerline and decreasing to zero near the cuff edges.[7] A high rate of change of pressure across the cuff width, or a high cuff pressure gradient, is a leading cause of nerve and muscle injury from tourniquet use.[7] Tourniquets with wider straps or cuffs, especially those with pneumatic actuation in contrast to mechanical force, distribute pressure more evenly and produce lower pressure gradients.[7] They are therefore more likely to stop bleeding and less likely to cause damage to underlying tissue, in addition to being significantly less painful than tourniquets with narrow straps and bands.[4][8] Overpressure protection in certain emergency tourniquets also help to prevent excessive force from damaging the limb.[1]

Risks
Emergency tourniquet being applied in simulated combat. Military devices are designed for rugged environments.

Possible risks of complications—morbidity—related to emergency tourniquet use include

Emergency care services implementing routine tourniquet use, especially in the civilian setting, should exercise caution and ensure that training is adequate for optimal results.[3] However, given proper precautions, the occurrence of complications due to tourniquet use is quite rare.[9] Designed tourniquet devices are routinely tightened over healthy limbs during training with no ill effects, and recent evidence from combat hospitals in Iraq suggests that morbidity rates are low when users adhere to standard best practices. Since no better alternatives exist for users to self-apply with only basic training, the benefit of tourniquet use far outweighs the risks.[2][3][9]

Safe tourniquet practice involves:

1. Careful placement of tourniquet proximal to all sites of hemorrhage.

2. Limiting tourniquet time to less than two hours, if possible.

3. Minimizing excessive applied pressure beyond the point of complete blood flow cessation.[2][9]

Current developments
Tourniquet application on the lower arm during training. Device user knowledge greatly increases survival rate and minimizes complications.

Field experience

Latest field trials suggest that wider straps are more effective and less painful than tourniquets with thinner straps. The concept of limb occlusion pressure is also gaining prominence over the misconception that greater applied force results in greater effectiveness. In addition, studies of failed cases indicate that the correct devices should be coupled with training that facilitates realistic expectations and correct user actions.[4] The Stop The Bleed educational initiative provides knowledge aimed at the greater public on when to use a tourniquet and the correct user actions.[10]

Emerging needs

Despite the success of widespread tourniquet deployment to limit combat casualties, many preventable deaths from hemorrhage occur where conventional tourniquet use is inappropriate. The need exists for controlling junctional bleeding, especially in the pelvic area.[11] In 2012, the Combat Ready Clamp (CRoC) was selected by the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR) for that purpose.[12] Another emerging need is more refined training regimes and doctrine based on scientific evidence, which can ensure that future tourniquet practice and policies are in line with the most current body of knowledge.[11]

See also

References
  1. Walters, Thomas J.; Wenke, Joseph C.; Kauvar, David S. (2005). "Effectiveness of Self-Applied Tourniquets in Human Volunteers". Prehospital Emergency Care. Informa Healthcare. 9 (4): 416–22. doi:10.1080/10903120500255123. PMID 16263675.
  2. Kragh, John F.; Walters, Thomas J.; Baer, David G. (2008). "Practical Use of Emergency Tourniquets to Stop Bleeding in Major Limb Trauma". The Journal of Trauma. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 64 (2): S38–S50. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31816086b1. PMID 18376170.
  3. Kragh, John F.; Walters, Thomas J.; Baer, David G. (2009). "Survival With Emergency Tourniquet Use to Stop Bleeding in Major Limb Trauma". Annals of Surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 249 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818842ba. PMID 19106667.
  4. Kragh, John F.; O'Neill, Michelle L.; Walters, Thomas J. (2011). "The Military Emergency Tourniquet Program's Lessons Learned With Devices and Designs". Military Medicine. Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S. 176 (10): 1144–52. doi:10.7205/milmed-d-11-00114. PMID 22128650.
  5. Ruterbusch, VL; Swiergosz, MJ; Montgomery, LD; Hopper, KW; Gerth, WA (2005). "ONR/MARCORSYSCOM Evaluation of Self-Applied Tourniquets for Combat Applications". United States Navy Experimental Diving Unit Technical Report. NEDU-TR-05-15. Archived from the original on 2009-09-23. Retrieved 2008-07-22.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  6. Hill, JP; Montgomery, LD; Hopper, KW; Roy, LA (2007). "Evaluation of Self-Applied Tourniquets for Combat Applications, Second Phase". US Navy Experimental Diving Unit Technical Report. NEDU-TR-07-07. Archived from the original on 2009-09-21. Retrieved 2008-07-22.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  7. Noordin, Shahryar; McEwen, James A.; Kragh, John F. (2009). "Current Concepts Review: Surgical Tourniquets in Orthopaedics". Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. JBJS. 91 (12): 2958–67. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.00634. ISSN 0021-9355. PMID 19952261.
  8. Taylor, David M.; Vater, Gill M.; Parker, Paul J. (2011). "An Evaluation of Two Tourniquet Systems for the Control of Prehospital Lower Limb Hemorrhage". The Journal of Trauma. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 71 (3): 591–5. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31820e0e41.
  9. Kragh, John F.; Littrel, Michelle L.; Walters, Thomas J. (2009). "Battle Casualty Survival with Emergency Tourniquet Use to Stop Limb Bleeding". The Journal of Emergency Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. XX (2): S38–S50. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.07.022.
  10. Jacobs, Lenworth; Keating, Jane J.; Hunt, Richard C.; Butler, Frank K.; Pons, Peter T.; Gestring, Mark; Bulger, Eileen; Eastman, Alexander; Kerby, Jeffrey; Hashmi, Zain; Fridling, Jeremy; Inaba, Kenji; Matsushima, Kazuhide; Goralnick, Eric; Melnitchouk, Nelya (August 2022). "Stop the BleedⓇ". Current Problems in Surgery: 101193. doi:10.1016/j.cpsurg.2022.101193.
  11. Murphy, Chris; Kragh, John F.; Dubick, Michael A. (2011). "New Tourniquet Device Concepts for Battlefield Hemorrhage Control". U.S. Army Medical Department Journal: 38–48. ISSN 1524-0436.
  12. "New truncal tourniquet ready for battle use".
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.