Discectomy

A discectomy (also called open discectomy, if done through a 1/2 inch or larger skin opening) is the surgical removal of abnormal disc material that presses on a nerve root or the spinal cord. The procedure involves removing a portion of an intervertebral disc, which causes pain, weakness or numbness by stressing the spinal cord or radiating nerves. The traditional open discectomy, or Love's technique, was published by Ross and Love in 1971. Advances have produced visualization improvements to traditional discectomy procedures (e.g. microdiscectomy, an open discectomy using an external microscope typically done through a 1-inch or larger skin opening), or endoscopic discectomy (the scope passes internally and typically done through a 2 mm skin opening or larger, up to 12 mm). In conjunction with the traditional discectomy or microdiscectomy, a laminotomy is often involved to permit access to the intervertebral disc. Laminotomy means a significant amount of typically normal bone (the lamina) is removed from the vertebra, allowing the surgeon to better see and access the area of disc herniation.

See also: Spinal decompression
Discectomy
Median sagittal section of two lumbar vertebrae and their ligaments. ("Intervertebral fibrocartilage", an old name for the intervertebral disc, labeled at center left.)
ICD-9-CM80.51
MeSHD017586
MedlinePlus007250
Illustration depicting a surgical discectomy

Endoscopic discectomy

Small or ultra-small endoscopic discectomy (called Nano Endoscopic Discectomy) does not have internal cutting or bone removal and, due to the small size, is not called "open". These procedures do not cause post-laminectomy syndrome (Failed back syndrome).[1][2]

Microdiscectomy

Microdiscectomy is a spine operation with a smaller incision than traditional discectomy, in which a portion of a herniated nucleus pulposus is removed by way of a surgical instrument, while using an external operating microscope for lighting and magnification. They may be "open," i.e., with a larger incision, or minimally invasive, i.e., with a 1.5 to 2.0 cm surgical incision.[3][4]

Indications

Microdiscectomy may be a surgical option for patients with a single-level disc herniation and evidence of nerve root compression with residual unremitting radicular symptoms after failed conservative treatment. Cauda equina syndrome and progressive or new motor deficits are among the urgent surgical indications for microdiscectomy.[3]

Contraindications

Contraindications include additional pathologies, including infection, tumor, or segmental instability or vertebral fracture where fusion or instrumentation may be required. However, segmental instability and spondylolisthesis may be considered relative contraindications by some physicians.[3]

Discectomy for athletes

Degeneration caused by years of repetitive mechanical stress can cause the disc of an athlete to be herniated. Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a critical injury for elite athletes that could cause extreme pain and significantly hinder performance. To relieve the pain, athletes usually go through microdiscectomy. However, the results of treatments in elite athletes differ due to the demand for optimal treatment, short recovery period, and high performance after the operation.

Most athletes return to their pre-surgery level after a discectomy. A systematic review of 450 athletes shows that 75-100% of athletes return to play after surgery.[5] The average recovery period ranged from 2.8 to 8.7 months. Athletes recovered an average of 64.4% to 103.6% of their preoperative performance and had reported career longevity of 2.6 to 4.8 years post-return.[5] There are unsuccessful cases of discectomy for certain athletes like Tiger Woods, a world-famous PGA Tour golfer. Woods underwent three microdiscectomy procedures from 2014 to 2015 which failed to alleviate his pain.[6] The removal of disc material due to discectomy meant that Woods eventually had to go through spinal fusion to recover.

In the US

In the U.S., it has been estimated that the Medicare system spends over $300 million annually on lumbar discectomies.[7]

See also

References
  1. Book Chapter - Decision Making in Spinal Care - Chapter 61; Copyright 2013 by Thieme
  2. "ISASS17 - Regular Poster Presentation Abstracts - Endoscopic Surgery - 455 - Nano Endoscopic Approach for Central Lumbar Disc Herniations".
  3. Dowling, Thomas J.; Dowling, Thomas J. (2021), "Microdiscectomy", StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, PMID 32310444, retrieved 2021-05-07
  4. "Nucleus Pulposus - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics". www.sciencedirect.com. Retrieved 2021-05-07.
  5. Nair, Rueben; Kahlenberg, Cynthia A.; Hsu, Wellington K. (2015-06-01). "Outcomes of Lumbar Discectomy in Elite Athletes: The Need for High-level Evidence". Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 473 (6): 1971–1977. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3762-z. ISSN 1528-1132. PMC 4419017. PMID 25002213.
  6. O'Sullivan, Peter (2015-07-01). "Common misconceptions about back pain in sport: Tiger Woods' case brings five fundamental questions into sharp focus". British Journal of Sports Medicine. 49 (14): 905–907. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-094542. ISSN 0306-3674. PMID 25807161. S2CID 43137403.
  7. Schoenfeld, A. J.; Weiner, B. K. (2010). "Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Evidence-based practice". International Journal of General Medicine. 3: 209–214. doi:10.2147/ijgm.s12270. PMC 2915533. PMID 20689695.
  • Emmett, J. L.; Love, J. G. (1971). "Vesical dysfunction caused by protruded lumbar disk". The Journal of Urology. 105 (1): 86–91. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)61466-6. PMID 5100876.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.