Microwave ablation

For isolated, nonmetastatic lung tumors, surgical resection remains the reference standard for treatment. However, many patients are precluded from surgery due to poor cardiopulmonary function, advanced age, or extensive disease burden. For these patients, minimally invasive therapeutic options such as radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation have emerged as possible alternatives.

Tumor ablation of thoracic malignancies should be considered a viable treatment option for patients with early stage, primary or secondary lung cancers who are not surgical candidates or for patients in whom palliation of tumor related symptoms is the intent. MWA is regarded as a particularly efficient option for the treatment of lung tumors since unlike RFA it does not rely on impedance to generate heat, rather electromagnetic microwave waves heat matter by agitating water molecules in the surrounding tissue, producing friction and heat.

Another common use for microwave ablation is the treatment of liver tumors. For nonsurgical patients, local thermal ablation techniques have enabled local control of tumors without resection. In particular, this therapy has grown in use for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, since many patients present with advanced disease or compromised liver function.

Clinical applications of MWA have also included treatment of renal, adrenal, and bone malignancies. The goals of ablation of thoracic malignancies include: 1. Ablating the entire tumor and a margin of normal parenchyma surrounding it 2. Avoiding injury to critical structures 3. Creating a large ablation area quickly.

The most common adverse effects of MWA for lung tumors include pain, fever, pneumothorax, and pleural effusions.^[6-12] Rib fractures, following thermal ablation, particularly MWA, have been newly noted in the literature.^[13]

One of the limitations of thermal-based ablation therapies, including MWA, is the risk of marginal recurrences and/or residual disease. Residual or recurrent tumor is particularly likely in areas adjacent to heat sinks, such as larger blood vessels or airways. Theoretically, the greater heat intensity generated in MWA compared to other thermal modalities should allow for more complete ablations in larger tumors and thus decreased incidence of residual disease or recurrence at the tumor margins.^[3]

MWA allows for flexible treatment approaches, including percutaneous, laparoscopic, and open surgical access. Therapy is generally performed with the patient under conscious sedation; however, in cases where intra-procedural pain is problematic a general anesthetic may be used. Ablations can be performed using a single MW antenna or a cluster of three to achieve a greater ablation volume.^[4] Tumor temperatures during ablation can be measured with a separate thermal couple; tumors are treated to over 60 °C to achieve coagulation necrosis.

The technique for thermal ablation in the lung by using radiofrequency ablation was first described in 1995 for use in animal lung tumor models and then in 2000 in humans.^[1-2] Microwave ablation has emerged as a newer ablation modality and an addition to the arsenal of minimally invasive cancer care.

The purported benefits of microwave ablation over other heat-based modalities such as radiofrequency ablation and laser include a larger and faster volume of tissue heating with a given application. Unlike radiofrequency ablation, MWA does not rely on an electrical circuit allowing for multiple applicators to be used simultaneously.^[3]

1. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Compton CC, McLoud TC (1995). Radiofrequency Tissue Ablation in the Rabbit Lung: Efficacy and Complications. Acad Radiol 2(9).
2. Dupuy DE, Zagoria RJ, Akerley W, Mayo-Smith WW, Kavanagh PV, Safran H (2000). Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of malignancies in the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(1).
3. Dupuy DE (2009). Microwave Ablation Compared with Radiofrequency Ablation in Lung Tissue – Is Microwave Not Just for Popcorn Anymore? Radiology 251(3).
4. McTaggart RA, Dupuy DE (2007). Thermal Ablation of Lung Tumors. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 10(2).
5. Dupuy DE (2011). Image-guided Thermal Ablation of Lung Malignancies. Radiology 260.
6. Lencioni RR, Crocetti L, Cioni R, et al. (2008). Response to Radiofrequency Ablation of Pulmonary Tumours: A Prospective, Intention-to-treat, Multicentre Clinical Trial (the RAPTURE study). Lancet Oncol 9(7).
7. Simon CJ, Dupuy DE, DiPetrillo TA, et al. (2007). Pulmonary Radiofrequency Ablation: Long-term Safety and Efficacy in 153 Patients. Radiology 243(1).
8. Kang S, Luo R, Liao W, Wu H, Zhang X, Meng Y (2004). Single Group Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Complications of Radiofrequency Ablation and Usefulness of Post Treatment Position Emission Tomography in Lung Tumours. World J Surg Oncol 2(30).
9. de Baère T, Palussière J, Aupérin A, et al. (2006). Midterm Local Efficacy and Survival after Radiofrequency Ablation of Lung Tumors with Minimum Follow-up of 1 Year: Prospective Evaluation. Radiology 240(2).
10. Dupuy DE, DiPetrillo T, Gandhi S, et al. (2006). Radiofrequency Ablation Followed by Conventional Radiotherapy for Medically Inoperable Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Chest 129(3).
11. Wolf FJ, Grand DJ, Machan JT, Dipetrillo TA, Mayo-Smith WW, Dupuy DE (2008). Microwave Ablation of Lung Malignancies: Effectiveness, CT Findings, and Safety in 50 Patients. Radiology 247(3).
12. Feng W, Liu W, Li C, et al. (2002). Percutaneous Microwave Coagulation Therapy for Lung Cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 24(4).
13. Alexander ES, Hankins CA, Machan JT, Healey TT, Dupuy DE (2013). Rib Fractures after Percutaneous Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation of Lung Tumors: Incidence and Relevance. Radiology 266(3