Maslow's hierarchy of needs

Maslow's hierarchy of needs is an idea in psychology proposed by American psychologist Abraham Maslow in his 1943 paper "A Theory of Human Motivation" in the journal Psychological Review.[1] Maslow subsequently extended the idea to include his observations of humans' innate curiosity. His theories parallel many other theories of human developmental psychology, some of which focus on describing the stages of growth in humans. The theory is a classification system intended to reflect the universal needs of society as its base, then proceeding to more acquired emotions.[3] The hierarchy of needs is split between deficiency needs and growth needs, with two key themes involved within the theory being individualism and the prioritization of needs. While the theory is usually shown as a pyramid in illustrations, Maslow himself never created a pyramid to represent the hierarchy of needs[4][5]. The hierarchy of needs is a psychological idea and also an assessment tool, particularly in education, healthcare and social work.[6] The hierarchy remains a popular framework in sociology research, including management training[7] and higher education.[8]

Maslow's hierarchy of needs is often represented as a pyramid, with the more basic needs at the bottom[1][2]

Moreover, the hierarchy of needs is used to study how humans intrinsically partake in behavioral motivation. Maslow used the terms "physiological", "safety", "belonging and love", "social needs" or "esteem", "self-actualization" and "transcendence" to describe the pattern through which human needs and motivations generally move. This means that, according to the theory, for motivation to arise at the next stage, each prior stage must be satisfied by an individual. The hierarchy has been used to explain how effort and motivation are correlated in the context of human behavior. Each of these individual levels contains a certain amount of internal sensation that must be met in order for an individual to complete their hierarchy.[3] The goal in Maslow's hierarchy is to attain the level or stage of self-actualization.[9]

Although widely used and researched, Maslow's hierarchy of needs lacks conclusive supporting evidence and the validity of the theory remains contested in academia.[10][11][12][13] One criticism of the original theory which has been revised into newer versions of the theory, was that the original hierarchy states that a lower level must be completely satisfied and fulfilled before moving onto a higher pursuit; there is evidence to suggest that levels continuously overlap each other.[3] Other criticisms include the placement location of sex in the hierarchy, the assumption of individualism in the theory, and lack of accounting for regional variances in culture and availability of resources.

Stages
Alternative illustration as a dynamic hierarchy of needs with overlaps of different needs at the same time
Simplified hierarchy of needs

Maslow's hierarchy of needs is often portrayed in the shape of a pyramid, with the largest, most fundamental needs at the bottom, and the need for self-actualization and transcendence at the top. In other words, the idea is that individuals' most basic needs must be met before they become motivated to achieve higher-level needs.[14] Despite the fact that the ideas behind the hierarchy are Maslow's, the pyramid itself does not exist anywhere in Maslow's original work.[15]

The most fundamental four layers of the pyramid contain what Maslow called "deficiency needs" or "d-needs": esteem, friendship and love, security, and physical needs. If these "deficiency needs" are not met – except for the most fundamental (physiological) need – there may not be a physical indication, but the individual will feel anxious and tense. Deprivation is what causes deficiency, so when one has unmet needs, this motivates them to fulfill what they are being denied.[2] Maslow's idea suggests that the most basic level of needs must be met before the individual will strongly desire (or focus motivation upon) the secondary or higher-level needs. Maslow also coined the term "metamotivation" to describe the motivation of people who go beyond the scope of basic needs and strive for constant betterment.[16]

The human brain is a complex system and has parallel processes running at the same time, thus many different motivations from various levels of Maslow's hierarchy can occur at the same time. Maslow spoke clearly about these levels and their satisfaction in terms such as "relative," "general," and "primarily." Instead of stating that the individual focuses on a certain need at any given time, Maslow stated that a certain need "dominates" the human organism.[17] Thus Maslow acknowledged the likelihood that the different levels of motivation could occur at any time in the human mind, but he focused on identifying the basic types of motivation and the order in which they would tend to be met.[18]

Physiological needs

Physiological needs are the base of the hierarchy. These needs are the biological component for human survival. According to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, physiological needs are factored into internal motivation. According to Maslow's theory, humans are compelled to satisfy physiological needs first to pursue higher levels of intrinsic satisfaction.[1] To advance higher-level needs in Maslow's hierarchy, physiological needs must be met first. This means that if a person is struggling to meet their physiological needs, they are unwilling to seek safety, belonging, esteem, and self-actualization on their own.

Physiological needs include:

These physiological needs must be met for the human body to remain in homeostasis. Air, for example, is a physiological need; a human being requires air more urgently than higher-level needs, such as a sense of social belonging. Physiological needs are critical to "...meet the very basic essentials of life ..."[6] This allows for cravings such as hunger and thirst to be satisfied and not disrupt the regulation of the body.

Safety needs

Once a person's physiological needs are satisfied, their safety needs take precedence and dominate behavior. In the absence of physical safety – due to war, natural disaster, family violence, childhood abuse, etc. and/or in the absence of economic safety – (due to an economic crisis and lack of work opportunities) these safety needs manifest themselves in ways such as a preference for job security, grievance procedures for protecting the individual from unilateral authority, savings accounts, insurance policies, disability accommodations, etc. This level is more likely to predominate in children as they generally have a greater need to feel safe - especially children that have disabilities.[19] Adults are also impacted by this, typically in economic matters, "... adults are not immune to the need of safety."[6] It includes shelter, job security, health, and safe environments. If a person does not feel safe in an environment, they will seek safety before attempting to meet any higher level of survival. This is why the "... goal of consistently meeting the need for safety is to have stability in one's life,"[6] stability brings back the concept of homeostasis for humans which our bodies need.

Safety needs include:

  • Health
  • Personal security
  • Emotional security
  • Financial security

Love and social belonging needs

After physiological and safety needs are fulfilled, the third level of human needs is interpersonal and involves feelings of belongingness. According to Maslow, humans possess an effective need for a sense of belonging and acceptance among social groups, regardless of whether these groups are large or small; being a part of a group is crucial, regardless if it is work, sports, friends or family.[2] The sense of belongingness is "being comfortable with and connection to others that results from receiving acceptance, respect, and love."[19] For example, some large social groups may include clubs, co-workers, religious groups, professional organizations, sports teams, gangs, and online communities. Some examples of small social connections include family members, intimate partners, mentors, colleagues, and confidants. Humans need to love and be loved – both sexually and non-sexually – by others.[1] Many people become susceptible to loneliness, social anxiety, and clinical depression in the absence of this love or belonging element. This need is especially strong in childhood and it can override the need for safety as witnessed in children who cling to abusive parents. Deficiencies due to hospitalism, neglect, shunning, ostracism, etc. can adversely affect the individual's ability to form and maintain emotionally significant relationships in general. Mental health can be a huge factor when it comes to an individual's needs and development. When an individual's needs are not met, it can cause depression during adolescence. When an individual grows up in a higher-income family, it is much more likely that they will have a lower rate of depression. This is because all of their basic needs are met. Studies have shown that when a family goes through financial stress for a prolonged time, depression rates are higher, not only because their basic needs are not being met, but because this stress strains the parent-child relationship. The parent(s) is stressed about providing for their children, and they are also likely to spend less time at home because they are working more to make more money and provide for their family.[20]

Social belonging needs include:

This need for belonging may overcome the physiological and security needs, depending on the strength of the peer pressure. In contrast, for some individuals, the need for self-esteem is more important than the need for belonging; and for others, the need for creative fulfillment may supersede even the most basic needs.[21]

Esteem needs

Esteem is the respect, and admiration of a person, but also "... self-respect and respect from others."[19] Most people need stable esteem, meaning which is soundly based on real capacity or achievement. Maslow noted two versions of esteem needs. The "lower" version of esteem is the need for respect from others and may include a need for status, recognition, fame, prestige, and attention. The "higher" version of esteem is the need for self-respect, and can include a need for strength, competence,[3] mastery, self-confidence, independence, and freedom. This "higher" version takes guidelines, the "hierarchies are interrelated rather than sharply separated."[17] This means that esteem and the subsequent levels are not strictly separated; instead, the levels are closely related.

Esteem comes from day-to-day experiences, that provide a learning opportunity that allows us to discover ourselves. This is incredibly important for children, which is why giving them "... the opportunity to discover they are competent and capable learners."[19] To boost this, adults must provide opportunities for children to have successful and positive experiences to give children a greater "... sense of self."[19] Adults, especially parents and educators must create and ensure an environment for children that is supportive and provides them with opportunities that "helps children see themselves as respectable, capable individuals." It can also be found that "Maslow indicated that the need for respect or reputation is most important for children ... and precedes real self-esteem or dignity,"[2] which reflects the two aspects of esteem: for oneself and others.

Cognitive needs

After esteem needs cognitive needs come next in the hierarchy of needs. People have cognitive needs such as creativity, foresight, curiosity, and meaning. Individuals who enjoy activities that require deliberation and brainstorming have a greater need for cognition. Individuals who are unmotivated to participate in the activity, on the other hand, have a low demand for cognitive abilities.[22] It has been said that Maslow's hierarchy of needs can be extended after esteem needs into two more categories: cognitive needs and aesthetic needs. Cognitive needs crave meaning, information, comprehension and curiosity - this creates a will to learn and attain knowledge.[2]  From an educational viewpoint, Maslow wanted humans to have intrinsic motivation to become educated people.

Aesthetic needs

After reaching one's cognitive needs it would progress to aesthetic needs, to beautify one's life. This would consist of having the ability to appreciate the beauty within the world around one's self, on a day-to-day basis.[2] According to Maslow's theories, to progress toward Self-Actualization, humans require beautiful imagery or novel and aesthetically pleasing experiences. Humans must immerse themselves in nature's splendor while paying close attention to and observing their surroundings to extract the world's beauty. This higher level of need to connect with nature results in an endearing sense of intimacy with nature and all that is endearing.[2] After reaching one's cognitive needs it would progress to aesthetic needs, to beautify oneself. This would consist of improving one's physical appearance to ensure its beauty to balance the rest of the body.[2]

Self-actualization
Main article: Self-actualization

"What a man can be, he must be."[17]: 91  This quotation forms the basis of the perceived need for self-actualization. This level of need refers to the realization of one's full potential. Maslow describes this as the desire to accomplish everything that one can, to become the most that one can be.[17]: 92  People may have a strong, particular desire to become an ideal parent, succeed athletically, or create paintings, pictures, or inventions.[17]: 93  To understand this level of need, a person must not only succeed in the previous needs but master them. Self-actualization can be described as a value-based system when discussing its role in motivation. Self-actualization is understood as the goal or explicit motive, and the previous stages in Maslow's hierarchy fall in line to become the step-by-step process by which self-actualization is achievable; an explicit motive is the objective of a reward-based system that is used to intrinsically drive the completion of certain values or goals.[3] Individuals who are motivated to pursue this goal seek and understand how their needs, relationships, and sense of self are expressed through their behavior. Self-actualization needs include:[3]

  • Partner acquisition
  • Parenting
  • Utilizing and developing talents and abilities
  • Pursuing goals

Transcendence needs

Maslow later subdivided the triangle's top to include self-transcendence, also known as spiritual needs. Spiritual needs differ from other types of needs in that they can be met on multiple levels. When this need is met, it produces feelings of integrity and raises things to a higher plane of existence.[23] In his later years, Maslow explored a further dimension of motivation, while criticizing his original vision of self-actualization.[24][25][26][27] By these later ideas, one finds the fullest realization in giving oneself to something beyond oneself—for example, in altruism or spirituality. He equated this with the desire to reach the infinite.[28] "Transcendence refers to the very highest and most inclusive or holistic levels of human consciousness, behaving and relating, as ends rather than means, to oneself, to significant others, to human beings in general, to other species, to nature, and to the cosmos."[29]

History

Maslow's hierarchy of needs was created as Maslow "studied and observed monkeys [...] noticing their unusual pattern of behavior that addressed priorities based on individual needs."[6]

Some indigenous academics have speculated that his theories, including the hierarchy, may have been influenced by the teachings and philosophy of the Blackfeet tribe, where he spent several weeks doing fieldwork in 1938;[30][31] however, while this idea has gained attention on social media, there is no evidence to suggest he borrowed or stole ideas for his hierarchy of needs, which he only first published in 1943.[4][5]

Maslow's idea was further described in his 1954 book Motivation and Personality.[17]

At the time of its original publication in 1943, there was no empirical evidence to support the theory.[32][33]

Criticism

Maslow's hierarchy of needs has widespread influence outside academia, perhaps because it explains things "that most humans immediately recognize in themselves and others."[34] Still, academically, Maslow's idea is heavily contested. Although recent research appears to validate the existence of universal human needs, as well as shared ordering of the way in which people seek and satisfy needs, the exact hierarchy proposed by Maslow is called into question.[12][13]

Methodology

Maslow studied people such as Albert Einstein, Jane Addams, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Baruch Spinoza, rather than mentally ill or neurotic people, writing that "the study of crippled, stunted, immature, and unhealthy specimens can yield only a cripple psychology and a cripple philosophy."[17]: 202, 234  Maslow studied the healthiest 1% of the college student population.[35][17]: 200 

Global ranking

In a 1976 review of Maslow's hierarchy of needs, little evidence was found for the specific ranking of needs that Maslow described or for the existence of a definite hierarchy at all.[36] This refutation was claimed to be supported by the majority of longitudinal data and cross-sectional studies at the time, with the limited support for Maslow's hierarchy criticized due to poor measurement criteria and selection of control groups.[36]

In 1984, the order in which the hierarchy is arranged was criticized as being ethnocentric by Geert Hofstede.[37] In turn, Hofstede's work was criticized by others.[38] Maslow's hierarchy of needs was argued as failing to illustrate and expand upon the difference between the social and intellectual needs of those raised in individualistic societies and those raised in collectivist societies. The needs and drives of those in individualistic societies tend to be more self-centered than those in collectivist societies, focusing on the improvement of the self, with self-actualization being the apex of self-improvement. In collectivist societies, the needs of acceptance and community will outweigh the needs for freedom and individuality.[39]

Criticisms towards the theory have also been expressed on the lack of consideration towards individualism and collectivism in the context of spirituality.[32]

Ranking of sex

The position and value of sex on the pyramid have also been a source of criticism regarding Maslow's hierarchy. Maslow's hierarchy places sex in the needs category (above) along with food and breathing; it lists sex solely from an individualistic perspective. For example, sex is placed with other physiological needs which must be satisfied before a person considers "higher" levels of motivation. Some critics feel this placement of sex neglects the emotional, familial, and evolutionary implications of sex within the community, although others point out that this is true of all of the basic needs.[40][41] In addition and in stark contrast to the other listed needs, it is clear that sex is not a universal need. This is evident in children who have not undergone puberty, and even adults can choose to go their entire life without it yet still obtain higher needs. The same cannot be said for the other listed needs.

Changes to the hierarchy by circumstance

The higher-order (self-esteem and self-actualization) and lower-order (physiological, safety, and love) need classification of Maslow's hierarchy of needs is not universal and may vary across cultures due to individual differences and availability of resources in the region or geopolitical entity/country.

In a 1997 study,[42] exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of a thirteen-item scale showed there were two particularly important levels of needs in the US during the peacetime of 1993 to 1994: survival (physiological and safety) and psychological (love, self-esteem, and self-actualization). In 1991, a retrospective peacetime measure was established and collected during the Persian Gulf War, and US citizens were asked to recall the importance of needs from the previous year. Once again, only two levels of needs were identified; therefore, people have the ability and competence to recall and estimate the importance of needs. For citizens in the Middle East (Egypt and Saudi Arabia), three levels of needs regarding importance and satisfaction surfaced during the 1990 retrospective peacetime. These three levels were completely different from those of US citizens.

Changes regarding the importance and satisfaction of needs from the retrospective peacetime to wartime due to stress varied significantly across cultures (the US vs. the Middle East). For the US citizens, there was only one level of needs, since all needs were considered equally important. With regards to satisfaction of needs during the war, in the US there were three levels: physiological needs, safety needs, and psychological needs (social, self-esteem, and self-actualization). During the war, the satisfaction of physiological needs and safety needs were separated into two independent needs, while during peacetime, they were combined as one. For the people of the Middle East, the satisfaction of needs changed from three levels to two during wartime.[43][44]

A study of the ordering of needs in Asia found differences between the ordering of lower and higher order needs. For instance, community (related to belongingness and considered a lower order need in Maslow's hierarchy) was found to be the highest order need across Asia, followed closely by self-acceptance and growth.[45]

A 1981 study looked at how Maslow's hierarchy might vary across age groups.[46] A survey asked participants of varying ages to rate a set number of statements from most important to least important. The researchers found that children had higher physical need scores than the other groups, the love need emerged from childhood to young adulthood, the esteem need was highest among the adolescent group, young adults had the highest self-actualization level, and old age had the highest level of security, it was needed across all levels comparably. The authors argued that this suggested Maslow's hierarchy may be limited as a theory for developmental sequence since the sequence of the love need and the self-esteem need should be reversed according to age.

See also
  • ERG theory, further expands and explains Maslow's theory
  • First World problem reflects on trivial concerns in the context of more pressing needs
  • Manfred Max-Neef's Fundamental human needs, Manfred Max-Neef's model
  • Functional prerequisites
  • Human givens, a theory in psychotherapy that offers descriptions of the nature, needs, and innate attributes of humans
  • Need theory, David McClelland's model
  • Positive disintegration
  • Self-determination theory, Edward L. Deci's and Richard Ryan's model

References
  1. Maslow 1943.
  2. McLeod, Saul (29 December 2021) [2007]. "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs". SimplyPsychology. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
  3. Deckers, Lambert (2018). Motivation: Biological, Psychological, and Environmental. Routledge Press. ISBN 9781138036338.
  4. Kaufman, Scott Barry; Bridgman, Todd; Cummings, Stephen; Ballard, John (23 April 2019). "Who Created Maslow's Iconic Pyramid?". Beautiful Minds. Scientific American Blog Network. New York City: Springer Nature America. ISSN 0036-8733. Archived from the original on 8 May 2019. The claim that Maslow stole the idea for his pyramid from the Blackfoot has gained attention on social media, but if Maslow did not create the pyramid, he could not have taken it from the Blackfoot. There is no doubt that Maslow’s fieldwork with the Blackfoot was insightful for him. He discussed his observations with the Blackfoot briefly in his 1954 book. Maslow’s biographer, Ed Hoffman, devoted an entire chapter to Maslow’s fieldwork. While Maslow learned much about these proud people, there is nothing in these writings to suggest he borrowed or stole ideas for his hierarchy of needs.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  5. Bridgman, Todd; Cummings, Stephen; Ballard, John (March 2019). "Who Built Maslow's Pyramid? A History of the Creation of Management Studies' Most Famous Symbol and Its Implications for Management Education". Academy of Management Learning & Education. 18 (1): 81–98. doi:10.5465/amle.2017.0351. ISSN 1537-260X. S2CID 150163519.
  6. Poston, Bob (August 2009). "An Exercise in Personal Exploration: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs" (PDF). The Surgical Technologist. Association of Surgical Technologists. 308: 348.
  7. Kremer, William; Hammond, Claudia (31 August 2013). "Abraham Maslow and the pyramid that beguiled business". World Service. BBC News Magazine. Archived from the original on 16 July 2018. Retrieved 1 September 2013. Abraham Maslow and the Hierarchy of Needs was broadcast on Mind Changers on Radio 4 and Health Check on the BBC World Service
  8. Freitas, Frances Anne; Leonard, Lora J. (January 2011). "Maslow's hierarchy of needs and student academic success". Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 6 (1): 9–13. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2010.07.004. ISSN 1557-3087.
  9. Wills, Evelyn; McEwen, Melanie (2014). Theoretical basis for nursing. ISBN 9781451190311. OCLC 857664345.
  10. Lester, David (August 2013). "Measuring Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs". Psychological Reports. 113 (1): 15–17. doi:10.2466/02.20.pr0.113x16z1. ISSN 0033-2941. PMID 24340796. S2CID 35870176.
  11. Fallatah, Rodwan Hashim Mohammed; Syed, Jawad (2017-11-30), "A Critical Review of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs", Employee Motivation in Saudi Arabia, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 19–59, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67741-5_2, ISBN 978-3-319-67740-8, retrieved 2022-04-30
  12. Villarica, H. (August 17, 2011). "Maslow 2.0: A new and improved recipe for happiness". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on November 21, 2011. Retrieved March 9, 2017.
  13. Tay, L.; Diener, E. (2011). "Needs and subjective well-being around the world". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 101 (2): 354–365. doi:10.1037/a0023779. PMID 21688922.
  14. Steere, B. F. (1988). Becoming an effective classroom manager: A resource for teachers. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-88706-620-7. Archived from the original on 2021-06-26. Retrieved 2020-11-06.
  15. Eaton, Sarah Elaine (August 4, 2012). "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: Is the Pyramid a Hoax?". Learning, Teaching, and Leadership. Archived from the original on May 22, 2020. Retrieved May 22, 2020.
  16. Goble, Frank G. (1971). The third force: the psychology of Abraham Maslow. Richmond, CA: Maurice Bassett Publishing. p. 62. ISBN 0671421743.
  17. Maslow, A (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper. ISBN 978-0-06-041987-5.
  18. "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs in Education". Education Library. 2020-02-06. Archived from the original on 2020-02-06. Retrieved 2020-02-06.
  19. Dodge, Diane Trister; Colker, Laura J.; Heroman, Cate (2002). "Theory and Research Behind The Creative Curriculum". The Creative Curriculum for Preschool (PDF) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies. pp. 2–3. ISBN 978-1879537439. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 January 2020 – via Jeanette Fanconi, Modesto Junior College.
  20. Crandall, Aliceann; Powell, Elizabeth A.; Bradford, Grace C.; Magnusson, Brianna M.; Hanson, Carl L.; Barnes, Michael D.; Novilla, M. Lelinneth B.; Bean, Roy A. (2020). "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs as a Framework for Understanding Adolescent Depressive Symptoms over Time". Journal of Child and Family Studies. 29 (2): 273–281. doi:10.1007/s10826-019-01577-4. S2CID 204353035.
  21. Cherry, Kendra. "What Is Self-Actualization?". About.com. Archived from the original on 2016-04-04. Retrieved 2016-04-15.
  22. "Need for Cognition". Research and custom writing services. Archived from the original on 2021-06-28. Retrieved 2021-08-01.
  23. Gautum, Sandeep (14 December 2007). "Maslow's eight basic needs and the eight stage developmental model" (Blog). The Mouse Trap. Archived from the original on 1 August 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2021.
  24. Maslow, Abraham H. (1996). "Critique of self-actualization theory". In Hoffman, Edward (ed.). Future visions: The unpublished papers of Abraham Maslow. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 26–32. ISBN 978-0761900511.
  25. Maslow, Abraham H. (1969). "The farther reaches of human nature". Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. 1 (1): 1–9.
  26. Maslow, Abraham H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: The Viking Press.
  27. Koltko-Rivera, Mark E. (2006). "Rediscovering the Later Version of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: Self-Transcendence and Opportunities for Theory, Research, and Unification" (PDF). Review of General Psychology. 10 (4): 302–317. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.302. S2CID 16046903. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-10-25. Retrieved 2014-12-24.
  28. Garcia-Romeu, Albert (2010). "Self-transcendence as a measurable transpersonal construct" (PDF). Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. 421: 26–47. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-02-14. Retrieved 2020-05-25.
  29. Maslow 1971, p. 269.
  30. Taylor, Steve (22 March 2019). "Original Influences |" (Blog). Psychology Today. Archived from the original on 2021-09-26. Retrieved 2021-08-21. There is even the possibility—put forward by some indigenous academics such as Professor Cindy Blackstock and Leroy Little Bear—that Maslow’s exposure to Blackfoot culture was instrumental in his formation of the "hierarchy of needs" model, which he first presented in 1943.
  31. Dames, Shannon (9 December 2021). Root Strength E-Book: A Health and Care Professionals Guide to Minimizing Stress and Maximizing Thriving. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-323-77870-1. The Maslow/Blackfoot controversy illustrates the foundational difference between two frameworks that look similar, but in principle are quite different. Some historical researchers, such as Ryan Heavy Head, speculate that Maslow's hierarchy of needs is largely informed by the Blackfoot (Siksika) Nation he visited in 1938
  32. Bouzenita, Anke Iman; Boulanouar, Aisha Wood (2016). "Maslow's hierarchy of needs: An Islamic critique". Intellectual Discourse. 24.
  33. Colledge, Ray (2002), "Maslow's theory of human motivation", Mastering Counselling Theory, London: Macmillan Education UK, pp. 129–138, doi:10.1007/978-0-230-62957-8_10, ISBN 978-0-333-92243-9, retrieved 2022-04-30
  34. Abulof, Uriel (2017-12-01). "Introduction: Why We Need Maslow in the Twenty-First Century". Society. 54 (6): 508–509. doi:10.1007/s12115-017-0198-6. ISSN 0147-2011.
  35. Mittelman, W. (1991). "Maslow's study of self-actualization: A reinterpretation". Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 31 (1): 114–135. doi:10.1177/0022167891311010. S2CID 144849415.
  36. Wahba, M. A.; Bridwell, L. G. (1976). "Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory". Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 15 (2): 212–240. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90038-6.
  37. Hofstede, G. (1984). "The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept" (PDF). Academy of Management Review. 9 (3): 389–398. doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4279653. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-11-12.
  38. Jones, M. (28 June 2007). "Hofstede – Culturally questionable?". Faculty of Commerce – Papers (Archive). Archived from the original on 3 August 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
  39. Cianci, R.; Gambrel, P. A. (2003). "Maslow's hierarchy of needs: Does it apply in a collectivist culture". Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship. 8 (2): 143–161.
  40. Kenrick, D. (May 19, 2010). "Rebuilding Maslow's pyramid on an evolutionary foundation". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on September 26, 2021. Retrieved July 26, 2010.
  41. Kenrick, D. T.; Griskevicius, V.; Neuberg, S. L.; Schaller, M. (2010). "Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 5 (3): 292–314. doi:10.1177/1745691610369469. eISSN 1745-6924. ISSN 1745-6916. LCCN 2006205924. OCLC 65176886. PMC 3161123. PMID 21874133.
  42. Tang, T. L.; West, W. B. (1997). "The importance of human needs during peacetime, retrospective peacetime, and the Persian Gulf War". International Journal of Stress Management. American Psychological Association on behalf of the International Stress Management Association. 4 (1): 47–62. doi:10.1007/BF02766072. eISSN 1573-3424. ISSN 1072-5245. LCCN 94648209. OCLC 44461463. S2CID 68311297.
  43. Tang, T. L.; Ibrahim, A. H. (1998). "Importance of human needs during retrospective peacetime and the Persian Gulf War: Mid-eastern employees". International Journal of Stress Management. American Psychological Association on behalf of the International Stress Management Association. 5 (1): 25–37. doi:10.1023/A:1022902803386. eISSN 1573-3424. ISSN 1072-5245. LCCN 94648209. OCLC 44461463. S2CID 141983215.
  44. Tang, T. L.; Ibrahim, A. H.; West, W. B. (2002). "Effects of war-related stress on the satisfaction of human needs: The United States and the Middle East". International Journal of Management Theory and Practices. 3 (1): 35–53.
  45. Monnot, M. J.; Beehr, T. A. (2022). "The Good Life Versus the "Goods Life": An Investigation of Goal Contents Theory and Employee Subjective Well-Being Across Asian Countries". Journal of Happiness Studies. 23 (3): 12–15–1244. doi:10.1007/s10902-021-00447-5. S2CID 239678199.
  46. Goebel, B. L.; Brown, D. R. (1981). "Age differences in motivation related to Maslow's need hierarchy". Developmental Psychology. 17 (6): 809–815. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.17.6.809.

Further reading

Documents Cited
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
Wikiquote has quotations related to Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.