Monte Verde

Monte Verde is an archaeological site in the Llanquihue Province[1] in southern Chile, located near Puerto Montt, Southern Chile, which has been dated to as early as 18,500 cal BP (16,500 BC).[2] Previously, the widely accepted date for early occupation at Monte Verde was about 14,500 years cal BP.[3] This dating added to the evidence showing that the human settlement of the Americas pre-dates the Clovis culture by roughly 1,000 years (or 5,000 years if the 18,500 BP dates are confirmed). This contradicts the previously accepted "Clovis first" model which holds that settlement of the Americas began after 13,500 cal BP. The Monte Verde findings were initially dismissed by most of the scientific community, but the evidence then became more accepted in archaeological circles.[3][4]

Monte Verde
View of Monte Verde and Chinchihuapi Creek in 2012
Shown within Chile
LocationSouthern Chile
Coordinates41°30′17″S 73°12′16″W
Typeopen-air

Paleoecological evidence of the coastal landscape's ability to sustain human life further supports a "coastal migration" model.[5] Dating of rock surfaces and animal bones suggests the coastal corridor was deglaciated and became habitable after 17,000 years BP.[6] Although testing coastal migration theories can be difficult due to sea level rise since the last glacial maximum, archaeologists are increasingly willing to accept the possibility that the initial settlement of the Americas occurred via coastlines.[7][8]

History

Discovery

The site was discovered in late 1975 when a veterinary student visited the area of Monte Verde, where severe erosion was occurring due to logging. Prior to the logging, the site itself had been preserved well due to the favorable conditions created by the Chinchihuapi creek banks. The student was shown a strange "cow bone" collected by nearby peasants who had found it exposed in the eroded Chinchihuapi Creek. The bone later proved to be from a gomphothere. Tom Dillehay, an American anthropologist and professor at the Universidad Austral de Chile at the time, started excavating Monte Verde in 1977.[9]

The site is situated on the banks of Chinchihuapi Creek, a tributary of the Maullín River located 36 miles (58 km) from the Pacific Ocean. One of the rare open-air prehistoric sites found so far in the Americas, Monte Verde was well preserved because it was located in an anaerobic bog environment near the creek. A short time after the site was originally occupied, the waters of the creek rose and a peat-filled bog formed that inhibited the bacterial decay of organic material and preserved many perishable artifacts and other items for millennia.

Radiocarbon dating of bones and charcoal in 1982 gave the site an average age of 14,800 years ago (calibrated), more than 1,000 years earlier than the oldest-known site of human habitation in the Americas at that time.[3][10][11]

In the initial excavation, two large hearths and many small ones were found. The remains of local animals were discovered, in addition to wooden posts from approximately twelve huts. Scraps of clothing made of hide were also found. This led archaeologists to estimate the population was around 20-30 inhabitants. A human footprint was also observed in the clay, probably from a 70 kg adult.[12] Inside the camp, archaeologists found a chunk of meat that still had preserved DNA. After a DNA analysis, it matched that of a gomphothere, indicating what type of food the inhabitants ate.[13]

Stratigraphy

The Monte Verde site has two distinct levels. The upper level, MV-II, has been extensively characterized. Its occupation is reliably dated to 14,800 – 13,800 BP.[14]

The lower level, MV-I, is less well understood. It was more ephemeral, having come from ancient river sediments. Dillehay found charcoal scatters which may have been the remains of fireplaces next to stone and wood artifacts. These were dated to at least 33,000BP.[15] He acknowledges MV-I has issues, such as uncertain artifacts, doubtful radiocarbon dates, and unreliable contexts. He hesistates to accept this level without additional evidence, including sites of similar age in the Americas.[16][17]

Monte Verde Level I (MV-I)

Monte Verde I is located under an outwash plain, which formed during the last glaciation.[2] It is not directly below MV-II.[1] It was first concluded to be a site of human occupation because of three clay-lined burned areas and 26 stones, 13 of which may have been modified by humans.[2] In 2013, Dillehay and his team returned to perform another excavation at Monte Verde due to the inadequate previous excavations.[2] In 2015, Monte Verde I was re-dated to around 18,500 to 14,500 BP.[2] Charcoal remains, charred animal bone fragments and several lithic artifacts, about 34% of which were derived from non-local sources, were discovered.[2]

Monte Verde Level II (MV-II)

According to Dillehay and his team, Monte Verde II was occupied around 14,800 – 13,800 BP by about twenty to thirty people. A twenty-foot-long tent-like structure of wood and animal hides was erected on the banks of the creek and was framed with logs and planks staked in the ground, making walls of poles covered with animal hides. Using ropes made of local reeds, the hides were tied to the poles creating separate living quarters within the main structure. Outside the tent-like structure, two large hearths had been built for community usage, most probably for tool making and craftwork.

Each of the living quarters had a brazier pit lined with clay. Around those hearths, many stone tools and remnants of spilled seeds, nuts, and berries were found. A 13,000-year-old specimen of the wild potato, Solanum maglia, was also found at the site; these remains, the oldest on record for any species of potato, wild or cultivated, suggest that southern Chile was one of the two main centres for the evolution of Solanum tuberosum tuberosum, the common potato.[18] Remains of forty-five different edible plant species were found within the site, over a fifth of them originating from up to 150 miles (240 km) away. This suggested that the people of Monte Verde either had traded on or traveled regularly in this extended network.

Other important finds from this site include human coprolites, a footprint, assumed to have been made by a child, stone tools, and cordage. The date for this site was obtained by Dr. Dillehay with the use of radiocarbon dating of charcoal and bone found within the site.

In the May 9, 2008 issue of Science, a team reported that they identified nine species of seaweed and marine algae recovered from hearths and other areas in the ancient settlement. The seaweed samples were directly dated between 14,220 and 13,980 years ago, confirming that MV-II was occupied more than 1,000 years earlier than any other reliably dated human settlements in the Americas.[14][19]

Associated Sites

Another Chinchihuapi Creek site (with two layers labeled CH-I and CH-II), located about 500 meters upstream the same river that the Monte Verde site is on, has been dating to about 14,500 BP.[20] Similar materials such as burned areas and fragmentary scorched animal bones associated with small rock flakes have been recovered.[2] Between the sites, Dillehay and his team excavated test pits and core drillings, finding 12 small burned features directly associate with both burned and unburned animal remains, manuport stones, and anthropologically modified flakes dated between 18,500 BP - 14,500 BP.[2] These findings may represent seasonal activities around the area.[2] As of 2019, Dillehay has led two more excavations at the Chinchihuapi site, finding lithic tools and flakes alongside burned features associated with burned animal and plant remains in CH-I.[20]

Interpretations

Material evidence gathered at Monte Verde has reshaped the way archaeologists think about the earliest inhabitants of the Americas. Radiocarbon dating has provided a date of 14,800 BP and possibly 33,000 BP, establishing Monte Verde as the oldest-known site of human habitation in the Americas.[21] Previously, the earliest accepted site had been determined to be near Clovis, New Mexico, dating between 13,500 and 13,000 BP, over 1,000 years later than Monte Verde.[22][23]

The new dates supplied by Monte Verde have made the site a key factor in the debate over the first migration route from Asia to North America. Before the discovery of Monte Verde, the most popular and widely accepted theory was the overland route, which speculates that the first American inhabitants migrated from Asia across the Bering Strait and then spread throughout North America. However, the early dates associated with Monte Verde appear to weaken this theory. Prior to 13,000 BP, the Cordilleran Glacier (which covered much of present-day Canada) had not yet melted enough to reveal an ice-free corridor for people to reasonably journey by foot. The Monte Verde radiocarbon dates precede 13,000 BP, despite the fact that before the glacial melt, the vast, desolate, icy landscape of much of the Americas could not possibly have permitted enough vegetation to sustain traveling people or herded animals.[23][24]

The most prevalent theory today is the coastal migration hypothesis, which argues that people migrated from Asia down along the western coasts of North and South America.[25] Monte Verde is located 8,000 miles south of the Bering Strait. Such a considerable distance was probably unreasonable to trek by foot, especially on ice.[26] Furthermore, remains of 22 varieties of seaweed are referenced in regards to this theory. Modern native inhabitants of the regions use these particular local seaweed varieties for medicinal purposes. Using an ethnographic analogy, this suggests that the Monte Verde residents used these varieties for similar purposes, which further suggests an extensive knowledge of marine resources.[14][27] Together with a relative lack of stone tools, it appears that these first settlers were maritime-adapted hunter-gatherer-fishermen, and not necessarily big-game hunters like the Clovis. Therefore, it is feasible that they traveled along the coast by boat or along the shoreline, and could survive on marine resources throughout the voyage south.[28][29]

The presence of non-local items at Monte Verde, such as plants, beach-rolled pebbles, quartz, and tar, indicates possible trade networks and other sites of human habitation of similar age.[27]

Academic History

Diffusion

Awareness about Monte Verde among the international archaeology community was greatly increased in 1989 when Dillehay delivered a presentation on Monte Verde at a conference on settlement of the Americas at the University of Maine.[30] Archaeologist David J. Meltzer notes on that presentation:

The images Tom Dillehay was showing of the well-preserved remains at Monte Verde—wooden artifacts and house planks, fruits, berries, seeds, leaves, and stems, as well as marine algae, crayfish, chunks of animal hide, and what appeared to be several human coprolites found in three small pits—were unlike anything most of us, who long ago had learned to be used to stone tools and grateful for occasional bits of bone, had ever seen.[30]

Pre-Clovis Controversy

Because of the nature of the preservation of Monte Verde, it was one of the first Pre-Clovis sites to be accepted by the academic community. Dillehay, himself, doubted his dates due to the stronghold the Clovis First hypothesis has on the academic community.[1] Monte Verde was one of the most accepted Pre-Clovis sites, according to a survey done by Amber Wheat in 2012.[31] Out of 132 respondents (mainly archaeologists), approximately 65% of them confirmed Monte Verde as a Pre-Clovis site.[32] Still, the early date for the site was not widely accepted until 1997. It had hitherto been generally agreed that ancient people had entered the Americas using the Bering Strait Land Bridge, which was about 13,000 kilometers (8,000 miles) north of the Monte Verde site. Though the Monte Verde site does not disprove the Bering Strait theory, it does support the theory that, instead of going down the ice free corridor as previously hypothesized, people may have populated the Americas through a coastal route.[33] A group of 12 respected archaeologists revisited the site in 1997 and concluded that Monte Verde was an inhabited site and predated the Clovis culture. One of Dillehay's colleagues, Dr. Mario Pino, claimed a lower layer of the site is 33,200 years old, based on the discovery of burned wood several hundred feet to the south of Monte Verde. Radiocarbon dating established the wood as 33,000 years old.[34] Dillehay was cautious of this earlier date,[35] and as of 2007 it has not been verified or accepted by the scientific community.[36]

Comparison to other early Americas sites

MV-I has been radiocarbon dated to 33,000 BP.[37][38] As with other sites that suggest extremely early dates, such as the Topper site in South Carolina and Pedra Furada in Brazil, this deeper layer remains controversial.

The only other archaeological site in Southern Chile comparable in age to Monte Verde is Pilauco Bajo, dated to 12,500–11,000 BP.[39] Researchers postulated that the two sites were complementary – Monte Verde would be a habitation site, and Pilauco Bajo would be a hunting and scavenging site.[40][41] Further south lies the Pali Aike Crater lava tube, dated to 14,000–10,000 BP.[42]

The Chinchorro culture, which was mostly a coastal culture of northern Chile and southern Peru, originated ca. 9,000 years BP, and was long lasting. Other sites on the coast, such as the Quebrada Jaguay, and Quebrada Tacahuay of Peru, seem to go back to ca. 13,000-12,000 BP.[43] Huaca Prieta in northern Peru was occupied as early as 15,000 BP.

See also

References
  1. Steeves, Paulette F. C. (2021). The Indigenous Paleolithic of the Western Hemisphere. University of Nebraska Press. pp. 145–147. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1s5nzn7.17. ISBN 978-1-4962-0217-8.
  2. Dillehay, Tom D.; Ocampo, Carlos (November 18, 2015). "New Archaeological Evidence for an Early Human Presence at Monte Verde, Chile". PLOS One. 10 (11): e0141923. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1041923D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141923. PMC 4651426. PMID 26580202.
  3. "Monte Verde Archaeological Site". Tentative List of Properties of Outstanding Universal Value. World Heritage - United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Retrieved 1 November 2010.
  4. "Ancient seaweed chews confirm age of Chilean site". Reuters. 2008-05-08.
  5. Mandryk, C. A. S.; Josenhans, H.; Fedje, D. W.; Mathewes, R. W. (2001). "Late Quaternary paleoenvironments of Northwestern North America: Implications for inland versus coastal migration routes". Quaternary Science Reviews. 20 (1–3): 301–314. Bibcode:2001QSRv...20..301M. doi:10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00115-3.
  6. Lesnek, A. J.; Briner, J. P.; Lindqvist, C.; Baichtal, J. F.; Heaton, T. H. (2018). "Deglaciation of the Pacific coastal corridor directly preceded the human colonization of the Americas". Science Advances. 4 (5): eaar5040. Bibcode:2018SciA....4.5040L. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar5040. PMC 5976267. PMID 29854947.
  7. Braje, Todd J.; Dillehay, Tom D.; Erlandson, Jon M.; Klein, Richard G.; Rick, Torben C. (2017-11-03). "Finding the first Americans". Science. 358 (6363): 592–594. Bibcode:2017Sci...358..592B. doi:10.1126/science.aao5473. ISSN 1095-9203. PMID 29097536. S2CID 206663671.
  8. Wade, Lizzie (2017-08-08). "Most archaeologists think the first Americans arrived by boat. Now, they're beginning to prove it". Science | AAAS. Retrieved 2018-12-14.
  9. "Chilean Site Verified as Earliest Habitation of Americas; Findings Show Monte Verde Dates Back 12,500 Years". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
  10. "Monte Verde Excavations To Resume." Archaeology Magazine. Web. 08 Dec. 2011. <http://www.archaeology.org/online/news/verde.html>.
  11. R. E. Taylor; C. Vance Haynes Jr.; Donna L. Kirner; John R. Southon (July 1999). "Radiocarbon Analyses of Modern Organics at Monte Verde, Chile: No Evidence for a Local Reservoir Effect". American Antiquity. Society for American Archaeology. 64 (3): 455–460. doi:10.2307/2694145. JSTOR 2694145.
  12. Moreno, Karen; Bostelmann, Juan Enrique; MacÍas, Cintia; Navarro-Harris, Ximena; De Pol-Holz, Ricardo; Pino, Mario (2019). "A late Pleistocene human footprint from the Pilauco archaeological site, northern Patagonia, Chile". PLOS One. 14 (4): e0213572. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1413572M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213572. PMC 6481816. PMID 31017908.
  13. "Monte Verde Excavation: or Clovis Police Beat a Retreat". Archived from the original on 2012-02-02. Retrieved 2011-10-07.
  14. Dillehay TD, Ramírez C, Pino M, Collins MB, Rossen J, Pino-Navarro JD (May 9, 2008). "Monte Verde: seaweed, food, medicine, and the peopling of South America". Science. 320 (5877): 784–6. Bibcode:2008Sci...320..784D. doi:10.1126/science.1156533. PMID 18467586. S2CID 25648338.
  15. Mithen, S. After the Ice: A Global Human History 20,000-5000 BC. Orion Books, 2003. ISBN 0-7538-1392-0.
  16. Dillehay, Tom D. (11 May 1999). "The Late Pleistocene Cultures of South America" (PDF). Evolutionary Anthropology. 7 (6): 206–216. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1999)7:6<206::AID-EVAN5>3.0.CO;2-G.
  17. Dillehay, Tom D. (2000). The settlement of the Americas: a new prehistory. Basic Books. pp. 167. ISBN 9780786725434.
  18. Ugent, Donald; Dillehay, Tom; Ramirez, Carlos (1987). "Potato remains from a late pleistocene settlement in southcentral Chile". Economic Botany. 41: 17–27. doi:10.1007/BF02859340. S2CID 5924134.
  19. Salisbury, David F. "New Evidence About Earliest Americans Supports Coastal Migration Theory". Vanderbilt University. Retrieved 1 November 2010.
  20. Dillehay, Tom D.; Ocampo, Carlos; Saavedra, Jose; Pino, Mario; Scott-Cummings, Linda; Kovácik, Peter; Silva, Claudia; Alvar, Rodrigo (July 2019). "New excavations at the late Pleistocene site of Chinchihuapi I, Chile". Quaternary Research. 92 (1): 70–80. doi:10.1017/qua.2018.145. ISSN 0033-5894.
  21. Dillehay, Tom D.; Collins, Michael B. (1988). "Early cultural evidence from Monte Verde in Chile". Nature. 332 (6160): 150–152. Bibcode:1988Natur.332..150D. doi:10.1038/332150a0. S2CID 4363738.
  22. Wilford, John. "Chilean Field Yields New Clues to Peopling of Americas." New York Times, 25 Aug 1998, n. pag. Print.
  23. Rose, Mark. "The Importance of Monte Verde." Archaeology. 18 Oct 1999: n. page. Web. 8 Dec. 2011.
  24. Wayman, Erin. "Seaweed confirms Monte Verde dates, but also migration patterns?." Geotimes. Jul 2008: n. page. Web. 8 Dec. 2011. http://www.geotimes.org/july08/article.html?id=nn_seaweed.html
  25. Surovell, T. A. (August 2003). "Simulating Coastal Migration in New World Colonization" (PDF). Current Anthropology. 44 (4): 580–591. doi:10.1086/377651. S2CID 144347880. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-01-27.
  26. Dickinson, W.R. (2011). "Geological perspectives on the Monte Verde archeological site in Chile and pre-Clovis coastal migration in the Americas". Quaternary Research. 76 (2): 201–210. Bibcode:2011QuRes..76..201D. doi:10.1016/j.yqres.2011.06.011. S2CID 128394838.
  27. "Monte Verde, Chile." Native Peoples of North America. Cabrillo Anthropology Department, 18 Feb 2000. Web. 8 Dec 2011.<http://www.cabrillo.edu/~crsmith/mverde.html Archived 2011-11-04 at the Wayback Machine>.
  28. Dixon, E.J. (2001). "Human colonization of the Americas: timing, technology and process". Quaternary Science Reviews. 20 (1–3): 277–299. Bibcode:2001QSRv...20..277J. doi:10.1016/s0277-3791(00)00116-5.
  29. "Monte Verde Excavation: or Clovis Police Beat a Retreat ." Cabrillo Anthropology Department, n.d. Web. 26 Nov 2011.
  30. Meltzer 2009, pp. 117-118
  31. Steeves, Paulette F. C. (2021). The Indigenous Paleolithic of the Western Hemisphere. University of Nebraska Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1s5nzn7.20. ISBN 978-1-4962-0217-8.
  32. Wheat, Amber (March 2012). "Survey of Professional Opinions Regarding the Peopling of America". SAA Archaeological Record. 12: 10–14.
  33. Daley, Jason. "New Evidence Shows That Humans Could Have Migrated to the Americas Along the Coast". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 2022-03-10.
  34. "Monte Verde Excavations to Resume - Archaeology Magazine Archive".
  35. "Chilean Field Yields New Clues to Peopling of Americas (Monte_verde1) | Raymond Hames, Professor | Nebraska".
  36. Waguespack, Nicole M. (2007). "Why We're Still Arguing About the Pleistocene Occupation of the Americas" (PDF). Evolutionary Anthropology. 16 (2): 63–74. doi:10.1002/evan.20124. S2CID 19014507.
  37. Tom D. Dillehay & Michael B. Collins (1988). "Early cultural evidence from Monte Verde in Chile". Nature. Nature.com. 332 (6160): 150–152. Bibcode:1988Natur.332..150D. doi:10.1038/332150a0. S2CID 4363738.
  38. Wilford, John Noble. "Chilean Field Yields New Clues to Peopling of Americas". New York Times. Retrieved 1 November 2010.
  39. Pino, Mario; Chávez-Hoffmeister, Martín; Navarro-Harris, Ximena; Labarca, Rafael (2013), "The late Pleistocene Pilauco site, Osorno, south-central Chile", Quaternary International, 299: 3–12, Bibcode:2013QuInt.299....3P, doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2012.05.001, hdl:10533/131324
  40. Diario austral Osorno.com.pe, Página 14 del dia 23 de Enero de 2008 (Spanish).
  41. Meltzer, David J. 2009. First Peoples in a New World Berkeley: University of California Press
  42. Hogan, C. Michael. "Pali Aike Cave or Rock Shelter". Megalithic Portal. Retrieved 1 November 2010.
  43. Arriaza, Bernardo T.; Standen, Vivien G.; Cassman, Vicki; Santoro, Calogero M. (2008). "Chinchorro Culture: Pioneers of the Coast of the Atacama Desert". The Handbook of South American Archaeology. pp. 45–58. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74907-5_3. ISBN 978-0-387-74906-8.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.