Synthetic diamond

Lab-grown diamond (LGD;[1] also called laboratory-grown, laboratory-created, man-made, artisan-created, artificial, synthetic, or cultured diamond) is diamond that is produced in a controlled technological process (in contrast to naturally formed diamond, which is created through geological processes and obtained by mining). Unlike diamond simulants (imitations of diamond made of superficially-similar non-diamond materials), synthetic diamonds are composed of the same material as naturally formed diamonds – pure carbon crystallized in an isotropic 3D form – and share identical chemical and physical properties.

Lab-grown diamonds of various colors grown by the high-pressure-and-temperature technique

Numerous claims of diamond synthesis were reported between 1879 and 1928; most of these attempts were carefully analyzed but none was confirmed. In the 1940s, systematic research of diamond creation began in the United States, Sweden and the Soviet Union, which culminated in the first reproducible synthesis in 1953. Further research activity yielded the discoveries of HPHT diamond and CVD diamond, named for their production method (high-pressure high-temperature and chemical vapor deposition, respectively). These two processes still dominate synthetic diamond production. A third method in which nanometer-sized diamond grains are created in a detonation of carbon-containing explosives, known as detonation synthesis, entered the market in the late 1990s. A fourth method, treating graphite with high-power ultrasound, has been demonstrated in the laboratory, but currently has no commercial application.

The properties of man-made diamond depend on the manufacturing process. Some synthetic diamonds have properties such as hardness, thermal conductivity and electron mobility that are superior to those of most naturally formed diamonds. Synthetic diamond is widely used in abrasives, in cutting and polishing tools and in heat sinks. Electronic applications of synthetic diamond are being developed, including high-power switches at power stations, high-frequency field-effect transistors and light-emitting diodes. Synthetic diamond detectors of ultraviolet (UV) light or high-energy particles are used at high-energy research facilities and are available commercially. Due to its unique combination of thermal and chemical stability, low thermal expansion and high optical transparency in a wide spectral range, synthetic diamond is becoming the most popular material for optical windows in high-power CO
2
lasers and gyrotrons. It is estimated that 98% of industrial-grade diamond demand is supplied with synthetic diamonds.[2]

Both CVD and HPHT diamonds can be cut into gems and various colors can be produced: clear white, yellow, brown, blue, green and orange. The advent of synthetic gems on the market created major concerns in the diamond trading business, as a result of which special spectroscopic devices and techniques have been developed to distinguish synthetic and natural diamonds.

History

Moissan trying to create synthetic diamonds using an electric arc furnace

After the 1797 discovery that diamond was pure carbon,[3][4] many attempts were made to convert various cheap forms of carbon into diamond.[5][lower-alpha 1] The earliest successes were reported by James Ballantyne Hannay in 1879[10] and by Ferdinand Frédéric Henri Moissan in 1893. Their method involved heating charcoal at up to 3,500 °C (6,330 °F) with iron inside a carbon crucible in a furnace. Whereas Hannay used a flame-heated tube, Moissan applied his newly developed electric arc furnace, in which an electric arc was struck between carbon rods inside blocks of lime.[11] The molten iron was then rapidly cooled by immersion in water. The contraction generated by the cooling supposedly produced the high pressure required to transform graphite into diamond. Moissan published his work in a series of articles in the 1890s.[5][12]

Many other scientists tried to replicate his experiments. Sir William Crookes claimed success in 1909.[13] Otto Ruff claimed in 1917 to have produced diamonds up to 7 mm (0.28 in) in diameter,[14] but later retracted his statement.[15] In 1926, Dr. J. Willard Hershey of McPherson College replicated Moissan's and Ruff's experiments,[16][17] producing a synthetic diamond; that specimen is on display at the McPherson Museum in Kansas.[18] Despite the claims of Moissan, Ruff, and Hershey, other experimenters were unable to reproduce their synthesis.[19][20]

The most definitive replication attempts were performed by Sir Charles Algernon Parsons. A prominent scientist and engineer known for his invention of the steam turbine, he spent about 40 years (1882–1922) and a considerable part of his fortune trying to reproduce the experiments of Moissan and Hannay, but also adapted processes of his own.[21] Parsons was known for his painstakingly accurate approach and methodical record keeping; all his resulting samples were preserved for further analysis by an independent party.[22] He wrote a number of articles—some of the earliest on HPHT diamond—in which he claimed to have produced small diamonds.[23] However, in 1928, he authorized Dr. C. H. Desch to publish an article[24] in which he stated his belief that no synthetic diamonds (including those of Moissan and others) had been produced up to that date. He suggested that most diamonds that had been produced up to that point were likely synthetic spinel.[19]

ASEA

First synthetic diamonds by ASEA 1953

The first known (but initially not reported) diamond synthesis was achieved on February 16, 1953 in Stockholm by ASEA (Allmänna Svenska Elektriska Aktiebolaget), Sweden's major electrical equipment manufacturing company. Starting in 1942, ASEA employed a team of five scientists and engineers as part of a top-secret diamond-making project code-named QUINTUS. The team used a bulky split-sphere apparatus designed by Baltzar von Platen and Anders Kämpe.[25][26] Pressure was maintained within the device at an estimated 8.4 GPa (1,220,000 psi) and a temperature of 2,400 °C (4,350 °F) for an hour. A few small diamonds were produced, but not of gem quality or size.

Due to questions on the patent process and the reasonable belief that no other serious diamond synthesis research occurred globally, the board of ASEA opted against publicity and patent applications. Thus the announcement of the ASEA results occurred shortly after the GE press conference of February 15, 1955.[27]

GE diamond project

A belt press produced in the 1980s by KOBELCO

In 1941, an agreement was made between the General Electric (GE), Norton and Carborundum companies to further develop diamond synthesis. They were able to heat carbon to about 3,000 °C (5,430 °F) under a pressure of 3.5 gigapascals (510,000 psi) for a few seconds. Soon thereafter, the Second World War interrupted the project. It was resumed in 1951 at the Schenectady Laboratories of GE, and a high-pressure diamond group was formed with Francis P. Bundy and H. M. Strong. Tracy Hall and others joined the project later.[25]

The Schenectady group improved on the anvils designed by Percy Bridgman, who received a Nobel Prize in Physics for his work in 1946. Bundy and Strong made the first improvements, then more were made by Hall. The GE team used tungsten carbide anvils within a hydraulic press to squeeze the carbonaceous sample held in a catlinite container, the finished grit being squeezed out of the container into a gasket. The team recorded diamond synthesis on one occasion, but the experiment could not be reproduced because of uncertain synthesis conditions,[28] and the diamond was later shown to have been a natural diamond used as a seed.[29]

Hall achieved the first commercially successful synthesis of diamond on December 16, 1954, and this was announced on February 15, 1955. His breakthrough was using a "belt" press, which was capable of producing pressures above 10 GPa (1,500,000 psi) and temperatures above 2,000 °C (3,630 °F).[30] The press used a pyrophyllite container in which graphite was dissolved within molten nickel, cobalt or iron. Those metals acted as a "solvent-catalyst", which both dissolved carbon and accelerated its conversion into diamond. The largest diamond he produced was 0.15 mm (0.0059 in) across; it was too small and visually imperfect for jewelry, but usable in industrial abrasives. Hall's co-workers were able to replicate his work, and the discovery was published in the major journal Nature.[31][32] He was the first person to grow a synthetic diamond with a reproducible, verifiable and well-documented process. He left GE in 1955, and three years later developed a new apparatus for the synthesis of diamond—a tetrahedral press with four anvils—to avoid violating a U.S. Department of Commerce secrecy order on the GE patent applications.[29][33]

Further development

A scalpel with single-crystal synthetic diamond blade

Synthetic gem-quality diamond crystals were first produced in 1970 by GE, then reported in 1971. The first successes used a pyrophyllite tube seeded at each end with thin pieces of diamond. The graphite feed material was placed in the center and the metal solvent (nickel) between the graphite and the seeds. The container was heated and the pressure was raised to about 5.5 GPa (800,000 psi). The crystals grow as they flow from the center to the ends of the tube, and extending the length of the process produces larger crystals. Initially, a week-long growth process produced gem-quality stones of around 5 mm (0.20 in) (1 carat or 0.2 g), and the process conditions had to be as stable as possible. The graphite feed was soon replaced by diamond grit because that allowed much better control of the shape of the final crystal.[32][34]

The first gem-quality stones were always yellow to brown in color because of contamination with nitrogen. Inclusions were common, especially "plate-like" ones from the nickel. Removing all nitrogen from the process by adding aluminum or titanium produced colorless "white" stones, and removing the nitrogen and adding boron produced blue ones.[35] Removing nitrogen also slowed the growth process and reduced the crystalline quality, so the process was normally run with nitrogen present.

Although the GE stones and natural diamonds were chemically identical, their physical properties were not the same. The colorless stones produced strong fluorescence and phosphorescence under short-wavelength ultraviolet light, but were inert under long-wave UV. Among natural diamonds, only the rarer blue gems exhibit these properties. Unlike natural diamonds, all the GE stones showed strong yellow fluorescence under X-rays.[36] The De Beers Diamond Research Laboratory has grown stones of up to 25 carats (5.0 g) for research purposes. Stable HPHT conditions were kept for six weeks to grow high-quality diamonds of this size. For economic reasons, the growth of most synthetic diamonds is terminated when they reach a mass of 1 carat (200 mg) to 1.5 carats (300 mg).[37]

In the 1950s, research started in the Soviet Union and the US on the growth of diamond by pyrolysis of hydrocarbon gases at the relatively low temperature of 800 °C (1,470 °F). This low-pressure process is known as chemical vapor deposition (CVD). William G. Eversole reportedly achieved vapor deposition of diamond over diamond substrate in 1953, but it was not reported until 1962.[38][39] Diamond film deposition was independently reproduced by Angus and coworkers in 1968[40] and by Deryagin and Fedoseev in 1970.[41][42] Whereas Eversole and Angus used large, expensive, single-crystal diamonds as substrates, Deryagin and Fedoseev succeeded in making diamond films on non-diamond materials (silicon and metals), which led to massive research on inexpensive diamond coatings in the 1980s.[43]

From 2013, reports emerged of a rise in undisclosed synthetic melee diamonds (small round diamonds typically used to frame a central diamond or embellish a band)[44] being found in set jewelry and within diamond parcels sold in the trade.[45] Due to the relatively low cost of diamond melee, as well as relative lack of universal knowledge for identifying large quantities of melee efficiently,[46] not all dealers have made an effort to test diamond melee to correctly identify whether it is of natural or man-made origin. However, international laboratories are now beginning to tackle the issue head-on, with significant improvements in synthetic melee identification being made.[47]

Manufacturing technologies

There are several methods used to produce synthetic diamonds. The original method uses high pressure and high temperature (HPHT) and is still widely used because of its relatively low cost. The process involves large presses that can weigh hundreds of tons to produce a pressure of 5 GPa (730,000 psi) at 1,500 °C (2,730 °F). The second method, using chemical vapor deposition (CVD), creates a carbon plasma over a substrate onto which the carbon atoms deposit to form diamond. Other methods include explosive formation (forming detonation nanodiamonds) and sonication of graphite solutions.[48][49][50]

High pressure, high temperature

Schematic of a belt press

In the HPHT method, there are three main press designs used to supply the pressure and temperature necessary to produce synthetic diamond: the belt press, the cubic press and the split-sphere (BARS) press. Diamond seeds are placed at the bottom of the press. The internal part of the press is heated above 1,400 °C (2,550 °F) and melts the solvent metal. The molten metal dissolves the high purity carbon source, which is then transported to the small diamond seeds and precipitates, forming a large synthetic diamond.[51]

The original GE invention by Tracy Hall uses the belt press wherein the upper and lower anvils supply the pressure load to a cylindrical inner cell. This internal pressure is confined radially by a belt of pre-stressed steel bands. The anvils also serve as electrodes providing electric current to the compressed cell. A variation of the belt press uses hydraulic pressure, rather than steel belts, to confine the internal pressure.[51] Belt presses are still used today, but they are built on a much larger scale than those of the original design.[52]

The second type of press design is the cubic press. A cubic press has six anvils which provide pressure simultaneously onto all faces of a cube-shaped volume.[53] The first multi-anvil press design was a tetrahedral press, using four anvils to converge upon a tetrahedron-shaped volume.[54] The cubic press was created shortly thereafter to increase the volume to which pressure could be applied. A cubic press is typically smaller than a belt press and can more rapidly achieve the pressure and temperature necessary to create synthetic diamond. However, cubic presses cannot be easily scaled up to larger volumes: the pressurized volume can be increased by using larger anvils, but this also increases the amount of force needed on the anvils to achieve the same pressure. An alternative is to decrease the surface area to volume ratio of the pressurized volume, by using more anvils to converge upon a higher-order platonic solid, such as a dodecahedron. However, such a press would be complex and difficult to manufacture.[53]

Schematic of a BARS system

The BARS apparatus is claimed to be the most compact, efficient, and economical of all the diamond-producing presses. In the center of a BARS device, there is a ceramic cylindrical "synthesis capsule" of about 2 cm3 (0.12 cu in) in size. The cell is placed into a cube of pressure-transmitting material, such as pyrophyllite ceramics, which is pressed by inner anvils made from cemented carbide (e.g., tungsten carbide or VK10 hard alloy).[55] The outer octahedral cavity is pressed by 8 steel outer anvils. After mounting, the whole assembly is locked in a disc-type barrel with a diameter about 1 m (3 ft 3 in). The barrel is filled with oil, which pressurizes upon heating, and the oil pressure is transferred to the central cell. The synthesis capsule is heated up by a coaxial graphite heater, and the temperature is measured with a thermocouple.[56]

Chemical vapor deposition

Free-standing single-crystal CVD diamond disc

Chemical vapor deposition is a method by which diamond can be grown from a hydrocarbon gas mixture. Since the early 1980s, this method has been the subject of intensive worldwide research. Whereas the mass production of high-quality diamond crystals make the HPHT process the more suitable choice for industrial applications, the flexibility and simplicity of CVD setups explain the popularity of CVD growth in laboratory research. The advantages of CVD diamond growth include the ability to grow diamond over large areas and on various substrates, and the fine control over the chemical impurities and thus properties of the diamond produced. Unlike HPHT, CVD process does not require high pressures, as the growth typically occurs at pressures under 27 kPa (3.9 psi).[48][57]

The CVD growth involves substrate preparation, feeding varying amounts of gases into a chamber and energizing them. The substrate preparation includes choosing an appropriate material and its crystallographic orientation; cleaning it, often with a diamond powder to abrade a non-diamond substrate; and optimizing the substrate temperature (about 800 °C (1,470 °F)) during the growth through a series of test runs. The gases always include a carbon source, typically methane, and hydrogen with a typical ratio of 1:99. Hydrogen is essential because it selectively etches off non-diamond carbon. The gases are ionized into chemically active radicals in the growth chamber using microwave power, a hot filament, an arc discharge, a welding torch, a laser, an electron beam, or other means.

During the growth, the chamber materials are etched off by the plasma and can incorporate into the growing diamond. In particular, CVD diamond is often contaminated by silicon originating from the silica windows of the growth chamber or from the silicon substrate.[58] Therefore, silica windows are either avoided or moved away from the substrate. Boron-containing species in the chamber, even at very low trace levels, also make it unsuitable for the growth of pure diamond.[48][57][59]

Detonation of explosives

Electron micrograph (TEM) of detonation nanodiamond

Diamond nanocrystals (5 nm (2.0×10−7 in) in diameter) can be formed by detonating certain carbon-containing explosives in a metal chamber. These are called "detonation nanodiamonds". During the explosion, the pressure and temperature in the chamber become high enough to convert the carbon of the explosives into diamond. Being immersed in water, the chamber cools rapidly after the explosion, suppressing conversion of newly produced diamond into more stable graphite.[60] In a variation of this technique, a metal tube filled with graphite powder is placed in the detonation chamber. The explosion heats and compresses the graphite to an extent sufficient for its conversion into diamond.[61] The product is always rich in graphite and other non-diamond carbon forms, and requires prolonged boiling in hot nitric acid (about 1 day at 250 °C (482 °F)) to dissolve them.[49] The recovered nanodiamond powder is used primarily in polishing applications. It is mainly produced in China, Russia and Belarus, and started reaching the market in bulk quantities by the early 2000s.[62]

Ultrasound cavitation

Micron-sized diamond crystals can be synthesized from a suspension of graphite in organic liquid at atmospheric pressure and room temperature using ultrasonic cavitation. The diamond yield is about 10% of the initial graphite weight. The estimated cost of diamond produced by this method is comparable to that of the HPHT method; the crystalline perfection of the product is significantly worse for the ultrasonic synthesis. This technique requires relatively simple equipment and procedures, but it has only been reported by two research groups, and has no industrial use. Numerous process parameters, such as preparation of the initial graphite powder, the choice of ultrasonic power, synthesis time and the solvent, are not yet optimized, leaving a window for potential improvement of the efficiency and reduction of the cost of the ultrasonic synthesis.[50][63]

Properties

Traditionally, the absence of crystal flaws is considered to be the most important quality of a diamond. Purity and high crystalline perfection make diamonds transparent and clear, whereas its hardness, optical dispersion (luster), and chemical stability (combined with marketing), make it a popular gemstone. High thermal conductivity is also important for technical applications. Whereas high optical dispersion is an intrinsic property of all diamonds, their other properties vary depending on how the diamond was created.[64]

Crystallinity

Diamond can be one single, continuous crystal or it can be made up of many smaller crystals (polycrystal). Large, clear and transparent single-crystal diamonds are typically used as gemstones. Polycrystalline diamond (PCD) consists of numerous small grains, which are easily seen by the naked eye through strong light absorption and scattering; it is unsuitable for gems and is used for industrial applications such as mining and cutting tools. Polycrystalline diamond is often described by the average size (or grain size) of the crystals that make it up. Grain sizes range from nanometers to hundreds of micrometers, usually referred to as "nanocrystalline" and "microcrystalline" diamond, respectively.[65]

Hardness

The hardness of diamond is 10 on the Mohs scale of mineral hardness, the hardest known material on this scale. Diamond is also the hardest known material for its resistance to indentation.[66] The hardness of synthetic diamond depends on its purity, crystalline perfection and orientation: hardness is higher for flawless, pure crystals oriented to the [111] direction (along the longest diagonal of the cubic diamond lattice).[67] Nanocrystalline diamond produced through CVD diamond growth can have a hardness ranging from 30% to 75% of that of single crystal diamond, and the hardness can be controlled for specific applications. Some synthetic single-crystal diamonds and HPHT nanocrystalline diamonds (see hyperdiamond) are harder than any known natural diamond.[66][68][69]

Impurities and inclusions

Every diamond contains atoms other than carbon in concentrations detectable by analytical techniques. Those atoms can aggregate into macroscopic phases called inclusions. Impurities are generally avoided, but can be introduced intentionally as a way to control certain properties of the diamond. Growth processes of synthetic diamond, using solvent-catalysts, generally lead to formation of a number of impurity-related complex centers, involving transition metal atoms (such as nickel, cobalt or iron), which affect the electronic properties of the material.[70][71]

For instance, pure diamond is an electrical insulator, but diamond with boron added is an electrical conductor (and, in some cases, a superconductor),[72] allowing it to be used in electronic applications. Nitrogen impurities hinder movement of lattice dislocations (defects within the crystal structure) and put the lattice under compressive stress, thereby increasing hardness and toughness.[73]

Thermal conductivity

The thermal conductivity of CVD diamond ranges from tens of W/m-K to more than 2000 W/m-K, depending on the defects, grain boundary structures.[74] As the growth of diamond in CVD, the grains grow with the film thickness, leading to a gradient thermal conductivity along the film thickness direction.[74]

Unlike most electrical insulators, pure diamond is an excellent conductor of heat because of the strong covalent bonding within the crystal. The thermal conductivity of pure diamond is the highest of any known solid. Single crystals of synthetic diamond enriched in 12
C
(99.9%), isotopically pure diamond, have the highest thermal conductivity of any material, 30 W/cm·K at room temperature, 7.5 times higher than that of copper. Natural diamond's conductivity is reduced by 1.1% by the 13
C
naturally present, which acts as an inhomogeneity in the lattice.[75]

Diamond's thermal conductivity is made use of by jewelers and gemologists who may employ an electronic thermal probe to separate diamonds from their imitations. These probes consist of a pair of battery-powered thermistors mounted in a fine copper tip. One thermistor functions as a heating device while the other measures the temperature of the copper tip: if the stone being tested is a diamond, it will conduct the tip's thermal energy rapidly enough to produce a measurable temperature drop. This test takes about 2–3 seconds.[76]

Applications

Machining and cutting tools

Diamonds in an angle grinder blade

Most industrial applications of synthetic diamond have long been associated with their hardness; this property makes diamond the ideal material for machine tools and cutting tools. As the hardest known naturally occurring material, diamond can be used to polish, cut, or wear away any material, including other diamonds. Common industrial applications of this ability include diamond-tipped drill bits and saws, and the use of diamond powder as an abrasive.[77] These are by far the largest industrial applications of synthetic diamond. While natural diamond is also used for these purposes, synthetic HPHT diamond is more popular, mostly because of better reproducibility of its mechanical properties. Diamond is not suitable for machining ferrous alloys at high speeds, as carbon is soluble in iron at the high temperatures created by high-speed machining, leading to greatly increased wear on diamond tools compared to alternatives.[78]

The usual form of diamond in cutting tools is micron-sized grains dispersed in a metal matrix (usually cobalt) sintered onto the tool. This is typically referred to in industry as polycrystalline diamond (PCD). PCD-tipped tools can be found in mining and cutting applications. For the past fifteen years, work has been done to coat metallic tools with CVD diamond, and though the work shows promise, it has not significantly replaced traditional PCD tools.[79]

Thermal conductor

Most materials with high thermal conductivity are also electrically conductive, such as metals. In contrast, pure synthetic diamond has high thermal conductivity, but negligible electrical conductivity. This combination is invaluable for electronics where diamond is used as a heat spreader for high-power laser diodes, laser arrays and high-power transistors. Efficient heat dissipation prolongs the lifetime of those electronic devices, and the devices' high replacement costs justify the use of efficient, though relatively expensive, diamond heat sinks.[80] In semiconductor technology, synthetic diamond heat spreaders prevent silicon and other semiconducting devices from overheating.[81]

Optical material

Diamond is hard, chemically inert, and has high thermal conductivity and a low coefficient of thermal expansion. These properties make diamond superior to any other existing window material used for transmitting infrared and microwave radiation. Therefore, synthetic diamond is starting to replace zinc selenide as the output window of high-power CO2 lasers[82] and gyrotrons. Those synthetic polycrystalline diamond windows are shaped as disks of large diameters (about 10 cm for gyrotrons) and small thicknesses (to reduce absorption) and can only be produced with the CVD technique.[83][84] Single crystal slabs of dimensions of length up to approximately 10 mm are becoming increasingly important in several areas of optics including heatspreaders inside laser cavities, diffractive optics and as the optical gain medium in Raman lasers.[85] Recent advances in the HPHT and CVD synthesis techniques have improved the purity and crystallographic structure perfection of single-crystalline diamond enough to replace silicon as a diffraction grating and window material in high-power radiation sources, such as synchrotrons.[86][87] Both the CVD and HPHT processes are also used to create designer optically transparent diamond anvils as a tool for measuring electric and magnetic properties of materials at ultra high pressures using a diamond anvil cell.[88]

Electronics

Synthetic diamond has potential uses as a semiconductor,[89] because it can be doped with impurities like boron and phosphorus. Since these elements contain one more or one fewer valence electron than carbon, they turn synthetic diamond into p-type or n-type semiconductor. Making a p–n junction by sequential doping of synthetic diamond with boron and phosphorus produces light-emitting diodes (LEDs) producing UV light of 235 nm.[90] Another useful property of synthetic diamond for electronics is high carrier mobility, which reaches 4500 cm2/(V·s) for electrons in single-crystal CVD diamond.[91] High mobility is favorable for high-frequency operation and field-effect transistors made from diamond have already demonstrated promising high-frequency performance above 50 GHz.[92][93] The wide band gap of diamond (5.5 eV) gives it excellent dielectric properties. Combined with the high mechanical stability of diamond, those properties are being used in prototype high-power switches for power stations.[94]

Synthetic diamond transistors have been produced in the laboratory. They remain functional at much higher temperatures than silicon devices, and are resistant to chemical and radiation damage. While no diamond transistors have yet been successfully integrated into commercial electronics, they are promising for use in exceptionally high-power situations and hostile non-oxidizing environments.[95][96]

Synthetic diamond is already used as radiation detection device. It is radiation hard and has a wide bandgap of 5.5 eV (at room temperature). Diamond is also distinguished from most other semiconductors by the lack of a stable native oxide. This makes it difficult to fabricate surface MOS devices, but it does create the potential for UV radiation to gain access to the active semiconductor without absorption in a surface layer. Because of these properties, it is employed in applications such as the BaBar detector at the Stanford Linear Accelerator[97] and BOLD (Blind to the Optical Light Detectors for VUV solar observations).[98][99] A diamond VUV detector recently was used in the European LYRA program.

Conductive CVD diamond is a useful electrode under many circumstances.[100] Photochemical methods have been developed for covalently linking DNA to the surface of polycrystalline diamond films produced through CVD. Such DNA-modified films can be used for detecting various biomolecules, which would interact with DNA thereby changing electrical conductivity of the diamond film.[101] In addition, diamonds can be used to detect redox reactions that cannot ordinarily be studied and in some cases degrade redox-reactive organic contaminants in water supplies. Because diamond is mechanically and chemically stable, it can be used as an electrode under conditions that would destroy traditional materials. As an electrode, synthetic diamond can be used in waste water treatment of organic effluents[102] and the production of strong oxidants.[103]

Gemstones

Colorless gem cut from diamond grown by chemical vapor deposition

Synthetic diamonds for use as gemstones are grown by HPHT[37] or CVD[104] methods, and represented approximately 2% of the gem-quality diamond market as of 2013.[105] However, there are indications that the market share of synthetic jewelry-quality diamonds may grow as advances in technology allow for larger higher-quality synthetic production on a more economic scale.[106] They are available in yellow, pink, green, orange, blue and, to a lesser extent, colorless (or white). The yellow color comes from nitrogen impurities in the manufacturing process, while the blue color comes from boron.[35] Other colors, such as pink or green, are achievable after synthesis using irradiation.[107][108] Several companies also offer memorial diamonds grown using cremated remains.[109]

Gem-quality diamonds grown in a lab can be chemically, physically and optically identical to naturally occurring ones. The mined diamond industry has undertaken legal, marketing and distribution countermeasures to try to protect its market from the emerging presence of synthetic diamonds.[110][111] Synthetic diamonds can be distinguished by spectroscopy in the infrared, ultraviolet, or X-ray wavelengths. The DiamondView tester from De Beers uses UV fluorescence to detect trace impurities of nitrogen, nickel or other metals in HPHT or CVD diamonds.[112]

At least one maker of laboratory-grown diamonds has made public statements about being "committed to disclosure" of the nature of its diamonds, and laser-inscribed serial numbers on all of its gemstones.[104] The company web site shows an example of the lettering of one of its laser inscriptions, which includes both the words "Gemesis created" and the serial number prefix "LG" (laboratory grown).[113]

In May 2015, a record was set for an HPHT colorless diamond at 10.02 carats. The faceted jewel was cut from a 32.2-carat stone that was grown in about 300 hours.[114] By 2022, gem-quality diamonds of 16–20 carats were being produced.[115]

Traditional diamond mining has led to human rights abuses in Africa and other diamond mining countries. The 2006 Hollywood movie Blood Diamond helped to publicize the problem. Consumer demand for synthetic diamonds has been increasing, albeit from a small base, as customers look for stones that are ethically sound and cheaper.[116] Any kind of mining also causes irreversible changes to the bio-diversity.[117]

According to a report from the Gem & Jewellery Export Promotional Council, synthetic diamonds accounted for 0.28% of diamond produced for use as gemstones in 2014.[118] In April 2022, CNN Business[119] reported that engagement rings featuring a synthetic or a lab grown diamond jumped 63% compared to previous year, while the number of engagement rings sold with a natural diamond declined 25% in the same period.

Around 2016, the price of synthetic diamond gemstones (e.g., 1 carat stones) began dropping "precipitously" by roughly 30% in one year, becoming clearly lower than that of mined diamonds.[120] As of 2017, synthetic diamonds sold as jewelry were typically selling for 15–20% less than natural equivalents; the relative price was expected to decline further as production economics improve.[121]

In May 2018, De Beers announced that it would introduce a new jewelry brand called "Lightbox" that features synthetic diamonds.[122]

In July 2018, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission approved a substantial revision to its Jewelry Guides, with changes that impose new rules on how the trade can describe diamonds and diamond simulants.[123] The revised guides were substantially contrary to what had been advocated in 2016 by De Beers.[122][124][125] The new guidelines remove the word "natural" from the definition of "diamond", thus including lab-grown diamonds within the scope of the definition of "diamond". The revised guide further states that "If a marketer uses 'synthetic' to imply that a competitor's lab-grown diamond is not an actual diamond, ... this would be deceptive."[126][124] In July 2019, the third party diamond certification lab GIA (Gemological Institute of America) dropped the word 'synthetic' from its certification process and report for lab-grown diamonds, according to the FTC revision.[127]

See also

  • The Diamond Maker (1895): a short story by H. G. Wells inspired by Hannay and Moissan
  • Synthetic alexandrite
  • List of diamonds

Notes

  1. As early as 1828, investigators claimed to have synthesized diamonds:
    • Procès-verbaux des séances de l'Académie (Académie des sciences), November 3, 1828:[6] "There was given a reading of a letter from Mr. Gannal, who communicated some investigations into the action of phosphorus placed in contact with pure carbon disulfide, and into the product of his experiments, which have presented properties similar to those of particles of diamond."
    • "Artificial production of real diamonds", Mechanics' Magazine, 10 (278): 300–301 (December 6, 1828)[7]
    • Procès-verbaux des séances de l'Académie (Académie des sciences), November 10, 1828:[8] "Mr. Arago communicated a note from Mr. Cagniard de Latour, in which this physicist states that he has, on his part, succeeded in making carbon crystallize by methods different from those of Mr. Gannal, and that a sealed packet which he deposited with the Secretary in 1824 contains the details of his initial procedures. Mr. Arago announced that he knew another person who had arrived at similar results, and Mr. Gay-Lussac announced that Mr. Gannal had spoken to him eight years ago about his attempts."
    • Procès-verbaux des séances de l'Académie (Académie des sciences), December 1, 1828:[9] "Mr. Thenard gave a reading of the minutes of experiments made on November 26, 1828 on the powder presented as artificial diamond by Mr. Cagniard de Latour."

References

  1. Fisher, Alice (October 1, 2022). "Lab-grown diamonds: girl's best friend or cut-price sparklers?". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved October 1, 2022.
  2. Zimnisky, Paul (January 22, 2013). "The state of 2013 global rough diamond supply". Resource Investor. Archived from the original on January 28, 2013. Retrieved February 4, 2013.
  3. Tennant, Smithson (1797). "On the nature of the diamond". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 87: 123–127. doi:10.1098/rstl.1797.0005. Archived from the original on April 25, 2016. Retrieved February 23, 2016.
  4. Spear and Dismukes, p. 309
  5. Spear and Dismukes, pp. 23, 512–513
  6. [Minutes of the meetings of the [French] Academy of Sciences], November 3, 1828, volume 9,page 137: Archived September 11, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  7. Artificial production of real diamonds Archived June 29, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
  8. [Minutes of the meetings of the [French] Academy of Sciences], November 10, 1828, volume 9, page 140: Archived September 11, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  9. [Minutes of the meetings of the [French] Academy of Sciences], December 1, 1828, volume 9, page 151: Archived September 11, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  10. Hannay, J. B. (1879). "On the Artificial Formation of the Diamond". Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 30 (200–205): 450–461. doi:10.1098/rspl.1879.0144. JSTOR 113601. S2CID 135789069.
  11. Royère, C. (1999). "The electric furnace of Henri Moissan at one hundred years: connection with the electric furnace, the solar furnace, the plasma furnace?". Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises. 57 (2): 116–30. PMID 10365467.
  12. Moissan, Henri (1894). "Nouvelles expériences sur la reproduction du diamant". Comptes Rendus. 118: 320–326. Archived from the original on September 11, 2017. Retrieved March 10, 2014.
  13. Crookes, William (1909). Diamonds. London and New York's Harper Brothers. pp. 140 ff. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved August 18, 2011.
  14. Ruff, O. (1917). "Über die Bildung von Diamanten". Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie. 99 (1): 73–104. doi:10.1002/zaac.19170990109. Archived from the original on October 25, 2020. Retrieved June 29, 2019.
  15. Nassau, K. (1980). Gems made by Man. Chilton Book Co. pp. 12–25. ISBN 978-0-8019-6773-3.
  16. Hershey, J. Willard (2004). The Book of Diamonds: Their Curious Lore, Properties, Tests and Synthetic Manufacture. Kessinger Publishing. pp. 123–130. ISBN 978-1-4179-7715-4.
  17. Hershey, J. Willard (1940). Book of Diamonds. Heathside Press, New York. pp. 127–132. ISBN 978-0-486-41816-2. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved August 15, 2009.
  18. "Science". mcphersonmuseum.com. Archived from the original on January 12, 2016. Retrieved January 12, 2016.
  19. Lonsdale, K. (1962). "Further Comments on Attempts by H. Moissan, J. B. Hannay and Sir Charles Parsons to Make Diamonds in the Laboratory". Nature. 196 (4850): 104–106. Bibcode:1962Natur.196..104L. doi:10.1038/196104a0.
  20. O'Donoghue, p. 473
  21. Feigelson, R. S. (2004). 50 years progress in crystal growth: a reprint collection. Elsevier. p. 194. ISBN 978-0-444-51650-3. Archived from the original on March 20, 2022. Retrieved May 3, 2021.
  22. Barnard, pp. 6–7
  23. Parson, C. A. (1907). "Some notes on carbon at high temperatures and pressures". Proceedings of the Royal Society. 79a (533): 532–535. Bibcode:1907RSPSA..79..532P. doi:10.1098/rspa.1907.0062. JSTOR 92683.
  24. Desch, C. H. (1928). "The Problem of Artificial Production of Diamonds". Nature. 121 (3055): 799–800. Bibcode:1928Natur.121..799C. doi:10.1038/121799a0.
  25. Hazen, R. M. (1999). The diamond makers. Cambridge University Press. pp. 100–113. ISBN 978-0-521-65474-6.
  26. Liander, H. & Lundblad, E. (1955). "Artificial diamonds". ASEA Journal. 28: 97.
  27. Sveriges Tekniska Museum (1988). Daedalus 1988 : Sveriges Tekniska Museums Årsbok 1988. Jan-Erik Pettersson. Stockholm: Sveriges Tekniska Museum. ISBN 91-7616-018-1. OCLC 841614801. Archived from the original on March 20, 2022. Retrieved November 20, 2021.
  28. O'Donoghue, p. 474
  29. Bovenkerk, H. P.; Bundy, F. P.; Chrenko, R. M.; Codella, P. J.; Strong, H. M.; Wentorf, R. H. (1993). "Errors in diamond synthesis". Nature. 365 (6441): 19. Bibcode:1993Natur.365...19B. doi:10.1038/365019a0. S2CID 4348180.
  30. Hall, H. T. (1960). "Ultra-high pressure apparatus" (PDF). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 31 (2): 125. Bibcode:1960RScI...31..125H. doi:10.1063/1.1716907. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 8, 2014.
  31. Bundy, F. P.; Hall, H. T.; Strong, H. M.; Wentorf, R. H. (1955). "Man-made diamonds" (PDF). Nature. 176 (4471): 51–55. Bibcode:1955Natur.176...51B. doi:10.1038/176051a0. S2CID 4266566. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 8, 2014.
  32. Bovenkerk, H. P.; Bundy, F. P.; Hall, H. T.; Strong, H. M.; Wentorf, R. H. (1959). "Preparation of diamond" (PDF). Nature. 184 (4693): 1094–1098. Bibcode:1959Natur.184.1094B. doi:10.1038/1841094a0. S2CID 44669031. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 8, 2014.
  33. Barnard, pp. 40–43
  34. O'Donoghue, p. 320
  35. Burns, R. C.; Cvetkovic, V.; Dodge, C. N.; Evans, D. J. F.; Rooney, Marie-Line T.; Spear, P. M.; Welbourn, C. M. (1990). "Growth-sector dependence of optical features in large synthetic diamonds". Journal of Crystal Growth. 104 (2): 257–279. Bibcode:1990JCrGr.104..257B. doi:10.1016/0022-0248(90)90126-6.
  36. Barnard, p. 166
  37. Abbaschian, Reza; Zhu, Henry; Clarke, Carter (2005). "High pressure-high temperature growth of diamond crystals using split sphere apparatus". Diam. Relat. Mater. 14 (11–12): 1916–1919. Bibcode:2005DRM....14.1916A. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2005.09.007.
  38. Spear and Dismukes, pp. 25–26
  39. Eversole, W. G. (April 17, 1962) "Synthesis of diamond" U.S. Patent 3,030,188
  40. Angus, John C.; Will, Herbert A.; Stanko, Wayne S. (1968). "Growth of Diamond Seed Crystals by Vapor Deposition". J. Appl. Phys. 39 (6): 2915. Bibcode:1968JAP....39.2915A. doi:10.1063/1.1656693.
  41. Spear and Dismukes, p. 42
  42. Deryagin, B. V.; Fedoseev, D. V. (1970). "Epitaxial Synthesis of Diamond in the Metastable Region". Russian Chemical Reviews. 39 (9): 783–788. Bibcode:1970RuCRv..39..783D. doi:10.1070/RC1970v039n09ABEH002022.
  43. Spear and Dismukes, pp. 265–266
  44. "Melee Diamonds: Tiny Diamonds, Big Impact". April 11, 2017. Archived from the original on June 12, 2018. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
  45. "Industry worries about undisclosed synthetic melee". JCKOnline. jckonline.com. Archived from the original on May 18, 2015. Retrieved May 10, 2015.
  46. "Diamond Melee definition". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on May 18, 2015. Retrieved May 10, 2015.
  47. "Swiss lab introduces melee identifier". National Jeweler. National Jeweler. Archived from the original on September 10, 2015. Retrieved May 10, 2015.
  48. Werner, M; Locher, R (1998). "Growth and application of undoped and doped diamond films". Rep. Prog. Phys. 61 (12): 1665–1710. Bibcode:1998RPPh...61.1665W. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/12/002.
  49. Osawa, E (2007). "Recent progress and perspectives in single-digit nanodiamond". Diamond and Related Materials. 16 (12): 2018–2022. Bibcode:2007DRM....16.2018O. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2007.08.008.
  50. Galimov, É. M.; Kudin, A. M.; Skorobogatskii, V. N.; Plotnichenko, V. G.; Bondarev, O. L.; Zarubin, B. G.; Strazdovskii, V. V.; Aronin, A. S.; Fisenko, A. V.; Bykov, I. V.; Barinov, A. Yu. (2004). "Experimental Corroboration of the Synthesis of Diamond in the Cavitation Process". Doklady Physics. 49 (3): 150–153. Bibcode:2004DokPh..49..150G. doi:10.1134/1.1710678. S2CID 120882885.
  51. "HPHT synthesis". International Diamond Laboratories. Archived from the original on May 1, 2009. Retrieved May 5, 2009.
  52. Barnard, p. 150
  53. Ito, E. (2007). G. Schubert (ed.). Multianvil cells and high-pressure experimental methods, in Treatise of Geophysics. Vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 197–230. ISBN 978-0-8129-2275-2.
  54. Hall, H. T. (1958). "Ultrahigh-Pressure Research: At ultrahigh pressures new and sometimes unexpected chemical and physical events occur". Science. 128 (3322): 445–449. Bibcode:1958Sci...128..445H. doi:10.1126/science.128.3322.445. JSTOR 1756408. PMID 17834381.
  55. Loshak, M. G. & Alexandrova, L. I. (2001). "Rise in the efficiency of the use of cemented carbides as a matrix of diamond-containing studs of rock destruction tool". Int. J. Refractory Metals and Hard Materials. 19: 5–9. doi:10.1016/S0263-4368(00)00039-1.
  56. Pal'Yanov, N.; Sokol, A.G.; Borzdov, M.; Khokhryakov, A.F. (2002). "Fluid-bearing alkaline carbonate melts as the medium for the formation of diamonds in the Earth's mantle: an experimental study". Lithos. 60 (3–4): 145–159. Bibcode:2002Litho..60..145P. doi:10.1016/S0024-4937(01)00079-2.
  57. Koizumi, S.; Nebel, C. E. & Nesladek, M. (2008). Physics and Applications of CVD Diamond. Wiley VCH. pp. 50, 200–240. ISBN 978-3-527-40801-6. Archived from the original on March 20, 2022. Retrieved May 3, 2021.
  58. Barjon, J.; Rzepka, E.; Jomard, F.; Laroche, J.-M.; Ballutaud, D.; Kociniewski, T.; Chevallier, J. (2005). "Silicon incorporation in CVD diamond layers". Physica Status Solidi A. 202 (11): 2177–2181. Bibcode:2005PSSAR.202.2177B. doi:10.1002/pssa.200561920.
  59. Kopf, R. F., ed. (2003). State-of-the-Art Program on Compound Semiconductors XXXIX and Nitride and Wide Bandgap Semiconductors for Sensors, Photonics and Electronics IV: proceedings of the Electrochemical Society. The Electrochemical Society. p. 363. ISBN 978-1-56677-391-1. Archived from the original on March 20, 2022. Retrieved May 3, 2021.
  60. Iakoubovskii, K.; Baidakova, M.V.; Wouters, B.H.; Stesmans, A.; Adriaenssens, G.J.; Vul', A.Ya.; Grobet, P.J. (2000). "Structure and defects of detonation synthesis nanodiamond" (PDF). Diamond and Related Materials. 9 (3–6): 861–865. Bibcode:2000DRM.....9..861I. doi:10.1016/S0925-9635(99)00354-4. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 22, 2015. Retrieved March 4, 2013.
  61. Decarli, P.; Jamieson, J. (June 1961). "Formation of Diamond by Explosive Shock". Science. 133 (3467): 1821–1822. Bibcode:1961Sci...133.1821D. doi:10.1126/science.133.3467.1821. PMID 17818997. S2CID 9805441.
  62. Dolmatov, V. Yu. (2006). "Development of a rational technology for synthesis of high-quality detonation nanodiamonds". Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry. 79 (12): 1913–1918. doi:10.1134/S1070427206120019. S2CID 96810777.
  63. Khachatryan, A.Kh.; Aloyan, S.G.; May, P.W.; Sargsyan, R.; Khachatryan, V.A.; Baghdasaryan, V.S. (2008). "Graphite-to-diamond transformation induced by ultrasonic cavitation". Diam. Relat. Mater. 17 (6): 931–936. Bibcode:2008DRM....17..931K. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2008.01.112.
  64. Spear and Dismukes, pp. 308–309
  65. Zoski, Cynthia G. (2007). Handbook of Electrochemistry. Elsevier. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-444-51958-0. Archived from the original on March 20, 2022. Retrieved May 3, 2021.
  66. Blank, V.; Popov, M.; Pivovarov, G.; Lvova, N.; Gogolinsky, K.; Reshetov, V. (1998). "Ultrahard and superhard phases of fullerite C60: comparison with diamond on hardness and wear" (PDF). Diamond and Related Materials. 7 (2–5): 427–431. Bibcode:1998DRM.....7..427B. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.520.7265. doi:10.1016/S0925-9635(97)00232-X. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 21, 2011.
  67. Neves, A. J. & Nazaré, M. H. (2001). Properties, Growth and Applications of Diamond. IET. pp. 142–147. ISBN 978-0-85296-785-0. Archived from the original on March 20, 2022. Retrieved May 3, 2021.
  68. Sumiya, H. (2005). "Super-hard diamond indenter prepared from high-purity synthetic diamond crystal". Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76 (2): 026112–026112–3. Bibcode:2005RScI...76b6112S. doi:10.1063/1.1850654.
  69. Yan, Chih-Shiue; Mao, Ho-Kwang; Li, Wei; Qian, Jiang; Zhao, Yusheng; Hemley, Russell J. (2005). "Ultrahard diamond single crystals from chemical vapor deposition". Physica Status Solidi A. 201 (4): R25. Bibcode:2004PSSAR.201R..25Y. doi:10.1002/pssa.200409033.
  70. Larico, R.; Justo, J. F.; Machado, W. V. M.; Assali, L. V. C. (2009). "Electronic properties and hyperfine fields of nickel-related complexes in diamond". Phys. Rev. B. 79 (11): 115202. arXiv:1208.3207. Bibcode:2009PhRvB..79k5202L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115202. S2CID 119227072.
  71. Assali, L. V. C.; Machado, W. V. M.; Justo, J. F. (2011). "3d transition metal impurities in diamond: electronic properties and chemical trends". Phys. Rev. B. 84 (15): 155205. arXiv:1307.3278. Bibcode:2011PhRvB..84o5205A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.155205. S2CID 118553722.
  72. Ekimov, E. A.; Sidorov, V. A.; Bauer, E. D.; Mel'Nik, N. N.; Curro, N. J.; Thompson, J. D.; Stishov, S. M. (2004). "Superconductivity in diamond" (PDF). Nature. 428 (6982): 542–545. arXiv:cond-mat/0404156. Bibcode:2004Natur.428..542E. doi:10.1038/nature02449. PMID 15057827. S2CID 4423950. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved April 24, 2009.
  73. Catledge, S. A.; Vohra, Yogesh K. (1999). "Effect of nitrogen addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of diamond films grown using high-methane concentrations". Journal of Applied Physics. 86 (1): 698. Bibcode:1999JAP....86..698C. doi:10.1063/1.370787.
  74. Cheng, Zhe; Bougher, Thomas; Bai, Tingyu; Wang, Steven Y.; Li, Chao; Yates, Luke; Foley, Brian M.; Goorsky, Mark; Cola, Baratunde A.; Faili, Firooz; Graham, Samuel (February 7, 2018). "Probing Growth-Induced Anisotropic Thermal Transport in High-Quality CVD Diamond Membranes by Multifrequency and Multiple-Spot-Size Time-Domain Thermoreflectance". ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 10 (5): 4808–4815. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b16812. ISSN 1944-8244. PMID 29328632. Archived from the original on March 20, 2022. Retrieved October 16, 2020.
  75. Wei, Lanhua; Kuo, P.; Thomas, R.; Anthony, T.; Banholzer, W. (1993). "Thermal conductivity of isotopically modified single crystal diamond". Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (24): 3764–3767. Bibcode:1993PhRvL..70.3764W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3764. PMID 10053956.
  76. Wenckus, J. F. (December 18, 1984) "Method and means of rapidly distinguishing a simulated diamond from natural diamond" U.S. Patent 4,488,821
  77. Holtzapffel, C. (1856). Turning And Mechanical Manipulation. Holtzapffel. pp. 176–178. ISBN 978-1-879335-39-4.
  78. Coelho, R.T.; Yamada, S.; Aspinwall, D.K.; Wise, M.L.H. (1995). "The application of polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tool materials when drilling and reaming aluminum-based alloys including MMC". International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 35 (5): 761–774. doi:10.1016/0890-6955(95)93044-7.
  79. Ahmed, W.; Sein, H.; Ali, N.; Gracio, J.; Woodwards, R. (2003). "Diamond films grown on cemented WC-Co dental burs using an improved CVD method". Diamond and Related Materials. 12 (8): 1300–1306. Bibcode:2003DRM....12.1300A. doi:10.1016/S0925-9635(03)00074-8.
  80. Sakamoto, M.; Endriz, J. G. & Scifres, D. R. (1992). "120 W CW output power from monolithic AlGaAs (800 nm) laser diode array mounted on diamond heatsink". Electronics Letters. 28 (2): 197–199. Bibcode:1992ElL....28..197S. doi:10.1049/el:19920123.
  81. Ravi, Kramadhati V. et al. (August 2, 2005) "Diamond-silicon hybrid integrated heat spreader" U.S. Patent 6,924,170
  82. Harris, D. C. (1999). Materials for infrared windows and domes: properties and performance. SPIE Press. pp. 303–334. ISBN 978-0-8194-3482-1.
  83. "The diamond window for a milli-wave zone high power electromagnetic wave output". New Diamond. 15: 27. 1999. ISSN 1340-4792.
  84. Nusinovich, G. S. (2004). Introduction to the physics of gyrotrons. JHU Press. p. 229. ISBN 978-0-8018-7921-0.
  85. Mildren, Richard P.; Sabella, Alexander; Kitzler, Ondrej; Spence, David J.; McKay, Aaron M. (2013). "Ch. 8 Diamond Raman Laser Design and Performance". In Mildren, Rich P.; Rabeau, James R. (eds.). Optical Engineering of Diamond. Wiley. pp. 239–276. doi:10.1002/9783527648603.ch8. ISBN 978-352764860-3.
  86. Khounsary, Ali M.; Smither, Robert K.; Davey, Steve; Purohit, Ankor (1992). Khounsary, Ali M (ed.). "Diamond Monochromator for High Heat Flux Synchrotron X-ray Beams". Proc. SPIE. High Heat Flux Engineering. 1739: 628–642. Bibcode:1993SPIE.1739..628K. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.261.1970. doi:10.1117/12.140532. S2CID 137212507. Archived from the original on September 17, 2008. Retrieved May 5, 2009.
  87. Heartwig, J.; et al. (September 13, 2006). "Diamonds for Modern Synchrotron Radiation Sources". European Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Archived from the original on March 24, 2015. Retrieved May 5, 2009.
  88. Jackson, D. D.; Aracne-Ruddle, C.; Malba, V.; Weir, S. T.; Catledge, S. A.; Vohra, Y. K. (2003). "Magnetic susceptibility measurements at high pressure using designer diamond anvils". Rev. Sci. Instrum. (Submitted manuscript). 74 (4): 2467. Bibcode:2003RScI...74.2467J. doi:10.1063/1.1544084. Archived from the original on October 20, 2020. Retrieved August 21, 2018.
  89. Denisenko, A.; Kohn, E. (2005). "Diamond power devices. Concepts and limits". Diamond and Related Materials. 14 (3–7): 491–498. Bibcode:2005DRM....14..491D. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2004.12.043.
  90. Koizumi, S.; Watanabe, K; Hasegawa, M; Kanda, H (2001). "Ultraviolet Emission from a Diamond pn Junction". Science. 292 (5523): 1899–1901. Bibcode:2001Sci...292.1899K. doi:10.1126/science.1060258. PMID 11397942. S2CID 10675358. Archived from the original on March 20, 2022. Retrieved December 6, 2019.
  91. Isberg, J.; Hammersberg, J; Johansson, E; Wikström, T; Twitchen, DJ; Whitehead, AJ; Coe, SE; Scarsbrook, GA (2002). "High Carrier Mobility in Single-Crystal Plasma-Deposited Diamond". Science. 297 (5587): 1670–1672. Bibcode:2002Sci...297.1670I. doi:10.1126/science.1074374. PMID 12215638. S2CID 27736134.
  92. Russell, S. A. O.; Sharabi, S.; Tallaire, A.; Moran, D. A. J. (October 1, 2012). "Hydrogen-Terminated Diamond Field-Effect Transistors With Cutoff Frequency of 53 GHz". IEEE Electron Device Letters. 33 (10): 1471–1473. Bibcode:2012IEDL...33.1471R. doi:10.1109/LED.2012.2210020. S2CID 15626986.
  93. Ueda, K.; Kasu, M.; Yamauchi, Y.; Makimoto, T.; Schwitters, M.; Twitchen, D. J.; Scarsbrook, G. A.; Coe, S. E. (July 1, 2006). "Diamond FET using high-quality polycrystalline diamond with fT of 45 GHz and fmax of 120 GHz". IEEE Electron Device Letters. 27 (7): 570–572. Bibcode:2006IEDL...27..570U. doi:10.1109/LED.2006.876325. S2CID 27756719.
  94. Isberg, J.; Gabrysch, M.; Tajani, A. & Twitchen, D.J. (2006). "High-field Electrical Transport in Single Crystal CVD Diamond Diodes". Advances in Science and Technology. Diamond and Other New Carbon Materials IV. 48: 73–76. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.48.73. ISBN 978-3-03813-096-3. S2CID 137379434.
  95. Railkar, T. A.; Kang, W. P.; Windischmann, Henry; Malshe, A. P.; Naseem, H. A.; Davidson, J. L.; Brown, W. D. (2000). "A critical review of chemical vapor-deposited (CVD) diamond for electronic applications". Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences. 25 (3): 163–277. Bibcode:2000CRSSM..25..163R. doi:10.1080/10408430008951119. S2CID 96368363.
  96. Salisbury, David (August 4, 2011) "Designing diamond circuits for extreme environments" Archived November 18, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Vanderbilt University Research News. Retrieved May 27, 2015.
  97. Bucciolini, M.; Borchi, E; Bruzzi, M; Casati, M; Cirrone, P; Cuttone, G; Deangelis, C; Lovik, I; Onori, S; Raffaele, L.; Sciortino, S. (2005). "Diamond dosimetry: Outcomes of the CANDIDO and CONRADINFN projects". Nuclear Instruments and Methods A. 552 (1–2): 189–196. Bibcode:2005NIMPA.552..189B. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2005.06.030.
  98. "Blind to the Optical Light Detectors". Royal Observatory of Belgium. Archived from the original on June 21, 2009. Retrieved May 5, 2009.
  99. Benmoussa, A; Soltani, A; Haenen, K; Kroth, U; Mortet, V; Barkad, H A; Bolsee, D; Hermans, C; Richter, M; De Jaeger, J C; Hochedez, J F (2008). "New developments on diamond photodetector for VUV Solar Observations". Semiconductor Science and Technology. 23 (3): 035026. Bibcode:2008SeScT..23c5026B. doi:10.1088/0268-1242/23/3/035026.
  100. Panizza, M. & Cerisola, G. (2005). "Application of diamond electrodes to electrochemical processes". Electrochimica Acta. 51 (2): 191–199. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2005.04.023.
  101. Nebel, C.E.; Uetsuka, H.; Rezek, B.; Shin, D.; Tokuda, N.; Nakamura, T. (2007). "Inhomogeneous DNA bonding to polycrystalline CVD diamond". Diamond and Related Materials. 16 (8): 1648–1651. Bibcode:2007DRM....16.1648N. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2007.02.015.
  102. Gandini, D. (2000). "Oxidation of carbonylic acids at boron-doped diamond electrodes for wastewater treatment". Journal of Applied Electrochemistry. 20 (12): 1345–1350. Bibcode:1988JApEl..18..410W. doi:10.1023/A:1026526729357. S2CID 97692319.
  103. Michaud, P.-A. (2000). "Preparation of peroxodisulfuric acid using Boron-Doped Diamond thin film electrodes". Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters. 3 (2): 77. doi:10.1149/1.1390963.
  104. Yarnell, Amanda (February 2, 2004). "The Many Facets of Man-Made Diamonds". Chemical & Engineering News. 82 (5): 26–31. doi:10.1021/cen-v082n005.p026. Archived from the original on October 28, 2008. Retrieved March 2, 2004.
  105. "How High Quality Synthetic Diamonds Will Impact the Market". Kitco. July 12, 2013. Archived from the original on November 3, 2013. Retrieved August 1, 2013.
  106. Zimnisky, Paul (February 10, 2015). "Global Rough Diamond Production Estimated to Hit Over 135M Carats in 2015". Kitco Commentary. Kitco. Archived from the original on March 22, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  107. Walker, J. (1979). "Optical absorption and luminescence in diamond". Rep. Prog. Phys. 42 (10): 1605–1659. Bibcode:1979RPPh...42.1605W. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.467.443. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/42/10/001.
  108. Collins, A.T.; Connor, A.; Ly, C-H.; Shareef, A.; Spear, P.M. (2005). "High-temperature annealing of optical centers in type-I diamond". Journal of Applied Physics. 97 (8): 083517–083517–10. Bibcode:2005JAP....97h3517C. doi:10.1063/1.1866501.
  109. "Memorial Diamonds Deliver Eternal Life". Reuters. June 23, 2009. Archived from the original on October 17, 2012. Retrieved August 8, 2009.
  110. "De Beers pleads guilty in price fixing case". Associated Press via NBC News. July 13, 2004. Archived from the original on January 1, 2015. Retrieved May 27, 2015.
  111. Pressler, Margaret Webb (July 14, 2004). "DeBeers Pleads to Price-Fixing: Firm Pays $10 million, Can Fully Reenter U.S." The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 12, 2012. Retrieved November 26, 2008.
  112. O'Donoghue, p. 115
  113. Laboratory Grown Diamond Report Archived October 21, 2012, at the Wayback Machine for Gemesis diamond, International Gemological Institute, 2007. Retrieved May 27, 2015.
  114. Company Grows 10 Carat Synthetic Diamond Archived June 1, 2015, at the Wayback Machine. Jckonline.com (May 27, 2015). Retrieved on September 1, 2015.
  115. Wang, Wuyi; Persaud, Stephanie; Myagkaya, Elina (2022). "New Record Size for CVD Laboratory-Grown Diamond". Gems and Gemology. 58 (1).
  116. Murphy, Hannah; Biesheuvel, Thomas; Elmquist, Sonja (August 27, 2015). "Want to Make a Diamond in Just 10 Weeks? Use a Microwave". Bloomberg Businessweek.
  117. Oluleye, Dr Gbemi (May 5, 2022). "Environmental Impacts of Mined Diamonds" (PDF). Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London.
  118. "Synthetic Diamonds – Promoting Fair Trade" (PDF). gjepc.org. The Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 13, 2014. Retrieved February 12, 2016.
  119. Kavilanz, Parija (April 27, 2022). "CNN Business". CNN Business. Retrieved May 5, 2022.
  120. Fried, Michael (January 20, 2017). "Why Lab Created Diamonds are a Poor Value Purchase". The Diamond Pro. Archived from the original on November 20, 2018. Retrieved November 19, 2018.
  121. Zimnisky, Paul (January 9, 2017). "A New Diamond Industry". Mining Journal (London). The Mining Journal (trade magazine). Archived from the original on January 13, 2017. Retrieved January 14, 2017.
  122. Kottasová, Ivana (May 29, 2018). "De Beers admits defeat over man-made diamonds". CNN. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  123. "FTC Approves Final Revisions to Jewelry Guides". U.S. Federal Trade Commission. July 24, 2018. Archived from the original on January 12, 2019. Retrieved August 17, 2018.
  124. Payne, Jason (July 25, 2018). "Orwell's '1984', De Beers' Lobbying, & the New FTC Lab Diamond Guidelines". Archived from the original on November 27, 2018. Retrieved July 29, 2018.
  125. "DPA Petition on Proposed Revisions to the Guides for the Jewelry, Precious Metals and Pewter Industries" (PDF). De Beers Technologies UK. May 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 22, 2017. Retrieved August 21, 2018.
  126. 16 C.F.R. Part 23: Guides for the Jewelry, Precious Metals, and Pewter Industries: Federal Trade Commission Letter Declining to Amend the Guides with Respect to Use of the Term "Cultured", U.S. Federal Trade Commission, July 21, 2008.
  127. Graff, Michelle (April 4, 2019). "How GIA Is Changing Its Reports for Lab-Grown Diamonds". Nationaljeweler.com. Archived from the original on July 11, 2021. Retrieved July 11, 2021.


Bibliography

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.