Turboprop
A turboprop engine is a turbine engine that drives an aircraft propeller.[1]
A turboprop consists of an intake, reduction gearbox, compressor, combustor, turbine, and a propelling nozzle.[2] Air enters the intake and is compressed by the compressor. Fuel is then added to the compressed air in the combustor, where the fuel-air mixture then combusts. The hot combustion gases expand through the turbine stages, generating power at the point of exhaust. Some of the power generated by the turbine is used to drive the compressor and electric generator. The gases are then exhausted from the turbine. In contrast to a turbojet or turbofan, the engine's exhaust gases do not provide enough energy to create significant thrust, since almost all of the engine's power is used to drive the propeller.[3]
Technological aspects
Exhaust thrust in a turboprop is sacrificed in favor of shaft power, which is obtained by extracting additional power (beyond that necessary to drive the compressor) from turbine expansion. Owing to the additional expansion in the turbine system, the residual energy in the exhaust jet is low.[4][5][6] Consequently, the exhaust jet produces about 10% of the total thrust.[7] A higher proportion of the thrust comes from the propeller at low speeds and less at higher speeds.[8]
Turboprops have bypass ratios of 50-100,[9][10] although the propulsion airflow is less clearly defined for propellers than for fans.[11][12]
The propeller is coupled to the turbine through a reduction gear that converts the high RPM/low torque output to low RPM/high torque. The propeller itself is normally a constant-speed (variable pitch) propeller type similar to that used with larger aircraft reciprocating engines, except that the propeller-control requirements are very different.[13]
To make the engine more compact, reverse airflow can be used. On a reverse-flow turboprop engine, the compressor intake is at the aft of the engine, and the exhaust is situated forward, reducing the distance between the turbine and the propeller.[14]
Unlike the small diameter fans used in turbofan engines, the propeller has a large diameter that lets it accelerate a large volume of air. This permits a lower airstream velocity for a given amount of thrust. Since it is more efficient at low speeds to accelerate a large amount of air by a small degree than a small amount of air by a large degree,[15][16] a low disc loading (thrust per unit disc area) increases the aircraft's energy efficiency, and this reduces the fuel use.[17][18]
Propellers work well until the flight speed of the aircraft is high enough that the airflow past the blade tips reaches the speed of sound. Beyond that speed, the proportion of the power that drives the propeller that is converted to propeller thrust falls dramatically. For this reason turboprop engines are not used on aircraft[4][5][6] that fly faster than 0.6–0.7 Mach.[7] However, propfan engines, which are very similar to turboprop engines, can cruise at flight speeds approaching 0.75 Mach. To maintain propeller efficiency across a wide range of airspeeds, turboprops use constant-speed (variable-pitch) propellers. The blades of a constant-speed propeller increase their pitch as aircraft speed increases. Another benefit of this type of propeller is that it can also be used to generate reverse thrust to reduce stopping distance on the runway. Additionally, in the event of an engine failure, the propeller can be feathered, thus minimizing the drag of the non-functioning propeller.[19]
While the power turbine may be integral with the gas generator section, many turboprops today feature a free power turbine on a separate coaxial shaft. This enables the propeller to rotate freely, independent of compressor speed.[20]
History
Alan Arnold Griffith had published a paper on compressor design in 1926. Subsequent work at the Royal Aircraft Establishment investigated axial compressor-based designs that would drive a propeller. From 1929, Frank Whittle began work on centrifugal compressor-based designs that would use all the gas power produced by the engine for jet thrust.[21]
The world's first turboprop was designed by the Hungarian mechanical engineer György Jendrassik.[22] Jendrassik published a turboprop idea in 1928, and on 12 March 1929 he patented his invention. In 1938, he built a small-scale (100 Hp; 74.6 kW) experimental gas turbine.[23] The larger Jendrassik Cs-1, with a predicted output of 1,000 bhp, was produced and tested at the Ganz Works in Budapest between 1937 and 1941. It was of axial-flow design with 15 compressor and 7 turbine stages, annular combustion chamber. First run in 1940, combustion problems limited its output to 400 bhp. In 1941, the engine was abandoned due to war, and the factory was turned over to conventional engine production.
The first mention of turboprop engines in the general public press was in the February 1944 issue of the British aviation publication Flight, which included a detailed cutaway drawing of what a possible future turboprop engine could look like. The drawing was very close to what the future Rolls-Royce Trent would look like.[24] The first British turboprop engine was the Rolls-Royce RB.50 Trent, a converted Derwent II fitted with reduction gear and a Rotol 7 ft 11 in (2.41 m) five-bladed propeller. Two Trents were fitted to Gloster Meteor EE227 — the sole "Trent-Meteor" — which thus became the world's first turboprop-powered aircraft, albeit a test-bed not intended for production.[25][26] It first flew on 20 September 1945. From their experience with the Trent, Rolls-Royce developed the Rolls-Royce Clyde, the first turboprop engine to receive a type certificate for military and civil use,[27] and the Dart, which became one of the most reliable turboprop engines ever built. Dart production continued for more than fifty years. The Dart-powered Vickers Viscount was the first turboprop aircraft of any kind to go into production and sold in large numbers.[28] It was also the first four-engined turboprop. Its first flight was on 16 July 1948. The world's first single engined turboprop aircraft was the Armstrong Siddeley Mamba-powered Boulton Paul Balliol, which first flew on 24 March 1948.[29]
The Soviet Union built on German World War II turboprop preliminary design work by Junkers Motorenwerke, while BMW, Heinkel-Hirth and Daimler-Benz also worked on projected designs.[30] While the Soviet Union had the technology to create the airframe for a jet-powered strategic bomber comparable to Boeing's B-52 Stratofortress, they instead produced the Tupolev Tu-95 Bear, powered with four Kuznetsov NK-12 turboprops, mated to eight contra-rotating propellers (two per nacelle) with supersonic tip speeds to achieve maximum cruise speeds in excess of 575 mph, faster than many of the first jet aircraft and comparable to jet cruising speeds for most missions. The Bear would serve as their most successful long-range combat and surveillance aircraft and symbol of Soviet power projection throughout the end of the 20th century. The USA used turboprop engines with contra-rotating propellers, such as the Allison T40, on some experimental aircraft during the 1950s. The T40-powered Convair R3Y Tradewind flying-boat was operated by the U.S. Navy for a short time.
The first American turboprop engine was the General Electric XT31, first used in the experimental Consolidated Vultee XP-81.[31] The XP-81 first flew in December 1945, the first aircraft to use a combination of turboprop and turbojet power. The technology of Allison's earlier T38 design evolved into the Allison T56, used to power the Lockheed Electra airliner, its military maritime patrol derivative the P-3 Orion, and the C-130 Hercules military transport aircraft.
The first turbine-powered, shaft-driven helicopter was the Kaman K-225, a development of Charles Kaman's K-125 synchropter, which used a Boeing T50 turboshaft engine to power it on 11 December 1951.[32]
Usage
In contrast to turbofans, turboprops are most efficient at flight speeds below 725 km/h (450 mph; 390 knots) because the jet velocity of the propeller (and exhaust) is relatively low. Modern turboprop airliners operate at nearly the same speed as small regional jet airliners but burn two-thirds of the fuel per passenger.[33] However, compared to a turbojet (which can fly at high altitude for enhanced speed and fuel efficiency) a propeller aircraft has a lower ceiling.
Compared to piston engines, their greater power-to-weight ratio (which allows for shorter takeoffs) and reliability can offset their higher initial cost, maintenance and fuel consumption. As jet fuel can be easier to obtain than avgas in remote areas, turboprop-powered aircraft like the Cessna Caravan and Quest Kodiak are used as bush airplanes.
Turboprop engines are generally used on small subsonic aircraft, but the Tupolev Tu-114 can reach 470 kn (870 km/h, 541 mph). Large military aircraft, like the Tupolev Tu-95, and civil aircraft, such as the Lockheed L-188 Electra, were also turboprop powered. The Airbus A400M is powered by four Europrop TP400 engines, which are the second most powerful turboprop engines ever produced, after the 11 MW (15,000 hp) Kuznetsov NK-12.
In 2017, the most widespread turboprop airliners in service were the ATR 42/72 (950 aircraft), Bombardier Q400 (506), De Havilland Canada Dash 8-100/200/300 (374), Beechcraft 1900 (328), de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter (270), Saab 340 (225).[35] Less widespread and older airliners include the BAe Jetstream 31, Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia, Fairchild Swearingen Metroliner, Dornier 328, Saab 2000, Xian MA60, MA600 and MA700, Fokker 27 and 50.
Turboprop business aircraft include the Piper Meridian, Socata TBM, Pilatus PC-12, Piaggio P.180 Avanti, Beechcraft King Air and Super King Air. In April 2017, there were 14,311 business turboprops in the worldwide fleet.[36]
Reliability
Between 2012 and 2016, the ATSB observed 417 events with turboprop aircraft, 83 per year, over 1.4 million flight hours: 2.2 per 10,000 hours. Three were "high risk" involving engine malfunction and unplanned landing in single‑engine Cessna 208 Caravans, four "medium risk" and 96% "low risk". Two occurrences resulted in minor injuries due to engine malfunction and terrain collision in agricultural aircraft and five accidents involved aerial work: four in agriculture and one in an air ambulance.[37]
Current engines
Jane's All the World's Aircraft. 2005–2006.
Manufacturer | Country | Designation | Dry weight (kg) | Takeoff rating (kW) | Application |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMC | People's Republic of China | WJ5E | 720 | 2130 | Harbin SH-5, Xi'an Y-7 |
Europrop International | European Union | TP400-D6 | 1800 | 8203 | Airbus A400M |
General Electric | United States | CT7-5A | 365 | 1294 | |
General Electric | United States | CT7-9 | 365 | 1447 | CASA/IPTN CN-235, Let L-610, Saab 340, Sukhoi Su-80 |
General Electric | United States Czech Republic | H80 Series[38] | 200 | 550–625 | Thrush Model 510, Let 410NG, Let L-410 Turbolet UVP-E, CAIGA Primus 150, Nextant G90XT |
General Electric | United States | T64-P4D | 538 | 2535 | Aeritalia G.222, de Havilland Canada DHC-5 Buffalo, Kawasaki P-2J |
Honeywell | United States | TPE331 Series | 150–275 | 478–1650 | Aero/Rockwell Turbo Commander 680/690/840/960/1000, Antonov An-38, Ayres Thrush, BAe Jetstream 31/32, BAe Jetstream 41, CASA C-212 Aviocar, Cessna 441 Conquest II, Dornier 228, General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper, Grum Ge man, Mitsubishi MU-2, North American Rockwell OV-10 Bronco, Piper PA-42 Cheyenne, RUAG 228NG, Short SC.7 Skyvan, Short Tucano, Swearingen Merlin, Fairchild Swearingen Metroliner, HAL HTT-40 |
Honeywell | United States | LTP 101-700 | 147 | 522 | Air Tractor AT-302, Piaggio P.166 |
KKBM | Russia | NK-12MV | 1900 | 11033 | Antonov An-22, Tupolev Tu-95, Tupolev Tu-114 |
Progress | Ukraine | TV3-117VMA-SB2 | 560 | 1864 | Antonov An-140 |
Klimov | Russia | TV7-117S | 530 | 2100 | Ilyushin Il-112, Ilyushin Il-114 |
Progress | Ukraine | AI20M | 1040 | 2940 | Antonov An-12, Antonov An-32, Ilyushin Il-18 |
Progress | Ukraine | AI24T | 600 | 1880 | Antonov An-24, Antonov An-26, Antonov An-30 |
LHTEC | United States | LHTEC T800 | 517 | 2013 | Ayres LM200 Loadmaster (not built) |
OMKB | Russia | TVD-20 | 240 | 1081 | Antonov An-3, Antonov An-38 |
Pratt & Whitney Canada | Canada | PT-6 Series | 149–260 | 430–1500 | Air Tractor AT-502, Air Tractor AT-602, Air Tractor AT-802, Beechcraft Model 99, Beechcraft King Air, Beechcraft Super King Air, Beechcraft 1900, Beechcraft T-6 Texan II, Cessna 208 Caravan, Cessna 425 Corsair/Conquest I, de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter, Harbin Y-12, Embraer EMB 110 Bandeirante, Let L-410 Turbolet, Piaggio P.180 Avanti, Pilatus PC-6 Porter, Pilatus PC-12, Piper PA-42 Cheyenne, Piper PA-46-500TP Meridian, Shorts 360, Daher TBM 700, Daher TBM 850, Daher TBM 900, Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano |
Pratt & Whitney Canada | Canada | PW120 | 418 | 1491 | ATR 42-300/320 |
Pratt & Whitney Canada | Canada | PW121 | 425 | 1603 | ATR 42-300/320, Bombardier Dash 8 Q100 |
Pratt & Whitney Canada | Canada | PW123 C/D | 450 | 1603 | Bombardier Dash 8 Q300 |
Pratt & Whitney Canada | Canada | PW126 C/D | 450 | 1950 | BAe ATP |
Pratt & Whitney Canada | Canada | PW127 | 481 | 2051 | ATR 72 |
Pratt & Whitney Canada | Canada | PW150A | 717 | 3781 | Bombardier Dash 8 Q400 |
PZL | Poland | TWD-10B | 230 | 754 | PZL M28 |
RKBM | Russia | TVD-1500S | 240 | 1044 | Sukhoi Su-80 |
Rolls-Royce | United Kingdom | Dart Mk 536 | 569 | 1700 | Avro 748, Fokker F27, Vickers Viscount |
Rolls-Royce | United Kingdom | Tyne 21 | 1085 | 4500 | Aeritalia G.222, Breguet Atlantic, Transall C-160 |
Rolls-Royce | United Kingdom | 250-B17 | 88.4 | 313 | Fuji T-7, Britten-Norman Turbine Islander, O&N Cessna 210, Soloy Cessna 206, Propjet Bonanza |
Rolls-Royce | United Kingdom | Allison T56 | 828–880 | 3424–3910 | P-3 Orion, E-2 Hawkeye, C-2 Greyhound, C-130 Hercules |
Rolls-Royce | United Kingdom | AE2100A | 715.8 | 3095 | Saab 2000 |
Rolls-Royce | United Kingdom | AE2100J | 710 | 3424 | ShinMaywa US-2 |
Rolls-Royce | United Kingdom | AE2100D2, D3 | 702 | 3424 | Alenia C-27J Spartan, Lockheed Martin C-130J Super Hercules |
Rybinsk | Russia | TVD-1500V | 220 | 1156 | |
Saturn | Russia | TAL-34-1 | 178 | 809 | |
Turbomeca | France | Arrius 1D | 111 | 313 | Socata TB 31 Omega |
Turbomeca | France | Arrius 2F | 103 | 376 | |
Walter | Czech Republic | M601 Series[39] | 200 | 560 | Let L-410 Turbolet, Aerocomp Comp Air 10 XL, Aerocomp Comp Air 7, Ayres Thrush, Dornier Do 28, Lancair Propjet, Let Z-37T, Let L-420, Myasishchev M-101T, PAC FU-24 Fletcher, Progress Rysachok, PZL-106 Kruk, PZL-130 Orlik, SM-92T Turbo Finist |
Walter | Czech Republic | M602A | 570 | 1360 | Let L-610 |
Walter | Czech Republic | M602B | 480 | 1500 |
See also
- Jet engine
- Jetboat
- Scimitar propeller
- Supercharger
- Tiltrotor
- Turbocharger
References
- "Turboprop", Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, Federal Aviation Administration, 2009.
- "Aviation Glossary – Turboprop". dictionary.dauntless-soft.com. Retrieved 7 July 2019.
- Rathore, Mahesh. Thermal Engineering. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. p. 968.
- "Turboprop Engine" Glenn Research Center (NASA)
- "Turboprop Thrust" Glenn Research Center (NASA)
- "Variations of Jet Engines". smu.edu. Retrieved 31 August 2016.
- ""The turbofan engine Archived 18 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine", page 7. SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Department of aerospace engineering.
- J. Russell (2 August 1996). Performance and Stability of Aircraft. Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 16. ISBN 0080538649.
- Ilan Kroo and Juan Alonso. "Aircraft Design: Synthesis and Analysis, Propulsion Systems: Basic Concepts Archived 18 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine" Stanford University School of Engineering, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Main page Archived 23 February 2001 at the Wayback Machine
- Prof. Z. S. Spakovszky. "11.5 Trends in thermal and propulsive efficiency" MIT turbines, 2002. Thermodynamics and Propulsion
- "Propeller thrust" Glenn Research Center (NASA)
- Philip Walsh, Paul Fletcher. "Gas Turbine Performance", page 36. John Wiley & Sons, 15 April 2008. Quote: "It has better fuel consumption than a turbojet or turbofan, due to a high propulsive efficiency.., achieving thrust by a high mass flow of air from the propeller at low jet velocity. Above 0.6 Mach number the turboprop in turn becomes uncompetitive, due mainly to higher weight and frontal area."
- Airscrews For Turbines,Fairhurst, Flight magazine, 10 November 1949, p.609
- Martin, Swayne (16 May 2019). "How A Turboprop Engine Works". Boldmethod. Retrieved 6 November 2021.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - Paul Bevilaqua. The shaft driven Lift Fan propulsion system for the Joint Strike Fighter Archived 5 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine page 3. Presented 1 May 1997. DTIC.MIL Word document, 5.5 MB. Retrieved 25 February 2012.
- Bensen, Igor. "How they fly – Bensen explains all" Gyrocopters UK. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
- Johnson, Wayne. Helicopter theory pp3+32, Courier Dover Publications, 1980. Retrieved 25 February 2012. ISBN 0-486-68230-7
- Wieslaw Zenon Stepniewski, C. N. Keys. Rotary-wing aerodynamics p3, Courier Dover Publications, 1979. Retrieved 25 February 2012. ISBN 0-486-64647-5
- "Operating Propellers during Landing & Emergencies". experimentalaircraft.info. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
- "An Engine Ahead of Its Time". PT6 Nation. Pratt & Whitney Canada.
- Gunston Jet, p. 120
- Gunston World, p.111
- "Magyar feltalálók és találmányok – JENDRASSIK GYÖRGY (1898–1954)". SZTNH. Retrieved 31 May 2012.
- "Our Contribution – How Flight Introduced and Made Familiar With Gas Turbines and Jet Propulsion" Flight, 11 May 1951, p. 569.
- James p. 251-2
- Green p.18-9
- "rolls-royce trent – armstrong siddeley – 1950–2035 – Flight Archive". Flightglobal. Retrieved 31 August 2016.
- Green p.82
- Green p.81
- Turbojet History And Development 1930-1960 Volume 1 Great Britain And Germany, Antony L. Kay 2007, ISBN 978 1 86126 912 6, various pages
- Green p.57
- "Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum – Collections – Kaman K-225 (Long Description)". National Air and Space Museum. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
- "More turboprops coming to the market – maybe". CAPA – Centre for Aviation. 9 July 2010. Archived from the original on 13 July 2010. Retrieved 9 July 2010.
- "Beechcraft King Air 350i rolls out improved situational awareness, navigation" (Press release). Textron Aviation. 30 May 2018.
- "787 stars in annual airliner census". Flightglobal. 14 August 2017.
- "Business Aviation Market Update Report" (PDF). AMSTAT, Inc. April 2017.
- Gordon Gilbert (25 June 2018). "ATSB Study Finds Turboprop Engines Safe, Reliable".
- "The H-Series Engine | Engines | B&GA | GE Aviation". www.geaviation.com. Retrieved 1 June 2016.
- , PragueBest s.r.o. "History | GE Aviation". www.geaviation.cz. Archived from the original on 29 October 2017. Retrieved 1 June 2016.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|last=
Bibliography
- Green, W. and Cross, R.The Jet Aircraft of the World (1955). London: MacDonald
- Gunston, Bill (2006). The Development of Jet and Turbine Aero Engines, 4th Edition. Sparkford, Somerset, England, UK: Patrick Stephens, Haynes Publishing. ISBN 0-7509-4477-3.
- Gunston, Bill (2006). World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines, 5th Edition. Phoenix Mill, Gloucestershire, England, UK: Sutton Publishing Limited. ISBN 0-7509-4479-X.
- James, D.N. Gloster Aircraft since 1917 (1971). London: Putnam & Co. ISBN 0-370-00084-6
Further reading
- Van Sickle, Neil D.; et al. (1999). "Turboprop Engines". Van Sickle's modern airmanship. McGraw-Hill Professional. p. 205. ISBN 978-0-07-069633-4.
External links
- Jet Turbine Planes by LtCol Silsbee USAAF, Popular Science, December 1945, first article on turboprops printed
- Wikibooks: Jet propulsion
- "Development of the Turboprop" a 1950 Flight article on UK and US turboprop engines