accountability
(noun)
Individuals' responsibility for their own work and acceptance of the repercussions of their actions.
(noun)
The state of being responsible for something.
(noun)
Being responsible for one's own work and answering for the repercussions of one's own actions.
(noun)
The acknowledgment and assumption of responsibility for actions, products, and decisions.
Examples of accountability in the following topics:
-
The Importance of Accountability
- Being accountable simply means being responsible for decisions made, actions taken, and assignments completed.
- The United States Department of Organization provides specific guidelines for managerial accountability.
- In organizations, accountability is a management control process in which responses are given for a person's actions.
- Because there is no global, democratically elected body to which organizations must account, global organizations from all sectors' bodies are often criticized as having large accountability gaps.
- The United States Department of Organization provides specific guidelines about accountability of managers.
-
Social Responsibility Audits
- As with financial audits, social responsibility audits involve accounting processes.
- This type of accounting originated in the early 1990s and is known by various names, including social accounting, sustainability accounting, CSR reporting, environmental and social governance (ESG) reporting, and triple-bottom-line accounting (encompassing social and environmental as well as financial reporting).
- In most countries, existing legislation regulates only a fraction of accounting for socially relevant corporate activity.
- Having third-party groups conduct social audits is one way that corporations are held accountable for their CSR performance.
- Environmental-related accounting might address pollution emissions, resources used, or wildlife habitats damaged or re-established.
-
Accountability in Teams
- In a management context, accountability explicitly identifies who is responsible for ensuring that outcomes meet goals and creates incentives for success.
- Organizations often use team-based rewards to hold teams accountable for their work.
- A sense of accountability to the team creates an incentive for individuals to provide help when needed.
- Teams use norms and other forms of social pressure to hold one another accountable.
- For accountability to work, teams need to have the resources, skills, and authority to do what they are being held responsible for.
-
Managers Role in Ethical Conduct
- Managers hold positions of authority that make them accountable for the ethical conduct of those who report to them.
- A fiduciary must put the interests of those to whom he is accountable ahead of any interests, and must not profit from his position as a fiduciary unless the principal consents.
- The stakeholders will be interested to hear how the organization took ethics into account, and in those cases it is the manager's duty to speak on the company's behalf.
-
Self-Managing Teams
- A self-managing team is a group of employees working together who are accountable for all or most aspects of their task.
- A self-managing team is a group of employees working together who are accountable for most or all aspects of their task.
-
Defining Ethics
- Professionals such as managers, lawyers, and accountants are individuals who exercise specialized knowledge and skills when providing services to customers or to the public.
- For example, lawyers must hold client conversations confidential and accountants must display the highest levels of honest and integrity in their record keeping and financial analysis.
-
Middle-Level Management
- Middle management is the intermediate management level accountable to top management and responsible for leading lower level managers.
- They are accountable to the top-level management for their department's function, and they devote more time to organizational and directional functions than upper management.
-
Non-Rational Decision Making
- To account for these limitations, alternative models of decision making offer different views of how people make choices.
- This process takes into account new information and considers multiple scenarios of how the future will evolve.
-
Project Management Audits
- This usually refers to audits in accounting, but similar concepts also exist in project management and quality management, as the auditing of steps and processes in a project systematically or randomly to insure that the project is meeting estimated completion and quality standards.
- Identify how project managers can use the common accounting concept of audits to achieve optimal levels of control and efficiency
-
Advantages and Disadvantages of Group Decision Making
- Group decisions take into account a broader scope of information since each group member may contribute unique information and expertise.
- One possible disadvantage of group decision making is that it can create a diffusion of responsibility that results in a lack of accountability for outcomes.