conclusion

Examples of conclusion in the following topics:

• Discussion and Conclusion

  • The discussion section of a scientific paper analyzes and interprets the results of a study, while the conclusion explains implications for further research.
  • You don't have to write a conclusion if your points fit neatly into the discussion section, but a conclusion is helpful if you want to make suggestions that stretch beyond the scope of your project.
  • The conclusion section is not strictly necessary in the social sciences, but it can be helpful to provide a succinct summary of your work.
  • But think carefully about whether you could benefit from the distancing effect of putting these implications in a separate conclusion.
  • The conclusion should not repeat your discussion section.

• Assembling Your Argument

  • A categorical syllogism consists of three basic parts: the major premise, minor premise, and conclusion.
  • Next, you want to be clear on what conclusions you are drawing.
  • Make sure that every conclusion corresponds to some piece of evidence.
  • Conclusions should build on each other, rather than be listed all at once at the end of your paper.
  • Warrants are the way in which you link evidence to conclusions.

• Approaches to Your Concluding Paragraph

  • The conclusion, while not adding new information to the argument, can inspire readers to believe the paper's thesis.
  • One way to think of the conclusion is as "The Tale of the Conquering Hero."
  • There should be no new evidence or claims presented in the conclusion.
  • This portion of the conclusion won't apply to all topics, and it's certainly not a requirement.
  • While you needn't get overly emotional with your ending, you do want to make the conclusion powerful.

• Results

  • It will be tempting to start drawing conclusions as you write the results section.
  • You'll get your chance to draw conclusions in the conclusion section.

• Arguing with Evidence and Warrants

  • After identifying the problem, gather evidence, draw conclusions, then assemble those conclusions into a cohesive position or proposal.
  • Obviously, your paper will include both evidence and warrants that justify the conclusions drawn from it.
  • But chances are that you will find yourself relying on one more than the other when trying to justify your conclusions.
  • The former would depend primarily on hard data that supports its conclusions; the latter would emphasize the rigorousness of its logic.

• Abstract

  • The abstract is the first (and, sometimes, only) part of a scientific paper people will read, so it's essential to summarize all necessary information about your methods, results, and conclusions.

• Making Your Own Arguments

  • Instead, you must draw conclusions from those results, explain why those conclusions are valid, and reveal why a wider audience should care about the importance of those findings.
  • In the case of the sciences, those claims are the conclusions you draw from your data.
  • Alternatively, you can base your argument on the counterpoint of another writer's conclusions.

• Starting with the Data

  • Scientific work is structured around data, and the conclusions must be based on verifiable data.
  • Manipulating data is a very serious ethical violation in scientific work, because it not only corrupts your research findings but also undermines any conclusions you may have drawn from the data.
  • The body of an IMRAD paper is concerned with presenting your data (in the sections on methodology and results) and then drawing conclusions from it (in the sections on analysis and discussion).
  • Doing so will corrupt your data and, consequently, any conclusions you may draw from it.
  • Scientific work is structured around data, and the conclusions must be based on verifiable data.

• Entering the Scientific Conversation

  • What was the conclusion reached from the results?
  • Unlike academic articles, science textbooks organize information in chronological order and highlight important terms, definitions, and conclusions with bold text and flashy graphics.
  • Skim the conclusion to see how the results correspond to the hypothesis.
  • Tests a method or conclusion on a new type of data or specimen
  • Tests an earlier conclusion with a new method or larger sample

• Step 4: Drafting

  • Next, you want to be clear on what conclusions you are drawing.
  • Conclusions should build on each other.
  • Warrants are the way in which you link evidence to conclusions.
  • Here's what the conclusion must do:
  • These are the points to recall in your conclusion.