A small incision is made on the left side at about the level of the second or third rib. A pocket is created under the skin, and the device is inserted in that pocket, and then the incision is closed. The device is usually implanted by an electrophysiologist as an outpatient procedure using local anesthesia. Conscious sedation can be used but is generally not required. Once implanted, the device is activated by passing a magnet over it.

The most common complication is a pain at the implant site. Risks of the procedure include a local pocket infection that may require removal of the implanted device or a local skin reaction to the device.  Poor R-wave sensing is a rare complication that may require moving the device to another location.

An implantable loop recorder can store patient activated episodes, automatically activated episodes or a combination of the two. A typical loop recorder report includes information about the captured ECG tracings, the technician’s interpretation of the ECG tracing and any reported symptoms and their respective duration, which can assist the physician in diagnosing the underlying problem.

Implantable loop recorders have the best yield (up to a 75% detection rate for the cause of syncope at 3 years). They do not need to be removed during certain activities such as showering or swimming and may identify significant cardiac rhythm abnormalities when the patient is sleeping. Patients can continue with their normal activity of everyday living and exercise freely. An identification card is usually given to the patient with the make and model of their implantable loop recorder device. This information is valuable should the patient with recurrent symptoms present to the emergency department and need to have their device checked. The main purpose of the device is to record electrical activity and is therefore safe to travel with and it is not affected by other electrical devices. Event recorders are the next most productive and Holter monitors are the least effective unless events occur daily, which is not the case for most patients.

Following the monitoring period, there are three possible combinations of patient symptoms and ECG findings. The first possibility is that the patient had symptoms with corresponding ECG abnormalities, in which case appropriate therapy should be initiated. Possible recommendations include implantation of a permanent pacemaker, implantation of an implantable cardiac defibrillator, or a diagnostic electric study of the heart that may or may not be followed by a therapeutic procedure. If an arrhythmia is detected, such as atrial fibrillation, the patient may need to start a blood thinning medication to decrease the risk of a cerebral vascular accident. The second possibility is that the patient had symptoms without corresponding ECG abnormalities, in which case the diagnosis is unlikely cardiac in nature, and other etiologies for the patient’s symptoms should be investigated. The patient can be referred to other more appropriate specialist if necessary. The third possibility is that the patient had no symptoms and no ECG abnormalities during the monitoring period and a cardiac etiology is unlikely, and no further ECG monitoring is required. If a diagnosis is made or no abnormalities were discovered during the monitoring period, the patient can have the device removed in a similar fashion that it was implanted.

Implantable loop recorders are a safe and effective way to identify arrhythmias and other cardiac abnormalities. It should be considered only after a thorough history and physical examination are performed. Family history and medication use should also be discussed with the patient. Initial imaging should include ECG and echocardiogram which may reveal structural heart disease. Other testing such as a stress test or a tilt table test, may be beneficial if indicated. If the patient continues to have symptoms and all workup is unrevealing, then electrophysiology testing and an implantable loop recorder is the best approach in select patients.[1][5]

Healthcare workers including the nurse practitioner who deal with patients with syncope and arrhythmias should be familiar with the implantable loop recorder. Unlike the traditional holter monitor, the implantable loop recorder is far more efficient and reliable at identifying abnormal rhythms. However, they should be considered only after a thorough history and physical examination are performed. Family history and medication use should also be discussed with the patient. Initial imaging should include ECG and echocardiogram which may reveal structural heart disease. Other testing such as a stress test or a tilt table test, may be beneficial if indicated. If the patient continues to have symptoms and all workup is unrevealing, then electrophysiology testing and an implantable loop recorder is the best approach in select patients.