Bronchospasm characteristically presents as smooth muscle constriction of the small airways. Clinically this manifests as wheezing. The pediatric population is more susceptible to disease and complications from bronchospasm due to children’s unique anatomy. Infants use different lung mechanics compared to older children, making them more prone to wheezing. Flow obstruction is affected by the airway diameter as well as lung and chest wall compliance. In the application of Poiseuille’s Law to the airways, airflow resistance through a tube is inversely related to the radius of the tube to the fourth power. Therefore, even minute decreases in the airway radius can result in significant flow impediment due to high resistance.
Many disease processes induce bronchospasm in the pediatric population, and several will be described in detail in this review: acute asthma exacerbation, acute viral bronchiolitis, and anaphylaxis. A more brief discussion will occur on the topics of foreign body aspiration and vascular ring.
Asthma is a pulmonary disease characterized by airway inflammation, smooth muscle constriction, edema, and mucus production, leading to obstruction and air trapping. Asthma is exacerbated by environmental triggers, resulting in excessive bronchoconstriction out of proportion to a normal airway’s reaction known as airway hyperresponsiveness. Frequent triggers of asthma-related bronchospasm include viral respiratory infections, tobacco exposure, weather fluctuations, potent odors, air pollution, and other irritants.
Bronchiolitis, a viral lower respiratory tract infection affecting children two years and younger, is known to cause bronchospasm, resulting from the inflammation, edema, and necrosis of the cells lining the bronchioles. Additionally, bronchiolitis causes increased production of mucus in these small airways, prompting further obstruction. Finally, bronchospasm presents in patients suffering from anaphylaxis, an acute systemic allergic reaction that is typically mediated by immunoglobulin E.
Asthma prevalence varies significantly based on community development, region, and climate. According to the 2017 asthma data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 6.2 million children (0 to 17 years) have asthma in the United States. Children aged 0 to 17 years have a higher prevalence of asthma and higher visit rates to primary care physicians and emergency departments than adults, yet lower mortality.[1] Racial disparities exist in pediatric asthma with the highest prevalence, nonadherence, emergency department and hospitalization rates, and death rates in African American children.[2]
Bronchiolitis most frequently presents in the winter season due to the plethora of viral pathogens--the most common of which is Respiratory syncytial virus. Bronchiolitis is more common in males, non-breastfed infants, and children who have crowded living conditions. On average, over 130000 children less than two years of age are hospitalized each year for bronchiolitis in the United States, with estimated annual healthcare costs of $1.73 billion.[3] This disease process accounts for approximately 16% of the total hospitalizations in this age group.[3] Factors that put children at higher risk for severe disease include age less than 12 weeks, history of premature birth, congenital or underlying cardiopulmonary disease, and immunodeficiency.[4]
In developed countries, estimates are that there is a lifetime prevalence of anaphylaxis of 0.5 to 2%.[5] In the United States, the lifetime prevalence is estimated to be more than 1.6%.[6] The diagnosis of anaphylaxis is on the rise in the United States, doubling from 5.7 to 11.7 patients per 10000 visits to emergency departments between 2009 and 2013.[7]
Bronchospasm clinically presents itself as wheezing on physical exam. However, some additional indirect signs and symptoms may prompt a healthcare provider to suspect bronchospasm. The child may complain of chest tightness, shortness of breath, or cough. Parents will sometimes describe “noisy breathing.” On exam, accessory respiratory muscle use, nasal flaring, tachypnea, and prolonged expiratory phase are clues. Children with a past medical history of other atopic diseases (such as allergic rhinitis or atopic dermatitis) are more likely to have asthma. In bronchiolitis, the child additionally will have signs and symptoms of a viral prodrome such as rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and sometimes fever. Anaphylaxis causes multi-system signs and symptoms, including wheezing secondary to bronchospasm (with symptomology similar to asthma), throat “tightness”, stridor, urticaria, flushing, edema and/or pruritus of the lips and tongue, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, dizziness, syncope, tachycardia, hypotension, anxiety, and periorbital edema. In the history, there is an acute onset of symptoms typically within seconds to minutes after exposure to a potential trigger.
Other unique presentations of medical conditions associated with bronchospasm and/or wheezing include foreign body aspiration and vascular ring. Foreign body aspiration typically occurs in late infancy or toddlerhood; the time when children can explore the world with their gained mobility but still enjoy frequently putting items in their mouths. There is an acute onset of respiratory distress with symptoms based on the location of the foreign body. Children present with stridor, unilateral wheezes, coughing, and choking. Alternatively, if a patient presents with long-standing symptoms of dysphagia and “noisy breathing” (such as stridor, wheezing, and high-pitched cough) without associated viral symptomatology, one may suspect a vascular ring compressing the trachea and/or esophagus.
To evaluate bronchospasm, a healthcare provider will work-up the suspected etiology.
Pediatric asthma is often diagnosed clinically based on the presentation of symptoms consistent with airway constriction and inflammation in response to an environmental trigger. By six years of age, children typically have the cognitive and physical ability to participate in spirometry, a test to measure airflow obstruction and aid in the diagnosis of asthma. It is helpful to perform this testing in a healthy state in order to solidify a baseline. Annual follow-up spirometry may be performed to assess if one’s asthma is controlled and if treatment regimens need adjustment. During an acute exacerbation of asthma, the patient is assessed clinically and a treatment plan is generated based on the history and physical. If a child with status asthmaticus, the most severe form of an asthma exacerbation, is deteriorating from a respiratory perspective or has altered mental status, one may consider performing an arterial blood gas to evaluate the patient’s gas exchange. A chest radiograph may be to evaluate for pneumothorax, atelectasis, and pneumonia.
Acute viral bronchiolitis is a clinical diagnosis based on a child’s history and physical exam findings. Laboratory and imaging studies are not routinely required. However, if there is not a consistent history of a viral prodrome, it is outside the typical season (winter), the patient’s clinical exam is not entirely consistent with bronchiolitis, and/or the child has increased risk factors for severe disease, laboratory studies as well as chest radiographs may need to be considered in the work-up.[4]
Anaphylaxis recognition can be challenging due to the various organ systems that can be involved. It is a clinical diagnosis based on diagnostic criteria that have been developed. Anaphylaxis is highly likely if one of the following criteria are fulfilled: 1) acute onset of skin/mucous membrane involvement, plus either respiratory compromise or shock; 2) after an exposure to a likely allergen, two or more of these symptoms: skin/mucous membrane involvement, respiratory compromise, hypotension, or gastrointestinal dysfunction; and 3) hypotension after exposure to a known allergen for that patient.[8] Although it is not needed for diagnosis, elevated levels of serum total tryptase can support the clinical findings consistent with the diagnosis of anaphylaxis.
If foreign body aspiration is suspected in older children, inspiration and expiration anteroposterior chest radiographs can be performed. On the expiration film, the laterality of the airway obstruction from the foreign body is determined by the exhibition of unilateral air trapping. Infants and toddlers are unable to follow directions for such imaging. In this population, lateral decubitus films are performed bilaterally. The side with the foreign body is determined by the lung that will not deflate due to its obstruction when it is put in the dependent position.[9] If this imaging does not provide the expected result yet the clinical suspicion is high, more extensive imaging (such as computed tomography of the chest) or a more invasive diagnostic test (such as rigid bronchoscopy) can be performed, the latter of which can also serve as treatment.
Asthma
Treatment of an acute asthma exacerbation targets the main components of the underlying pathophysiology: airway inflammation, smooth muscle constriction, edema, and mucus production. The standard initial therapy includes oxygen, intermittent dosing of a short-acting beta-2 agonist (i.e., albuterol), an inhaled anticholinergic (i.e., ipratropium bromide), and corticosteroids. Mucus plugging and atelectasis provoke ventilation-perfusion mismatch, leading to hypoxemia. Patients may paradoxically have a worsening of hypoxemia with the use of beta-2 agonists, as they eliminate the body’s compensatory mechanism of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. With the increased insensible losses from the respiratory tract, intravenous fluids will be necessary. If the acute exacerbation is worsening, a bolus dose of magnesium sulfate can be given as a rescue. Magnesium sulfate causes smooth muscle relaxation by inhibiting calcium uptake, thereby causing bronchodilation. Additionally, it inhibits mast cells degranulation and histamine release, reducing inflammation and edema.[10]
Children with status asthmaticus (a severe asthma exacerbation that is refractory to standard treatment and potentially fatal) require admission to the pediatric intensive care unit. Continuous albuterol nebulization is initiated and enacts on the beta-2 adrenergic receptors in the lungs, resulting in bronchiole smooth muscle relaxation and dilation. Meanwhile, the patient requires monitoring for albuterol’s side effects: restlessness, tachycardia (due to the inadvertent effect of the drug on beta-1 receptors), arrhythmias, nausea, hypokalemia (from potassium shifting intracellularly), hyperglycemia, and tremors. If the patient is not improving with continuous albuterol, it may be due to the drug not reaching its targeted small airways, as the severity of bronchospasm is limiting gas flow and tidal volume. In this setting, an intravenous beta-2 agonist, terbutaline, can be used. An initial loading dose of terbutaline is given subcutaneously or intravenously, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion. This beta-agonist is preferred over epinephrine, as it has a more favorable side effect profile that is similar to albuterol. Rarely, myocardial ischemia can occur; this should be monitored with daily electrocardiograms. Repeated boluses or a continuous infusion of magnesium sulfate can also be added to the child’s regimen. Ketamine is an anesthetic, sedative, and analgesic working as an antagonist to the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and has bronchodilatory effects. A bolus dose of ketamine followed by an infusion intravenously can serve as both a bronchodilator and sedative while on non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) or invasive mechanical ventilatory support.[10]
Intubation and invasive mechanical ventilatory support are reserved for the most severe cases of status asthmaticus, in which maximal medical therapy has been exhausted, and an indication of persistent hypoxia, severe acidosis, or altered mental status exists. It is avoided if possible, as manipulation of the airway in the setting of bronchial hyperresponsiveness can worsen the obstruction and hypercapnia. It is also difficult to ventilate this patient population due to airway obstruction and impeded exhalation, putting them at risk for barotrauma. If invasive mechanical ventilation is necessary, use a lung-protective strategy. Permissive hypercapnia should be tolerated. Using a ventilator mode with a decelerating flow pattern, such as pressure-regulated volume control, can be helpful in mechanically ventilated patients in status asthmaticus.[11],[12][11] Compared to a volume control mode, it allows for higher mean airway pressures, yet lower peak inspiratory pressures.[11],[12] Avoiding the use of neuromuscular blockade permits the use a spontaneous breathing mode--ideally one that allows the patient to regulate their own inspiratory and expiratory times. Additionally, it reduces the risk of myopathy of critical illness that occurs in the setting of combined use of corticosteroids and neuromuscular blocking agents.
Methylxanthines, such as theophylline, have historically been used in the treatment of status asthmaticus due to their bronchodilatory effects. Additionally, they have anti-inflammatory and immune modulation properties.[10] However, they are falling out of favor for use in children due to the narrow therapeutic window, toxic effects (arrhythmias, seizures, cerebral vasoconstriction), and availability of safer alternative therapies. Other inhaled gases can be mixed with or added to oxygen to 1) reduce turbulent flow (helium-oxygen mixture referred to as heliox via a mask or high flow nasal cannula), or 2) administer a potent bronchodilator (inhaled volatile anesthetics via the ventilator). The former may have limited use in the presence of hypoxemia, as the fraction of inspired oxygen in the gas mixture is restricted to 0.21 to 0.4 for the helium proportion to be significant enough to have the desired effect.[10] Utilization of inhaled volatile anesthetics is generally the final medication in the treatment arsenal or used as a bridge to get a child on extracorporeal life support for status asthmaticus. However, its use may be hampered by its need for specialized equipment, the risk of developing malignant hyperthermia, and its adverse effects (myocardial depression, arrhythmias, and cerebral vasodilation).[13]
Bronchiolitis
The mainstay of treatment of bronchiolitis is supportive care with supplemental oxygen, hydration, and clearing the airways of secretions. Some children’s respiratory support requires escalation to invasive mechanical ventilation. Alpha and/or beta-adrenergic agents with bronchodilatory effects, such as albuterol and epinephrine, are not recommended in the treatment of wheezing in bronchiolitis.[4] This restriction includes all forms of epinephrine: nebulized racemic and parenteral. A Cochrane review of 30 randomized controlled trials demonstrated no statistically significant improvement in oxygen saturation, rate of hospitalization, duration of hospitalization, or time to resolution of illness with the use of bronchodilators in the setting of bronchiolitis.[14] Clinical score improvement with bronchodilators was statistically significant in the outpatient setting; however, the clinical significance came into question due to the small degree of change observed.[14] In contrast, the inpatient population showed no improvement in the mean clinical score.[14] In a small study of 22 mechanically ventilated infants with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis, bronchodilators caused a small but statistically significant fall in peak inspiratory pressures.[15] The authors noted the effects were minute and unlikely to be clinically significant, while the statistically significant tachycardia (from the bronchodilators) had greater potential to be clinically significant.[15]
Nebulized hypertonic saline is not recommended for use in infants with bronchiolitis in the emergency department setting. Due to inconsistent outcomes in randomized controlled trials, a nebulized hypertonic saline is an option in hospitalized infants and children with bronchiolitis; however, note that this therapy has not been studied in critically ill children. Bronchospasm is a potential adverse effect of nebulized hypertonic saline, so it is typically co-administered with an inhaled bronchodilator. Corticosteroids are not a recommended intervention in the treatment of bronchiolitis.[4]
Anaphylaxis
Early recognition of anaphylaxis is paramount. Prompt treatment with epinephrine is necessary to prevent the progression of anaphylaxis to a state of life-threatening respiratory and/or hemodynamic compromise. If anaphylaxis is suspected, treatment should not be delayed, as anaphylaxis severity and rate of progression is unpredictable.
First assess the airway, breathing, and circulation of the patient. Place the child on a cardiorespiratory monitor, provide supplemental oxygen, and acquire intravenous or intraosseous access for aggressive volume resuscitation. Epinephrine is the most important treatment. As readily as possible, administer intramuscular epinephrine to the anterolateral surface of the child’s mid-thigh.[16] Intramuscular epinephrine is preferred over intravenous because it is typically faster to administer, has fewer cardiovascular complications (arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, hypertension), and has less dosing errors.[17] Avoid subcutaneous epinephrine administration, as it is slower to absorb than intramuscular, has inconsistent pharmacodynamics, and the response is unreliable.[16] Epinephrine dosing is repeatable every five to 15 minutes. If the patient is hemodynamically unstable and not responding to repeated doses of intramuscular epinephrine and fluid resuscitation, then an intravenous epinephrine infusion can be initiated. If stridor, other signs of airway involvement, or severe respiratory compromise are present, the child should undergo immediate intubation. If the healthcare provider is unable to secure an airway, an emergent cricothyroidotomy or tracheostomy should be performed. Additional therapies used in conjunction with epinephrine are H1 antihistamines (i.e., diphenhydramine), H2 antihistamines (i.e., ranitidine), bronchodilators, and glucocorticoids. If bronchospasm is present and unresponsive to epinephrine, inhaled bronchodilators use is necessary.
Acute asthma exacerbation, bronchiolitis, and anaphylaxis are a few of the most common causes of bronchospasm in the pediatric population. There are a wide variety of other disease processes that can cause bronchospasm and present with wheezing on physical exam. It is also imperative that one be mindful of the conditions that may mimic the symptomatology of bronchospasm. The differential diagnosis in these cases should include, but not be limited to, the following:
Wheezing is a common presenting symptom in the preschool age group. However, the majority of these children do not develop a chronic, persistent form of asthma. The odds of developing early childhood asthma are two to three times higher in infants with one or more episodes of bronchiolitis.[18] Infants requiring hospitalization for bronchiolitis have higher early childhood asthma morbidity.[18] Epidemiologic studies have aided in the development of an Asthma Predictive Index to improve the accuracy of diagnosing children younger than three years old with asthma. The Asthma Predictive Index is considered positive if a child has had at least three episodes of wheezing per year, plus meets either one major criterion (parental asthma, atopic dermatitis, or sensitization to air allergens) or two minor criteria (food allergies, wheezing unrelated to “colds”, or eosinophilia greater than or equal to 4%). A positive Asthma Predictive Index means the child is at a significantly higher risk of having asthma later in life. As high as 76% of toddlers with a positive Asthma Predictive Index will have active asthma symptoms when they are school age.[19][20] In regards to the prognosis in anaphylaxis, early identification and treatment with epinephrine are critical to stopping the progression of anaphylaxis to respiratory or cardiac arrest and death.
In the setting of air trapping from the obstruction caused by bronchospasm, patients are at higher risk for pneumothoraces and/or pneumomediastinum. In severe cases of bronchospasm causing acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and/or hypercapnia, extracorporeal life support may be required.
Smoking is a known trigger of asthma and damages children’s lungs. Efforts should be made to limit or eliminate a child’s exposure to smoke. If a child has asthma, the prescribed inhaler (albuterol) is considered that child's "cough medicine." Coughing in a child with asthma means there is wheezing, which needs treatment with the inhaler, not over-the-counter cough syrup.
Bronchiolitis is a respiratory tract infection caused by a virus in children who are under two years old. Since it is a virus, antibiotics will not help. Children will have the following symptoms: runny nose, nose congestion, mouth secretions, cough, and sometimes fever. Since children cannot effectively blow their noses and have small swollen airways, they need help clearing the mucus and secretions from their noses and mouths; this is easily done by using a bulb suction with or without over-the-counter saline drops. Frequent suctioning is often required. Children sometimes need oxygen, intravenous fluids, and admission to the hospital for this disease.
Allergic reactions should be taken seriously because some can result in a severe, life-threatening reaction known as anaphylaxis. Symptoms of anaphylaxis include hives, scratchy throat, hoarseness, shortness of breath, wheezing, and vomiting. If anaphylaxis is suspected, emergency medical services should be called, and the child should immediately go to the emergency department for life-saving treatment with epinephrine.
Providing pediatric patients with optimal care is a team sport; an interprofessional team providing a collaborative approach is critical. At a pediatric hospital, the respiratory therapists and nurses are often on the frontlines, assessing a child most frequently. It is crucial to have both mutual respect and good communication amongst all of the team members.
It is not always realistic for families to seek initial medical care for their children at a pediatric hospital or at a facility with pediatric-trained physicians and staff. Telemedicine, pediatric transport teams, and ongoing communication between the referring hospital and tertiary pediatric referral center play a crucial role in the successful management of complicated, critically ill pediatric patients with severe bronchospasm.
The exposure to tobacco and other smoke is a known trigger for children with asthma. Damage to children's lungs incurs that is directly attributable to exposure to smoke. Parents should be educated and counseled on the increased risk for acute exacerbations in the setting of secondhand smoke.
To decrease the morbidity of respiratory infections, it is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics that infants receive breastfeeding exclusively for at least six months.[4],[21] Compared to formula-fed infants, exclusively breastfeeding for four or more months reduces the risk of hospitalization due to lower respiratory tract infection (i.e., bronchiolitis) by 72%.[4],[22] [Level III]
Anaphylaxis is a medical emergency. If a child has signs or symptoms consistent with it, one should seek medical attention immediately. After resolution of the acute event, epinephrine should be carried with the child or parent at all times, as one is at risk for further occurrences if a child has developed anaphylaxis in the past.
Given the number of possible pharmaceutical agents used to manage cases accompanied by pediatric bronchospasm, a pharmacist should be explicitly involved with agent selection, combination therapy, dosing, and overall medication regimen. Nursing can verify compliance, and assist the pharmacist and treating physician in educating the patient's family on drug administration, trigger avoidance, and other items discussed above. If the pharmacist or nurse encounter any concerns or notices adverse events or therapeutic failure, they should immediately consult with the interprofessional team. Only with this type of interprofessional collaborative approach can these cases be directed to their optimal outcomes. [Level V]
[1] | Akinbami LJ,Moorman JE,Bailey C,Zahran HS,King M,Johnson CA,Liu X, Trends in asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality in the United States, 2001-2010. NCHS data brief. 2012 May; [PubMed PMID: 22617340] |
[2] | Hill TD,Graham LM,Divgi V, Racial disparities in pediatric asthma: a review of the literature. Current allergy and asthma reports. 2011 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 21107764] |
[3] | Hasegawa K,Tsugawa Y,Brown DF,Mansbach JM,Camargo CA Jr, Trends in bronchiolitis hospitalizations in the United States, 2000-2009. Pediatrics. 2013 Jul; [PubMed PMID: 23733801] |
[4] | Ralston SL,Lieberthal AS,Meissner HC,Alverson BK,Baley JE,Gadomski AM,Johnson DW,Light MJ,Maraqa NF,Mendonca EA,Phelan KJ,Zorc JJ,Stanko-Lopp D,Brown MA,Nathanson I,Rosenblum E,Sayles S 3rd,Hernandez-Cancio S, Clinical practice guideline: the diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2014 Nov; [PubMed PMID: 25349312] |
[5] | Lieberman P,Camargo CA Jr,Bohlke K,Jick H,Miller RL,Sheikh A,Simons FE, Epidemiology of anaphylaxis: findings of the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Epidemiology of Anaphylaxis Working Group. Annals of allergy, asthma [PubMed PMID: 17165265] |
[6] | Wood RA,Camargo CA Jr,Lieberman P,Sampson HA,Schwartz LB,Zitt M,Collins C,Tringale M,Wilkinson M,Boyle J,Simons FE, Anaphylaxis in America: the prevalence and characteristics of anaphylaxis in the United States. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2014 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 24144575] |
[7] | Michelson KA,Monuteaux MC,Neuman MI, Variation and Trends in Anaphylaxis Care in United States Children's Hospitals. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2016 May; [PubMed PMID: 26833535] |
[8] | Sampson HA,Muñoz-Furlong A,Campbell RL,Adkinson NF Jr,Bock SA,Branum A,Brown SG,Camargo CA Jr,Cydulka R,Galli SJ,Gidudu J,Gruchalla RS,Harlor AD Jr,Hepner DL,Lewis LM,Lieberman PL,Metcalfe DD,O'Connor R,Muraro A,Rudman A,Schmitt C,Scherrer D,Simons FE,Thomas S,Wood JP,Decker WW, Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report--Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2006 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 16461139] |
[9] | Rovin JD,Rodgers BM, Pediatric foreign body aspiration. Pediatrics in review. 2000 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 10702322] |
[10] | Nievas IF,Anand KJ, Severe acute asthma exacerbation in children: a stepwise approach for escalating therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit. The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG. 2013 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 23798903] |
[11] | Carroll CL,Sala KA, Pediatric status asthmaticus. Critical care clinics. 2013 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 23537669] |
[12] | Sarnaik AP,Daphtary KM,Meert KL,Lieh-Lai MW,Heidemann SM, Pressure-controlled ventilation in children with severe status asthmaticus. Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2004 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 14987342] |
[13] | Mondoñedo JR,McNeil JS,Amin SD,Herrmann J,Simon BA,Kaczka DW, Volatile Anesthetics and the Treatment of Severe Bronchospasm: A Concept of Targeted Delivery. Drug discovery today. Disease models. 2015 Spring; [PubMed PMID: 26744597] |
[14] | Gadomski AM,Scribani MB, Bronchodilators for bronchiolitis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014 Jun 17; [PubMed PMID: 24937099] |
[15] | Levin DL,Garg A,Hall LJ,Slogic S,Jarvis JD,Leiter JC, A prospective randomized controlled blinded study of three bronchodilators in infants with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis on mechanical ventilation. Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2008 Nov; [PubMed PMID: 18838938] |
[16] | Simons FE,Roberts JR,Gu X,Simons KJ, Epinephrine absorption in children with a history of anaphylaxis. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 1998 Jan; [PubMed PMID: 9449498] |
[17] | Campbell RL,Bellolio MF,Knutson BD,Bellamkonda VR,Fedko MG,Nestler DM,Hess EP, Epinephrine in anaphylaxis: higher risk of cardiovascular complications and overdose after administration of intravenous bolus epinephrine compared with intramuscular epinephrine. The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice. 2015 Jan-Feb; [PubMed PMID: 25577622] |
[18] | Carroll KN,Wu P,Gebretsadik T,Griffin MR,Dupont WD,Mitchel EF,Hartert TV, The severity-dependent relationship of infant bronchiolitis on the risk and morbidity of early childhood asthma. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2009 May; [PubMed PMID: 19361850] |
[19] | Castro-Rodríguez JA,Holberg CJ,Wright AL,Martinez FD, A clinical index to define risk of asthma in young children with recurrent wheezing. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2000 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 11029352] |
[20] | Leonardi NA,Spycher BD,Strippoli MP,Frey U,Silverman M,Kuehni CE, Validation of the Asthma Predictive Index and comparison with simpler clinical prediction rules. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2011 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 21453960] |
[21] | Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 22371471] |
[22] | Ip S,Chung M,Raman G,Chew P,Magula N,DeVine D,Trikalinos T,Lau J, Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evidence report/technology assessment. 2007 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 17764214] |