Delirium, also known as the acute confusional state, is a clinical syndrome that usually develops in the elderly. It is characterized by an alteration of consciousness and cognition with reduced ability to focus, sustain, or shift attention. It develops over a short period and fluctuates during the day. The clinical presentation can vary, but usually, it flourishes with psychomotor behavioral disturbances such as hyperactivity or hypoactivity with increased sympathetic activity and impairment in sleep duration and architecture. It is caused by a medical condition, substance intoxication, or withdrawal in addition to the medication side effects, as well as; it is no better explained by another preexisting, involving, or established neurocognitive disorder. The diagnosis is often missed, especially in hypoactive type because of the poor clinical manifestation. Efforts should focus on prevention and early diagnosis.[1][2][3]
Delirium is a medical condition complex to understand; a single factor can cause it; however, it is not the common course. The multifactorial model has been accepted as an interaction of a vulnerable patient with predisposing factors, exposed to noxious insults or precipitant factors.[4][5][6]
There are two groups of risk factors related to delirium: predisposing and precipitant factors. The most common predisposing factors are older age (older than 70 years), dementia (often not recognized clinically), functional disabilities, male gender, poor vision and hearing, and mild cognitive impairment. Alcohol use disorder and laboratory abnormalities have been associated with an increased risk.
Precipitating factors usually vary among the population. However, drugs are the most important factor. There are many drugs related to delirium, especially sedative-hypnotic agents and anticholinergic, but opioid analgesics (especially meperidine), nonbenzodiazepines, sedatives, hypnotics, antihistamines (especially first generation), alcohol, anticholinergics, anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, histamine H2-receptor blockers, antiparkinsonian agents, antipsychotics (especially low-potency typical antipsychotics), barbiturates, digoxin, and antibiotics have been reported as well. The risk increases as high as four and a half times if the patient consumes three or more drugs (polypharmacy), and the medication is psychoactive.
Among other precipitating factors are surgery, anesthesia, high pain levels, anemia, infections, acute illness, and acute exacerbation of chronic illness.
The nature of delirium is transient, but it can persist in patients with predisposing factors. A systematic review showed that hospital delirium persisted at hospital discharge in 45% of cases, and one month later in 33% of cases.
As can be seen, the etiology is not fully understood, and many variables contribute to its development. It is important to identify if the patient started to take any medication related to delirium before the onset of symptoms, if it is the case, always attribute the acute event to the drug and discontinue it.
The prevalence of delirium is higher in the elderly population; in fact, it is the most common surgical complication among older adults with an incidence reported up to 15% to 25% after major elective surgery and 50% after high-risk procedures (hip-fracture repair or cardiac surgery).[7][8]
One-third of general medical patients who are 70 years of age or older have delirium. The condition is present in half of these patients on admission and develops during hospitalization in the other half. Usually, this condition drives the patient to an emergency department, where delirium presents in 10% to 24%. Mortality is strongly related to an accurate diagnosis. A misdiagnosis can translate into mortality that varies from 10% to 36%, and there is a 70% increased risk of death during the first six months after the visit.
Patients, who develop delirium in intensive care until (ICU), have a two to four-fold increased risk of death out of the hospital, and those on general medical or geriatric wards have one and a half times increased the risk for death in the year following hospitalization. It is important to notice that at the end of life, this setting approaches 85% in palliative care.
Delirium increases the risk of medical complications, institutionalization, functional decline, and dementia; it contributes to $6.9 billion in Medicare hospital costs annually.
The isolated mechanism to explain delirium remains poorly understood. The multifactorial theory tries to elucidate the cause. The increase in blood-brain barrier permeability secondary to cytokines release and the direct neurotoxic effect of drugs can explain the prevalence among the elderly. The hypothesis is based on neuroinflammation, neurotransmitter imbalance, and chronic stress.
Neuroinflammation
Patients who develop delirium have shown elevated cortisol, although IL-8 is prevalent among patients in and out of ICU. The cytokines activate the endothelium and the coagulation cascade, which predisposes to microvascular thrombosis and blood flow dysfunction. The neuroinflammation leads to infiltrate cytokines and leukocytes to the hematoencephalic barrier and then in the central nervous system in which produces ischemia and neuronal apoptosis. The neuroinflammation activates the microglia. However, the exaggerated response to stimuli includes molecule expression and adhesion, cytokines production (IL-1B, TNF-a, ILGF-1) and metalloproteinases, reactive oxygen species secretion, and increment of nitrous oxide synthase. This reaction generates neural lesion, neural apoptotic loss, and continuous microglia proinflammatory activation. It damages the hippocampus and produces cognition disability because of the synaptic plasticity impairment.
The positive regulation of GABAa receptors is mediated by inflammation, which triggers the inhibitory brain tone and reduces the brain synaptic connections. The administration of GABA-mediated drugs contributes to inhibiting the neuronal routes previously damaged by neuroinflammatory insult and increases the risk of developing acute brain dysfunction.
Cholinergic Deficiency Hypothesis
Acetylcholine is a very important neurotransmitter in attention and consciousness. It is known, acetylcholine acts as a modulator in sensory and cognitive input so, an impairment in the route leads to develop symptoms of hypoactive or hyperactive delirium, including inattention, disorganized thinking, and perceptual disturbances. Cholinergic pathways project from basal forebrain and pontomesencephalon to interneurons in the striatum and finally targets throughout the cortex.
Neurotransmitter Imbalance
The dopamine excess contributes to hyperactive delirium and is related to decreased acetylcholine. The dopaminergic and cholinergic pathways overlap in the brain. This explains why dopamine receptors impact acetylcholine levels and explain the clinical manifestations of delirium, including hyperactive and hypoactive forms. The imbalance between neurotransmitters and the cholinergic pathway may result in delirium.
Chronic Stress
Chronic stress activates the sympathetic nervous system and the hypothalamus-hypophysis-suprarenal glands axis, which elevates the cytokines levels and results in chronic hypercortisolism that can cause an alteration in the hippocampus function. Cortisol is the main hormone in response to stress and has deleterious effects among 5HT 1A receptors. The association between these receptors and delirium is not conclusive. High cortisol levels produce a reduction in GABA release and impairment in neuronal energy bombs.
Delirium can be a life-threatening emergency. Affected patients require an appropriate evaluation with history taking, physical, and neurologic examination and laboratory tests.
Physical examination should evaluate head-to-toe and vital signs to determinate any possible cause. Neurologic examination should focus on evaluating new focal findings that suggest an intracranial cause, for example, a stroke.
It is important to know the previous mental state of the patient because it can help us to make a difference with dementia. A reliable interviewee should contribute the information.
Our approach would be a focus on the most probable diagnostic suspicion so that the laboratory test may confirm or exclude the precipitating factor as a possible cause. As an initial step, we can consider complete blood count, arterial blood analysis, electrolytes, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, liver function test, and urinalysis. Chest radiography and electrocardiography should be done in any hospitalized patient. Additional tests like a lumbar puncture, electroencephalography, and toxicology studies are useful in select cases. Cultures should be taken for the study if the clinician suspects sepsis of an indeterminate origin.
The test selection should be based on information obtained from the history and physical examination, keeping in mind that delirium is often multifactorial in etiology and can be influenced by a number of predisposing factors, precipitating factors, or both.
There are three types of delirium: hyperactive, which represents 25% of cases, hypoactive, and mixed level of activity. The hypoactive form is associated with higher rates of complications and morality because of its fluctuating nature and challenging diagnosis.
The DSM-5 defines delirium as the presence of all the following criteria:
Other features include alterations in the sleep-wake cycle, perceptual disturbances, delusions, inappropriate or unsafe behavior, and emotional lability.
Only 12% to 35% of delirium cases are recognized. The first thing one has to do is determinate the patient baseline mental status and the acuity of the symptom presentation, delirium presents over hours to days. This step requires a knowledgeable informant to obtaining the history. Although, it is necessary for the diagnosis to know if the disturbance in mental status started alone or with other symptoms as dyspnea or dysuria or with medication changes.[9][10][11]
The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is recognized as the most useful assessment tool, as a result of its high sensitivity of 94% to 100% and specificity of 90% to 95% to diagnosis delirium, and it includes the following criteria:
The presence of delirium requires features 1 and 2 and either 3 or 4:
Brief CAM-based instruments show better sensitivity. These include CAM-ICU, bCAM (emergency department patients), the 3-minute Diagnostic Interview for Delirium using CAM (3D-CAM) for general medical patients. Although, the CAM-S (severity scale) has high predictive validity for important clinical outcomes related to delirium as the length of stay, hospital costs, nursing home, and death at 30 and 90 days.
Interview-based methods need to be applied multiple times a day to obtain better sensitivity and specificity.
There are recent studies that try to find a biomarker to diagnosis delirium, including inflammatory markers, interleukins, and C-reactive protein. However, none have been yet validated for clinical application, such as diagnosis or monitoring.
Sometimes a CT scan of the head is done to ensure that there is no CNS pathology.
EEG will typically show slowing of the posterior dominant rhythm and an increase in generalized slow activity.
A lumbar puncture should be done to rule out a CNS infection.
The main treatment for delirium is based on non-pharmacologic interventions because there are no medications FDA-approved. The modifiable factors as medication, infection, environmental factors, and reduced sensory input are the cornerstone of the management.[12][13][14]
The Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) reduced the incidence in elderly patients. These interventions include the decrease of environmental disturbances, including the use of sleep masks and hearing aids to keep an area dark and quiet at night to enhance sleep. During the day, guidelines encourage the use of eyeglasses or hearing tools to optimize hearing and vision, the use of tools to improve orientation including clocks, calendars to remind individuals where they are, early morning rise times, and adequate fluid intake. It is known these strategies are cost-effective and remain the main treatment for delirium.
Clinicians should consider the pharmacologic approach in patients with symptoms that threaten their or other's safety, especially in older adults. This intervention includes antipsychotics. However, it is important to note that there is no current evidence to support its use in patients without hyperactive delirium. The options include haloperidol, which is the first choice if we need a minimal sedating effect. Nevertheless, clinicians can administer quetiapine if the desired effect is the opposite. The initial dose of haloperidol, olanzapine, and quetiapine are 0.25 mg, 2.5 mg, and 12.5 mg, respectively. Antipsychotic doses should be optimized and adjusted every day until no longer needed.
Other medications have been proposed to prevent and decrease the incidence of delirium, for example, melatonin and its analogs, but a recent Cochrane review concludes that is no clear evidence they reduce the incidence of delirium as compared with placebo. The use of cholinesterase inhibitors also demonstrates a minimal evidence to support the decrease in delirium incidence.
Complications can be urinary incontinence, immobility or falls, pressure ulcers, sleep disturbance, and feeding disorders. To prevent them, clinicians need to provide a scheduled program for patients to mobilize, go to the toilet, and get feeding assistance if needed.
Dementia
Psychosis
Depression
Paranoia
Aspiration pneumonia
Pressure ulcers
Weakness, decreased mobility, and decreased function
Falls and combative behavior leading to injuries and fractures
Malnutrition, fluid and electrolyte abnormalities
Long-term cognitive impairment: Accumulating evidence shows that delirium is not only a transient, reversible acute confusion but also can give rise to persistent long-term cognitive impairment.
To reduce delirium:
Delirium is a very common disorder seen in hospitalized patients. Its diagnosis and management are very complex and best done with an interprofessional team that includes a neurologist, psychiatrist, internist, intensivist, and ICU nurses. Nurses are often the first to detect the presence of delirium and should communicate ASAP with the team; because the sooner the condition is managed, the better the outcomes. At the same time, the nurses should maintain a quiet environment for the patient, ensure patient safety, and communicate with the patient and family.
The pharmacist should ensure that the patient is on no medication that causes CNS stimulation. The nurses should continue to promote good sleep, ensure the patient has no pain, and is optimally hydrated.
The main treatment for delirium is based on non-pharmacologic interventions because there are no medications FDA-approved. The modifiable factors as medication, infection, environmental factors, and reduced sensory input are the cornerstone of the management.[15][16][17]
The Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) reduced the incidence in elderly patients. These interventions include the decrease of environmental disturbances, including the use of sleep masks and hearing aids to keep an area dark and quiet at night to enhance sleep, which nursing and other ancillary staff can work to ensure are in place, in coordination with the treating clinician.
Pharmacological agents are used for severe adverse behavior. There should be open communication between the members of the interprofessional team to ensure that the patient is receiving goal-directed treatment. [Level 5]
Outcomes
The overall prognosis for patients with delirium is guarded. [10]
[1] | Boltey EM,Iwashyna TJ,Hyzy RC,Watson SR,Ross C,Costa DK, Ability to predict team members' behaviors in ICU teams is associated with routine ABCDE implementation. Journal of critical care. 2019 Mar 1; [PubMed PMID: 30856524] |
[2] | Airagnes G,Ducoutumany G,Laffy-Beaufils B,Le Faou AL,Limosin F, Alcohol withdrawal syndrome management: Is there anything new? La Revue de medecine interne. 2019 Mar 7; [PubMed PMID: 30853380] |
[3] | Michels M,Michelon C,Damásio D,Vitali AM,Ritter C,Dal-Pizzol F, Biomarker Predictors of Delirium in Acutely Ill Patients: A Systematic Review. Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology. 2019 Mar 10; [PubMed PMID: 30852930] |
[4] | Marra A,Kotfis K,Hosie A,MacLullich AMJ,Pandharipande PP,Ely EW,Pun BT, Delirium Monitoring: Yes or No? That Is The Question. American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. 2019 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 30824517] |
[5] | Cunningham ME,Vogel AM, Analgesia, sedation, and delirium in pediatric surgical critical care. Seminars in pediatric surgery. 2019 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 30824132] |
[6] | Haley MN,Casey P,Kane RY,Dārziņš P,Lawler K, Delirium management: Let's get physical? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australasian journal on ageing. 2019 Feb 22; [PubMed PMID: 30793460] |
[7] | Corradi JP,Thompson S,Mather JF,Waszynski CM,Dicks RS, Prediction of Incident Delirium Using a Random Forest classifier. Journal of medical systems. 2018 Nov 14; [PubMed PMID: 30430256] |
[8] | Fields A,Huang J,Schroeder D,Sprung J,Weingarten T, Agitation in adults in the post-anaesthesia care unit after general anaesthesia. British journal of anaesthesia. 2018 Nov; [PubMed PMID: 30336849] |
[9] | Boland JW,Kabir M,Bush SH,Spiller JA,Johnson MJ,Agar M,Lawlor P, Delirium management by palliative medicine specialists: a survey from the association for palliative medicine of Great Britain and Ireland. BMJ supportive [PubMed PMID: 30837278] |
[10] | Wu YC,Tseng PT,Tu YK,Hsu CY,Liang CS,Yeh TC,Chen TY,Chu CS,Matsuoka YJ,Stubbs B,Carvalho AF,Wada S,Lin PY,Chen YW,Su KP, Association of Delirium Response and Safety of Pharmacological Interventions for the Management and Prevention of Delirium: A Network Meta-analysis. JAMA psychiatry. 2019 Feb 27; [PubMed PMID: 30810723] |
[11] | Lange PW,Lamanna M,Watson R,Maier AB, Undiagnosed delirium is frequent and difficult to predict: Results from a prevalence survey of a tertiary hospital. Journal of clinical nursing. 2019 Feb 20; [PubMed PMID: 30786081] |
[12] | Kim YS,Song HN,Ahn JS,Koh SJ,Ji JH,Hwang IG,Yun J,Kwon JH,Kang JH, Sedation for terminally ill cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in South Korea. Medicine. 2019 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 30702591] |
[13] | Trogrlić Z,van der Jagt M,Lingsma H,Gommers D,Ponssen HH,Schoonderbeek JFJ,Schreiner F,Verbrugge SJ,Duran S,Bakker J,Ista E, Improved Guideline Adherence and Reduced Brain Dysfunction After a Multicenter Multifaceted Implementation of ICU Delirium Guidelines in 3,930 Patients. Critical care medicine. 2019 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 30608279] |
[14] | Sweeney J, Impacting Delirium in the Trauma ICU Utilizing the ICU Liberation Collaborative Benchmark Report. Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses. 2018 Nov/Dec; [PubMed PMID: 30395033] |
[15] | Chanques G,Drouot X,Payen JF, 2008-2018: Ten years of gradual changes in the sedation guidelines for critically ill patients. Anaesthesia, critical care [PubMed PMID: 30580774] |
[16] | Kristiansen S,Konradsen H,Beck M, Nurses' experiences of caring for older patients afflicted by delirium in a neurological department. Journal of clinical nursing. 2019 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 30376210] |
[17] | Evered L,Silbert B,Knopman DS,Scott DA,DeKosky ST,Rasmussen LS,Oh ES,Crosby G,Berger M,Eckenhoff RG, Recommendations for the Nomenclature of Cognitive Change Associated with Anaesthesia and Surgery-20181. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. 2018; [PubMed PMID: 30347621] |