The Gram staining is one of the most crucial staining techniques in microbiology. It gets its name from the Danish bacteriologist Hans Christian Gram who first introduced it in 1882, mainly to identify organisms causing pneumonia.[1] Often the first test performed, gram staining involves the use of crystal violet or methylene blue as the primary color.[2] The term for organisms that retain the primary color and appear purple-brown under a microscope is Gram-positive organisms. The organisms that do not take up primary stain appear red under a microscope and are Gram-negative organisms.
The first step in gram staining is the use of crystal violet dye for the slide's initial staining. The next step, also known as fixing the dye, involves using iodine to form crystal violet- iodine complex to prevent easy removal of dye. Subsequently, a decolorizer, often solvent of ethanol and acetone, is used to remove the dye. The basic principle of gram staining involves the ability of the bacterial cell wall to retain the crystal violet dye during solvent treatment.[3] Gram-positive microorganisms have higher peptidoglycan content, whereas gram-negative organisms have higher lipid content.[4]
Initially, all bacteria take up crystal violet dye; however, with the use of solvent, the lipid layer from gram-negative organisms is dissolved. With the dissolution of the lipid layer, gram negatives lose the primary stain. In contrast, solvent dehydrates the gram-positive cell walls with the closure of pores preventing diffusion of violet-iodine complex, and thus, bacteria remain stained.[5] The length of decolorization is a critical step in gram staining as prolonged exposure to a decolorizing agent can remove all the stains from both types of bacteria.[6]
The final step in gram staining is to use basic fuchsin stain to give decolorized gram-negative bacteria pink color for easier identification. It is also known as counterstain. Some laboratories use safranin as a counterstain; however, basic fuchsin stains gram-negative organisms more intensely than safranin. Similarly, Hemophilus spp., Legionella app, and some anaerobic bacteria stain poorly with safranin.
Various clinical specimens can be used to perform Gram staining. Some of the commonly used specimens are sputum, blood, cerebrospinal fluid, ascitic fluid, synovial fluid, pleural fluid, and urine, etc. Swabs from nostrils, throat, rectum, wound, and cervix, etc. can also be used. The collection of specimens should always be in sterile containers.
Types of equipment needed for Gram staining include:
Reagents needed for Gram staining include:
Procedure
1. Preparation of a slide smear:
2. Gram staining:
3. Microscopic examination of slide:
Various modifications of gram staining are used, such as Atkin gram stain, and Burke gram stain, etc.
Gram staining is indicated whenever a bacterial infection is suspected for easy and early diagnosis.[8]
Gram staining aids in the diagnosis of a disease or a pathologic condition.
Examples of gram-positive organisms are:
A normal finding in a sterile body fluid should be the absence of any pathologic organism in the smear. The organisms are identified based on color and shape. Gram-positive organisms are either purple or blue in color, while gram-negative organisms are either pink or red in color. Bacilli are rod-shaped, while cocci are spherical.
Findings on gram stain that suggest underlying bacterial infections:
(Please note: Moraxella spp., and Acinetobacter spp., are often diplococcal in morphology. Acinetobacter can sometimes appear as Gram-positive cocci, and they can be pleomorphic.
Gram variable organisms: these organisms do not group into either gram-positive or gram-negative organisms.
If the specimen collection is not sterile, multiple organisms can contaminate the specimen. Similarly, improper specimen collection and prior use of antibiotics can interfere with the growth of organisms. During the interpretation of the Gram stain, as described by the World Health Organization in 2003, the following steps should be followed:
1. General nature of the smear requires analysis under low power magnification (10X)
2. Low power magnification should be utilized to note the following:
3. Oil immersion examination of multiple fields is necessary to note the following:
The interpretation of slides can be difficult if the microscopic smear is thick and clumped. Decolorization time should have very close monitoring to avoid under-decolorization or over-decolorization. Thicker smears require longer decolorizing time. Similarly, cultures should undergo evaluation while they are still fresh. Old cultures tend to lose the peptidoglycan cell walls, which predisposes gram-positive cells to be gram-negative or gram variable. Gram stain is not useful for organisms without a cell wall like Mycoplasma species, and for smaller bacteria like Chlamydia and Rickettsia species.
Gram stain may not falsely reveal organisms in the following scenario:
Sometimes results of Gram-stain may not match the final results of cultures and could potentially lead to inappropriate use of antibiotics.[10]
Gram stain is often the initial diagnostic test for the evaluation of infections. The use of Gram stain facilitates the rapid use of appropriate antibiotics. However, genetic sequences and molecular techniques are more specific than classic gram stain.
[1] | BARTHOLOMEW JW,MITTWER T, The Gram stain. Bacteriological reviews. 1952 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 14925025] |
[2] | O'Toole GA, Classic Spotlight: How the Gram Stain Works. Journal of bacteriology. 2016 Dec 1 [PubMed PMID: 27815540] |
[3] | LIBENSON L,McILROY AP, On the mechanism of the gram stain. The Journal of infectious diseases. 1955 Jul-Aug [PubMed PMID: 13242849] |
[4] | SHUGAR D,BARANOWSKA J, Studies on the gram stain; the importance of proteins in the Gram reaction. Acta microbiologica Polonica (1952). 1954 [PubMed PMID: 13147751] |
[5] | [PubMed PMID: 20255991] |
[6] | [PubMed PMID: 8724440] |
[7] | [PubMed PMID: 14782050] |
[8] | Wilson ML, Clinically relevant, cost-effective clinical microbiology. Strategies to decrease unnecessary testing. American journal of clinical pathology. 1997 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 9024064] |
[9] | Beveridge TJ,Davies JA, Cellular responses of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli to the Gram stain. Journal of bacteriology. 1983 Nov [PubMed PMID: 6195148] |
[10] | Rand KH,Tillan M, Errors in interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures. American journal of clinical pathology. 2006 Nov; [PubMed PMID: 17050065] |