Electroencephalography principles
The electroencephalographic (EEG) signal is a bioelectric potential related to brain activity recorded on the scalp with electrodes and appropriate instrumentation. The system for measuring brain bioelectric potentials has, indeed, the function of taking the weak electrical signal on the scalp, to increase its amplitude, to process it (including digitization), and, finally, to register it. Increasingly complex processing of the raw signal (e.g., processed EEG through Fourier analysis or Joint Time-Frequency Analysis, JTFA, and dedicated algorithms) allows the use of the signal in different fields of application such as general anesthesia, and for research purposes (e.g., neuroscience, and cognitive psychology).[1][2][3]
Basically, this signal is produced by pyramidal cells that reside in the upper layers of the cerebral cortex. EEG represents the expression of synaptic processes (pre- and postsynaptic electrical potentials), of dendritic potentials, and probably also of neuroglia potentials. The mathematical law describing the conduction of the electric potential from pyramidal neurons to the detection surface is known as the "Poisson equation." This law relates the surface distribution of potential to the charge underlying and the permittivity of the mass of tissue. Because pyramidal cells behave like dipole sources, they produce the so-called "dipolar fields"; the total field generated is the result of the linear combination of the potential fields that each source produces individually. The presence of a dipole of this type requires that a significant population of depolarized neurons in unison to produce external potential. This phenomenon is defined as local synchrony. The role of local synchrony in EEG rhythm generation is so intense that less than 5 percent of pyramidal cells can be responsible for over 90 percent of the energy of the EEG signal.
Moreover, the vast majority of pyramidal cells operate asynchronously (external potentials cancel each other out); if the pyramidal cells begin to polarize in unison, the effect will be visible and recorded on the EEG. In other words, groups of neurons can produce measurable potentials in the form of EEG signals. These signals are distinct in rhythms (or bands) according to the differences in amplitude (in microVolts) and in frequency (in cycles per second or hertz, Hz).
As electrodes are not in direct contact with the signal generator (conduction volume phenomenon), brain activity, even localized, can appear widely dispersed on the scalp, and any brain event can be reflected in more than one site on the scalp. As a general rule, 50 percent of the signal recorded by a sensor positioned on the leather arises from the brain tissue immediately below that sensor as the remaining signal comes received from other locations, primarily from adjacent sites. Consequently, the EEG represents an exam that has poor localization ability. However, technological advances such as the high-density EEG have allowed more localization information to be obtainable from the EEG.
The cerebral cortex contains tens of billions of neurons organized into functional groups; these groups are interconnected through a complex series of connections between cortical regions, as well as with subcortical brain structures. During the normal brain function, these networks are subjected to rhythmic activity that occurs at frequencies ranging from 1 to 100 Hz and more. Although the underlying neuronal activity proceeds at a frequency of thousands of Hz, the measurable external potentials are all in the EEG range. These groups of cortical neurons undergo cycles of activity in which they get sequentially recruited. These potential fluctuations are characterizable in terms of spectral content or characteristics in the time domain. This coordinated activity, indeed, is highlighted by rhythmic waves that are distinguished in particular positions and which are evident in particular conditions (for example, during sleep) or after stimulation (hyperventilation, light stimulation, sleep deprivation, evoked potentials). This cyclical pattern of activity produces an identifiable growing and falling in rhythms, which has a temporal trend of the order of seconds and shows great variability.
A neurophysiological process that conditions the recorded electrical activity concerns the activation of repetitive cyclical patterns involving the thalamus and subcortical regions but also different cortical regions. Thalamo-cortical reverberation activities give rise to the alpha rhythm (8 to 12 Hz, 50 microV) and the slow beta rhythm (12 to 15 Hz, 10 to 20 microV, and associated with alertness, concentration, and intentions to remain immobile). In contrast, the low-frequency theta rhythm (4 to 7 Hz, 20 to 100-microV.) is an expression of the reverberation between the cortex and the subthalamic nuclei. Cortico-cortical reverberations are the basis of the genesis of beta waves (15 to 20 Hz) commonly associated with thinking conscious and intentional. Furthermore, high beta waves (typically 20 to 30 Hz) are typical of anxious states and agitation. Gamma waves are fast waves (35 to 45 Hz) not easy to record because of their very small amplitude. They are present in moments of maximum performance (physical and mental) and profound concentration.
All this cyclical-repetitive activity is evident in the EEG, whose characteristic pattern reveals the general state of activation and deactivation of the areas at the origin of the measured surface potentials. A classic example is the alpha rhythm. It is a rhythm of the rest of the visual system (inactivation rhythm), which is maximum posteriorly and increases when the eyes they close and has a typical increasing and decreasing trend. All these characteristics derive from the fact that the thalamocortical reverberation at the base of the alpha rhythm involves the optical pathways and the primary visual cortex (relaxation of the visual system). Therefore, during alpha periods, an individual is typically aware but relaxed. Normal EEG of an awake subject shows an alpha rhythm of 8-12 Hz, which increases and decreases on the occipital and parietal lobes and beta waves at the frontal level, interspersed with theta waves. During sleep, both beta waves and delta and theta waves are present (theta in non-REM sleep).
The length of the cycles also varies according to the bands. Alpha bursts typically last from 100 to 500 milliseconds, while the gamma rhythm usually consists of very short bursts, from 20 to 50 milliseconds. In this context, the digital filtering of the signal is of fundamental importance. In addition to the frequency and amplitude, characteristics of the waves are their shape and trend. For example, the "mu" rhythm can occupy the alpha rhythm band although compared to this latter; it does not have a clearly sinusoidal aspect; it is maximum centrally and does not have a characteristic growth and degrowth. Again, another aspect to consider is the different expressions of a specific rhythm between the two hemispheres. For example, in healthy individuals, the left frontal alpha is typically between 10% and 15% lower than the controlateral; this asymmetry seems to be important for normal mood control.
In addition to the physiological findings, the EEG analysis can highlight several findings, such as excessive slowdowns identified with the presence of slow delta waves (polyphasic and monophasic shapes) of 1 to 4 Hz, 50 to 350 microV occurring in the depression of the state of consciousness (e.g., general anesthesia), in encephalopathy and dementia, and a wide range of wave patterns. Some of these waves are nonspecific (e.g., sharp epileptiform waves); others are diagnostic, such as the continuous spike-wave pattern with a frequency of 1.5 to 2.5 spikes/sec in Landau Kleffner syndrome, or periodic sharp waves at 1 Hz in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.[4][5]
In the context of physiological findings, apart from the mu rhythm and certain delta waves, other waveforms have been illustrated including K complex (large-amplitude delta frequency waves), V waves (sharp waves that occur during sleep), positive occipital sharp transients of sleep (POSTS), and lambda waves (LWs). These latter are of bi- or tri-phasic morphology (the predominant positive component is preceded and followed by a negative component), appearing on the occipital regions in awake subjects during visual exploration and are usually detected as a response to moving an object in the visual field. The main component is generally positive. The amplitude varies but is generally less than 50 microV, whereas duration is 200 to 300 msec, except in 1 to 3 years children when it can be up to 400 msec. Of note, LWs decrease significantly, or disappear; when the eyes are closed, the lighting decreases, and when a white sheet is presented. This data is crucial because, in the suspicion of an epileptic correlate, the disappearance of the waves replacing a geometric multicolor image with a blank surface clearly indicates the finding of non-pathologic LWs.
Because LWs are sharp waves, they can be misinterpreted as pathological epileptiform findings, especially when present unilaterally (rarely). However, LWs do not have correlations to epilepsy or other pathological conditions. Although LWs do not have pathological features, it is appropriate to characterize their features and distinguish them from the POSTS. While LWs and POSTS are both normal EEG patterns and have many similarities in terms of morphology and location, LWs occur in wakefulness and as an evoked response, whereas POSTS appear typically during physiologic sleep. Yet, POSTS, also termed as 'lambdoid waves,' are usually monophasic. In a recent investigation, the authors found that there is a significant association between LWs and POSTS and, in turn, suggested that both normal EEG findings have a common occipital generator.[6]
The so-called occipital generator systems are different groups of specialized neurons located within the occipital lobe and involved in the visual system function. In EEG terms, the functioning of the occipital generators gets expressed by the production of different waveforms, including alpha rhythms, photic driving response, POSTS, and LWs.
In particular, LWs are positive transient waves with a triangular appearance. Of note, they are symmetric and appear in the occipital region while the individual is awake and fixes a uniform surface. The appearance has also been demonstrated when the subject watches TV.[7] They are also elicited through the saccadic visual exploration in which rapid movements (saccadic movements), between one fixation and another, are used to explore the visual environment towards peripheral stimuli of interest.[8] Most likely, LWs are more frequent in children.[9] The prevalence of LWs between 3 to 12 years is up to 80%, but they do not occur before one year of age. Concerning features, in an investigation conducted for evaluating the correlation between different products of occipital generators, Tatum et al. found a mean amplitude of 17.69 microV and a duration of 118.7 ms. They also proved a significant (p=0.001) association between LWs during scanning eye movements.[10]
Considering the clinical data published so far, the clinical significance of LWs could be to demonstrate the physiological functioning of the saccadic visual exploration processes. In other words, as LWs are probably related to an oculomotor visual integration mechanism, the failure to demonstrate LWs could be indicative of a specific dysfunction involving particular areas of the visual cortex. Clinically, the subject experiences difficulties in visually fixing what is of interest to him, while the EEG finding is the reduced or non-appearance of the LWs.
[1] | Cascella M,Bimonte S,Muzio MR, Towards a better understanding of anesthesia emergence mechanisms: Research and clinical implications. World journal of methodology. 2018 Oct 12; [PubMed PMID: 30345225] |
[2] | Cascella M, Mechanisms underlying brain monitoring during anesthesia: limitations, possible improvements, and perspectives. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2016 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 27066200] |
[3] | Canette LH,Fiveash A,Krzonowski J,Corneyllie A,Lalitte P,Thompson D,Trainor L,Bedoin N,Tillmann B, Regular rhythmic primes boost P600 in grammatical error processing in dyslexic adults and matched controls. Neuropsychologia. 2019 Dec 23; [PubMed PMID: 31877312] |
[4] | Muzio MR,Cascella M,Al Khalili Y, Landau Kleffner Syndrome 2019 Jan; [PubMed PMID: 31613525] |
[5] | Kwon GT,Kwon MS, Diagnostic challenge of rapidly progressing sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. BMJ case reports. 2019 Sep 24; [PubMed PMID: 31551319] |
[6] | Amin U,Sullivan L,Trudeau P,Benbadis SR, Association Between Positive Occipital Sharp Transients of Sleep and Lambda Waves. Clinical EEG and neuroscience. 2019 May; [PubMed PMID: 30428706] |
[7] | Alvarez V,Maeder-Ingvar M,Rossetti AO, Watching television: a previously unrecognized powerful trigger of λ waves. Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society. 2011 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 21811131] |
[8] | Schiller PH,Tehovnik EJ, Neural mechanisms underlying target selection with saccadic eye movements. Progress in brain research. 2005; [PubMed PMID: 16226583] |
[9] | Shih JJ,Thompson SW, Lambda waves: incidence and relationship to photic driving. Brain topography. 1998 Summer; [PubMed PMID: 9672225] |
[10] | Tatum WO,Ly RC,Sluzewska-Niedzwiedz M,Shih JJ, Lambda waves and occipital generators. Clinical EEG and neuroscience. 2013 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 23545245] |