Over the last decade, endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) has been the method of choice to harvest the greater saphenous vein (GSV), which is the most widely used conduit in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The saphenous veins often are used due to their ease of harvesting and length. The global demand for CABG surgery, as well as the increasing need for patients to require multiple coronary artery bypasses in the same procedure, have increased the demand for more and better conduits.[1]
In the past, the conventional open technique of GSV harvesting involved a long skin incision, which often carries a higher incidence of wound complications, and pain. This is often coupled with increased length of hospital stay and a decrease in patient satisfaction. The endoscopic vein harvesting technique has evolved and developed to improve the above-mentioned drawbacks of the open procedure.[2]
A recent review of approximately 28000 patients from 22 studies found that mid and long term patency of vein conduits harvested by the endoscopic technique was lower than the open technique. However, this study was limited to one year. The researchers concluded that growing surgical experience in the EVH might be associated with better outcomes.[3]
Although long-term patency of conduits harvested by EVH has been questioned, many studies show that the patency of vein grafts harvested by EVH technique is similar to the patency reported using the conventional method.[4]
The greater saphenous vein is the longest vein in the body. It emerges from the dorsal foot veins medially and runs anteriorly to the medial malleolus. It continues on the medial side of the leg along the tibial side of the calf region beside the edge of the tibia up to the knee. The GSV then runs in a direction posterior and medial to the knee curving behind the medial femoral condyle.
Above the knee, it returns to a more medial position through the medial aspect of the thigh before draining into the common femoral vein at the saphenofemoral junction. Through the whole course of the GSV, it runs in a superficial plane to the muscles and deep fascia of the lower limb. The saphenous nerve runs along the vein at the lower two-thirds of the leg. This orientation makes it more susceptible to injury, to postoperative pain and paresthesias.[5]
The main indication for endoscopic vein harvesting is coronary artery bypass grafting as a conduit. Other vessels that could qualify for bypass include the internal mammary artery and the radial arteries. The saphenous vein has also found use as a conduit for arteriovenous grafts for dialysis fistulas, peripheral vascular bypass interventions, and cerebral bypass surgeries.[6]
From a technical point of view, there are no absolute contraindications for endoscopic vein harvesting. However, there are some reservations on harvesting the saphenous vein in general, especially in patients with extensive varicosities, deep venous thrombosis, and those where the vessel is of poor quality and would not function as an adequate conduit.[7]
Specific devices should be available and working efficiently to perform the endoscopic vein harvesting procedure. Including a zero-degree endoscopic lens connected through a cable to a high definition monitor video display. A light source unit needs to be wired to the lens to provide illumination. A source of carbon dioxide is necessary to insufflate and keep the EVH tunnel open during the procedure. Finally, a ready-made single-use kit which comes as a package to provide housing for the endoscope and electrocautery probe. Different manufacturing companies supply the above-mentioned equipment with similar mechanisms with minor design differences.[8]
In the operating theatre, a surgeon and a surgical scrub nurse are necessary. A surgical technician should be available in the operating theatre as well for any technical or equipment related problems.
There is no specific preparation for the endoscopic vein harvesting procedure. However, preoperative bedside venous doppler mapping is of great importance before harvesting. Many centers consider this test mandatory as it provides crucial information regarding the location and quality of the greater saphenous vein as a conduit. The scan provides measurements typically within margin of 95% confidence level of the predicted conduit diameter.[9]
The vein course, size, and quality undergo inspection to asses which side to be harvested or even aborting the procedure entirely in cases of small vein diameter (less than 1.5 to 2 mm), grossly dilated veins, and extensive varicosities. This test is noninvasive and is typically performed in under ten minutes.
Under general anesthesia with the patient positioned supine, the team identifies the surgical site and laterality. The information provided by the previous preoperative venous doppler mapping should be available. For better positioning, the clinician flexes the knee from 90 to 120 degrees with mild external rotation of the hip joint on the ipsilateral side. Towels should support the leg at the posterior aspect of the knee (popliteal region).[10]
The skin incision of approximately two centimeters is made on the medial side of the lower limb one inch above or below the medial tibial tuberosity based on surgeon preference and the mapping. Following identification of the GSV, regular surgical dissection occurs to free the proximal part of the vein and to double-check the suitability of the conduit before starting the procedure. A balloon port is advanced through the incision to seal the tunnel and to prevent the escape of carbon dioxide. The endoscope is introduced into the subcutaneous tissue tunnel created by the device carefully and under vision. Some centers highly recommend starting low dose heparin at this step to prevent thrombus formation inside the conduit.[11]
Carbon dioxide insufflation starts at between 10 and 13 mmHg to facilitate the dissection process and to keep the tunnel opened. The dissection should be gentle to avoid injuries of the wall of the conduit or avulsion of vessel branches. After completing the dissection above and below the knee (or as required) according to the requested number of conduits, the endoscopic electrocautery functions to cut and cauterize the venous tributaries and free the vein from the surrounding adventitia. Small incisions are made at the groin and above the medial malleolus to divide the conduit, allowing its extraction at the site of the original incision. Both proximal and distal ends of the GSV are transfixed with (3-0) silk sutures and clipped with medium titanium clips.[1]
The tunnel gets checked one last time for proper hemostasis. Then pack the tunnel with an antibiotic soaked swab for five minutes before the closure. Some centers routinely consider inserting a surgical drain in the tunnel, while others only use drains in emergencies, or in patients expected to bleed postoperatively. All wounds should get sutured appropriately using absorbable sutures and staplers. The limb should be tightly bandaged with an average amount of pressure to keep the field hemostatic.
Once outside the body, the vein should be cannulated and inspected precisely for any tears, thrombus, or avulsed branches. All branches should be clipped with small clips, while tears can be fixed with (7-0) nonabsorbable sutures. The conduit should be kept in a solution, typically heparinized saline, until the time it is ready to be used in the anastomosis.[12]
The main complication associated with endoscopic vein harvesting is wound infection. However, the rate of infection is minimal in comparison to the conventional technique. Hematoma, dehiscence, and infection are often managed conservatively, but additional surgery may be necessary for definitive correction.[13]
Saphenous nerve injury during the procedure leads to postoperative pain and altered sensation along the medial aspect of the lower limb. Parasthesias and hyperalgesia can occur at the skin above the harvest site, which is typically temporary. After open and even endoscopic saphenous dissection, it is not uncommon for patients to report having more pain from their leg than from their sternum in the early postoperative period. The proceduralist needs to be aware to avoid damage to the adjacent saphenous nerve by mechanical force or the diathermy heat, particularly in the lower part of the leg where the nerve is close to the great saphenous vein.[14]
Endoscopic vein harvesting insufflates carbon dioxide to facilitate vein exposure. Pneumoperitoneum, subcutaneous extravasation, and air embolism can occur as a result. Treatment typically involves stopping insufflation and supporting hemodynamic status until the carbon dioxide is absorbed.[15]
Endoscopic vein harvesting has become the preferred technique for the harvesting of the great saphenous vein to be used in multiple surgical interventions, specifically, coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
A recent meta-analysis of 43 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies (OT) of 27789 patients took place to compare the two techniques. Forty-six percent of them underwent EVH versus fifty-six percent for the conventional open procedure. The results supported the superiority of the EVH technique for multiple endpoints, including conduit failure, myocardial infarction, mortality, and wound infection.[16]
Greater saphenous vein harvesting is a crucial step in multiple procedures. Endoscopic vein harvesting techniques have resulted in comparable technical outcomes while also improving morbidity, wound infection, hospital stay, and patient satisfaction. During the EVH procedure, cooperation between the surgeon, the nursing staff, and the radiologist leads to satisfactory results regarding patient care and overall prognosis.
[1] | Zingaro C,Cefarelli M,Berretta P,Matteucci S,Pierri M,Di Eusanio M, Endoscopic vein-graft harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery: Tips and tricks. Multimedia manual of cardiothoracic surgery : MMCTS. 2019 Jul 9; [PubMed PMID: 31290620] |
[2] | Allen K,Cheng D,Cohn W,Connolly M,Edgerton J,Falk V,Martin J,Ohtsuka T,Vitali R, Endoscopic Vascular Harvest in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Consensus Statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2005. Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2005 Winter; [PubMed PMID: 22436545] |
[3] | Li G,Zhang Y,Wu Z,Liu Z,Zheng J, Mid-term and long-term outcomes of endoscopic versus open vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2019 Nov 9; [PubMed PMID: 31707009] |
[4] | Kim DY,Song H,Kim HW,Jo GH,Kang J, Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Vein Harvesting during the Initial Learning Period. The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2015 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 26078923] |
[5] | Portugal IB,Ribeiro Ide L,Sousa-Rodrigues CF,Monte-Bispo RF,Rocha AC, Distribution of saphenous vein valves and its practical importance. Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular : orgao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular. 2014 Oct-Dec; [PubMed PMID: 25714210] |
[6] | Cheatle T, The long saphenous vein: to strip or not to strip? Seminars in vascular surgery. 2005 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 15791547] |
[7] | Bonde P,Graham AN,MacGowan SW, Endoscopic vein harvest: advantages and limitations. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2004 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 15172271] |
[8] | van Diepen S,Brennan JM,Hafley GE,Reyes EM,Allen KB,Ferguson TB,Peterson ED,Williams JB,Gibson CM,Mack MJ,Kouchoukos NT,Alexander JH,Lopes RD, Endoscopic harvesting device type and outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Annals of surgery. 2014 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 24368640] |
[9] | Manetta F,Yu PJ,Mattia A,Karaptis JC,Hartman AR, Bedside Vein Mapping for Conduit Size in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2017 Apr-Jun; [PubMed PMID: 28439192] |
[10] | Mahmood D,Rosati F,Petsikas D,Payne D,Torkan L,Bisleri G, Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting with a non-sealed approach. Multimedia manual of cardiothoracic surgery : MMCTS. 2019 Apr 9; [PubMed PMID: 30990577] |
[11] | Brown EN,Kon ZN,Tran R,Burris NS,Gu J,Laird P,Brazio PS,Kallam S,Schwartz K,Bechtel L,Joshi A,Zhang S,Poston RS, Strategies to reduce intraluminal clot formation in endoscopically harvested saphenous veins. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2007 Nov; [PubMed PMID: 17976458] |
[12] | Chernyavskiy A,Volkov A,Lavrenyuk O,Terekhov I,Kareva Y, Comparative results of endoscopic and open methods of vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized parallel-group trial. Journal of cardiothoracic surgery. 2015 Nov 12; [PubMed PMID: 26563714] |
[13] | Ma GT,Liu XR,Zhang CJ,Liu JZ,Miao Q,Jiang C,Mao R, [Endoscopic Saphenous Vein Harvesting versus Open Vein Harvesting Techniques]. Zhongguo yi xue ke xue yuan xue bao. Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae. 2015 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 26564458] |
[14] | Raja SG,Sarang Z, Endoscopic vein harvesting: technique, outcomes, concerns [PubMed PMID: 24251019] |
[15] | Suarez-Pierre A,Terasaki Y,Magruder JT,Kapoor A,Grant MC,Lawton JS, Complications of CO{sub}2{/sub} insufflation during endoscopic vein harvesting. Journal of cardiac surgery. 2017 Dec [PubMed PMID: 29169212] |
[16] | Deppe AC,Liakopoulos OJ,Choi YH,Slottosch I,Kuhn EW,Scherner M,Stange S,Wahlers T, Endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 27,789 patients. The Journal of surgical research. 2013 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 23218736] |