In 1950 Robert W. Sengstaken and Arthur H. Blakemore recognized that the introduction of blood banks and the ability to provide patients with large quantities of blood quickly was saving lives, especially in cases of hemorrhaging esophageal varices, but transfusion alone was not sufficient. Many patients who present with esophageal varices also have liver cirrhosis. Cirrhotic livers, in general, are more fragile to anoxia and shock. They found that transfusions were very beneficial in the initial presentation, but patients were often dying days later after admission due to liver failure. They examined recent advancements made in controlling peptic ulcers, which had dramatically reduced mortality rates. They formulated a method to halt varices related hemorrhage with the goals of decreasing total blood loss, end-organ shock, and delayed deaths. At the time, there was no device available for esophageal varices tamponade; however, in the previous decade, there was experimentation with portal pressure readings for portal hypertension patients. The portal pressure readings gave an idea of how much pressure was required to result in a collapse of the veins in the coronary-esophageal collateral circuit. From this information, they also derived the amount of pressure that the esophagus could withstand for an extended period of time.[1]
They subsequently developed the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube, which is rarely used but can be extremely useful in situations when first-line treatment fails. Endoscopy by a gastroenterologist is the gold standard for both diagnosing and treating an acute variceal hemorrhage. Endoscopic band ligation is the treatment of choice, but sclerotherapy is also used.[2] Unfortunately, even when practicing at a location with a readily available gastroenterologist, the endoscopic procedures are not always successful. In these scenarios, the balloon tamponade technique may be a lifesaving transitory measure to control the hemorrhage.[3]
Esophageal varices are most commonly the result of liver cirrhosis. As the hepatic tissue becomes scarred, the vasculature can become compressed and obstructed, leading to portal hypertension. Portal hypertension leads to increased pressure in the veins of the esophagus and stomach. The increased pressure results in the development of varices. Specifically, varices can develop in the para-esophageal collateral veins supplied from the azygos vein and short gastric veins supplied from the splenic vein.[4]
Sengstaken-Blakemore tube placement is indicated for unstable patients with an uncontrolled hemorrhage. In some instances, endoscopy is not available; however, even if it is available, it is not always successful. In both scenarios, Sengstaken-Blakemore tube placements can temporarily control the hemorrhage.[5][6] Another indication would be if there is a lack of available consultants or specialist physicians, such as in remote rural areas. The tube can be placed to stabilize the patient for transfer to a facility with a higher level of care. As previously stated, in all situations, the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube is only a temporizing, rescue measure. Even if the initial hemorrhage is controlled by the balloon tamponade, over 50% of patients will rebleed when the device is deflated; therefore, a definitive treatment is always needed.[7]
The relative contraindications include known esophageal stricture and recent esophageal or gastric surgery. Both of these predispose the patient to an increased risk of esophageal rupture. However, Sengstaken-Blakemore tube placement is almost always a last resort option to control an unstable, massive hemorrhage. It is considered an emergent life-saving measure; therefore, the risks must be considered in that frame of reference.[8]
Please note that while equipment and technique of balloon tamponade devices for esophageal varices are similar, this list is specific to Sengstaken-Blakemore tube placement. The most common tube types are Sengstaken-Blakemore tube and the Minnesota tube, with the major difference being that the Minnesota tube has a larger gastric balloon and both gastric and esophageal aspiration ports. The Sengstaken-Blakemore tube only has an aspiration port for gastric contents; however, a double-lumen nasogastric tube used as an esophageal aspiration port. Further note that there are a few variations on the supplies required. It is possible to place the tube without Luer-locks and stopcocks by clamping the tubing with Magill forceps instead.[1]
An appropriately trained provider and an assistant.
Airway protection remains the foremost focus. If the patient is requiring a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube placement, they have likely already been intubated for airway protection, but if not, endotracheal intubation should be performed prior to placement. Following intubation, the patient should be placed in the supine position with the head of the bed elevated to 45 degrees. If this position is not possible, the next best positioning is left lateral decubitus. Next, the gastric and esophageal balloon should be inflated to check for leaks. The balloons should then be fully deflated and lubricated. Nasogastric tube marking should be done prior to placement. Hold the distal end of the nasogastric tube 2 cm above the gastric balloon and mark at the level of the 50 cm line on the tube. Do the same 2 cm above the esophageal balloon.
It should be noted that there are variations for the placement of the tube; however, there are some critical steps that should be performed without any deviation from the protocol. These critical steps involve the balloon inflation volumes and/or pressures and the need for interval placement confirmation with a plain film.[9][10][11][1]
A competent emergency medicine provider should be able to stabilize and treat all emergent and life-threatening disease processes. A Sengstaken-Blakemore tube is one of the only stabilizing procedures for an esophageal variceal hemorrhage. It is of utmost clinical importance that emergency medicine physicians are capable of performing this procedure.
Many emergency departments are transitioning to protocols and flowcharts for frequently seen emergencies. This is common for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions and cerebral vascular accidents. Similarly, gastrointestinal bleeds are also frequently seen in the emergency department and can deteriorate rapidly. Having an interprofessional team-based approach and protocol for massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the emergency department can be lifesaving and create a low stress, efficient work environment for the entire team. Being familiar with not only the procedure but also what equipment and devices the hospital stocks will save time when it matters the most. Interprofessional communication between physicians and nurses is essential for both placement of the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube and recognizing complications throughout the procedure.
[1] | SENGSTAKEN RW,BLAKEMORE AH, Balloon tamponage for the control of hemorrhage from esophageal varices. Annals of surgery. 1950 May; [PubMed PMID: 15411151] |
[2] | Sass DA,Chopra KB, Portal hypertension and variceal hemorrhage. The Medical clinics of North America. 2009 Jul; [PubMed PMID: 19577117] |
[3] | Christensen T, The treatment of oesophageal varices using a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube: considerations for nursing practice. Nursing in critical care. 2004 Mar-Apr; [PubMed PMID: 15068055] |
[4] | Odelowo OO,Smoot DT,Kim K, Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. Journal of the National Medical Association. 2002 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 12152928] |
[5] | Bhasin DK,Malhi NJ, Variceal bleeding and portal hypertension: much to learn, much to explore. Endoscopy. 2002 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 11822007] |
[6] | Garbuzenko DV, Current approaches to the management of patients with liver cirrhosis who have acute esophageal variceal bleeding. Current medical research and opinion. 2016; [PubMed PMID: 26804426] |
[7] | García-Pagán JC,Reverter E,Abraldes JG,Bosch J, Acute variceal bleeding. Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine. 2012 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 22447260] |
[8] | Kaman L,Iqbal J,Kundil B,Kochhar R, Management of Esophageal Perforation in Adults. Gastroenterology research. 2010 Dec; [PubMed PMID: 27942303] |
[9] | Chong CF, Esophageal rupture due to Sengstaken-Blakemore tube misplacement. World journal of gastroenterology. 2005 Nov 7; [PubMed PMID: 16425437] |
[10] | Thomson A, Safe and efficacious placement of Sengstaken-Blakemore tubes. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2009 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 19631807] |
[11] | Haddock G,Garden OJ,McKee RF,Anderson JR,Carter DC, Esophageal tamponade in the management of acute variceal hemorrhage. Digestive diseases and sciences. 1989 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 2656137] |
[12] | Seet E,Beevee S,Cheng A,Lim E, The Sengstaken-Blakemore tube: uses and abuses. Singapore medical journal. 2008 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 18756331] |
[13] | Stark P,Phillips JM, [Esophageal rupture as a complication of the use of a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube]. Der Radiologe. 1985 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 3873086] |