Contraceptive implant

Contraceptive implant
Container/applicator for Nexplanon, an example of an etonogestrel-based contraceptive implant.
Background
TypeLong-acting reversible contraception
First use?
Failure rates (Low)
Perfect useLow%
Typical useLow%
Usage
User remindersNone
Advantages and disadvantages
STI protectionNo protection

A contraceptive implant is an implantable medical device used for the purpose of birth control. The implant may depend on the timed release of hormones to hinder ovulation or sperm development, the ability of copper to act as a natural spermicide within the uterus, or it may work using a non-hormonal, physical blocking mechanism. As with other contraceptives, a contraceptive implant is designed to prevent pregnancy, but it does not protect against sexually transmitted infections.

Women

Insertion of a contraceptive implant into a woman's arm
Removal of a contraceptive implant from a woman's arm

Implant

The contraceptive implant is hormone-based and highly effective, approved in more than 60 countries and used by millions of women around the world. The typical implant is a small flexible tube measuring about 40mm in length, inserted under the skin (typically in the upper arm) by a health care professional. After insertion, it prevents pregnancy by releasing hormones that prevent ovaries from releasing eggs and thicken cervical mucus. The two most common versions are the single-rod etonogestrel implant and the two-rod levonorgestrel implant.[1] The implant has been found to be more than 99% effective.[2]

Brands include: Norplant, Jadelle (Norplant II), Implanon, Nexplanon, Sino-implant (II), Zarin, Femplant and Trust.

Benefits of the implant include fewer, lighter periods, improved symptoms of premenstrual syndrome, long-lasting up to three to five years, smoker- and breastfeeding-safe, and the convenience of not needing to remember to use it every day. In some cases, negative side effects do occur, the most common being irregular bleeding for the first six to 12 months. Less common symptoms include change in appetite, depression, moodiness, hormonal imbalance, sore breasts, weight gain, dizziness, pregnancy symptoms, and lethargy.[3][4]

With regard to helping women space their pregnancies appropriately, there is some debate about the most effective time to insert contraceptive implants after pregnancy. Offering immediate postpartum insertion probably leads to more women initiating use of contraceptive implants, compared to offering insertion at the first postpartum visit. However, there may be little or no difference between immediate and delayed insertion in terms of continued use of implants at six months or in terms of women's satisfaction.[5] It is not certain if immediate insertion of implants has any effect on unintended pregnancy or the risk of side effects compared to delayed insertion.[5]

Intrauterine device

An intrauterine device (IUD) is a small contraceptive device, often 'T'-shaped and containing either copper or the hormone levonorgestrel, which is implanted into the uterus. Copper IUDs are wrapped with a copper wire, repelling sperm and preventing pregnancy. Hormonal IUDs thicken cervical mucus, preventing sperm from traveling to an egg.[6] They also can prevent eggs from leaving the ovaries during ovulation, leaving sperm without an egg to fertilize.[7] They are long-acting, reversible, and the most effective types of reversible birth control.[8] Paragard, the copper IUD, is the most effective emergency contraception when inserted 5 days after sex.[9] Failure rates with the copper IUD is about 0.8% while the levonorgestrel IUD has a failure rate of 0.2% in the first year of use.[10] Among types of birth control they, along with birth control implants, result in the greatest satisfaction among users.[11] As of 2011, IUDs are the most widely used form of reversible contraception worldwide.[12] IUDs also tend to be one of the most cost-effective methods of contraception for women.[13]

Brands include: Paragard, Kyleena, Liletta, Mirena, and Skyla.[14]

Men

Several barriers exist to expanding research into implantable and other contraceptive methods for men, including vague regulatory guidelines, long device development timelines, men's attitudes towards convenience, and a significant lack of funding.[15][16][17] Several implantable devices have been attempted, both hormonal and non-hormonal.

Research

In 2001, Dutch pharmaceutical company Organon announced clinical trials of its implantable etonogestrel-based male contraceptive would begin in Europe and the U.S., anticipating a marketable product as early as 2005.[18][19] Despite promising results, research development stopped, with outside speculation that lack of marketability was a factor. Organon representative Monique Mols stated in 2007 that "[d]espite 20 years of research, the development of a [hormonal] method acceptable to a wide population of men is unlikely".[20] Schering/Bayer had been working on a similar annual implant with quarterly injections but cancelled the research in 2006/2007,[20] declaring that men would most likely view it as "not as convenient as a woman taking a pill once a day."[17]

In 2005, a collaboratory project led by the Population Council, the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Medical Research Council began researching a matchstick-sized implant that contains MENT (7α-methyl-19-nortestosterone or trestolone), a "synthetic steroid that resembles testosterone."[21] Clinical trials were set to begin in 2011 or 2012,[15] and the project was ongoing as of 2016, with hopes of gaining approval as the first reversible male contraceptive.[21]

In 2006, Shepherd Medical Company received FDA approval for a clinical trial of its non-hormonal implant called an intra vas device (IVD), which consists of two plugs that block sperm flow in the vas deferens. Working on the success of its pilot study and solid results from its clinical trials, the company announced it would expand its trials to three U.S. cities later that year. Questions remained about how reversible the procedure would be in the long-term; however, it was expected to be more reversible than a vasectomy. In 2008, the company disbanded due to the economic crisis but has stated it would restart its research with proper funding.[22][23][24]

In January 2016, news broke of a non-hormonal, implantable valve — the Bimek SLV. It included a switch that attaches to the vas deferens, allowing the owner to stop and resume the flow of sperm on demand. A clinical trial of 25 participants was announced to further test the efficacy of the device.[25][26]

Other animals

Implantable contraception is also an option for animals, particularly for animal managers at zoos and other captive animal facilities who require reversible contraception methods for managing population growth in limited captive habitat.[27] The Association of Zoos and Aquariums' (AZA) Reproductive Management Center (formerly known as the AZA Wildlife Contraception Center) at the Saint Louis Zoo in St. Louis, Missouri has played a major role in researching and disseminating contraception information, via its Contraception Database. It houses over 30,000 records for hundreds of species.[27][28] One of the most popular contraceptive methods used by zoos (as well as in domestic animals) is the melengestrol acetate (MGA) implant, a progestin-based hormonal contraceptive developed in the mid-1970s. Other progestin-based implants that have been placed in animals include Norplant, Jadelle, and Implanon. Androgen-based implants that use agonist (stimulating) gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and, to a lesser degree, IUDs have also seen use in several domestic and exotic species. Whatever the implant, some care must be taken to minimize the risk of implant migration or loss.[27][29][30]

References

  1. ↑ French, V.A.; Darney, P.D. (2015). "Chapter 9: Implantable Contraception". In Shoupe, D.; Mishell Jr., D.R. (eds.). The Handbook of Contraception: A Guide for Practical Management (2nd ed.). Humana Press. pp. 139–164. ISBN 9783319201856. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  2. ↑ "What is the Effectiveness of the Birth Control Implant?". www.plannedparenthood.org. Retrieved 2021-12-03.
  3. ↑ "Birth Control Methods - Implant". Bedsider.org. National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. February 2016. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  4. ↑ "What is the Effectiveness of the Birth Control Implant?". www.plannedparenthood.org. Retrieved 2021-12-03.
  5. 1 2 Sothornwit, J; Werawatakul, Y; Kaewrudee, S; Lumbiganon, P; Laopaiboon, M (22 April 2017). "Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant for contraception". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017 (4): CD011913. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011913.pub2. PMC 6478153. PMID 28432791.
  6. ↑ "Copper IUD (ParaGard) - Mayo Clinic". www.mayoclinic.org. Retrieved 2021-12-03.
  7. ↑ "IUD Birth Control | Info About Mirena & Paragard IUDs". www.plannedparenthood.org. Retrieved 2021-12-03.
  8. ↑ Winner, B; Peipert, JF; Zhao, Q; Buckel, C; Madden, T; Allsworth, JE; Secura, GM (2012). "Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception". New England Journal of Medicine. 366 (21): 1998–2007. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1110855. PMID 22621627.
  9. ↑ "IUD Birth Control | Info About Mirena & Paragard IUDs". www.plannedparenthood.org. Retrieved 2021-12-03.
  10. ↑ Hanson, S.J.; Burke, A.E. (2012). Hurt, K.J. (ed.). The Johns Hopkins Manual of Gynecology and Obstetrics (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 232. ISBN 978-1-60547-433-5. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  11. ↑ Committee on Adolescent Health Care Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group, The American College of Obstetricians and, Gynecologists (October 2012). "Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices". Obstetrics and Gynecology. 120 (4): 983–8. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b7d. PMID 22996129.
  12. ↑ U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (December 2013). "Trends in Contraceptive Methods Used Worldwide" (PDF). United Nations. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  13. ↑ Duke, J.; Barhan, S. (2007). "Chapter 27: Modern Concepts in Intrauterine Devices". In Falcone, T.; Hurd, W. (eds.). Clinical Reproductive Medicine and Surgery. Elsevier Health Sciences. pp. 405–416. ISBN 9780323076593. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
  14. ↑ "IUD Birth Control | Info About Mirena & Paragard IUDs". www.plannedparenthood.org. Retrieved 2021-12-03.
  15. 1 2 Bai, N. (14 June 2011). "Beyond Condoms: The Long Quest for a Better Male Contraceptive". Scientific American. Nature America, Inc. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  16. ↑ Fawcett, K. (26 February 2015). "The Future of Male Birth Control". U.S. News & World Report. U.S. News & World Report LP. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  17. 1 2 Khazan, O. (March 2015). "Block That Sperm!". The Atlantic. The Atlantic Monthly Group. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  18. ↑ "Male Contraceptive Implant Gets Trial Run". abcnews.go.com. ABC News Internet Ventures. 11 July 2001. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  19. ↑ Jones, N. (11 July 2001). "Contraceptive implant for men in trials". New Scientist. Reed Business Information Ltd. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  20. 1 2 Goodman, A. (3 August 2008). "The Long Wait for Male Birth Control". Time. Time, Inc. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  21. 1 2 "MENT: Subdermal Implants for Men". PopCouncil.org. The Population Council, Inc. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  22. ↑ "New male contraceptive targets sperm, not hormones". EurekAlert!. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 5 May 2006. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  23. ↑ "Male contraceptive study expands to 4 US cities". Psych Central. Psych Central. October 2006. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  24. ↑ "Shug Product Report" (PDF). Calliope, The Contraceptive Pipeline Database. Contraceptive Technology Innovation Exchange. 21 May 2015. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  25. ↑ Atkin, C. (8 January 2016). "The male contraception that makes you infertile by flicking a switch". The Independent. Independent Digital News and Media Limited. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  26. ↑ "FAQ - Science and Research". PES Innovation AG. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  27. 1 2 3 Asa, C.S.; Porton, I.J. (2010). "Chapter 34: Contraception as a Management Tool for Controlling Surplus Animals". In Kleiman, D.G.; Thompson, K.V.; Baer, C.K. (eds.). Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques for Zoo Management (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. 469–482. ISBN 9780226440118. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  28. ↑ "AZA Reproductive Management Center". STLZoo.org. Saint Louis Zoo. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  29. ↑ "AZA Reproductive Management Center - Contraception Methods". STLZoo.org. Saint Louis Zoo. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  30. ↑ Concannon, P.W. (2013). "Chapter 215: Estrus Suppression in the Bitch". In Bonagura, J.D.; Twedt, D.C. (eds.). Kirk's Current Veterinary Therapy XV. Elsevier Health Sciences. pp. 984–989. ISBN 9780323227629. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
This article is issued from Offline. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.