Constitution of Brazil

The Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil (Portuguese: Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil) is the supreme law of Brazil. It is the foundation and source of the legal authority underlying the existence of Brazil and the federal government of Brazil. It replaced the autocratic 1967 constitution capping 21 years of military dictatorship and establishing Brazil's 6th republic, also known as the New Republic (Nova República). Made in the light of the Brazilian transition to democracy, it resignified the role of the state in the citizens' lives, providing a vast system of human and individual rights protection, social welfare, and democratic tools.

Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil
Constitution of Brazil (1988)
Overview
Original titleConstituição da República Federativa do Brasil
JurisdictionFederative Republic of Brazil
Presented22 September 1988 (1988-09-22)
Ratified5 October 1988 (1988-10-05)
SystemFederal presidential constitutional republic
Government structure
BranchesThree (executive, legislature, judiciary)
ChambersBicameral: Chamber of Deputies and Federal Senate
ExecutivePresident of the Republic
JudiciarySupreme Federal Court
FederalismFederation
Electoral collegeNo
Author(s)1987–88 Constituent Assembly
SignatoriesConstituent Assembly
Supersedes1967 Constitution of Brazil
Full text
Constitution of Brazil at Wikisource
This article is part of a series on the
Politics of Brazil
Executive
Legislative
Judiciary
Law
Administrative divisions
Elections

Recent elections
Foreign relations
Related topics

Overview

The current Brazilian Constitution is the seventh enacted since the country's independence in 1822, and the sixth since the proclamation of the republic in 1889.[1][2] It was promulgated on 5 October 1988, after a two-year process in which it was written from scratch.

History
Main article: History of the Constitution of Brazil
The original copy of the Constitution
First version of the current Brazilian Constitution

The current Constitution of Brazil was drafted as a reaction to the period of military dictatorship, and sought to guarantee individual rights and restrict the state's ability to limit freedom, to punish offences and to regulate individual life. Among the new constitutional guarantees are the errand of injunction and the habeas data. It also anticipated the existence of a Consumers' Defence Code (enacted in 1990), of a Children's and Youth Code (1990) and of a new Civil Code (2002).

It was the first constitution to demand severe punishment for breaches of civil liberties and rights. Consequently, Brazil later approved a law making the propagation of prejudice against any minority or ethnic group an unbailable crime. This law provided legal remedy against those who spread hate speech or those who do not treat all citizens equally. This second aspect helped disabled people to have a reserved percentage of jobs in public service and large companies, and Afro-Brazilians to seek reparation for racism in court.

Breaking with the authoritarian logic of the previous Constitution, it made unbailable crimes those of torture and of actions directed against the democratic state and the constitutional order, thus creating constitutional devices to block coups d'état of any kind.

The Constitution also established many forms of direct popular participation besides regular voting, such as plebiscite, referendum and the citizens' initiative. Examples of these democratic mechanisms were the 1993 plebiscite concerning the form of government, where the presidential system was confirmed, and the 2005 firearms and ammunition referendum.

The mention of God in the preamble of the Constitution (and later on the Brazilian currency) was opposed by most leftists as incompatible with freedom of religion because it does not recognize the rights of polytheists such as some indigenous peoples or of atheists. The Supreme Federal Court has ruled that this commission of the protection of God was not unconstitutional since the preamble of the constitution is simply an indication of principles that serves as an introduction to the constitutional text and reflects the ideological conceptions of the legislator, falling within the scope of political ideology and not of the Law.

Criticism
Roberto Campos, one of the few voices to rise up against the 1988 Constitution at the time of its creation

The Federal Constitution of 1988 is criticized in the doctrine for being very extensive, long-winded, and analytical. This characteristic forced the Constitution to be amended several times, in politically costly processes, to adapt to changes in society[3][4][5][6]

Another criticism is that the 1988 Federal Constitution reproduces a model of state capitalism, expanding state monopolies and regulations, which allowed the Brazilian state, in 2017, to have stakes in more than 650 companies, involved in one-third of the national GDP. This model also created restrictions for the performance of foreign companies in several fields with harmful consequences for the country's growth. In the view of some scholars, this economic model favors patrimonialism and corruption.[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]

Since the approval of the 1988 Federal Constitution, the homicide rate has grown 124% in Brazil and more than one million people have been murdered. While in the 1980s there were 11.7 homicides per 100 thousand inhabitants, in 2010 the rate reached 26.2 - an average increase of 2.7% per year.[14] A portion of scholars have blamed the Constitution. Raul Jungmann criticized the fact that the Constitution gave states responsibility for public security, leaving the Union with only a residual role. This would have enabled the growth of factions such as the Primeiro Comando da Capital and the Comando Vermelho. In the view of Alexandre de Moraes, Brazil confused the respect for the dignity of the human person with the leniency for criminal leaders.[15][16][17]

The Constitution is also responsible for creating a slow judicial system. Brazil has the 30th slowest judiciary among 133 countries, according to the World Bank. This has caused the judiciary to use provisional arrests as an advance of the sentence. In 2015 more than 40% of prisoners in Brazil were provisional.[18][19][20][21]

A World Bank study criticized the 1988 Federal Constitution for extending the privileges of civil servants, aggravating income inequality in Brazil. Remuneration and retirement are disproportionately high according to studies. In 2015, the federal government's deficit associated with the retirement of the approximately 1 million government employees was greater than the total registered with 33 million private pensioners. For the World Bank, civil servants are among the richest fifth of the Brazilian population. For Roberto Brant, the Federal Constitution was captured by groups of civil servants in 1988. Philosopher Fernando Schüler maintains that Brazil went against the grain in the 1980s: "While the world tried to adjust the State to globalization and modernize public management, Brazil bet on a super bureaucratic state in the 1988 Constitution. We offer rigid stability in the employment for civil servants, we mix careers of State with common careers of the public service, we create the law of biddings, we cast the budgets and we eliminate any space for the meritocracy in the public area." For jurist Modesto Carvalhosa, only a new "principiological" constitution would end the privileges of the 1988 Constitution.[22][23][24][25][26][27][28]

The Federal Constitution of 1988 is also criticized for having adopted one of the broadest Special Forums in the world, which jurists argue encourage corruption. A quarter of the actions with a Privileged Forum take more than ten years to be judged. The Supreme Federal Court takes 1,300 days to judge criminal actions by persons with privileged jurisdiction. Between 2001 and 2017, 200 actions involving the Privileged Forum expired.[29][30][31][32][33][34]

Also criticized is the requirement of unappealable transit for the execution of the sentence. For Judge Sérgio Moro, waiting for the final judgment will contribute to impunity. According to Minister Teori Zavascki after confirming a second sentence, one could no longer speak of the principle of non-culpability, since "the exceptional remedies, for the superimposition courts, do not boast the ability to review facts and evidence". In the United Nations, 193 of the 194 countries have a first or second arrest.[35][36][37][38]

In the electoral aspect, the Constitution adopted the mandatory vote. Among the 15 largest economies in the world, Brazil is the only country in which voting is mandatory. A 2014 survey showed that the mandatory vote is rejected by 61% of Brazilians. Some question whether it is democratic to compel people to vote.[39][40][41][42]

The Constitution adopted the social democratic model of State organization, as defined by the columnist for the newspaper O Estado de S. Paulo Luiz Sérgio Henriques. For professor and lawyer Marco Aurélio Marrafon, president of the Brazilian Academy of Constitutional Law, the 1988 Brazilian Magna Carta organized the State according to the Welfare State model, in which it is intended to reconcile "the liberal component of preservation of individual rights and limitation of state power, with direct economic intervention and the promotion of public policies, in order to redistribute resources and reduce social inequalities." In order to finance the Welfare State, it was necessary to raise the tax burden, which went from 23.4% of GDP in 1988, to 33.6% of GDP in 2005, and to link budget revenues. Thus, the Union reached 93% of mandatory spending in 2017, decreasing the room for maneuver by the government and affecting investments. This option is criticized by some.[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]

Some criticize an alleged excessive power granted to the Order of Attorneys of Brazil by the Constitution. Brazilian philosopher and journalist Hélio Schwartsman considers that the 1988 Constitution conferred "disproportionate powers" on lawyers such as "appointing judges, writing laws, proposing direct actions of unconstitutionality, defining who can and who cannot become a lawyer". Roberto Campos, economist, ex-senator and Minister of Planning of Brazil in the early years of the military dictatorship noted that "The OAB has achieved the feat of being mentioned three times in what he defines as the "besteirol Constitution" of 1988. According to him, "it's perhaps the only case in the world where a club of professionals has enshrined the constitutional text."[53][54]

Contents
2017 edition of the Constitution

The Constitution of Brazil is composed of nine titles, subsequently divided into chapters and then articles. The articles are in turn divided into short clauses called incisos (indicated by Roman numerals) and parágrafos (indicated by numbers followed by §). The Constitution refers to the country as "the Union".

Preamble

The preamble to the Federal Constitution is a brief introductory statement that sets out the guiding purpose and principles of the document. The text reads:[55][56]

We, the representatives of the Brazilian People, assembled in the National Constituent Assembly to institute a Democratic State for the purpose of ensuring the exercise of social and individual rights, liberty, security, well being, development, equality and justice as supreme values of a fraternal, pluralist and unprejudiced society, based on social harmony and committed, in the internal and international spheres, to the peaceful solution of disputes, promulgate, under the protection of God, this Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil.

Title 1

Title 1 is devoted to the fundamental principles of the Union. It describes the States, the municipalities and the Federal District as the indissoluble constituents of the Union. It also establishes three independent, harmonic government branches: the Executive, the Legislative and the Judiciary, and lists the nation's main goals.

One of the most important excerpts from this title is in Article 1, single paragraph, stating:

All power emanates from the People, who exercise it through elected representatives or directly, under this Constitution.

Title 2

Title 2 states the Fundamental Safeguards.[57] It ensures basic rights to all citizens and foreigners residing in the Country, prohibits capital punishment, defines citizenship requirements, political rights, among other regulations.

Title 3

Title 3 regulates the state organization. It establishes Brasília as the nation's capital, describes the rights and duties of the states, the municipalities, as well rules for the public staff.

Title 4

Title 4 is about the branches of government. It describes the attributes for every government branch, and the rules for amendments to the Constitution as well.

Title 5

Title 5 regulates the defense of the State and its democratic institutions. It rules the deployment of the armed forces, the national security baselines, and declaration of state of emergency.

Title 6

Title 6 comprises taxation and the nation's budget. It disposes on budget distribution among the Union's components and their competencies, and the nation's budget.

Title 7

Title 7 rules the economic activities in the country, the agricultural and urban policies, as well the state monopolies.

  • The Constitution allows the Brazilian government to "expropriate, for the purpose of agrarian reform, rural property that is not performing its social function." (Article 184)
  • According to Article 187, the social function is performed when rural property simultaneously meets the following requirements:
    • rational and adequate use;
    • adequate use of available natural resources and preservation of the environment;
    • compliance with the provisions which regulate labor relations; and
    • exploitation which favors the well-being of the owners and workers.

Title 8

Title 8 is about the social order. It establishes the Social Security system, the Public Health system, the Public Pension system, among regulations concerning education, culture, science and technology, and sports policies.

Title 9

Title 9 encompasses general constitutional dispositions. Among those, there are sparse regulations, as well as transitional dispositions.

References
  1. Elkins, Zachary; Ginsburg, Tom; Melton, James (12 October 2009). The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-73132-4.
  2. Comparative Constitutions Project
  3. "Erro político produziu Constituição difícil até para técnicos". Conjur. 13 June 2004. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
  4. "Entrevista: Luís Roberto Barroso — Parte 1". Conjur. 14 May 2006. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
  5. "A marca inequívoca da CF de 88 é a da judicialização". Conjur. 14 May 2006. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
  6. "Constituição Federal completa 20 anos envelhecida e remendada". Conjur. 4 October 2010. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
  7. "The Case of Brazil". Retrieved 26 February 2018.
  8. "Críticas de Roberto Campos à Constituição ainda ecoam". Conjur. 25 November 2012. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
  9. "Privatizações: ainda é pouco". Retrieved 26 February 2018.
  10. "Constituição de 1988 pára pesquisa mineral". Folha. 29 May 2004. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
  11. "Governo quer ampliar abertura da economia e flexibilizar monopólios". Folha. 29 May 2004. Retrieved 3 March 2018.
  12. "ANÁLISE - A questão é: haverá mais?". 29 May 2004. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
  13. "Inchaço estatal". Folha. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
  14. "País está em situação epidêmica, de acordo com a OMS, que limita em 10 o número de assassinatos por 100 mil habitantes; taxa do Brasil é de 26,2%". Veja. 14 December 2011. Archived from the original on 28 January 2020. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  15. "Raul Jungmann: "Prendemos muito, mas prendemos mal"". Folha. 27 February 2018. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  16. "Facções criminosas se alimentam das falhas do Estado, diz pesquisadora". Folha. 27 February 2018. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  17. "País deve acabar com a hipocrisia ao tratar questões penitenciárias, diz Moraes". Istoé. 30 November 2017. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  18. "Por que a Justiça brasileira é lenta?". Istoé. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  19. "Por que a Justiça brasileira é lenta?". Istoé. Archived from the original on 24 February 2020. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  20. "Justiça, mesmo tardia". Istoé. Archived from the original on 8 March 2018. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  21. "JNo Brasil, 40% dos presos são provisórios". Carta Capital. Archived from the original on 13 July 2017. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  22. "Assim não dá". Veja. 24 November 2017. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  23. "Os privilégios salariais do servidor público". Globo. 24 November 2017. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  24. "Serviço público puxa desigualdade na Previdência". Globo. 24 November 2017. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  25. "Para o Banco Mundial, Brasil precisa reduzir os privilégios de servidores". 24 November 2017. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  26. ""Pobre paga privilégios de servidores", diz ex-ministro da Previdência". 24 November 2017. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  27. "Reforma administrativa ou do Estado?". Retrieved 10 October 2019.
  28. ""Os brasileiros estão a eliminar os políticos que sugam o Estado"". Retrieved 10 October 2019.
  29. "Foro privilegiado no Brasil é mais amplo comparado a outros 20 países". O Globo. 24 October 2016. Retrieved 14 December 2016.
  30. Estevão Taiar (24 October 2016). "Para ministro Barroso, foro privilegiado 'é feito para não funcionar'". Valor Econômico. Retrieved 14 December 2016.
  31. José Nêumanne (13 Junho 2016). «O privilégio do foro».politica.estadao.com.br
  32. "Casos de foro privilegiado se arrastam por até 18 anos". 6 November 2016. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  33. "STF leva 1,3 mil dias para julgar ações penais de pessoas com foro privilegiado". 19 March 2017. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  34. "O foro privilegiado em números". 23 November 2017. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  35. "Aguardar o trânsito em julgado contribui para a impunidade, diz Moro". Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  36. "Prisão antes do trânsito em julgado: mudança de rumos no STF". Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  37. "Na ONU, 193 dos 194 países têm prisão em 1ª ou 2ª instância". 20 March 2018. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  38. "'Prisão em 2ª instância é moralizadora'". Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  39. "Voto obrigatório no mundo". 12 May 2014. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  40. "Rejeição a voto obrigatório atinge 61% e alcança taxa recorde entre brasileiros". 12 May 2014. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  41. "Na democracia o voto é um direito, não uma obrigação". 24 May 2005. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  42. "Principal instrumento da democracia tem de ser facultativo". 24 May 2005. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  43. "A perspectiva social-democrata". Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  44. "Esgotamento do Estado de Bem-Estar afeta concretização de direitos sociais". Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  45. "Do poder constituinte lipoaspiracional". Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  46. "Pesquisadores alertam para sistema tributário regressivo no Brasil; mais pobres são afetados". Retrieved 17 June 2019.
  47. "União tem 93% de gastos obrigatórios". Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
  48. ""Quem vencer as eleições vai governar de mãos amarradas"". Retrieved 29 March 2018.
  49. ""Constituição de 1988 é a causa do atraso do Brasil, diz descendente de D. Pedro II"". Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  50. "A Constituição de 1988 na visão de Roberto Campos". Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  51. "Carta criou despesas sem fonte de recursos". Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  52. "Uma visão crítica". Retrieved 5 January 2020.
  53. "Negócios da OAB". Retrieved 30 August 2012.
  54. "O pior corporativismo". Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  55. Brazil - Constitution:Preamble International Constitutional Law. Retrieved 2011-10-13.
  56. Declaração - Constituição Federal
  57. "Brazil 1988 (rev. 2014)". Constitute. Retrieved 9 April 2015.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Brazilian Constitution of 1988.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.