Brown Corpus

The Brown University Standard Corpus of Present-Day American English (or just Brown Corpus) is an electronic collection of text samples of American English, the first major structured corpus of varied genres. This corpus first set the bar for the scientific study of the frequency and distribution of word categories in everyday language use. Compiled by Henry Kučera and W. Nelson Francis at Brown University, in Rhode Island, it is a general language corpus containing 500 samples of English, totaling roughly one million words, compiled from works published in the United States in 1961.

The Department of Cognitive Linguistic & Psychological Sciences at Brown University

History

In 1967, Kučera and Francis published their classic work, entitled "Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English", which provided basic statistics on what is known today simply as the Brown Corpus.[1]

The Brown Corpus was a carefully compiled selection of current American English, totalling about a million words drawn from a wide variety of sources. Kučera and Francis subjected it to a variety of computational analyses, from which they compiled a rich and variegated opus, combining elements of linguistics, psychology, statistics, and sociology. It has been very widely used in computational linguistics, and was for many years among the most-cited resources in the field.[2]

Shortly after publication of the first lexicostatistical analysis, Boston publisher Houghton-Mifflin approached Kučera to supply a million word, three-line citation base for its new American Heritage Dictionary. This ground-breaking new dictionary, which first appeared in 1969, was the first dictionary to be compiled using corpus linguistics for word frequency and other information.

The initial Brown Corpus had only the words themselves, plus a location identifier for each. Over the following several years part-of-speech tags were applied. The Greene and Rubin tagging program (see under part of speech tagging) helped considerably in this, but the high error rate meant that extensive manual proofreading was required.

The tagged Brown Corpus used a selection of about 80 parts of speech, as well as special indicators for compound forms, contractions, foreign words and a few other phenomena, and formed the model for many later corpora such as the Lancaster-Oslo-Bergen Corpus (British English from the early 1990s) and the Freiburg-Brown Corpus of American English (FROWN) (American English from the early 1990s).[3][4] Tagging the corpus enabled far more sophisticated statistical analysis, such as the work programmed by Andrew Mackie, and documented in books on English grammar.[5]

One interesting result is that even for quite large samples, graphing words in order of decreasing frequency of occurrence shows a hyperbola: the frequency of the n-th most frequent word is roughly proportional to 1/n. Thus "the" constitutes nearly 7% of the Brown Corpus, "to" and "of" more than another 3% each; while about half the total vocabulary of about 50,000 words are hapax legomena: words that occur only once in the corpus.[6] This simple rank-vs.-frequency relationship was noted for an extraordinary variety of phenomena by George Kingsley Zipf (for example, see his The Psychobiology of Language), and is known as Zipf's law.

Although the Brown Corpus pioneered the field of corpus linguistics, by now typical corpora (such as the Corpus of Contemporary American English, the British National Corpus or the International Corpus of English) tend to be much larger, on the order of 100 million words.

Sample distribution

The Corpus consists of 500 samples, distributed across 15 genres in rough proportion to the amount published in 1961 in each of those genres. All works sampled were published in 1961; as far as could be determined they were first published then, and were written by native speakers of American English.

Each sample began at a random sentence-boundary in the article or other unit chosen, and continued up to the first sentence boundary after 2,000 words. In a very few cases miscounts led to samples being just under 2,000 words.

The original data entry was done on upper-case only keypunch machines; capitals were indicated by a preceding asterisk, and various special items such as formulae also had special codes.

The corpus originally (1961) contained 1,014,312 words sampled from 15 text categories:

  • A. PRESS: Reportage (44 texts)
    • Political
    • Sports
    • Society
    • Spot News
    • Financial
    • Cultural
  • B. PRESS: Editorial (27 texts)
    • Institutional Daily
    • Personal
    • Letters to the Editor
  • C. PRESS: Reviews (17 texts)
    • theatre
    • books
    • music
    • dance
  • D. RELIGION (17 texts)
    • Books
    • Periodicals
    • Tracts
  • E. SKILL AND HOBBIES (36 texts)
    • Books
    • Periodicals
  • F. POPULAR LORE (48 texts)
    • Books
    • Periodicals
  • G. BELLES-LETTRES - Biography, Memoirs, etc. (75 texts)
    • Books
    • Periodicals
  • H. MISCELLANEOUS: US Government & House Organs (30 texts)
    • Government Documents
    • Foundation Reports
    • Industry Reports
    • College Catalog
    • Industry House organ
  • J. LEARNED (80 texts)
    • Natural Sciences
    • Medicine
    • Mathematics
    • Social and Behavioral Sciences
    • Political Science, Law, Education
    • Humanities
    • Technology and Engineering
  • K. FICTION: General (29 texts)
    • Novels
    • Short Stories
  • L. FICTION: Mystery and Detective Fiction (24 texts)
    • Novels
    • Short Stories
  • M. FICTION: Science (6 texts)
    • Novels
    • Short Stories
  • N. FICTION: Adventure and Western (29 texts)
    • Novels
    • Short Stories
  • P. FICTION: Romance and Love Story (29 texts)
    • Novels
    • Short Stories
  • R. HUMOR (9 texts)
    • Novels
    • Essays, etc.

Part-of-speech tags used
Tag Definition
CCcoordinating conjunction (and, or)
CDcardinal numeral (one, two, 2, etc.)
CSsubordinating conjunction (if, although)
EXexistential there
INpreposition (in, at, on)
JJadjective
JJAadjective + Auxiliary
JJCadjective, Comparative
JJCCAdjective + Conjunction
JJSsemantically superlative adjective (chief, top)
JJFAdjective + Female
JJMAdjective + Male
NNsingular or mass noun
NNANoun + Auxiliary
NNCNoun + Conjunction
NNSplural noun
NNPproper noun or part of name phrase
NNPCproper noun + Conjunction
PRPpersonal pronoun, singular
PRPSpersonal pronoun, plural
PRP$Possessive pronoun
RBadverb
RBRcomparative adverb
RBSsuperlative adverb
VBverb, base form
VBAverb + Auxiliary, singular, present
VBDverb, past tense
VBGverb, present participle/gerund
VBNverb, past participle
VBZverb, 3rd. singular present
FWForeign Words
SYMSymbols
PUNAll Punctuations

See also

References
  1. Francis, W. Nelson & Henry Kucera. 1967. Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
  2. Francis, W. Nelson & Henry Kucera. 1979. BROWN CORPUS MANUAL: Manual of Information to Accompany a Standard Corpus of Present-Day Edited American English for Use with Digital Computers. http://icame.uib.no/brown/bcm.html.
  3. Hundt, Marianne, Andrea Sand & Rainer Siemund. 1998. Manual of Information to Accompany the Freiburg-Brown Corpus of American English (FROWN). http://khnt.hit.uib.no/icame/manuals/frown/INDEX.HTM
  4. Leech, Geoffrey & Nicholas Smith. 2005. Extending the possibilities of corpus-based research on English in the twentieth century: A prequel to LOB and FLOB. ICAME Journal 29. 83–98.
  5. Winthrop Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera. 1983. Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar, Houghton Mifflin.
  6. Kirsten Malmkjær, The Linguistics Encyclopedia, 2nd ed, Routledge, 2002, ISBN 0-415-22210-9, p. 87.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.