David Galenson

Galenson is known for postulating a new theory of artistic creativity.[4] Based on a study of the ages at which various innovative artists made their greatest contributions to the field, Galenson's theory divides all artists into two classes: conceptualists, who make radical innovations in their field at a very early age; and experimentalists, whose innovations develop slowly over a long period of experimentation and refinement. [5]

Although Galenson initially developed his theory from data solely concerning the visual arts, he has since also investigated conceptual and experimental innovators among poets, novelists, film makers, popular musicians and economists.[6][7] Elias et al (2020)[8] and Elias et al (2022)[9] combine Galenson´s approach with Paul Romer approach to innovation to analize innovations and innovators in the Argentine wine industry and the Peruvian cuisine respectively.

Among the examples Galenson cites of conceptualists are:

• F. Scott Fitzgerald, who wrote The Great Gatsby at 29.
• Pablo Picasso, who painted Les Demoiselles d'Avignon at 26.
• Orson Welles, who made Citizen Kane at 26.
• Nicolas Garcia Uriburu, who dyed the waters of Venice's Grand Canal green at 30.

Among the examples he gives of experimentalists are:

• Paul Cézanne, whose most recent work, the paintings of his last few years, come to be considered his greatest contribution, and would directly influence every important artistic development of the decades that followed.[10]
• Mark Twain, who wrote Adventures of Huckleberry Finn at 50.
• Alfred Hitchcock, who made Vertigo at 59.[11]
• Charles Darwin, who spent decades accumulating evidence on evolution and its mechanisms, and made his greatest contributions late in his career.[12]

In 2008, he was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship in fine arts research.

Comics theorist Scott McCloud seems to have anticipated some aspects of Galenson's theory in his 1993 book Understanding Comics.

He talks about his ideas in the Shaping Business Minds Through Art podcast in 2020.[13]

Galenson's distinction between conceptual and experimental is based upon evidence from the age in which artists were most productive creatively. However, other studies have challenged that the underlying cause is not age, but are due to artistic movements which occur in certain periods. Artists in artistic movements tend to be creative regardless of their age.[14] Thus, Galenson's theory has been criticized for overemphasizing the individual and overlooking the collective aspects in supporting creativity.

• David Galenson's homepage
• Article about him in Wired
• Faculty page at University of Chicago's Department of Economics
• University of Chicago Experts Guide
• Arts of Innovation, which applies Galenson's approach to innovation in business, science, invention and daily life.