Davinder Singh (lawyer)
Davinder Singh Sachdev s/o Amar Singh SC (born 1 August 1957) is a Singaporean lawyer and former politician. A member of the governing People's Action Party (PAP), he was the Member of Parliament (MP) representing the Toa Payoh East ward of Bishan–Toa Payoh GRC from 1997 to 2006 and the Toa Payoh ward of Toa Payoh GRC from 1988 to 1991.
Davinder Singh | |
---|---|
Member of Parliament for Bishan–Toa Payoh GRC (Toa Payoh East) | |
In office 2 January 1997 – 6 May 2006 | |
Preceded by | Constituency Established |
Succeeded by | Josephine Teo |
Member of Parliament for Toa Payoh GRC (Toa Payoh) | |
In office 3 September 1988 – 31 August 1991 | |
Preceded by | Constituency Established |
Succeeded by | Constituency Abolished |
Personal details | |
Born | Davinder Singh Sachdev s/o Amar Singh 1 August 1957 Colony of Singapore |
Political party | People's Action Party |
Alma mater | National University of Singapore |
Occupation | Lawyer, former politician |
Singh was widely considered Singapore's top litigator,[1] he is best known for representing Singaporean prime ministers Lee Kuan Yew and Lee Hsien Loong in civil lawsuits, and for acting for Singapore Press Holdings in the National Kidney Foundation scandal. He worked at the law firm Drew & Napier for 37 years, spending 17 years as Chief Executive Officer, and the last two as Executive Chairman.[2] In 2019, he left Drew & Napier to start his own firm, Davinder Singh Chambers.
Early life and education
Singh's father, Amar Singh, was born in Quetta, British India (present-day Balochistan, Pakistan) and left for Southeast Asia as an economic migrant. His mother was born in Kuala Lumpur, British Malaya. Amar Singh moved first to Kuala Lumpur, and then to early post-independence Singapore with his family, working as a travel agent. Davinder Singh grew up alongside two brothers and two sisters.[3]
Singh completed his early education in the Jesuit Saint Michael's School, following in his two older brothers' footsteps. He went on to attend Saint Joseph's Institution, as was the normal progression of students at Saint Michael's School at that time. He was not focused on academics, and, to his parents' disappointment, entered the arts stream rather than the sciences stream after his Secondary 2 examinations. He performed well in his GCE Ordinary Level examinations, enabling him entry into the newly-established National Junior College, then a prestigious government school in Singapore.[3] Singh spent two years there, and then served his national service as an officer in the Singapore Army before attending the National University of Singapore, where he read law.[3]
Singh's choice to read law was partially influenced by an event at Saint Joseph's Institution when his usual teacher was absent and his principal stood in as relief teacher. The principal set the students a test, and looking at Singh's paper, asked him whether his father was a lawyer. Singh answered no, but came away feeling that he must have impressed his principal very much to have earned such a remark. The idea stuck in Singh's head that he had a talent for argument.[3]
Singh's focus in law school was not academic. He described his view of university as "a great opportunity to experience varsity life", and treated the study of law as incidental to the experience.[3]
In the first three years of his education, Singh did not give any thought to what he would do in practice. Internships and work placements were uncommon at that time. Singh, however, was attending law school on a scholarship from DBS Bank, which came with a job and a bond. One of the requirements of the scholarship was that he spent three weeks a year at the bank, which he did. In his third year, he decided that he did not enjoy the prospect of being in-house counsel at a bank. That year, he attempted the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition in Washington, D.C., with three friends, Steven Chong, V. K. Rajah and Jimmy Yim. The team became the first from the National University of Singapore to win the prestigious moot, and Singh was named the Best Oralist in the Championship round.[4] Singh decided that he enjoyed advocacy, and charted his career accordingly.[3]
Legal career
Pupillage
By the end of law school, Singh had decided not to join DBS Bank as in-house counsel. He applied to various law firms for pupillage, but received rejections in various forms. Some of the reasons given included that he spoke no languages other than English. One firm informed him that DBS Bank was one of its clients and the firm did not want to displease them by offering a job to one of their bond-breakers. Singh ended up without alternatives, and approached one of his lecturers in banking law with his difficulty. This lecturer recommended him to Harry Elias, then a lawyer at Drew & Napier, who offered Singh pupillage at his firm.[3]
Singh described pupillage as life-changing. He entered Drew & Napier in May 1983, one of a number of pupils. Through a stroke of administrative luck, he was assigned pupil to Joseph Grimberg, then a well-known advocate in Singapore, whose clients included Singapore's prime minister Lee Kuan Yew. Singh described his experience under Grimberg is transformational, filling him with the inspiration he had earlier lacked. He decided then that he wanted to be "the next Joe Grimberg".[3]
Singh learnt through experience. Since Grimberg was a senior lawyer, he tended to be assigned complex cases. Singh also absorbed Grimberg's intellectual process and work ethic. When pupillage was complete, Grimberg retained Singh, making Singh his legal assistant and paying off Singh's bond. Singh, in turn, strived to make himself indispensable to Grimberg. Singh's early work was on a breadth of commercial disputes, which Grimberg focused on.[3]
In 1997, Singh was appointed to the first batch of Senior Counsels in Singapore. He is the Chairman of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre.[5]
2005 National Kidney Foundation scandal
In 2005, Singh represented Singapore Press Holdings in a lawsuit brought against them by T. T. Durai, Chief Executive Officer of the National Kidney Foundation (NKF), for defamation in relation to an article written by one of their correspondents. Durai dropped the case on the second day of the trial.
2014–15 Roy Ngerng defamation case
In 2014, Singh and three other lawyers from Drew & Napier represented Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in a defamation lawsuit against blogger Roy Ngerng, who was represented by M Ravi and Eugene Thuraisingam. On 7 November 2014, Justice Lee Seiu Kin found Ngerng to have defamed Lee Hsien Loong in an online article whose contents suggested that the Prime Minister was guilty of criminal misappropriation.[6][7] In July 2015, during a hearing to assess the amount of damages he has to pay Lee Hsien Loong, Ngerng broke down in tears while he was being cross-examined by Singh.[8] On 17 December 2015, the judge handed down a judgement ordering Ngerng to pay S$100,000 in general damages and S$50,000 in aggravated damages. Ngerng, through his lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam, proposed to pay the S$150,000 in instalments – a request granted by Lee Hsien Loong on the condition that Ngerng paid the S$30,000 in hearing costs immediately, i.e., by 16 March 2016. Ngerng is expected to repay $100 a month from 1 April 2016 onwards over five years until 1 April 2021 when instalments are increased to S$1,000 until the full sum has been paid by the year 2033.
Political career
In 1987, Home Affairs Minister S. Jayakumar, who had taught Singh constitutional law when he was a lecturer at the National University of Singapore, asked Singh to consider becoming a Member of Parliament. Singh, at that time, had a busy practice and was focused on his career, and was not sure that he was prepared for the commitment. However, Singh decided to accept, for a number of reasons. Singh's parents were ardent admirers of Singapore's first prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew, and Singh knew that joining the People's Action Party would make his mother proud and would have made his late father proud too. Singh was himself an admirer of Lee. Once, when asked by Grimberg what he wanted to be in fifteen years, Singh replied, "I'd like to be Lee Kuan Yew's lawyer", to which Grimberg replied, "You will be."[3] He also felt that contributing as a parliamentarian was a rare opportunity would add a valuable dimension to life.[3] Singh ran in the 1988 Singaporean general election and won in an walkover, and from 1988 to 2006, Singh served as a Member of Parliament for Bishan-Toa Payoh Group Representation Constituency.
References
- Lum, Selina (24 January 2019). "Top litigator Davinder Singh to leave Drew & Napier and set up own firm". The Straits Times. Archived from the original on 25 January 2019. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
Mr Singh was in the pioneer batch of senior counsel appointed in 1997, is widely considered Singapore's top litigator. He was once described by Asia Pacific Legal 500 as being "without peer at the bar".
- Tay, Peck Gek (24 January 2019). "Davinder Singh to leave Drew & Napier and set up own practice". Business Times. Archived from the original on 26 January 2019. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
- Sreenevasan, G., 2021. 6: Davinder Singh SC. [Podcast] Meet The Advocates. Available on Spotify. [Accessed 10 March 2021].
- "1982 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition". Jessup History. International Law Students Association. Archived from the original on 2 March 2019. Retrieved 1 March 2019.
- "SIAC Announces Appointment of New Chairman".
- Lee Hsien Loong v Roy Ngerng Yi Ling [2014] SGHC 230
- Sim, Walter (3 July 2015). "The case in two minutes: Lee Hsien Loong vs Roy Ngerng". The Straits Times. Archived from the original on 6 July 2015. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
- Law, Elizabeth (3 July 2015). "Roy Ngerng cries in court". The New Paper. Archived from the original on 6 July 2015. Retrieved 5 July 2015.