Denunciation (penology)

Denunciation in the context of sentencing philosophy demonstrates the disapproval of an act by society expressed by the imposition of a punishment. The purpose of denunciation is not so much to punish the offender but to demonstrate to law-abiding citizens that the particular behaviour which is being punished, or denounced, is not acceptable.[1] In this respect, it has been argued that "punishment is not like a private letter; it is like a billboard put up on a busy street… it is also meant for the victim of crime and for the public at large”.[2] Denunciation is one of five different objectives that punishment is thought to achieve; the other four objectives are deterrence, incapacitation (for the protection of society), retribution and rehabilitation.

Criminology and penology
Theory
Types of crime
Methods
Penology
Justice in penology
Schools
Subfields
Browse

Theories

Instrumental denunciation

Durkheim (1960) argued that denunciation was a form of education in that punishment "reinforce(s) the conscience collective of society and thereby ensure(s) that members of society continued to refrain from crime". This is a forward looking or utilitarian approach which is similar to the concept of deterrence.[3]

Expressive denunciation

This view of denunciation is that punishment is justified because it expresses society's abhorrence of crime and shows the commitment of a particular society to its own values. This perspective does not 'look forward' as it does not include an intention to change or affect anyone's behaviour.[4]

Communicative theory of punishment

Antony Duff (1986) claims that punishment is "an attempt at moral dialogue with offenders, censuring their actions and hoping to secure their ‘contrition’, with the result that they mend their ways." Cavadino says this view 'resembles denunciation' but also contains elements of reform and reintegrative shaming.[5]

Legislative applications

Some jurisdictions include 'denunciation' as a sentencing purpose in their legislation. For instance, The Canadian Criminal Code describes the principles and purpose of sentencing in section 718. One of those purposes is denunciation, described as "making sure the punishment reflects society’s abhorrence for the crime committed".[6] In New Zealand, section 7 of the Sentencing Act 2002 describes eight different purposes of sentencing for 'dealing with offenders'. The purpose under section 7(a) is "to hold the offender accountable for harm done to the victim and the community by the offending and 7(e) is "to denounce the conduct in which the offender was involved."[7]

Effectiveness

Cavadino says research indicates that citizens generally seem to have sufficient respect for the justice system to obey the laws in society and are not particularly influenced by the level of punishment imposed for particular offences - bearing in mind that people often have quite inaccurate beliefs about what the penalties are for particular offences. As a consequence, he argues that using the notion of denunciation to justify punishing offenders is a dubious mechanism to use.[8]

See also

References
  1. Ronald J. Rychlak. Society's Moral Right to Punish: A Further Exploration of the Denunciation Theory of Punishment, Tulane Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 2, 1990.
  2. Bill Wringe. Rethinking expressive theories of punishment: why denunciation is a better bet than communication or pure expression. Bilkent University, 06800 Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey, June 2016, p.5.
  3. Cavadino, Justifying Punishment, p 46-48.
  4. Cavadino, Justifying Punishment, p 46-48.
  5. Cavadino, Justifying Punishment, p 48.
  6. Purpose and Principles of Sentencing in Canada
  7. Purposes of sentencing or otherwise dealing with offenders, Sentencing Act 2002
  8. Cavadino, Justifying Punishment, p 47.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.