Fairey Battle

The Fairey Battle is a British single-engine light bomber that was designed and manufactured by the Fairey Aviation Company. It was developed during the mid-1930s for the Royal Air Force (RAF) as a monoplane successor to the Hawker Hart and Hind biplanes. The Battle was powered by the same high-performance Rolls-Royce Merlin piston engine that powered various contemporary British fighters such as the Hawker Hurricane and Supermarine Spitfire. As the Battle, with its three-man crew and bomb load, was much heavier than the fighters, it was therefore much slower. Though a great improvement over the aircraft that preceded it, its relatively slow speed, limited range and inadequate defensive armament of only two .303 (7.7 mm) machine guns left it highly vulnerable to enemy fighters and anti-aircraft fire.[1]

Battle
Role Light bomber
National origin United Kingdom
Manufacturer Fairey Aviation Company
First flight 10 March 1936
Introduction June 1937
Retired 1949
Status Retired
Primary users Royal Air Force
Belgian Air Force
Royal Australian Air Force
Royal Canadian Air Force
Produced 1937–1940
Number built 2,201

The Fairey Battle was used on operations early in the Second World War. During the "Phoney War" the type achieved the distinction of scoring the first aerial victory of an RAF aircraft in the conflict. In May 1940, the Battles of the Advanced Air Striking Force suffered many losses, frequently in excess of 50 per cent of aircraft sorties per mission. By the end of 1940 the type had been withdrawn from front-line service and relegated to training units overseas. As an aircraft that had been considered to hold great promise in the pre-war era, the Battle proved to be one of the most disappointing aircraft in RAF service.[1]

Development

Origins

In April 1933, the British Air Ministry issued Specification P.27/32 which sought a two-seat single-engine monoplane day bomber to replace the Hawker Hart and Hind biplane bombers then in service with the Royal Air Force (RAF).[2] A requirement of the prospective aircraft was to be capable of carrying 1,000 lb (450 kg) of bombs over a distance of 1,000 mi (1,600 km) while flying at a speed of 200 mph (320 km/h).[2] According to aviation author Tony Buttler, during the early 1920s, Britain had principally envisioned that a war with France as its enemy and the range to reach Paris was sought.[3] According to aerospace publication Air International, a key motivational factor in the Air Ministry's development of Specification P.27/32 had been for the corresponding aircraft to act as an insurance policy in the event that heavier bombers were banned by the 1932 Geneva Disarmament Conference.[4]

The Fairey Aviation Company were keen to produce a design to meet the demands of Specification P.27/32 and commenced work upon such a design.[2] The Belgian aeronautical engineer Marcel Lobelle served as the aircraft's principal designer. One of the early decisions made by Lobelle on the project was the use of the newly developed Rolls-Royce Merlin I engine, which had been selected due to its favourable power and compact frontal area.[2] The Merlin engine was quickly paired to a de Havilland Propellers-built three-bladed variable-pitch propeller unit. The choice of engine enabled the designing of the aircraft to possess exceptionally clean lines and a subsequently generous speed performance.[2] The resulting design was an all-metal single-engine aircraft, which adopted a low-mounted cantilever monoplane wing and was equipped with a retractable tail wheel undercarriage.[5]

A total of four companies decided to formally respond to Specification P.27/32, these being the Fairey, Hawker Aircraft, Armstrong Whitworth Aircraft, and Bristol Aeroplane Company.[2] Of the submissions made, the Air Ministry selected Armstrong Whitworth and Fairey to produce prototypes to demonstrate their designs. On 10 March 1936, the first Fairey prototype, K4303, equipped with a Merlin I engine capable of generating 1,030 hp (770 kW), performed its maiden flight at Hayes, Middlesex.[2][6] The prototype was promptly transferred to RAF Martlesham Heath, Woodbridge, Suffolk for service trials, during which it attained a maximum speed of 257 MPH and reportedly achieved a performance in advance of any contemporary day bomber.[2]

Even prior to the first flight of the prototype, some members of the Air Staff had concluded that both the specified range and bomb load, to which the aircraft had been designed to, were insufficient to enable its viable use in a prospective conflict with a re-emergent Germany.[2] Despite these performance concerns, there was also considerable pressure for the Battle to be rapidly placed into mass production in order that it could contribute to a wider increase of the RAF's frontline combat aircraft strength in line with similar strides being made during the 1930s by the German Luftwaffe. As such, the initial production order placed for the type, for the manufacture of 155 aircraft built as per the requirements of Specification P.23/35, which had received the name Battle, had been issued in advance of the first flight of the prototype.[2]

Production
Mechanics of No. 226 Squadron RAF overhaul the engines of their Battles in a hangar at Reims, France

In 1936, further orders were placed for Fairey to build additional Battles to Specification P.14/36.[7] In June 1937, the first production Battle, K7558, conducted its maiden flight.[2] K7558 was later used to perform a series of official handling and performance trials in advance to the wider introduction of the type to operational service. During these trials, it demonstrated the Battle's ability to conduct missions of a 1,000-mile range while under a full bomb load.[2] The first 136 Fairey-built Battles were the first to be powered by the Merlin I engine.[2] By the end of 1937, 85 Battles had been completed and a number of RAF squadrons had been re-equipped with the type, or were otherwise in the process of re-equipping.[7]

Ground crew unloading 250 lb (110 kg) GP bombs in front of a Battle, 1939–1940

As the RAF embarked on what became a substantial pre-war expansion programme, the Battle was promptly recognised as being a priority production target. At one point a total of 2,419 aircraft were on order for the service.[8][9] In June 1937, the first aircraft was completed at Hayes, but all subsequent aircraft were manufactured at Fairey's newly completed factory at Heaton Chapel, Stockport, Cheshire.[5] Completed aircraft were promptly dispatched for testing at the company's facility adjacent to RAF Ringway, about 6 miles away. A total of 1,156 aircraft were produced by Fairey.[8][9] Subsequently, as part of government-led wartime production planning, a shadow factory operated by the Austin Motor Company at Cofton Hackett, Longbridge, also produced the type, manufacturing a total of 1,029 aircraft to Specification P.32/36. On 22 July 1938, the first Austin-built Battle, L4935, conducted its maiden flight.[10] At that point, concerns that the aircraft was obsolete had become widespread, but due to the difficulties associated with getting other aircraft types into production, and the labour force having already been established, stop-gap orders were maintained, and production continued at a steady rate through to late 1940.[10]

A further 16 were built by Fairey for service with the Belgian Air Force.[11] The Belgian Battles were delivered in early 1938, and were differentiated from British-built examples by having a longer radiator cowling and a smoother camouflage finish.[8][9] In September 1940, all production activity came to a close and the final assembly lines were shuttered. Overall production of the Battle during its entire manufacturing life was 2,201 machines, including 16 for Belgium.[11]

A number of Battles which had been originally completed as bombers were later converted to serve in different roles, such as target tugs and trainer aircraft.[9]

Design
218 Squadron RAF Fairey Battles over France, circa 1940

The Fairey Battle was a single-engine monoplane light bomber, powered by a Rolls-Royce Merlin engine. Production aircraft were progressively powered by various models of the Merlin engine, such as the Merlin I, II, III (most numerous) and V but all bomber variants were called the Battle Mk I.[11] The Battle had a relatively clean design, having adopted a slim oval-shaped fuselage which was manufactured in two sections.[2] The forward section, in front of the cockpit, included a steel tubular structure to support the engine; the rear section was of a metal monocoque structure comprised hoop frames and Z-section stringers which was built on jigs.[12] The structure of the aircraft involved several innovations and firsts for Fairey, it had the distinction of being the company's first low-wing monoplane; it also was the first light-alloy stressed-skin construction aircraft to be produced by the firm.[2]

The wing of the Battle used a two-part construction, the centre section being integral with the fuselage.[13] The internal structure of the wings relied upon steel spars which varied in dimension towards the wing tips; the ailerons, elevators and rudder all were metal-framed with fabric coverings, while the split trailing edge flaps were entirely composed of metal.[13]

The Battle had a crew of three, pilot, observer/bomb aimer and radio operator/air gunner, under one long continuous canopy which extended between the two cockpits set at the leading and trailing edges of the wing.[13] The aircraft had a fixed .303 Browning machine gun mounted in the starboard wing for the pilot and a free .303 Vickers K machine gun in the rear cockpit for the gunner. The forward view past the long canopy from the observer's station was virtually non-existent. The bomb aiming position was in the bottom of the aircraft with sighting done in a prone position through an open aiming panel behind the radiator outlet. If the pilot's canopy was open a rush of hot air and glycol/oil mist through the open panel[14] would prevent the bomb aimer from using the Mk. VII Course Setting Bomb Sight.[13][15]

Fairey Battle, K7650/63-M, of No. 63 Squadron, RAF Benson, November 1939. No. 63 was the first operational squadron to be equipped with the type

The armament and crew of the aircraft were similar to the Bristol Blenheim bomber: three crew, 1,000 lbs standard bomb load and two machine guns, although the Battle was a single-engine bomber with less horsepower.[16] The Battle had a standard payload of four 250 lb (113 kg) bombs which was carried in cells contained within the internal space of the wings.[17] Maximum bomb load was 1,500 lb (680 kg), with two additional 250 lb (113 kg) bombs on under-wing racks or with two 500 lb (227 kg) bombs carried externally under bomb bays and two 250 lb (113 kg) bombs on under-wing racks.[17] The bombs were mounted on hydraulic jacks and were normally released via trap doors; during a dive bombing attack, they were lowered below the surface of the wing.[13]

The air gunner of a Battle mans the aircraft's defensive weapon, a single pintle-mounted rapid firing Vickers K machine gun, France, 1940
The bomb aimer position in the Battle was in the aircraft's floor. Note the CSBS Mk. VII equipment

The Battle was a robust aircraft which was frequently described as being easy to fly, even for relatively inexperienced pilots.[18] The pilot was provided with good external visibility and the cockpit was considered to be roomy and comfortable for the era but the tasks of simultaneously deploying the flaps and the retractable undercarriage, which included a safety catch, has been highlighted as posing considerable complication.[18] Climate control within the cockpit was also reportedly poor.[7]

By the time that the Battle was entering service in 1937 it had already been rendered obsolete by the rapid advances in aircraft technology. The performance and capabilities of fighter aircraft had increased to outstrip the modest performance gains that the light bomber had achieved over its biplane antecedents.[19] For defence, the Battle had been armed only with a single Browning machine gun and a trainable Vickers K in the rear position; in service, these proved to be woefully inadequate.[5] The Battle lacked other common defensive features of the era, such as an armoured cockpit and self-sealing fuel tanks.[20] The Battle was considered well-armoured by the standards of 1940, although there was an emphasis on protection against small-arms fire from the ground.[21] No RAF bombers were fitted with self-sealing tanks at the beginning of the war, although they were hastily fitted once the necessity became apparent. Since it was some time before self-sealing tanks could be mass-produced, it was a common stop-gap in 1940, even into 1941, to simply armour the rear of the fuel tanks with single or double layers of 4 mm armour.[22] The Battle, along with the rest of the early-war inventory, was taken out of front-line duties before it had a chance to be fitted with self-sealing tanks.

Operational history
Wreckage of a Battle shot down by the Wehrmacht, France, May 1940

Introduction

In June 1937, No. 63 Squadron, based at RAF Upwood, Cambridgeshire, became the first RAF squadron to be equipped with the Fairey Battle.[23] On 20 May 1937, the delivery of the first Battle to No. 63 occurred; following further deliveries, the squadron was initially assigned to perform development trials. The type holds the distinction of being the first operational aircraft powered by a Rolls-Royce Merlin engine to enter service, having beaten the debut of the Hawker Hurricane fighter by a matter of months.

By May 1939, there were a total of 17 RAF squadrons that had been equipped with the Battle. While many of these were frontline combat squadrons, some, under the No. 2 Group, were assigned to a non-mobilising training role; on the eve of the outbreak of war, these squadrons were reassigned to operate under No. 6 Training Group or alternatively served as reserve squadrons.[10]

Wartime bomber service

The Battle was obsolete by the start of the Second World War, but remained a front-line RAF bomber owing to a lack of a suitable replacement. On 2 September 1939, during the "Phoney War", 10 Battle squadrons were deployed to pre-selected airfields in France to form a portion of the vanguard of the British RAF Advanced Air Striking Force, which was independent of the similarly-tasked Army-led British Expeditionary Force.[10] Once the Battles arrived, the aircraft were dispersed and efforts were made to camouflage or otherwise obscure their presence; the envisioned purpose of their deployment had been that, in the event of German commencement of bombing attacks, the Battles based in France could launch retaliatory raids upon Germany, specifically in the Ruhr valley region, and would benefit from their closer range than otherwise possible from the British mainland.[24]

Initial wartime missions were to perform aerial reconnaissance of the Siegfried Line during daylight, resulting in occasional skirmishes and losses.[25] On 20 September 1939, a German Messerschmitt Bf 109 was shot down by Battle gunner Sgt F. Letchford[26] during a patrol near Aachen; this occasion is recognised as being the RAF's first aerial victory of the war.[25][27] Nonetheless, the Battle was hopelessly outclassed by Luftwaffe fighters, being almost 100 mph (160 km/h) slower than the contemporary Bf 109 at 14,000 ft (4,300 m). That same day, three Battles were engaged by German fighters, resulting in two Battles being lost.[25] During the winter of 1939–1940, the Advanced Air Striking Force underwent restructuring; some of the Battle-equipped squadrons were returned to the UK while their place was taken by Bristol Blenheim-equipped squadrons instead.[25] The activities of the Advanced Air Striking Force were principally restricted to training exercises during this time.[25]

Upon the commencement of the Battle of France in May 1940, Battles were called upon to perform unescorted, low-level tactical attacks against the advancing German army; this use of the type placed the aircraft at risk of attack from Luftwaffe fighters and within easy range of light anti-aircraft guns.[25] In the first of two sorties carried out by Battles on 10 May 1940, three out of eight aircraft were lost, while a further 10 out of 24 were shot down in the second sortie, giving a total of 13 lost in that day's attacks, with the remainder suffering damage. Despite bombing from as low as 250 ft (76 m), their attacks were recorded as having had little impact on the German columns.[28] During the following day, nine Belgian Air Force Battles attacked bridges over the Albert Canal that connects to the Meuse River, losing six aircraft and in another RAF sortie that day against a German column, only one Battle out of eight survived.[9][29][30]

On 12 May, a formation of five Battles of 12 Squadron attacked two road bridges over the Albert Canal; four of these aircraft were destroyed while the final aircraft crash-landing upon its return to its base.[31][32] Two Victoria Crosses were awarded posthumously for the action, to Flying Officer Donald Garland and air observer/navigator sergeant Thomas Gray of Battle serial P2204 coded PH-K, for pressing home the attack in spite of the heavy defensive fire.[33] The third crew member, rear gunner Leading Aircraftsman Lawrence Reynolds, did not share the award. Both fighters and flak had proved lethal for the Battles. Although Garland's Battle managed to destroy one span of the bridge, the German army quickly erected a pontoon bridge to replace it.[34]

On 14 May 1940, in a desperate attempt to stop German forces crossing the Meuse, the Advanced Air Striking Force launched an "all-out" attack by all available bombers against the German bridgehead and pontoon bridges at Sedan. The light bombers were attacked by swarms of opposing fighters and were devastated. Out of a strike force of 63 Battles and eight Bristol Blenheims, 40 (including 35 Battles) were lost.[35][36] After these abortive raids, the Battle was switched to mainly night attacks, resulting in much lower losses.[37]

A similar situation befell the German Luftwaffe during the early days of the Battle of Britain, when the Junkers Ju 87 Stuka dive bomber suffered equivalent losses in a similar role. With the exception of a few successful twin-engine designs such as the de Havilland Mosquito, Bristol Beaufighter and Douglas A-20, low-level attack missions passed into the hands of single-engine, fighter-bomber aircraft, such as the Hawker Hurricane, Hawker Typhoon and Republic P-47 Thunderbolt.

On 15 June 1940, the last remaining aircraft of the Advanced Air Striking Force returned to Britain. In six weeks almost 200 Battles had been lost, with 99 lost between 10 and 16 May.[38] After the return from France, for a short period of time, the RAF continued to rely on the light bomber. Reforming No. 1 Group and later equipping four new Polish squadrons with the type, it continued to be deployed in operations against shipping massed in the Channel ports for Operation Sealion. Their last combat sortie was mounted on the night of 15/16 October 1940 by No. 301 (Polish) Squadron in a raid on Boulogne, and Nos 12 and 142 Squadrons bombing Calais. Shortly afterwards Battle squadrons of No. 1 Group were re-equipped with Vickers Wellington medium bombers.[39] Battles were operated into 1941 by 88 and 226 Squadrons in Northern Ireland and 98 Squadron in Iceland, for coastal patrol work.[40]

East Africa

The South African Air Force were also supplied with some Battles. In August 1940, No. 11 Squadron took possession of at least four, which were flown north to be operated in the Italian East Africa (Ethiopia, Italian Somaliland and Eritrea) campaign. They conducted bombing and reconnaissance operations. Whereas in France the RAF's Battles had encountered modern German fighters in large numbers, the South Africans faced a smaller number of Italian biplane fighters (Fiat CR.32 and CR.42), which enabled the aircrews to contribute more effectively to the campaign; but not without several losses, especially when surprised above some predictable targets (air bases, ports etc.). Italian biplanes dived as fast as possible over the bombers, trying to shoot them down in the first pass.[41][42]

Greece

The last combat operations carried out by Fairey Battles were during the Italian and German invasion of Greece, from the end of 1940 until April 1941. A few Fairey Battles of the RAF and about a dozen belonging to the RHAF – serial numbers starting from B274 – participated in secondary bombing roles against enemy infantry. Most of them were destroyed on the ground by Luftwaffe air attacks on the airfields of Tanagra and Tatoi north of Athens between end of March and mid April 1941. No significant contribution of this type was reported during this period, although some hits were recorded by the Greek Air Force.

Prior to the Second World War, in spring 1939, the Polish government had placed an order for 100 Battle bombers, but none of these were delivered before the outbreak of war. The first 22 aircraft were sent in early September 1939 on two ships to Constanta in Romania, to be received there by the Polish crews, but the ships were ordered back while in Istanbul when the fall of Poland became inevitable. They were next offered to Turkey.[43]

Some sources state that the Fairey Battle was licence-produced in Denmark for the Danish Air Force before the German invasion in 1940, but no such plane is known to have been completed.[44]

Trainer role
Fairey Battle Trainer

While found to be inadequate as a bomber aircraft in the Second World War, the Fairey Battle found a new niche in its later service life. As the Fairey Battle T, for which it was furnished with a dual-cockpit arrangement in place of the standard long canopy, the type served as a trainer aircraft. The Battle T was equipped with dual-controls in the cockpit and optionally featured a Bristol-built Type I gun turret when employed as a bombing/gunnery training.[45][46] As the winch-equipped Fairey Battle TT (target tug), it was used as a target-towing aircraft to support airborne gunnery training exercises. Furthermore, Battles were not only used in this role by the RAF, several overseas operators opted to acquire the type as a training platform.[47]

In August 1939, the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) received its first batch of eight Battles at RCAF Station Borden, Ontario, Canada.[45] A total of 802 Battles were eventually delivered from England, serving in various roles and configurations, including dual-control trainers, target-tugs, and gunnery trainers for both the Bombing and Gunnery schools of the Commonwealth Air Training Plan.[46] Canadian use of the Battle declined as more advanced aircraft, such as the Bristol Bolingbroke and North American Harvard, were introduced; the type remained in RCAF service until shortly after the end of hostilities in 1945.[45]

The Battle served as a trainer with the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF), which allocated it the prefix A22.[48] On 30 April 1940, the first four RAAF Battles were delivered to No. 1 Aircraft Depot; on 29 June 1940, the first assembled aircraft, P5239, conducted its first flight. Deliveries occurred at a steady pace until the last Battle was received on 7 December 1943.[49] These aircraft were a mix of bomber, target tug, and dual-control trainer variants; they were mainly used by Bombing and Gunnery schools until 1945; the last aircraft were phased out in 1949.[49]

Following an initial evaluation using a handful of aircraft, the SAAF purchased a number of Battles. Operated in the Western Desert and East Africa, SAAF Battles were used into early 1942.[33] Battles were also sold to the Turkish Air Force, which was reportedly pleased by the type's manoeuvrability.[47] The type remained in RAF service, in secondary roles, until 1949.

Engine testbed
Technicians performing work upon the engine of a Battle, c. 1939–1940

While the Battle was no longer viable as a frontline combat aircraft, its benign handling characteristics meant that it was an ideal platform for testing engines, and it was used in this role to evaluate engines up to 2,000 hp (1,500 kW) including the Rolls-Royce Exe, Fairey Prince (H-16) and Napier Dagger.[49] These trials were often conducted to support the development of other aircraft, such as the Fairey Spearfish, as well as the suitability of the individual engines.[49]

As part of a study of potential alternative engines in the event of supply interruptions of the Merlin engine, which normally powered the type, were encountered, a single Canadian Battle, R7439, was re-engined by Fairchild Aircraft with a Wright R-1820 Cyclone radial engine. R7439 was the sole aircraft to be equipped with this powerplant.[45]

In 1939, one Battle, K9370, underwent extensive modifications in order to test the Fairey Monarch 2,000 hp (1,500 kW) or higher engine; in addition to the engine itself, K9370 was furnished with electrically-controlled three-bladed contra-rotating propellers and a large ventral radiator.[49] According to Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1946–47, the aircraft was shipped to the US after 86 hours test time in December 1941. Testing continued for a time at Wright Airfield, Liberty County, Georgia.[49]

Two aircraft, K9270 and L5286, acted as flying testbeds for the Napier Sabre engine.[49] Modifications included the adoption of a fixed undercarriage, large ventral radiator, and an auxiliary intake. The two Sabre-equipped Battles accumulated roughly 700 flight hours.[49]

Variants
Fairey Day Bomber
Prototype (K4303).
Battle Mk I
Three-seat light bomber version. Powered by a 1,030 hp (770 kW) Rolls-Royce Merlin I, a 1,030 hp (770 kW) Merlin II, Merlin III or Merlin V inline piston engines (sometimes known unofficially as Battle I, II, III, V respectively).[11]
Battle T
After May 1940, a number of Battle Mk Is, IIs and Vs were converted into training aircraft.
Battle IT
After May 1940, a number of Battle Mk Is, IIs and Vs were converted into training aircraft with a turret installed in the rear.
Battle IIT
In October 1940, a sole RCAF Battle Mk I was converted into a prototype for a future series, powered by an 840 hp (630 kW) Wright Cyclone R-1820-G38. The Battle IIT was conceived as a stopgap conversion in the likelihood that Merlins were unavailable.[50]
Battle TT
After May 1940, a number of Battle Mk Is, IIs and Vs were converted into target tug aircraft; 100 built.
Battle TT.Mk I
Target tug version. This was the last production version; 226 built.

Operators
A Battle, K9204, of No. 142 Squadron, in a camouflaged 'hide' at Berry-au-Bac, France
Battles during construction at the Heaton Chapel factory

In addition to the units listed, many Battles were operated by training schools, particularly for bombing and gunnery training.

 Australia
 Belgium
 Canada
 India
 Ireland
 Greece
 Poland
 South Africa
 Turkey
 United Kingdom
Officers of No. 103 Squadron lined up in front of a Battle at Betheniville, France

Accidents and incidents

On 16 December 1939 a recently qualified flyer, Pilot Officer Harold G. Tipple of 264 Squadron RAF was tasked with ferrying Fairey Battle Mk.I (N2159) from RAF Little Risington to RAF Martlesham Heath in company with a more experienced officer in another Battle. Tipple had never flown the type previously and received only brief instruction before takeoff. Once in the air the aircraft was observed to be trailing smoke. By the time the pair had reached Hintlesham, Suffolk the aircraft was losing altitude and Tipple attempted to bail out. The aircraft crashed at Little Wenham, Babergh, Suffolk and the pilot was killed.[56] Tipple is buried in Hintlesham churchyard and is commemorated on the adjacent war memorial.[57]

On 2 August 1940, Richard Ormonde Shuttleworth, a racing motorist, aviator and prolific collector of veteran cars and aircraft was killed when Fairey Battle L4971 of No. 12 Operational Training Unit RAF Benson crashed into a hill during a solo night flying exercise.[58]

On 23 September 1940, Fairey Battle K9480 on a training flight, crashed onto a house, killing the Polish pilot and five civilians from one family in Hucknall, Nottinghamshire.[59][60][61][62]

Surviving aircraft

Specifications (Mk.II)
Fairey Battle 3-view drawing
A class of Czech airmen receiving a practical lecture on the engine controls of a Battle

Data from Fairey Aircraft since 1915,[72] The Fairey Battle[9]

General characteristics

  • Crew: 3
  • Length: 42 ft 4 in (12.90 m)
  • Wingspan: 54 ft 0 in (16.46 m)
  • Height: 15 ft 6 in (4.72 m)
  • Wing area: 422 sq ft (39.2 m2)
  • Airfoil: root: NACA 2418; tip: NACA 2409[73]
  • Empty weight: 6,647 lb (3,015 kg)
  • Gross weight: 10,792 lb (4,895 kg)
  • Powerplant: 1 × Rolls-Royce Merlin II V-12 liquid-cooled piston engine, 1,030 hp (770 kW)
  • Propellers: 3-bladed

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 257 mph (414 km/h, 223 kn) at 15,000 ft (4,572 m)
  • Range: 1,000 mi (1,600 km, 870 nmi)
  • Service ceiling: 25,000 ft (7,600 m)
  • Rate of climb: 925 ft/min (4.70 m/s)
  • Time to altitude: 5,000 ft (1,524 m) in 4 minutes 6 seconds

Armament

  • Guns:
  • Bombs:
  • 1,000 lb (450 kg) of bombs internally [4 × 250 lb (110 kg) bombs] or
  • 1,500 lb (680 kg) of bombs externally

See also

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

References

Citations
  1. Ethell 1995, p. 177.
  2. Moyes 1967, p. 3.
  3. Buttler 2004, p. 65.
  4. Air International March 1981, p. 127.
  5. Orbis 1985, p. 1693.
  6. Mason 1994, p. 285.
  7. Moyes 1967, p. 5.
  8. Moyes 1971, p. 120.
  9. Moyes 1967, p. 12.
  10. Moyes 1967, p. 6.
  11. Huntley, 2004, p.8, 12
  12. Moyes 1967, pp. 3–4.
  13. Moyes 1967, p. 4.
  14. https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/research/default/raf-historical-society-journals/, Journal 20,p.21
  15. "Fairey Battle – Designed for Mass Production". Flight , 19 August 1937, pp. 189–192.
  16. Air International March 1981, p. 128.
  17. Huntley, 2004, pp.36–39
  18. Moyes 1967, pp. 4–5.
  19. Taylor 1969, p. 358.
  20. Boyne 1994, p. 52.
  21. "Through German Eyes". Flight. 13 November 1941. p. 344. Archived from the original on 8 September 2018. Retrieved 8 September 2018.
  22. "1941 | 2699 | Flight Archive". www.flightglobal.com. Retrieved 8 September 2018.
  23. Moyes 1967, pp. 5–6.
  24. Moyes 1967, pp. 6–7.
  25. Moyes 1967, p. 7.
  26. 88 Squadron history, Ministry of Defence, archived from the original on 24 October 2008
  27. RAF Timeline 1939, Royal Air Force, archived from the original on 3 August 2008, retrieved 24 July 2008
  28. Richards 1953, pp. 113–114.
  29. Garcia 2001, pp. 67–68.
  30. Richards 1953, p. 115.
  31. Richards 1995, pp. 59–60.
  32. Moyes 1967, pp. 7–8.
  33. Moyes 1967, p. 8.
  34. Richards 1953, pp. 116–118.
  35. Richards 1953, p. 120.
  36. March 1998, p. 105.
  37. Richards 1995, p. 61.
  38. Gifford 2004, p. 24.
  39. Moyes 1971, p. 115.
  40. Moyes 1968, p. 79.
  41. Gustavsson, Håkan (2007), "Sergente Maggiore Athos Tieghi", Biplane Fighter Aces from the Second World War, Håkan Gustafson, retrieved 20 August 2011
  42. Gustavsson, Håkan. "Capitano Ugo Drago". Biplane Fighter Aces from the Second World War (surfcity.kund.dalnet) 2007. Retrieved: 20 August 2011.
  43. Morgała, Andrzej (2003): Samoloty wojskowe w Polsce 1924–1939 (Military Aircraft in Poland 1924–1939). Warsaw: Bellona. ISBN 83-11-09319-9, p.319 (in Polish)
  44. Morten Hein, Danish military aviation in relation to the Second World War, Rathbone Museum, retrieved 2 August 2014
  45. Moyes 1967, p. 9.
  46. Molson et al. 1988, p. 149.
  47. Moyes 1967, pp. 8–9.
  48. Moyes 1967, pp. 9–10.
  49. Moyes 1967, p. 10.
  50. Willis 2009, p. 60.
  51. "A22 Fairey Battle". RAAF Museum Point Cook. Retrieved 27 April 2014.
  52. ADF-Serials RAAF A22 Fairey Battle
  53. Harrison Aeroplane June 2016, p. 98.
  54. Huntley, 2004, p.62
  55. Huntley, 2004, p.61
  56. "ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 210172". Air Safety Network. Flight Safety Foundation.
  57. "Hintlesham WW2 – Hintlesham & Chattisham War Memorials". Hintlesham War Memorial.
  58. "The History of Shuttleworth" Archived 4 April 2010 at the Wayback Machine. Shuttleworth Collection. Retrieved: 20 August 2011.
  59. "Photograph of house hit by Fairey Battle K9480". Picture the Past. Retrieved 16 April 2016.
  60. "Our Lucky Escape". WW2 People's War. 15 October 2014. Retrieved 16 April 2016.
  61. "Fairey Battle K9840". Midlands Air Crash Research. Retrieved 16 April 2016.
  62. "Memory of Polish airman is kept alive". Hucknall and Bulwell Dispatch. Johnson Press. 6 March 2014. Retrieved 16 April 2016.
  63. "Fairey Battle 1". Royal Air Force Museum. Trustees of the Royal Air Force Museum. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
  64. Simpson, Andrew (2014). "INDIVIDUAL HISTORY" (PDF). Royal Air Force Museum. Royal Air Force Museum. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
  65. "SAAM - Restoration of Fairey Battle". South Australian Aviation Museum. South Australian Aviation Museum. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
  66. "Restorations". South Australian Aviation Museum. South Australian Aviation Museum. Archived from the original on 5 December 2016. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
  67. "Airframe Dossier - FaireyBattle, s/n A22-Unknown RAAF". Aerial Visuals. AerialVisuals.ca. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
  68. Giltay, Pascal. "Fairey Battle R3950 Project". bamf & bamrs. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
  69. "Airframe Dossier - FaireyBattle, s/n 1899 RCAF". Aerial Visuals. AerialVisuals.ca. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
  70. "FAIREY BATTLE IT". Canada Aviation and Space Museum. Canada Science and Technology Museums Corporation. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
  71. Commonwealth Air Training Plan Museum Canada 150 Project. "Commonwealth Air Training Plan Museum Canada 150 Vignette". Retrieved 9 March 2023.
  72. Taylor 1974, p. 283.
  73. Lednicer, David. "The Incomplete Guide to Airfoil Usage". m-selig.ae.illinois.edu. Retrieved 16 April 2019.

Bibliography
  • Baughen, G. (2017). The Fairey Battle: A Reassessment of its RAF Career. Stroud: Fonthill Media. ISBN 978-1-78155-585-9.
  • Boyne, Walter J. Clash of Wings. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994. ISBN 0-684-83915-6.
  • Buttler, Tony. British Secret Projects: Fighters and Bombers 1935–1950. Midland Publishing, 2004. ISBN 1-85780-179-2.
  • "Elegantly Obsolete...the Fairey Battle". Air International, Vol. 20, No. 3, March 1981, pp. 127–134. ISSN 0306-5634.
  • Ethell, L. Jeffrey. Aircraft of World War II. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers, 1995. ISBN 0-00-470849-0.
  • Garcia, Dionisio. "Air Force on the Edge: Belgian Military Aviation in 1940". Air Enthusiast, No. 96, November/December 2001, pp. 65–68. Stamford, Lincs, UK: Key Publishing. ISSN 0143-5450
  • Gifford, Simon. "Lost Battles: The Carnage of May 10 to May 16, 1940". Air Enthusiast, No. 109, January/February 2004, pp. 18–25. Stamford, Lincs, UK: Key Publishing. ISSN 0143-5450
  • Harrison, W. A. "Database: Fairey Battle". Aeroplane, Vol. 44, No. 6, June 2016. pp. 87–101. ISSN 0143-7240.
  • Huntley, Ian D. Fairey Battle, Aviation Guide 1. Bedford, UK: SAM Publications, 2004. ISBN 0-9533465-9-5.
  • Gifford, Simon (January–February 2004). "Lost Battles: The Carnage of May 10 to May 16, 1940". Air Enthusiast (109): 18–25. ISSN 0143-5450.
  • Lever, John. Fairey Battle in the RAAF. Koorlong, Victoria, Australia: John Lever, 2002. ISBN 1-876709-07-3.
  • The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Aircraft (Part Work 1982–1985). London: Orbis Publishing, 1985.
  • March, Daniel M. British Warplanes of World War II. London: Aerospace, 1998. ISBN 1-874023-92-1.
  • Mason, Francis K. The British Bomber Since 1914. London: Putnam Aeronautical Books, 1994. ISBN 0-85177-861-5.
  • Matricardi, Paolo. Aerei Militari: Bombardieri e da trasporto (in Italian). Milan: Mondadori Electa, 2006. No ISBN.
  • Molson, Kenneth M. et al. Canada's National Aviation Museum: Its History and Collections. Ottawa: National Aviation Museum, 1988. ISBN 978-0-660-12001-0.
  • Moyes, Philip, J. R. The Fairey Battle. Aircraft in Profile Number 34. Leatherhead, Surrey, UK: Profile Publications Ltd., 1967.
  • Moyes, Philip, J. R. The Fairey Battle. Aircraft in Profile, Volume 2 (nos. 25–48). Windsor, Berkshire, UK: Profile Publications, 1971. ISBN 0-85383-011-8.
  • Moyes, Philip, J. R. Royal Air Force Bombers of World War II (Volume 1). Windsor, Berkshire, UK: Hylton Lacey Publishers Ltd., 1968. ISBN 0-85064-051-2.
  • Neulen, Hans Werner. In the Skies of Europe: Air Forces Allied to the Luftwaffe 1939–1945. Ramsbury, Marlborough, UK: The Crowood Press, 1998. ISBN 1-86126-799-1.
  • Pacco, John. "Fairey Battle". Belgisch Leger/Armee Belge: Het Militair Vliegwezen/l'Aeronautique Militare 1930–1940 (bilingual French/Dutch). Aartselaar, Belgium: J. P. Publications, 2003, pp. 52–55. ISBN 90-801136-6-2.
  • Richards, Denis. The Hardest Victory: RAF Bomber Command in the Second World War. London: Coronet, 1995. ISBN 0-340-61720-9.
  • Denis, Richards (1953). "Chapter V; Collapse in the West". Royal Air Force 1939–1945: Volume I, The Fight at Odds. History of the Second World War. London: HMSO – via Hyperwar Foundation.
  • Shaile, Sidney and Ray Sturtivant. The Battle File. Tonbridge, Kent, UK: Air-Britain (Historians) Ltd., 1998. ISBN 0-85130-225-4.
  • Taylor, H. R. Fairey Aircraft since 1915. London: Putnam, 1974. ISBN 0-370-00065-X.
  • Taylor, John W. R. "Fairey Battle". Combat Aircraft of the World from 1909 to the Present. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1969. ISBN 0-425-03633-2.
  • Willis, David. "Battles for Power"]. FlyPast, January 2009. ISSN 0262-6950
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Fairey Battle.
External video
video icon Compilation of period footage of Battles taking off and during flights
video icon Video of a Fairey Battle under restoration
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.