Flora and Fauna Act myth

The "Flora and Fauna Act" myth is a belief often repeated in public debate that Indigenous Australians were classified as fauna by legislation, specifically under a “Flora and Fauna Act”, and managed as such by the Australian and State Governments, and that the legislation and practice was overturned by a change to the Australian Constitution implemented by the 1967 referendum about Aboriginal affairs.

A fact check conducted by ABC News in 2018 found "Aboriginal people in Australia have never been covered by a flora and fauna act, either under federal or state law".[1] Law professor Helen Irving has identified the "Flora and Fauna Act" myth as part of a series of myths about the 1967 referendum and the evolution of Aboriginal civil rights in general.[2]

Notable incidents

In 2003, Linda Burney, the first Aboriginal woman elected to the New South Wales Legislative Assembly and Australian House of Representatives, incorrectly claimed in her maiden speech that she had spent the first ten years of her life under the Flora and Fauna Act.[1] Burney's comments led to the increased proliferation of the "Flora and Fauna Act" myth.[3][4]

In 2018, actress Shareena Clanton claimed that her mother "was not considered a human being until the referendum came through from the Flora and Fauna Act in 1967".[5] In July 2020, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) published an interview with Victor Bartley, a Wiradjuri man, in which he claimed that he had "received a letter back stating I was exempt from national service because I was Indigenous under the National Flora and Fauna Act ... to this day I still don't know if I'm a kangaroo or a flower".[6]

In 2023, as part of the Indigenous Voice referendum Yes campaign, Adam Goodes stated his mother was part of the Flora and Fauna Act.[7]

Origin

Academic and indigenous rights activist Marcia Langton, in speaking to the ABC, said she first heard the term "Flora and Fauna Act" mentioned by filmmaker Lester Bostock at a council meeting in Canberra in the 1970s. Langton stated that she believed Bostock meant it in a metaphorical sense and she "had no idea that this would grow into the urban myth that it is today". She went on to say "We were not classified under the 'flora and fauna act' but we were treated as animals."[1]

According to the Western Australian Museum, the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 and similar acts in other states may have encouraged the development of the myth, as they included Aboriginal heritage sites in their purview. Before the creation of separate indigenous affairs departments, some states administered the area through combined departments that also dealt with wildlife. For example, Western Australia had a Department of Aborigines and Fisheries (1909–1920) and the federal government had a Department of the Environment, Aborigines and the Arts (1971–1972).[8]

See also

References
  1. "Fact check: Were Indigenous Australians classified under a flora and fauna act until the 1967 referendum?". ABC News. 12 July 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2019.
  2. Irving, Helen (9 June 2015). "Indigenous recognition and constitutional myths". Constitutional Reform Unit – Sydney Law School. Retrieved 12 March 2019.
  3. Gordon, Brian (22 October 2020). "Fact check: Australia never counted Aboriginal people as animals under 'Flora and Fauna Act'". USA Today. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
  4. Byrnand, Samuel. (2015). Reconfiguring History: The 'Flora and Fauna Act' and other myths of Australian legislation. 10.13140/RG.2.1.4460.2722.
  5. Byrnand, Samuel (22 March 2018). "Shareena Clanton is, like many of us, a victim of the Flora and Fauna Act myth". National Indigenous Television. Retrieved 12 March 2019.
  6. "Vietnam War gave Wiradjuri man Victor Bartley his first experience of life without racism". ABC Western Plains: Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 19 July 2020. Retrieved 26 July 2020.
  7. "Flora and Fauna myth". ABC News. 2023-08-18. Retrieved 2023-08-20.
  8. "Dispelling myths". Western Australian Museum. 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.