Thomisidae
The Thomisidae are a family of spiders, including about 170 genera and over 2,100 species. The common name crab spider is often linked to species in this family, but is also applied loosely to many other families of spiders. Many members of this family are also known as flower spiders or flower crab spiders.[3]
Thomisidae Temporal range: | |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Arthropoda |
Subphylum: | Chelicerata |
Class: | Arachnida |
Order: | Araneae |
Infraorder: | Araneomorphae |
Family: | Thomisidae Sundevall, 1833[1] |
Diversity[2] | |
171 genera, 2,167 species | |
Description
Members of this family of spiders do not spin webs, and are ambush predators. The two front legs are usually longer and more robust than the rest of the legs. The back two legs are smaller, and are usually covered in a series of strong spines.[4] They have dull colorations such as brown, grey, or very bright green, pink, white or yellow. They gain their name from the shape of their body, and they usually move sideways or backwards.[5] These spiders are quite easy to identify and can very rarely be confused with Sparassidae family, though the crab spiders are usually smaller.
Etymology
Spiders in this family are called "crab spiders" due to their resemblance to crabs, the way such spiders hold their two front pairs of legs, and their ability to scuttle sideways or backwards.[3][6] The Thomisidae are the family most generally referred to as "crab spiders", though some members of the Sparassidae are called "giant crab spiders", the Selenopidae are called "wall crab spiders", and various members of the Sicariidae are sometimes called "six-eyed crab spiders".[7] Some distantly related orb-weaver spider species such as Gasteracantha cancriformis also are sometimes called "crab spiders".
Behavior
Thomisidae do not build webs to trap prey, though all of them produce silk for drop lines and sundry reproductive purposes; some are wandering hunters and the most widely known are ambush predators. Some species sit on or beside flowers or fruit, where they grab visiting insects. Individuals of some species, such as Misumena vatia and Thomisus spectabilis, are able to change color over a period of some days, to match the flower on which they are sitting. Some species frequent promising positions among leaves or bark, where they await prey, and some of them sit in the open, where they are startlingly good mimics of bird droppings. However, these members of the family Thomisidae are not to be confused with the spiders that generally are called bird-dropping spiders, not all of which are close relatives of crab spiders.
Other species of crab spiders with flattened bodies either hunt in the crevices of tree trunks or under loose bark, or shelter under such crevices by day, and come out at night to hunt. Members of the genus Xysticus hunt in the leaf litter on the ground. In each case, crab spiders use their powerful front legs to grab and hold on to prey while paralysing it with a venomous bite.
The spider family Aphantochilidae was incorporated into the Thomisidae in the late 1980s. Aphantochilus species mimic Cephalotes ants, on which they prey.
The spiders of Thomisidae are not known to be harmful to humans. However, spiders of a distantly related genus, Sicarius, which are sometimes referred to as "crab spiders", or "six-eyed crab spiders", are close cousins to the recluse spiders, and are highly venomous, though human bites are rare.
Sexual dimorphism
Several different types of sexual dimorphism have been recorded in crab spiders. Some species exhibit color dimorphisms;[8] however, the most apparent dimorphism is the difference in size between males and females. In some species, this is relatively small; females of Misumena vatia are roughly twice the size of their male counterparts.[9] In other cases, the difference is extreme; on average, female Thomisus onustus are more than 60 times as massive as the males.[10]
Several hypothesized explanations are given for the evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in the Thomisidae and other sister taxa.[11] The most widely acknowledged hypothesis for female growth is the fecundity hypothesis:[12] selection favors larger females so they can produce more eggs and healthier offspring. Because males do not carry and lay eggs, a growth in size does not confer a fitness advantage.[13]
However, sexual size dimorphism may be a result of male dwarfism. The gravity hypothesis states that the smaller size allows the male to travel with greater ease, providing him with an increased opportunity to find mates.[14] Females are comparatively stationary, and their larger size allows them to capture larger prey, such as butterflies and bees, granting females the additional nutrients necessary for egg production.[10]
Other hypotheses propose that sexual size dimorphism evolved by chance, and no selective advantage exists to larger females or smaller males.[15]
Taxonomy
As of December 2021, this large family contains around 171 genera:[1]
- Acentroscelus Simon, 1886
- Acrotmarus Tang & Li, 2012
- Alcimochthes Simon, 1885
- Amyciaea Simon, 1885
- Angaeus Thorell, 1881
- Ansiea Lehtinen, 2004
- Aphantochilus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1870
- Apyretina Strand, 1929
- Australomisidia Szymkowiak, 2014
- Avelis Simon, 1895
- Bassaniana Strand, 1928
- Bassaniodes Pocock, 1903
- Boliscus Thorell, 1891
- Bomis L. Koch, 1874
- Bonapruncinia Benoit, 1977
- Boomerangiana Szymkowiak & Sherwood, 2021
- Borboropactus Simon, 1884
- Bucranium O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1881
- Camaricus Thorell, 1887
- Carcinarachne Schmidt, 1956
- Cebrenninus Simon, 1887
- Ceraarachne Keyserling, 1880
- Cetratus Kulczyński, 1911
- Coenypha Simon, 1895
- Coriarachne Thorell, 1870
- Corynethrix L. Koch, 1876
- Cozyptila Lehtinen & Marusik, 2005
- Crockeria Benjamin, 2016
- Cymbacha L. Koch, 1874
- Cymbachina Bryant, 1933
- Cynathea Simon, 1895
- Cyriogonus Simon, 1886
- Deltoclita Simon, 1887
- Demogenes Simon, 1895
- Diaea Thorell, 1869
- Dietopsa Strand, 1932
- Dimizonops Pocock, 1903
- Diplotychus Simon, 1903
- Domatha Simon, 1895
- Ebelingia Lehtinen, 2004
- Ebrechtella Dahl, 1907
- Emplesiogonus Simon, 1903
- Epicadinus Simon, 1895
- Epicadus Simon, 1895
- Epidius Thorell, 1877
- Erissoides Mello-Leitão, 1929
- Erissus Simon, 1895
- Felsina Simon, 1895
- Firmicus Simon, 1895
- Geraesta Simon, 1889
- Gnoerichia Dahl, 1907
- Haedanula Caporiacco, 1941
- Haplotmarus Simon, 1909
- Hedana L. Koch, 1874
- Henriksenia Lehtinen, 2004
- Herbessus Simon, 1903
- Heriaesynaema Caporiacco, 1939
- Heriaeus Simon, 1875
- Heterogriffus Platnick, 1976
- Hewittia Lessert, 1928
- Hexommulocymus Caporiacco, 1955
- Holopelus Simon, 1886
- Ibana Benjamin, 2014
- Indosmodicinus Sen, Saha & Raychaudhuri, 2010
- Indoxysticus Benjamin & Jaleel, 2010
- Iphoctesis Simon, 1903
- Isala L. Koch, 1876
- Isaloides F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900
- Kryptochroma Machado, 2021
- Lampertia Strand, 1907
- Latifrons Kulczyński, 1911
- Ledouxia Lehtinen, 2004
- Leroya Lewis & Dippenaar-Schoeman, 2014
- Loxobates Thorell, 1877
- Loxoporetes Kulczyński, 1911
- Lycopus Thorell, 1895
- Lysiteles Simon, 1895
- Massuria Thorell, 1887
- Mastira Thorell, 1891
- Mecaphesa Simon, 1900
- Megapyge Caporiacco, 1947
- Metadiaea Mello-Leitão, 1929
- Micromisumenops Tang & Li, 2010
- Misumena Latreille, 1804
- Misumenoides F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900
- Misumenops F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900
- Misumessus Banks, 1904
- Modysticus Gertsch, 1953
- Monaeses Thorell, 1869
- Musaeus Thorell, 1890
- Mystaria Simon, 1895
- Narcaeus Thorell, 1890
- Nyctimus Thorell, 1877
- Ocyllus Thorell, 1887
- Onocolus Simon, 1895
- Ostanes Simon, 1895
- Oxytate L. Koch, 1878
- Ozyptila Simon, 1864
- Pactactes Simon, 1895
- Pagida Simon, 1895
- Parabomis Kulczyński, 1901
- Parasmodix Jézéquel, 1966
- Parastrophius Simon, 1903
- Parasynema F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900
- Pasias Simon, 1895
- Pasiasula Roewer, 1942
- Phaenopoma Simon, 1895
- Pharta Thorell, 1891
- Pherecydes O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1883
- Philodamia Thorell, 1894
- Philogaeus Simon, 1895
- Phireza Simon, 1886
- Phrynarachne Thorell, 1869
- Physoplatys Simon, 1895
- Pistius Simon, 1875
- Plastonomus Simon, 1903
- Platyarachne Keyserling, 1880
- Platythomisus Doleschall, 1859
- Poecilothomisus Simon, 1895
- Porropis L. Koch, 1876
- Prepotelus Simon, 1898
- Pseudamyciaea Simon, 1905
- Pseudoporrhopis Simon, 1886
- Pycnaxis Simon, 1895
- Pyresthesis Butler, 1879
- Reinickella Dahl, 1907
- Rejanellus Lise, 2005
- Rhaebobates Thorell, 1881
- Runcinia Simon, 1875
- Runcinioides Mello-Leitão, 1929
- Saccodomus Rainbow, 1900
- Scopticus Simon, 1895
- Sidymella Strand, 1942
- Simorcus Simon, 1895
- Sinothomisus Tang et al., 2006
- Smodicinodes Ono, 1993
- Smodicinus Simon, 1895
- Soelteria Dahl, 1907
- Spilosynema Tang & Li, 2010
- Stephanopis O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869
- Stephanopoides Keyserling, 1880
- Stiphropella Lawrence, 1952
- Stiphropus Gerstäcker, 1873
- Strigoplus Simon, 1885
- Strophius Keyserling, 1880
- Sylligma Simon, 1895
- Synaemops Mello-Leitão, 1929
- Synalus Simon, 1895
- Synema Simon, 1864
- Tagulinus Simon, 1903
- Tagulis Simon, 1895
- Talaus Simon, 1886
- Tarrocanus Simon, 1895
- Taypaliito Barrion & Litsinger, 1995
- Tharpyna L. Koch, 1874
- Tharrhalea L. Koch, 1875
- Thomisops Karsch, 1879
- Thomisus Walckenaer, 1805
- Titidiops Mello-Leitão, 1929
- Titidius Simon, 1895
- Tmarus Simon, 1875
- Trichopagis Simon, 1886
- Ulocymus Simon, 1886
- Uraarachne Keyserling, 1880
- Wechselia Dahl, 1907
- Xysticus C. L. Koch, 1835
- Zametopina Simon, 1909
- Zygometis Simon, 1901
See also
- Philodromidae, also called crab spiders
References
- "Family: Thomisidae Sundevall, 1833". World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern. Retrieved 4 December 2021.
- "Currently valid spider genera and species". World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern. Retrieved 4 December 2021.
- Whyte, Robert; Anderson, Greg (2017). A field guide to spiders of Australia. Csiro Publishing. ISBN 9780643107083.
- "Thomisidae - General Information". www.arc.agric.za. Retrieved 2022-09-17.
- "crab spider | arachnid | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-09-17.
- Bradley, Richard A. (2012). Common Spiders of North America. University of California Press. ISBN 9780520954502.
- Filmer, Martin (1997). Southern African Spiders. City: BHB International / Struik. ISBN 1-86825-188-8.
- "BioKIDS - Kids' Inquiry of Diverse Species, Thomisidae: INFORMATION". www.biokids.umich.edu. Retrieved 2022-01-06.
- "Flower (a.k.a. Goldenrod) Crab Spider (Misumena vatia)". Woodland Park Zoo. Retrieved 2015-10-30.
- Corcobado, G.; Rodríguez-Gironés, M.A.; De Mas, E. & Moya-Laraño, J. (2010). "Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual size dimorphism". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 10: 236. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-236. PMC 2924870. PMID 20682029.
- Hormiga, G; Scharff, N; Coddington, J.A. (2000). "The Phylogenetic Basis of Sexual Size Dimorphism in Orb-Weaving Spiders (Araneae, Obiculariae)". Systematic Biology. 49 (3): 435–462. doi:10.1080/10635159950127330. PMID 12116421.
- Head, G (1995). "Selection on Fecundity and Variation in the Degree of Sexual Size Dimorphism Among Spider Species (Class Araneae)". Evolution. 49 (4): 776–781. doi:10.2307/2410330. JSTOR 2410330. PMID 28565139.
- Head, G. (1995). "Selection on Fecundity and Variation in the Degree of Sexual Size Dimorphism Among Spider Species (Class Araneae)". Evolution. 49 (4): 776–781. doi:10.2307/2410330. JSTOR 2410330. PMID 28565139.
- Corcobado, G.; Rodríguez-Gironés, M.A.; De Mas, E.; Moya-Laraño, J. (2010). "Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual size dimorphism". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 10: 236. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-236. PMC 2924870. PMID 20682029.
- Prenter, J.; Elwood, R.W. & Montgomery, W.I. (1998). "No Association between Sexual Size Dimorphism and Life Histories in Spiders". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 265 (1390): 57–62. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0264. PMC 1688762.
External links
- Pictures of crab spiders (free for noncommercial use)
- Photos of crab spiders hosted by University of California, Berkeley